1. XX’XX:
COPING THE
STANDARD
FOR EVALUATION OF
STUDENTS’
PERFORMANCE
AMIDST NEW
NORMAL
EDUCATION
*LIMWELL R.
TELMO
Laguilayan National High School
DEPED – Division of Sultan Kudarat
3. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
1. To what extent do teachers assess the
level of acceptability of Modified e-class
Record XX'XX in terms of:
a) performance expectancy;
b) effort expectancy;
c) social influence;
d) facilitating condition; and
e) behavioral intentions?
2. To what extent do teachers assess the level
of satisfaction of Modified e-class Record
XX'XX in terms:
a) usefulness; and
b) approval?
3. Is there a significant relationship between the level
of acceptability and satisfaction of teachers using
the Modified e-class Record XX'XX in terms of
school location such as rural or urban?
4. DESCRIPTIVE-CORRELATIONAL DESIGN
50 TEACHERS IN REGION XII from the Division of:
Sarangani; South Cotabato; Koronadal City; Kidapawan City; and
Sultan Kudarat
PURPOSIVE SAMPLING
The questionnaire contained 4 close-ended questions in each
category.
A 5-point Likert system
Reliability Test using Cronbach Method result of 0.992.
Validated by Leodie D. Mones, PhD; Jerry G. Ramos, EdD; and
Roel B. Antonio, PhD using Good and Scates (1972)
Google Form Link for Data Gathering
5. Indicators Mean Interpretation
Acceptability:
Performance
Expectancy
4.71 Strongly Agree
Effort
Expectancy
4.60 Strongly Agree
Social Influence 4.51 Strongly Agree
Facilitating 4.54 Strongly Agree
It implies that the respondents
agree with highest extent. This is to
admit the demand of the teachers to
deliver a faster, dependable, and
built-in program that will satisfy the
department's needs in
contemporary times or new normal
education.
The program enables
teachers to work more
quickly in terms of
performance expectancy
and provide error-free
output during the new
normal educational
approach.
It shows the system's
attempts to give teachers a
user-friendly interface with
clear and focused
commands.
Teachers' shared objective is
to stay on top of their work,
particularly in computing
grades, principals and school
heads also encouraged
teachers to utilize the program.
The program and the programmer
take excellent care of teachers. This
also indicates that the teacher in
learning the program may review the
handbook given by the programmer
or request a favor from him from time
to time.
The adjustment phase for
teachers was not demanding in
terms of grade computation,
and through experience and
immersion in the program, they
may resume average
productivity.
6. Indicators Mean Interpretation
Satisfaction:
Usefulness 4.63 Strongly Agree
Approval 4.64 Strongly Agree
Mean 4.64 Strongly Agree
This is to reassure teachers despite the current
epidemic crisis. A well-designed and easy-to-
manipulate program may also prevent teachers
from directly contacting their co-teachers,
avoiding close contact. In this approach, we can
assist teachers in working effectively with their
students.
It also supports the
programmer'sgoal to resolve
current problems further
since the program was
developed based on the
experiences encountered.
This manifestation resulted
from the program's goal of
providing an easy-to-
access and running
environment that satisfies
its requirements.
7. Indicators r-value Interpretation
Acceptability:
Performance
Expectancy
-0.082ns
Very Weak Magnitude
of Relationship
Effort
Expectancy
-0.156ns
Very Weak Magnitude
of Relationship
Social
Influence
-0.137ns
Very Weak Magnitude
of Relationship
Facilitating -0.234ns
Very Weak Magnitude
Generally, the level of acceptability of the teachers
has no significant relationship with the school's
location they belong, either urban or rural. This is a
positive manifestation that even teachers in rural
areas have a positive review of the program. The
program was able to subside technical skills
regardless of the location of the school they belong
to.
8. Indicators r-value Interpretation
Satisfacation:
Usefulness -0.132ns
Very Weak Magnitude
of Relationship
Approval -0.045ns
Very Weak Magnitude
of Relationship
This result expressed no significant
relationship between the level of
satisfaction of teachers to their school
location, whether their school is in urban
or rural. Both teachers in the urban and
rural admitted that they were satisfied
with the program because it is timely and
served their needs to automate or
computerize the computation of grades.
9. It can be concluded that the intervention is
strongly acceptable by the teachers and
provides high satisfaction to their work
after using it.
On the other hand, there is no significant
relationship between the teachers' level of
acceptability and satisfaction with their
school's location, whether in urban or rural
areas.
Finally, using the Electronic Class Record
XX'XX is one of the most acceptable and
10. In the light of the above, the researcher
wishes to make some recommendations,
which, if taken into consideration, might bring
some positive changes to the current
approach.
1.Sustain the needs of the teachers who
already use the program by giving them
updates on the program.
2.Wider dissemination of the e-Class Record
XX’XX within the Division of Sultan Kudarat,
and other Divisions of SOCSKSARGEN.
11. 4. The program may be patented for the
benefit of the school and administration.
5. Further testing of the program to address
minimal errors and discrepancies in the
system.
6. Future researchers could use the result
as a reference for their future research.
7. Other teachers may test the program on
how effective and efficient in solving
grades of students.
