Reparative Processing in the
Digital Humanities Classroom
Mattie Burkert + Kate Thornhill
University of Oregon
Digital Pedagogy Institute 2022
Link to these slides:
https://tinyurl.com/dpi-22
Content warning: racist
language
Water acknowledgment
Roadmap:
Institutional contexts
Learning goals
Key concepts
In-class activities
Challenges
Thanks
Institutional Contexts
{ your mileage may vary }
English 470/570:
Technologies and Texts
25 seats
Project-based learning
experience
Capstone to the Digital
Humanities minor, one of
several interdisciplinary
minors housed in English
DH minor homepage
Other
contexts
● DREAM Lab
● Digital Scholarship Services
● Learn-Static
● Sustainability Fellowship for
Community-Engaged
Learning
Learning goals
By cataloguing digitized archival materials, students:
● Learned how to describe resources using best practices from
library and information science (Dublin Core, controlled
vocabularies, file naming conventions)
● Learned the importance of metadata for research discovery,
search/retrieval, access, preservation, and usability
● Identified primary sources for their small group digital
storytelling projects
● Situated critical cataloging within a broader anti-oppressive
research praxis
Critical
cataloging
Within library and information
science, a set of approaches to
redressing the harm caused by
dominant knowledge
organization systems
Further reading:
Subject guide and bibliography,
Symphony Bruce (American
University)
Critical cataloging aims to:
recognize how oppressive structures codified in standard
classification schemes (i.e. Library of Congress Subject Headings)
directly impact the ways people access and see themselves in library
and archive collections; and
mitigate these effects through reparative processing and newly
reimaged descriptive workflows.
Class Pre-Reads
Dorothy Berry, “The House Archives Built,” Up//Root (2021)
Digital Public Library of America, “Statement on Potentially
Harmful Content”
Archives for Black Lives home page
Dorothy Berry, “The House Archives Built”
Dorothy Berry,
“The House
Archives Built”
Statement on Potentially Harmful Content
The Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) is a portal to millions of
freely available items from thousands of libraries, archives, museums,
and other cultural heritage organizations across the United States.
DPLA contains some content that may be harmful or difficult to view. Our
cultural heritage partners collect materials from history, as well as
artifacts from many cultures and time periods, to preserve and make
available the historical record. As a result, some of the materials
presented here may reflect outdated, biased, offensive, and possibly
violent views and opinions due to pervasive systemic intolerance. In
addition, some cultural heritage institutions collect and preserve
materials relating to violent or graphic events which are preserved for
their historical significance.
Focus
Questions
How do power relations and
imbalances shape not only the
history we’re tracing, but also the
archives and technologies
through which we can access it?
How can we try to avoid
reproducing harm?
The following
principles and
examples of archives
in need of remediation
come from A4BL’s
Anti-Racist Description
Resources toolkit,
available on GitHub.
Voice and Style
“Avoid passive voice
(or passive language
in linked data
predicates) when
describing oppressive
relationships. Use
active voice in order to
embed responsibility
within description.”
Compare:
● “Four Kent State University students were
killed on May 4, 1970, during a clash
between the Ohio National Guard and a
crowd gathered to protest the Vietnam War.”
● “Members of the Ohio National Guard killed
four Kent State University students during a
mass protest against the Vietnam War.”
“Use terminology that Black people
use to describe themselves.”
“Use ‘enslaved’
or ‘captive’
[person /
woman / man /
child / laborer]
rather than
‘slave’ when
describing
people held in
bondage.”
Subjects and Classification
“Consider avoiding LCSH terms if they are
harmful to the people they describe. If you
are uncertain, do research to determine
whether the subject heading is considered
harmful.
“If terms are not used, consider how this
may affect access. Balance access with
language usage thoughtfully.
“Consider working with groups such as the
Cataloging Lab to actively try to change
harmful headings.”
Peer Modeling: Remediation in Action
Initial description:
Newspaper article that
discusses the
background of Mattie
Reynolds, who in 1966
became the first black
person to run for Eugene
city office.
Revised description:
Retrospective newspaper article that details the life and activism of Mattie
Reynolds, who in 1966 became the first Black candidate for Eugene city office.
Newspaper article including
two pictures, one of a young
african american girl and a
older african american male.
The newspaper shared with
the reader what was going to
be talked about at the forum.
Newspaper article focusing on
young Lillie Reynolds and her
father Sam, two Black
residents of Eugene who talk
about what is at stake for
them in a Lane county forum
intended to discuss the
"Negro problem" in Eugene.
Initial
description:
Revised
description:
View of the catalogued item in our class repository
Remediation practice (in groups)
“Marking history: A memorial would recognize two
homes’ role in the city’s past”
Eugene Register-Guard, September 27, 2015
“Willie Mims discusses his plan to
fundraise to memorialize the homes at
330 & 336 High St. in honor of his
parents, C.B. and Annie Mims, who
purchased the properties in 1948. The
memorial acknowledges the struggle
and subsequent communities formed
by Black people outside Eugene
during a time when they were not
allowed to live in city bounds.”
“Willie Mims shares his
process of raising money for a
memorial for his parents'
home.”
Timeline credit: Mario Canul, Lilly Smith, Kendall Wilber
Challenge:
Encouraged students to reflect on
continuities between the power
dynamics we encountered and the
history we were studying, and to
incorporate these insights into their
projects
Intellectual property and
licensing negotiations between
UO, grant agencies, and local
partners reflected histories of
mistrust and extraction
How approached:
Challenge:
Developed lessons around trust
and collaboration in community
engaged DH and fair use
evaluation
Intellectual property and
licensing negotiations between
UO, grant agencies, and local
partners
How approached:
Challenge:
Reflected and iterated on
unsuccessful workflows (for
example, remediated data
dictionary as an interactive form
when spreadsheet proved
overwhelming for students)
COVID disruptions & ongoing
pandemic impacts on learning
How approached:
Challenge:
Made cataloguing a group activity
and provided supportive space for
processing anger and discomfort,
making mistakes, and problem-
solving
COVID disruptions & ongoing
pandemic impacts on learning
How approached:
Funding Acknowledgments
CollectionBuilder and digital pedagogy support for this project were sponsored
by the a Digital Humanities Advancement Grant from the National Endowment
for the Humanities (NEH Award HAA-281018-21). Any views, findings,
conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this Web resource do not
necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.
Partnership development and environmental justice education for this project
were sponsored by a Sustainability Fellowship for Community-Engaged
Learning from the University of Oregon Office of Sustainability and the Mellon-
funded Pacific Northwest Just Futures Institute for Racial and Climate Justice
(Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Special Initiative 2008-08962).
Thanks to our many collaborators…
Beyond Toxics: Lisa Arkin and Arjorie Arberry-Berribeault
Lane County History Museum Archives: Allison Fischer-Olson
UO faculty and staff: Franny Gaede, Gabriele Hayden, Mandy Gettler, Chuck
Williams, Sarah Stoeckl, Kathy Stroud
UO students: Bobbie Adelson, Sammy Albert, Aravind Arunachalam, Natalie Ayala,
Prayerna Babu, Meg Blevens, Noah Brown, Mario Canul, Miya Cohn, Lauryn Cole,
Edin Conway, Eli Cox, Teresa David, Rye Davies, Tyler Fox, Joe Funderburg, Sofia
Gluck, Abby Gregg, Hayden Grow, James Ha, Janelle Harris, Danté Hatcher-
Vasquez, Kiele Head, Olivia Hicks, Dora Jolivet, Ryan Kenney, Kyndall Kirkland,
Haylee Klingler, Whitney Klo, Sophia Marie Labucay, Jamie O’Connell, Grace Oh,
Avery Olson, Catherine Oswalt, Willem Patrick, Sasha Poll, Emma Ramage, Madison
Ridolfi, Charlotte Roder, Brianna Rojas, Allia Service, Lilly Smith, Oliver Smith, Sesilie
Stout, Jack Talbott, Olivia Tong, Ysenia Torres, Sam Walton, Ben Weiss, Kendall
Wilber, Henry Wool, Leo Zhao
Thank you!
mburkert@uoregon.edu
kmthorn@uoregon.edu

DPI-22-slides.pptx

  • 1.
    Reparative Processing inthe Digital Humanities Classroom Mattie Burkert + Kate Thornhill University of Oregon Digital Pedagogy Institute 2022
  • 2.
    Link to theseslides: https://tinyurl.com/dpi-22 Content warning: racist language Water acknowledgment Roadmap: Institutional contexts Learning goals Key concepts In-class activities Challenges Thanks
  • 3.
  • 4.
    English 470/570: Technologies andTexts 25 seats Project-based learning experience Capstone to the Digital Humanities minor, one of several interdisciplinary minors housed in English DH minor homepage
  • 5.
    Other contexts ● DREAM Lab ●Digital Scholarship Services ● Learn-Static ● Sustainability Fellowship for Community-Engaged Learning
  • 6.
    Learning goals By cataloguingdigitized archival materials, students: ● Learned how to describe resources using best practices from library and information science (Dublin Core, controlled vocabularies, file naming conventions) ● Learned the importance of metadata for research discovery, search/retrieval, access, preservation, and usability ● Identified primary sources for their small group digital storytelling projects ● Situated critical cataloging within a broader anti-oppressive research praxis
  • 7.
    Critical cataloging Within library andinformation science, a set of approaches to redressing the harm caused by dominant knowledge organization systems Further reading: Subject guide and bibliography, Symphony Bruce (American University)
  • 8.
    Critical cataloging aimsto: recognize how oppressive structures codified in standard classification schemes (i.e. Library of Congress Subject Headings) directly impact the ways people access and see themselves in library and archive collections; and mitigate these effects through reparative processing and newly reimaged descriptive workflows.
  • 10.
    Class Pre-Reads Dorothy Berry,“The House Archives Built,” Up//Root (2021) Digital Public Library of America, “Statement on Potentially Harmful Content” Archives for Black Lives home page
  • 11.
    Dorothy Berry, “TheHouse Archives Built”
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Statement on PotentiallyHarmful Content The Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) is a portal to millions of freely available items from thousands of libraries, archives, museums, and other cultural heritage organizations across the United States. DPLA contains some content that may be harmful or difficult to view. Our cultural heritage partners collect materials from history, as well as artifacts from many cultures and time periods, to preserve and make available the historical record. As a result, some of the materials presented here may reflect outdated, biased, offensive, and possibly violent views and opinions due to pervasive systemic intolerance. In addition, some cultural heritage institutions collect and preserve materials relating to violent or graphic events which are preserved for their historical significance.
  • 14.
    Focus Questions How do powerrelations and imbalances shape not only the history we’re tracing, but also the archives and technologies through which we can access it? How can we try to avoid reproducing harm?
  • 15.
    The following principles and examplesof archives in need of remediation come from A4BL’s Anti-Racist Description Resources toolkit, available on GitHub.
  • 16.
    Voice and Style “Avoidpassive voice (or passive language in linked data predicates) when describing oppressive relationships. Use active voice in order to embed responsibility within description.” Compare: ● “Four Kent State University students were killed on May 4, 1970, during a clash between the Ohio National Guard and a crowd gathered to protest the Vietnam War.” ● “Members of the Ohio National Guard killed four Kent State University students during a mass protest against the Vietnam War.”
  • 17.
    “Use terminology thatBlack people use to describe themselves.”
  • 18.
    “Use ‘enslaved’ or ‘captive’ [person/ woman / man / child / laborer] rather than ‘slave’ when describing people held in bondage.”
  • 19.
    Subjects and Classification “Consideravoiding LCSH terms if they are harmful to the people they describe. If you are uncertain, do research to determine whether the subject heading is considered harmful. “If terms are not used, consider how this may affect access. Balance access with language usage thoughtfully. “Consider working with groups such as the Cataloging Lab to actively try to change harmful headings.”
  • 20.
    Peer Modeling: Remediationin Action Initial description: Newspaper article that discusses the background of Mattie Reynolds, who in 1966 became the first black person to run for Eugene city office. Revised description: Retrospective newspaper article that details the life and activism of Mattie Reynolds, who in 1966 became the first Black candidate for Eugene city office.
  • 22.
    Newspaper article including twopictures, one of a young african american girl and a older african american male. The newspaper shared with the reader what was going to be talked about at the forum. Newspaper article focusing on young Lillie Reynolds and her father Sam, two Black residents of Eugene who talk about what is at stake for them in a Lane county forum intended to discuss the "Negro problem" in Eugene. Initial description: Revised description:
  • 23.
    View of thecatalogued item in our class repository
  • 24.
  • 25.
    “Marking history: Amemorial would recognize two homes’ role in the city’s past” Eugene Register-Guard, September 27, 2015 “Willie Mims discusses his plan to fundraise to memorialize the homes at 330 & 336 High St. in honor of his parents, C.B. and Annie Mims, who purchased the properties in 1948. The memorial acknowledges the struggle and subsequent communities formed by Black people outside Eugene during a time when they were not allowed to live in city bounds.” “Willie Mims shares his process of raising money for a memorial for his parents' home.”
  • 26.
    Timeline credit: MarioCanul, Lilly Smith, Kendall Wilber
  • 27.
    Challenge: Encouraged students toreflect on continuities between the power dynamics we encountered and the history we were studying, and to incorporate these insights into their projects Intellectual property and licensing negotiations between UO, grant agencies, and local partners reflected histories of mistrust and extraction How approached:
  • 28.
    Challenge: Developed lessons aroundtrust and collaboration in community engaged DH and fair use evaluation Intellectual property and licensing negotiations between UO, grant agencies, and local partners How approached:
  • 29.
    Challenge: Reflected and iteratedon unsuccessful workflows (for example, remediated data dictionary as an interactive form when spreadsheet proved overwhelming for students) COVID disruptions & ongoing pandemic impacts on learning How approached:
  • 30.
    Challenge: Made cataloguing agroup activity and provided supportive space for processing anger and discomfort, making mistakes, and problem- solving COVID disruptions & ongoing pandemic impacts on learning How approached:
  • 31.
    Funding Acknowledgments CollectionBuilder anddigital pedagogy support for this project were sponsored by the a Digital Humanities Advancement Grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH Award HAA-281018-21). Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this Web resource do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities. Partnership development and environmental justice education for this project were sponsored by a Sustainability Fellowship for Community-Engaged Learning from the University of Oregon Office of Sustainability and the Mellon- funded Pacific Northwest Just Futures Institute for Racial and Climate Justice (Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Special Initiative 2008-08962).
  • 32.
    Thanks to ourmany collaborators… Beyond Toxics: Lisa Arkin and Arjorie Arberry-Berribeault Lane County History Museum Archives: Allison Fischer-Olson UO faculty and staff: Franny Gaede, Gabriele Hayden, Mandy Gettler, Chuck Williams, Sarah Stoeckl, Kathy Stroud UO students: Bobbie Adelson, Sammy Albert, Aravind Arunachalam, Natalie Ayala, Prayerna Babu, Meg Blevens, Noah Brown, Mario Canul, Miya Cohn, Lauryn Cole, Edin Conway, Eli Cox, Teresa David, Rye Davies, Tyler Fox, Joe Funderburg, Sofia Gluck, Abby Gregg, Hayden Grow, James Ha, Janelle Harris, Danté Hatcher- Vasquez, Kiele Head, Olivia Hicks, Dora Jolivet, Ryan Kenney, Kyndall Kirkland, Haylee Klingler, Whitney Klo, Sophia Marie Labucay, Jamie O’Connell, Grace Oh, Avery Olson, Catherine Oswalt, Willem Patrick, Sasha Poll, Emma Ramage, Madison Ridolfi, Charlotte Roder, Brianna Rojas, Allia Service, Lilly Smith, Oliver Smith, Sesilie Stout, Jack Talbott, Olivia Tong, Ysenia Torres, Sam Walton, Ben Weiss, Kendall Wilber, Henry Wool, Leo Zhao
  • 33.