SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 27
Download to read offline
1
Managing Construction Site Water
2015
2
Outline
• WT Introduction
• Evaluating Construction Projects
• Discharge Locations
• Permitting
• Design Factors
• BMPs (Passive vs. Active)
• Quick Project Checklist
3
We Treat Water
4
Company Overview
• Permanent and Temporary Water Treatment Systems
• Hundreds of Treatment Projects Completed Since 1999
– Permitting, Design, R&D
– Manufacture, Integrate, Install
– Turnkey Operations & Maintenance 
– Training Courses, Remote Monitoring & Assistance
• Based in Everett, WA 
• 60+ employees
5
Team of Experts
Research &
Development
Design
Manufacturing Field
Operations
Engineering
Project Management
6
Pre‐Construction Services
Confidential &
Proprietary
COST ANALYSIS
Prepare project cost 
estimates and 
alternate analyses..
PERMITTING/PLAN PREP
Determine permitting needs, 
apply for permits, negotiate 
with AHJ, prepare SWPPPs, 
Technical Water Management 
Plans (EPA)
TREATABILITY STUDIES
In‐house testing & analysis
Lab & field‐scale programs
QAPP plans
7
Construction Services
TRAINING COURSES
DOE‐certified courses in 
various treatment 
technologies, both field 
and classroom training 
modules
EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER & 
FIELD SERVICE
Provide equipment to meet 
discharge requirements,  
Mobilization/Demobilization
Maintenance support, 
both remote and on‐site 
as needed.  
MONITORING
CESCL inspections and 
associated DMR 
reporting & 
compliance, water 
quality monitoring and 
analytical sample 
collection
8
Construction Technologies
Conidential &
Proprietary
PHATBOX
Automated pH Adjustment
Mobile: 50‐350gpm
Fixed: Up to 5,000gpm
WAVEIONICS
Electrocoagulation
Mobile: 50‐1,000gpm
Fixed: Up to 5,000gpm
ROADSIDE ACIST
Chemical Treatment System
Mobile: 300‐1,000gpm
Fixed: Up to 5,000gpm
9
Evaluating a Construction Project
• Things to Consider:
 Discharge Location
• Regulations
• Permits
• Discharge Limits
 Site Characteristics
• Soil Type
• Rainfall Patterns
• Schedule
 BMPs
• Planning
• SWPPP
 Budget
10
Discharge Location
Drives ALL Permitting & Treatment
Surface Water
Dept. of 
Ecology
City/County
Settleable Solids, pH
Authorization, Minor, Major
SS/CSO
KCIW/Local 
Sewer District
City/County
Turbidity, pH
Administrative Order
Detention, pH Adjustment, 
Mechanical Filtration, 
Active Treatment, GAC 
Detention, pH Adjustment, 
Mechanical Filtration, GAC
11
Discharge to Surface Water
NPDES (aka Construction Stormwater General Permit or CSWGP)
• Applicability
• Construction Sites disturbing ≥ 1 acre and will discharge stormwater 
offsite
• Sites under an acre that are part of a common plan (residential)
• Other sites that may discharge to sensitive areas or have contamination
• Requirements
• Must comply with permit limits for Turbidity (<25) and pH (6.5‐8.5)
• Must have a site‐specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
• Must have a CESCL perform site inspection weekly and take water 
quality readings
• Additional sampling/treatment required if site has contaminants
PROPOSED UPDATES for JAN 1st:
• More information required for Contaminated sites
• Contaminated sites will use AKART – Active Treatment
• Drilled shaft water (no drilling fluids) can be infiltrated
• SWPPP Elements (preserving topsoil/LID)
12
Discharge to Sanitary Sewer/CSO
King County Industrial Waste Discharge Authorization and/or Local Approval
• Applicability
• Sites discharging to a Combined Sewer
• Construction Sites disturbing < 1 acre and will discharge stormwater offsite
• Alternate discharge for sites that may discharge to sensitive areas or have 
contamination
• Requirements
• Must comply with permit limits for Maximum Daily Volume, Settleable Solids
(<7mg/L) and pH (5.5‐12)
• Must take Field Measurements (min Flow/Volume, Settleable Solids, pH) 
every day that discharge occurs
• Additional sampling/treatment required if site has contaminants
• Must submit monthly reports and pay per gallon fee.
Current review time for KCIW permit is at least 4 weeks, double if complex
or contaminated site.
City of Seattle may hold grading permit until SSPTD is obtained.
13
Local Authority
• Local Jurisdictions (City/County)
– May require specific plans for work during the wet season 
• Review SWPPP, site plans, geotech, may have formal application pkg
– May have more stringent discharge requirements than the State
– Allow time for review and approval (4 weeks min)
– Administrative fees associated with some approvals
City of Redmond – Wet Weather Plan
City of Bellevue – Turbidity Monitoring Plan
City of Seattle – Drainage Side Sewer Permit $, Dry Season Grading Extension
City of Tacoma – Special Authorization to Discharge (SAD) $
King County – Wet Season Plan
Snohomish – Enhanced TESC Review
14
• Surface Water
– Turbidity 
• 25 ntu benchmark
• 250 enforcement level
– pH 
• 6.5 – 8.5
– Other as receiving water or 
past site activity dictates
• Sanitary Sewer/CSO
– Settleable Solids
• <7 mg/L
– pH
• 5.0 – 11.0
– Other as receiving water or 
past site activity dictates
Discharge Limits
2000 1000 500 100 5
15
Site Characteristics
• Identify Site Characteristics
1. Rainfall – how much runoff should we 
plan on?
2. Soil Type (i.e. Particle Size!) 
3. Schedule – what time of year will the 
work take place?
4. Contamination Onsite
16
Rainfall
• 1” rain on 1 acre of impervious surface = 27,000 gallons
• Site Size = 2 acres
• 1” Storm = Detention Required = 3 tanks (18,000 gallons each)
• 2.5” Storm = Detention Required = 8 tanks (135,000 gallons)
Confidential &
Proprietary
17
Soil Type
10000 Gravel 0.016 sec
2000 0.4 sec
1000 1.7 sec
600 Coarse Sand 4.6 sec
300 Silt Fence, Ponds 19.0 sec
200 Bioswales 42.0 sec
150 1.25 min
100 Fine Sand 2.8 min
60 Passive filtration 7.8 min
25 Pressurized SF 2.2 hrs
15 Bag Filters 6.2 hrs
10 Silt 14.0 hrs
5 Active Treatment 56.0 hrs
3 CESF/EC 155.3 hrs
1.5 26.0 days
1 Clay 58.0 days
0.1 16 yrs
0.01 Colloidal Particles 1600 yrs
Soil Type
Time Required to
Settle 3ft
Particle
Diameter
(microns)
SS/CSO-
Settleable
Solids
Surface Water-
Turbidity
18
BMPs
• Source Control (i.e. Prevention)
• Plastic Covering
• Mulch
• Hydroseeding
• Nets & Blankets
• Soil Roughening
• Terracing
• Construction Schedule
• Check Dams / Straw Wattles
• Outlet Protection
• Stabilization Construction Entrances / Exits
GOAL = Cover Soils / Slow Velocity!
Performance not dependent on particle size
19
BMPs
• Runoff Control (i.e. Treatment)
1. Detention Ponds / Vaults / Tanks
2. Bioswales
3. Silt Fencing
4. Filter Bags
5. Sand Filters
6. Active Treatment
Confidential &
Proprietary
GOAL = Remove soil particles from water
Performance #1‐5 dependent on particle size
20
Chitosan Enhanced Sand 
Filtration (CESF)
Electrocoagulation (EC)
Approval Level GULD GULD
Consumable Liquid Chitosan EC Cells
Labor
On‐Site Labor When 
Operating
Automated Operator with 
Alerts
Contaminants Turbidity Only
Turbidity, Metals, Emulsified 
Oils
Active pH Range 7 to 8 5 to 12
Active NTU Range 0 to 600 0 to 4,000+
Rental Cost (300 gpm) $195 to 225 / day $250 to 310 / day
Active Treatment BMPs
21
Schedule
Permits
Activities
Seasonal
BMPs
Discharge Limits
Civil Plans
Contingencies
Budget
Materials
Equipment
Labor
Site
Soil Type
Topography
Proximity to Sensitive Areas
Stormwater 
Pollution Prevention 
Plan
Construction SWPPP
Confidential &
Proprietary
22
Case Study: Surface Water 
7.7 Acres – Direct Discharge 
to Lake Washington
“The Geotechnical Engineering Design Study for Southport Hotel prepared by Hart 
Crowser (April 18, 2014) lists site soils as a combination of sand, silt, and clays at various 
depths. The depth to, and thickness of, the soil layers vary greatly throughout the site.”
23
Case Study 
• Initial Action
• Site had 140,000 gallons of existing storage 
in a detention vault
• Site runoff for 1” storm = 208,000 gallons
• 208,000 – 140,000 = 68,000
• Divide by 8 hr shift = 8,500 gallons
• Divide by minutes = ~140gpm
Influent Turbidity
(NTU)
Effluent Turbidity
(NTU)
Effective Particle 
Size Removal
125 48 63 microns
24
Case Study 
• Intermediate Action
• Site could not meet turbidity benchmark
• Added sand filter – still only reduced 
turbidity down to 40 NTU
• Submitted sample for particle size 
distribution
Influent Turbidity
(NTU)
Effluent Turbidity
(NTU)
Effective Particle 
Size Removal
48 45 25 microns
25
Case Study
• Final Action
• Particle Size Distributions indicated           
very small particles
• Implemented WaveIonics
electrocoagulation system
Influent Turbidity
(NTU)
Effluent Turbidity
(NTU)
Effective Particle 
Size Removal
175 5 0.01 microns
26
10000 Gravel 0.016 sec
2000 0.4 sec
1000 1.7 sec
600 Coarse Sand 4.6 sec
300 Silt Fence, Ponds 19.0 sec
200 Bioswales 42.0 sec
150 1.25 min
100 Fine Sand 2.8 min
60 Passive filtration 7.8 min
25 Pressurized SF 2.2 hrs
15 Bag Filters 6.2 hrs
10 Silt 14.0 hrs
5 Active Treatment 56.0 hrs
3 CESF/EC 155.3 hrs
1.5 26.0 days
1 Clay 58.0 days
0.1 16 yrs
0.01 Colloidal Particles 1600 yrs
Soil Type
Time Required to
Settle 3ft
Particle
Diameter
(microns)
Project Planning Quick List
• Know the Site
• Discharge Location / Limits
• Site Characteristics 
• Rainfall
• Schedule
• Soil Type 
• Regulatory Requirements 
• Get Permits
• Identify BMPs to Treat Turbidity/SS & 
Contaminants if present
• Implement BMPs
• Work the Plan!
• Monitor
• Report
• Maintain & Adapt
27
6300 Merrill Creek Parkway
Suite C‐100
Everett, WA 98203
For more information please contact:
Liisa Doty,
National Construction Accounts Manager
liisa@watertectonics.com
Mobile (206) 371‐1693
www.watertectonics.com
Thank you!

More Related Content

Similar to WaterTectonics Presentation for Linked In Regulatory

Proper Maintenance for the Long Life of Concrete Pavements
Proper Maintenance for the Long Life of Concrete PavementsProper Maintenance for the Long Life of Concrete Pavements
Proper Maintenance for the Long Life of Concrete Pavements
Jill Reeves
 
amir akhtar cv engineer - Copy
amir akhtar cv engineer - Copyamir akhtar cv engineer - Copy
amir akhtar cv engineer - Copy
amir akhtar
 
Construction practices aphb
Construction practices aphbConstruction practices aphb
Construction practices aphb
hlksd
 
drillingfluids-171223201136.pptx
drillingfluids-171223201136.pptxdrillingfluids-171223201136.pptx
drillingfluids-171223201136.pptx
MuammerAlakary
 
Slattery_Resume_022516_Chemical Engineer Resume
Slattery_Resume_022516_Chemical Engineer ResumeSlattery_Resume_022516_Chemical Engineer Resume
Slattery_Resume_022516_Chemical Engineer Resume
Ian Slattery
 

Similar to WaterTectonics Presentation for Linked In Regulatory (20)

Proper Maintenance for the Long Life of Concrete Pavements
Proper Maintenance for the Long Life of Concrete PavementsProper Maintenance for the Long Life of Concrete Pavements
Proper Maintenance for the Long Life of Concrete Pavements
 
amir akhtar cv engineer - Copy
amir akhtar cv engineer - Copyamir akhtar cv engineer - Copy
amir akhtar cv engineer - Copy
 
Pre- Feasibility study of a low grade iron ore http://mineralprocessingconsul...
Pre- Feasibility study of a low grade iron ore http://mineralprocessingconsul...Pre- Feasibility study of a low grade iron ore http://mineralprocessingconsul...
Pre- Feasibility study of a low grade iron ore http://mineralprocessingconsul...
 
Construction practices aphb
Construction practices aphbConstruction practices aphb
Construction practices aphb
 
MR. Akhlaq Mohsin.pptx
MR. Akhlaq Mohsin.pptxMR. Akhlaq Mohsin.pptx
MR. Akhlaq Mohsin.pptx
 
A Sattar CV-II
A Sattar CV-IIA Sattar CV-II
A Sattar CV-II
 
Lotus-technicals-PPT.pdf
Lotus-technicals-PPT.pdfLotus-technicals-PPT.pdf
Lotus-technicals-PPT.pdf
 
Katleho P LETELE CV with picture
Katleho P LETELE CV with pictureKatleho P LETELE CV with picture
Katleho P LETELE CV with picture
 
A Sattar CV-II
A Sattar CV-IIA Sattar CV-II
A Sattar CV-II
 
drillingfluids-171223201136.pptx
drillingfluids-171223201136.pptxdrillingfluids-171223201136.pptx
drillingfluids-171223201136.pptx
 
drillingfluids-22.pptx
drillingfluids-22.pptxdrillingfluids-22.pptx
drillingfluids-22.pptx
 
What is the Future for Magnetite Projects in Australia
What is the Future for Magnetite Projects in AustraliaWhat is the Future for Magnetite Projects in Australia
What is the Future for Magnetite Projects in Australia
 
Project Management Challenges in an Effluent Treatment Plant Construction
Project Management  Challenges in an Effluent Treatment Plant Construction Project Management  Challenges in an Effluent Treatment Plant Construction
Project Management Challenges in an Effluent Treatment Plant Construction
 
Slattery_Resume_022516_Chemical Engineer Resume
Slattery_Resume_022516_Chemical Engineer ResumeSlattery_Resume_022516_Chemical Engineer Resume
Slattery_Resume_022516_Chemical Engineer Resume
 
Knowledge Exchange mission SUSWA project 30 November – 5 December 2014, Kajia...
Knowledge Exchange mission SUSWA project 30 November – 5 December 2014, Kajia...Knowledge Exchange mission SUSWA project 30 November – 5 December 2014, Kajia...
Knowledge Exchange mission SUSWA project 30 November – 5 December 2014, Kajia...
 
Project
Project Project
Project
 
Drilling fluids
Drilling fluidsDrilling fluids
Drilling fluids
 
Facilities Sand Management; SPE Distingushed Lecture Series
Facilities Sand Management; SPE Distingushed Lecture SeriesFacilities Sand Management; SPE Distingushed Lecture Series
Facilities Sand Management; SPE Distingushed Lecture Series
 
Facilities Sand Management Rawlins eProcess
Facilities Sand Management Rawlins eProcessFacilities Sand Management Rawlins eProcess
Facilities Sand Management Rawlins eProcess
 
AH15019
AH15019AH15019
AH15019
 

WaterTectonics Presentation for Linked In Regulatory