SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Download to read offline
This instructor motivated me to learn.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 3.75
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
50.0050.0050.0050.005.00SA 6
66.6716.6766.6716.674.00A 2
66.670.0066.670.003.00NA 0
91.6725.0091.6725.002.00D 3
100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1
The instructor communicated enthusiastically about the subject.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.50
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
91.6733.3391.6733.334.00A 4
100.008.33100.008.333.00NA 1
100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
The instructor increased my subject knowledge and/or skills.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.25
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
83.3325.0083.3325.004.00A 3
91.678.3391.678.333.00NA 1
91.670.0091.670.002.00D 0
100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1
ORiorden, Laura - BSC 1025C, Section 63870Filter:
STUDENT EVALUATION OF FACULTY - Spring 2015
Page 14/30/2015
The instructor effectively stimulated critical or technical thinking.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.00
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
75.0016.6775.0016.674.00A 2
75.000.0075.000.003.00NA 0
91.6716.6791.6716.672.00D 2
100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1
The instructor was available for individualized communication.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.50
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
91.6733.3391.6733.334.00A 4
100.008.33100.008.333.00NA 1
100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
The instructor communicated full explanation of assignments.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.00
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
75.0016.6775.0016.674.00A 2
75.000.0075.000.003.00NA 0
91.6716.6791.6716.672.00D 2
100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1
Page 24/30/2015
The instructor followed scheduled time frames.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.58
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5
100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0
100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
The instructor communicated clearly and effectively.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.42
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
91.6733.3391.6733.334.00A 4
91.670.0091.670.003.00NA 0
100.008.33100.008.332.00D 1
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
The instructor presented course content effectively.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.08
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
75.0016.6775.0016.674.00A 2
83.338.3383.338.333.00NA 1
91.678.3391.678.332.00D 1
100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1
Page 34/30/2015
The instructor was organized and well prepared.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.33
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
83.3325.0083.3325.004.00A 3
91.678.3391.678.333.00NA 1
100.008.33100.008.332.00D 1
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
The instructor provided exam results within reasonable time.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.58
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5
100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0
100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
The instructor graded reasonably and fairly according to the syllabus policies and procedures.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.25
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
83.3325.0083.3325.004.00A 3
91.678.3391.678.333.00NA 1
91.670.0091.670.002.00D 0
100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1
Page 44/30/2015
The instructor consistently followed the syllabus.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.58
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5
100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0
100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
The instructor provided a syllabus which clearly presented grading policies and procedures.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.58
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5
100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0
100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
The instructor communicated with students in a timely manner.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.58
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5
100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0
100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
Page 54/30/2015
The instructor will be recommended by me to other students.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 3.75
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
66.678.3366.678.334.00A 1
75.008.3375.008.333.00NA 1
75.000.0075.000.002.00D 0
100.0025.00100.0025.001.00SD 3
The course schedule and pace were effective.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.08
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7
66.678.3366.678.334.00A 1
91.6725.0091.6725.003.00NA 3
91.670.0091.670.002.00D 0
100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1
The learning materials in this course were useful to me.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 3.75
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
50.0050.0050.0050.005.00SA 6
58.338.3358.338.334.00A 1
75.0016.6775.0016.673.00NA 2
91.6716.6791.6716.672.00D 2
100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1
Page 64/30/2015
My educational experience at HCC, to date, has been satisfactory.
Value Freq. Percent Cum.
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cum. Val.
Percent
Response
Mean: 4.08
Graph
100.0012 100.00Total Valid
41.6741.6741.6741.675.00SA 5
83.3341.6783.3341.674.00A 5
83.330.0083.330.003.00NA 0
100.0016.67100.0016.672.00D 2
100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0
Page 74/30/2015

More Related Content

Similar to NOLASCO_ORiorden_BSC1025C_63870_SP15

LITR221 Quiz RubricExemplary LevelAccomplished L.docx
LITR221 Quiz RubricExemplary LevelAccomplished L.docxLITR221 Quiz RubricExemplary LevelAccomplished L.docx
LITR221 Quiz RubricExemplary LevelAccomplished L.docx
SHIVA101531
 
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=IQ GPA STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE.docx
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=IQ GPA   STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE.docxFREQUENCIES VARIABLES=IQ GPA   STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE.docx
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=IQ GPA STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE.docx
shericehewat
 
PATIENT SATISFACTION STUDY REPORTPRIVATE forProfession.docx
PATIENT SATISFACTION STUDY REPORTPRIVATE forProfession.docxPATIENT SATISFACTION STUDY REPORTPRIVATE forProfession.docx
PATIENT SATISFACTION STUDY REPORTPRIVATE forProfession.docx
herbertwilson5999
 
Jeemains 2014 qpaper analysis
Jeemains 2014 qpaper analysisJeemains 2014 qpaper analysis
Jeemains 2014 qpaper analysis
Ashok Tata
 
A Study of Factors Influencing Selection of Management Colleges in India - A ...
A Study of Factors Influencing Selection of Management Colleges in India - A ...A Study of Factors Influencing Selection of Management Colleges in India - A ...
A Study of Factors Influencing Selection of Management Colleges in India - A ...
Ravi Shankar
 
Power presentation ncsu 2
Power presentation ncsu 2Power presentation ncsu 2
Power presentation ncsu 2
EducationNC
 
Rutovytskyy Yevhen MAT_ K172 CRN 12866 Spring 2016
Rutovytskyy Yevhen  MAT_ K172 CRN 12866 Spring 2016Rutovytskyy Yevhen  MAT_ K172 CRN 12866 Spring 2016
Rutovytskyy Yevhen MAT_ K172 CRN 12866 Spring 2016
Yevhen Rutovytskyy
 

Similar to NOLASCO_ORiorden_BSC1025C_63870_SP15 (20)

Module 2 statistics
Module 2   statisticsModule 2   statistics
Module 2 statistics
 
Jwan kareem.biostatic exercise
Jwan kareem.biostatic exerciseJwan kareem.biostatic exercise
Jwan kareem.biostatic exercise
 
Item analysis presentation
Item analysis presentationItem analysis presentation
Item analysis presentation
 
Navy advancement center
Navy advancement centerNavy advancement center
Navy advancement center
 
University of Central Florida Student Survey Results about Deepak Danny Singh
University of Central Florida Student Survey Results about Deepak Danny SinghUniversity of Central Florida Student Survey Results about Deepak Danny Singh
University of Central Florida Student Survey Results about Deepak Danny Singh
 
ITEM ANALYSIS
ITEM ANALYSIS ITEM ANALYSIS
ITEM ANALYSIS
 
LITR221 Quiz RubricExemplary LevelAccomplished L.docx
LITR221 Quiz RubricExemplary LevelAccomplished L.docxLITR221 Quiz RubricExemplary LevelAccomplished L.docx
LITR221 Quiz RubricExemplary LevelAccomplished L.docx
 
Mean for Grouped Data
Mean for Grouped DataMean for Grouped Data
Mean for Grouped Data
 
e-Portfolio for Lab-Based Statistics (PSYC 3100) part 2 (7.presentation)
e-Portfolio for Lab-Based Statistics (PSYC 3100) part 2 (7.presentation)e-Portfolio for Lab-Based Statistics (PSYC 3100) part 2 (7.presentation)
e-Portfolio for Lab-Based Statistics (PSYC 3100) part 2 (7.presentation)
 
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=IQ GPA STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE.docx
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=IQ GPA   STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE.docxFREQUENCIES VARIABLES=IQ GPA   STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE.docx
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=IQ GPA STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE.docx
 
Frequencies kepira
Frequencies kepiraFrequencies kepira
Frequencies kepira
 
PATIENT SATISFACTION STUDY REPORTPRIVATE forProfession.docx
PATIENT SATISFACTION STUDY REPORTPRIVATE forProfession.docxPATIENT SATISFACTION STUDY REPORTPRIVATE forProfession.docx
PATIENT SATISFACTION STUDY REPORTPRIVATE forProfession.docx
 
New lengkap karakteristik mancova
New lengkap karakteristik mancovaNew lengkap karakteristik mancova
New lengkap karakteristik mancova
 
Jeemains 2014 qpaper analysis
Jeemains 2014 qpaper analysisJeemains 2014 qpaper analysis
Jeemains 2014 qpaper analysis
 
Science competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATION
Science competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATIONScience competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATION
Science competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATION
 
A Study of Factors Influencing Selection of Management Colleges in India - A ...
A Study of Factors Influencing Selection of Management Colleges in India - A ...A Study of Factors Influencing Selection of Management Colleges in India - A ...
A Study of Factors Influencing Selection of Management Colleges in India - A ...
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
Power presentation ncsu 2
Power presentation ncsu 2Power presentation ncsu 2
Power presentation ncsu 2
 
Measures of Position - Elementary Statistics
Measures of Position - Elementary StatisticsMeasures of Position - Elementary Statistics
Measures of Position - Elementary Statistics
 
Rutovytskyy Yevhen MAT_ K172 CRN 12866 Spring 2016
Rutovytskyy Yevhen  MAT_ K172 CRN 12866 Spring 2016Rutovytskyy Yevhen  MAT_ K172 CRN 12866 Spring 2016
Rutovytskyy Yevhen MAT_ K172 CRN 12866 Spring 2016
 

NOLASCO_ORiorden_BSC1025C_63870_SP15

  • 1. This instructor motivated me to learn. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 3.75 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 50.0050.0050.0050.005.00SA 6 66.6716.6766.6716.674.00A 2 66.670.0066.670.003.00NA 0 91.6725.0091.6725.002.00D 3 100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1 The instructor communicated enthusiastically about the subject. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.50 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 91.6733.3391.6733.334.00A 4 100.008.33100.008.333.00NA 1 100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 The instructor increased my subject knowledge and/or skills. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.25 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 83.3325.0083.3325.004.00A 3 91.678.3391.678.333.00NA 1 91.670.0091.670.002.00D 0 100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1 ORiorden, Laura - BSC 1025C, Section 63870Filter: STUDENT EVALUATION OF FACULTY - Spring 2015 Page 14/30/2015
  • 2. The instructor effectively stimulated critical or technical thinking. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.00 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 75.0016.6775.0016.674.00A 2 75.000.0075.000.003.00NA 0 91.6716.6791.6716.672.00D 2 100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1 The instructor was available for individualized communication. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.50 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 91.6733.3391.6733.334.00A 4 100.008.33100.008.333.00NA 1 100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 The instructor communicated full explanation of assignments. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.00 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 75.0016.6775.0016.674.00A 2 75.000.0075.000.003.00NA 0 91.6716.6791.6716.672.00D 2 100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1 Page 24/30/2015
  • 3. The instructor followed scheduled time frames. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.58 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5 100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0 100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 The instructor communicated clearly and effectively. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.42 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 91.6733.3391.6733.334.00A 4 91.670.0091.670.003.00NA 0 100.008.33100.008.332.00D 1 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 The instructor presented course content effectively. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.08 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 75.0016.6775.0016.674.00A 2 83.338.3383.338.333.00NA 1 91.678.3391.678.332.00D 1 100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1 Page 34/30/2015
  • 4. The instructor was organized and well prepared. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.33 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 83.3325.0083.3325.004.00A 3 91.678.3391.678.333.00NA 1 100.008.33100.008.332.00D 1 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 The instructor provided exam results within reasonable time. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.58 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5 100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0 100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 The instructor graded reasonably and fairly according to the syllabus policies and procedures. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.25 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 83.3325.0083.3325.004.00A 3 91.678.3391.678.333.00NA 1 91.670.0091.670.002.00D 0 100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1 Page 44/30/2015
  • 5. The instructor consistently followed the syllabus. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.58 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5 100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0 100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 The instructor provided a syllabus which clearly presented grading policies and procedures. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.58 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5 100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0 100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 The instructor communicated with students in a timely manner. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.58 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 100.0041.67100.0041.674.00A 5 100.000.00100.000.003.00NA 0 100.000.00100.000.002.00D 0 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 Page 54/30/2015
  • 6. The instructor will be recommended by me to other students. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 3.75 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 66.678.3366.678.334.00A 1 75.008.3375.008.333.00NA 1 75.000.0075.000.002.00D 0 100.0025.00100.0025.001.00SD 3 The course schedule and pace were effective. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.08 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 58.3358.3358.3358.335.00SA 7 66.678.3366.678.334.00A 1 91.6725.0091.6725.003.00NA 3 91.670.0091.670.002.00D 0 100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1 The learning materials in this course were useful to me. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 3.75 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 50.0050.0050.0050.005.00SA 6 58.338.3358.338.334.00A 1 75.0016.6775.0016.673.00NA 2 91.6716.6791.6716.672.00D 2 100.008.33100.008.331.00SD 1 Page 64/30/2015
  • 7. My educational experience at HCC, to date, has been satisfactory. Value Freq. Percent Cum. Percent Valid Percent Cum. Val. Percent Response Mean: 4.08 Graph 100.0012 100.00Total Valid 41.6741.6741.6741.675.00SA 5 83.3341.6783.3341.674.00A 5 83.330.0083.330.003.00NA 0 100.0016.67100.0016.672.00D 2 100.000.00100.000.001.00SD 0 Page 74/30/2015