IDS 100 Proofreading Checklist Guidelines and Rubric Prompt: In this module, you learned what citations are and why they matter. For this assignment, you will review each slide of your presentation. On the Proofreading Checklist Template (linked in Module Seven of your course), indicate whether you addressed each critical element within the slide in the table provided. For each question on the checklist, mark an “X” to indicate either “Yes” or “No” as you feel is appropriate. Use the “Notes” area provided for each question to take notes on any elements that you need to address once you have gone through your review and before you submit your final presentation to your instructor in Module Eight. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Submit the completed Proofreading Checklist Template to your instructor for grading. Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Not Evident (0%) Value Proofreading Checklist Submits completed Proofreading Checklist Template Does not submit completed Proofreading Checklist Template 100 Total 100% 1 IDS 100 Proofreading Checklist Guidelines and Rubric Rubric Accessibility ReportFilename: IDS 100 Proofreading Checklist Guidelines and Rubric.pdfReport created by: Organization: [Enter personal and organization information through the Preferences > Identity dialog.] Summary The checker found no problems in this document.Needs manual check: 2Passed manually: 0Failed manually: 0Skipped: 1Passed: 29Failed: 0 Detailed ReportDocumentRule NameStatusDescriptionAccessibility permission flagPassedAccessibility permission flag must be setImage-only PDFPassedDocument is not image-only PDFTagged PDFPassedDocument is tagged PDFLogical Reading OrderNeeds manual checkDocument structure provides a logical reading orderPrimary languagePassedText language is specifiedTitlePassedDocument title is showing in title barBookmarksPassedBookmarks are present in large documentsColor contrastNeeds manual checkDocument has appropriate color contrastPage ContentRule NameStatusDescriptionTagged contentPassedAll page content is taggedTagged annotationsPassedAll annotations are taggedTab orderPassedTab order is consistent with structure orderCharacter encodingPassedReliable character encoding is providedTagged multimediaPassedAll multimedia objects are taggedScreen flickerPassedPage will not cause screen flickerScriptsPassedNo inaccessible scriptsTimed responsesPassedPage does not require timed responsesNavigation linksPassedNavigation links are not repetitiveFormsRule NameStatusDescriptionTagged form fieldsPassedAll form fields are taggedField descriptionsPassedAll form fields have descriptionAlternate TextRule NameStatusDescriptionFigures alternate textPassedFigures require alternate textNested alternate textPassedAlternate text that will never be readAssociated with contentPassedAlternate text must be associated with some contentHides annotationPassedAlternate text should not hide annotationOther elements alternate textPassedO ...

1. IDS 100 Proofreading Checklist Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: In this module, you learned what citations are and why
they matter. For this assignment, you will review each slide of
your presentation. On the
Proofreading Checklist Template (linked in Module Seven of
your course), indicate whether you addressed each critical
element within the slide in the table
provided. For each question on the checklist, mark an “X” to
indicate either “Yes” or “No” as you feel is appropriate. Use the
“Notes” area provided for each
question to take notes on any elements that you need to address
once you have gone through your review and before you submit
your final presentation to
your instructor in Module Eight.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Submit the completed Proofreading
Checklist Template to your instructor for grading.

2. Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Proofreading
Checklist
Submits completed Proofreading
Checklist Template
Does not submit completed
Proofreading Checklist Template
100
Total 100%
1
IDS 100 Proofreading Checklist Guidelines and Rubric Rubric
Accessibility ReportFilename: IDS 100 Proofreading Checklist
Guidelines and Rubric.pdfReport created by: Organization:
[Enter personal and organization information through the
Preferences > Identity dialog.]
Summary
The checker found no problems in this document.Needs manual
check: 2Passed manually: 0Failed manually: 0Skipped: 1Passed:
29Failed: 0
Detailed ReportDocumentRule
NameStatusDescriptionAccessibility permission
flagPassedAccessibility permission flag must be setImage-only
PDFPassedDocument is not image-only PDFTagged
PDFPassedDocument is tagged PDFLogical Reading
OrderNeeds manual checkDocument structure provides a logical
reading orderPrimary languagePassedText language is
specifiedTitlePassedDocument title is showing in title

3. barBookmarksPassedBookmarks are present in large
documentsColor contrastNeeds manual checkDocument has
appropriate color contrastPage ContentRule
NameStatusDescriptionTagged contentPassedAll page content is
taggedTagged annotationsPassedAll annotations are taggedTab
orderPassedTab order is consistent with structure
orderCharacter encodingPassedReliable character encoding is
providedTagged multimediaPassedAll multimedia objects are
taggedScreen flickerPassedPage will not cause screen
flickerScriptsPassedNo inaccessible scriptsTimed
responsesPassedPage does not require timed
responsesNavigation linksPassedNavigation links are not
repetitiveFormsRule NameStatusDescriptionTagged form
fieldsPassedAll form fields are taggedField
descriptionsPassedAll form fields have descriptionAlternate
TextRule NameStatusDescriptionFigures alternate
textPassedFigures require alternate textNested alternate
textPassedAlternate text that will never be readAssociated with
contentPassedAlternate text must be associated with some
contentHides annotationPassedAlternate text should not hide
annotationOther elements alternate textPassedOther elements
that require alternate textTablesRule
NameStatusDescriptionRowsPassedTR must be a child of Table,
THead, TBody, or TFootTH and TDPassedTH and TD must be
children of TRHeadersPassedTables should have
headersRegularityPassedTables must contain the same number
of columns in each row and rows in each
columnSummarySkippedTables must have a summaryListsRule
NameStatusDescriptionList itemsPassedLI must be a child of
LLbl and LBodyPassedLbl and LBody must be children of
LIHeadingsRule NameStatusDescriptionAppropriate
nestingPassedAppropriate nestingBack to Top
2

4. PROCESS COSTING VS JOB ORDER COSTING
Institutional Affiliation
Student’s Name
Assignment Due Date
PROCESS COSTING VS JOB ORDER COSTING
Job order costing trails the prime costs to allocate direct
material and direct labour to a distinct product. At the same
time, process costing also trails prime costs to allocate direct
material and direct labour to each manufacturing department
(Argade, 2020). For instance, Ford Motor Company, listed in
New York Stock exchange, also applies process and job order
costing. The company does not find it quite easy in
merchandising as they must account for every material, labour,
and other manufacturing cost used in making the product—for
instance, the Ford Fiesta manufactured by Ford Motor company.
Therefore, Ford Motor Company uses a job-order costing to
ensure all revenues and costs for each model can be easily
differentiated from other models produced by the same company
and recorded. The costs are traced and divided by the number of
units in each model to evaluate the cost per model (Pollard,
2018). Additionally, the predetermined overhead costs are
applied in determining the overheads work in progress for each
product.
Hence, I would also choose Job order costing since the company
produces different types of cars, which are differentiated into
various models that meet the requirement of various customers.
The system also used to assign cost customers who might want
special orders of customed vehicles. On the other hand, the
company could also use process costing in manufacturing
identical models (Vanderbeck, 2012). The costing system used

5. depends on whether the company can trace the cost incurred in
manufacturing a single product model. Hence, Ford Motor
company can use job order costing systems for t operations and
process costing in assigning costs to special orders from
customers.
Reference
Pollard, W. B. (2018). An Active Learning Approach to
Teaching Job-Order Costing. Management Accounting
Quarterly, 19(4), 10-10.
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA567546847&sid=goo
gleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15285359&p=A
ONE&sw=w
Vanderbeck, E. J. (2012). Principles of cost accounting.
Cengage Learning.
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JQkKAAAAQB
AJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=job+order+costing+and+process+orde
r+costing+in+Ford+Motor+company+&ots=3rRjiPRskS&sig=RS
Sv178_Es6VOq0s79wvd6VnZX4
Argade, S. L. (2020). Difference between Job Costing and
Process Costing.
http://studymaterial.unipune.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/1234567
89/5111/1/Difference_between_Job_Costing_and_Process_Costi
ng.pdf
IDS 100 Proofreading Checklist Template
In this module, you are to proofread your drafted presentation
as you await your instructor’s feedback on the draft you
submitted in Module Six. For this assignment, you will first
review the Project 3 Rubric Table. You will then use the
provided proofreading checklist (based on the critical elements
in the Project 3 Presentation Guidelines and Rubric) to
proofread your presentation and do a “check” to be sure that

6. you included and addressed each of the critical elements in your
presentation.
This checklist, along with the feedback you receive from your
instructor on the draft of your presentation that you submitted
in Module Six, will help you make any necessary changes and
final revisions to your presentation before submitting it for final
review in Module Eight.
For this assignment, complete the following steps:
Review the prompt for this assignment and the Project 3 Rubric
Table (below).
Complete the proofreading checklist(which is after the rubric
table).
Project 3 Rubric Table
Critical Elements
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Value
Introduction
Meets “Proficient” criteria and explanation communicates
thoughtful reflection about choice (100%)
Introduces topic by identifying it and explaining choice (85%)
Identifies topic but explanation of choice is cursory (55%)
Does not identify topic and explain choice (0%)
16
First Lens
Meets “Proficient” criteria and examples provided are
especially insightful in illustrating the topic through the lens
(100%)
Explains topic through first lens by identifying it and choosing
details and examples relevant to that lens (85%)

7. Explains topic through first lens by identifying it and choosing
details and examples relevant to that lens, but explanation is
cursory, contains inaccuracies, or includes details and examples
that are not lens-relevant (55%)
Does not explain topic through first lens by identifying it and
choosing lens-relevant details and examples (0%)
16
Second Lens
Meets “Proficient” criteria and examples provided are
especially insightful in illustrating the topic through the lens
(100%)
Explains topic through second lens by identifying it and
choosing details and examples relevant to that lens (85%)
Explains topic through second lens by identifying it and
choosing details and examples relevant to that lens, but
explanation is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or includes details
and examples that are not lens-relevant (55%)
Does not explain topic through first lens by identifying it and
choosing lens-relevant details and examples (0%)
16
Convergence and Divergence
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and insights communicate
thoughtful reflection on the lenses and their relation to the topic
(100%)
Explains similarities and differences in how the lenses relate to
the topic, focusing on the view through both lenses (85%)
Explains similarities and differences in how the lenses relate to
the topic, focusing on the view through both lenses, but is
cursory, overly generalized, or contains inaccuracies (55%)
Does not explain similarities and differences in how the lenses
relate to the topic (0%)
16
Further Exploration
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and demonstrates a keen insight
about the value of further exploration of the topic (100%)
Articulates further exploration for topic exploration (85%)

8. Articulates further exploration for topic exploration but is
cursory or illogical (55%)
Does not articulate further exploration for topic (0%)
16
Conclusion
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and reflection is thoughtful and
thorough in addressing the research process (100%)
Reflects on learning from the research process focusing on the
benefits of looking at a topic from various lenses (85%)
Reflects on lessons learned during the research process but
response is cursory or lacks sufficient detail (55%)
Does not reflect on the research process (0%)
16
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a
professional and easy-to-read format (100%)
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization (85%)
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact
readability and articulation of main ideas (55%)
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of
ideas (0%)
4
Total
100%
Proofreading Checklist
Prompt: Now that you have reviewed the rubric that your
instructor will be using to grade your final presentation, review
each slide of your presentation. Then, in the proofreading
checklist, fill in the blank cells in the table provided to indicate
whether you addressed each critical element within the slide.
Once you are done, save this document and submit it to your

9. instructor for grading. Then revise your drafted presentation as
needed to address any areas that you noticed were lacking or not
evident in your review.
Note that the proofreading checklist assignment is pass/fail.
Critical elements in rubric
Questions to ask yourself when reviewing each slide
Yes
No
Notes
You may use this space to keep any notes for yourself about
areas that you would like to revisit on your presentation and
work to improve before submitting the final version of your
presentation to your instructor.
Introduction
1. Did I introduce my chosen topic by identifying it?
2. Did I explain why I chose it?
3. Did I include a thoughtful reflection about my choice?
First Lens
1. Did I explain my chosen topic through my first lens by
identifying it?

10. 2. Did I include details and examples relevant to that lens?
3. Are the examples I provided especially insightful in
illustrating the topic through the lens?
Second Lens
1. Did I explain my chosen topic through my second lens by
identifying it?
2. Did I include details and examples relevant to that lens?
3. Are the examples I provided especially insightful in
illustrating the topic through the lens?
Convergence and Divergence
1. Did I explain similarities in how the lenses related to my
chosen topic?
2. Did I explain differences in how the lenses related to my

11. chosen topic?
3. Did I discuss the view of my topic through both of my two
chosen lenses?
Further Exploration
1. Did I articulate the next steps I would take to explore my
topic?
Conclusion
1. Did I reflect on the research process?
2. Did I explain the benefits of looking at a topic from various
lenses?
Articulation of Response
1. Are there any errors in my work related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax or organization?
2. Did I include my “References” slide as the final slide in my
presentation?

12. 3. Is my presentation presented in a professional and easy-to-
read format?