Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (19)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Climate Smart Planning: Ethiopia Pilot
Similar to Climate Smart Planning: Ethiopia Pilot (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Climate Smart Planning: Ethiopia Pilot
- 1. Building Institutional Adaptive Capacity in the Food System An Ethiopia Example
- 2. Adaptive Governance • Responding to Signals • Managing ups and downs • Not vulnerability, but dynamics • What is our role?
- 3. Engaging a Complex System • Ethiopian annual budget is 8 billion • It’s a complex system – top, bottom, and inbetween • We need to work within their system • Tap into the energy, not create it • Understand processes ahead of time to reduce friction • We need to measure progress
- 4. The CCAFS Silver Platter • Provide a detailed decision scenario • What key decisions are made? • Who makes them and when? • What information did they used last year? • Social Learning platform for collective analysis of gaps and opportunities • Provide access to decision makers and gov’t buyin • Provide a M&E/Feedback loop (survey/crowd sourcing)
- 5. Decisions and Information Decisions How much flexibility is there to change decisions? • Politics • Policy • Resources • Program silos Information How difficult is it to change information sources? • Multitudes of information providers in Ethiopia • History of using specific information for specific decisions • Cost of changing information sources • Capacity issues • New information does not change process
- 6. Annual Plan and Budget Process in Ethiopia Federal State Zone Woreda Kebele April May June July Aug Sept
- 7. Annual Plan and Budget Process in Ethiopia Ask Decision-Makers • What they want to do? • What information they used to decide? • What are they tradeoffs/risks? Pre-Negotiation Surveys Federal State Zone Woreda Kebele April May June July Aug Sept
- 8. Annual Plan and Budget Process in Ethiopia Ask Decision-Makers • What they want to do? • What information they used to decide? • What are they tradeoffs/risks? Pre-Negotiation Surveys Federal State Observe •Who wins or looses? • What information in used? Zone Woreda Observe Negotiations Kebele April May June July Aug Sept
- 9. Survey Report and Near Future • “Decision scenarios” for inputs and food security assessments • Forward by regional presidents • Information gaps identified • Social learning platform • Relevant sections of the questionnaires made available to social learning partners
- 10. Social Learning Partners (so far) Local MoA DRMFSS MoA Inputs Directorate National Met Agency EIAR Mekele University Ethiopia ATA Regional Presidents 300 Decision-Makers International USAID FEWSNET/LAP WFP AFSC & CIAT Bioversity CIMMYT IFPRI IRI World Bank UNDP CARE
- 11. Examples Fertilizer: • Partners: IRI, AFSC, CIAT, MoA, ATA, IFRPI, CIMMYT, EIAR Seeds: • Bioversity (and above) Food Security Assessment: • Mekela University, DRMFSS, WFP, USAID-FEWS,IRI
- 12. Replication • Latin America Proposal - Bioversity • UNDP/GEF/ADB – Interested as M&E component of larger Cambodia PPCR/GEF projects • NEPAD Secretariat has ask for concept note to replicate in 5 African countries (they’ll pitch to donors)