The impacts of genetically modified food labeling are assessed from an industry, consumer, and legislative standpoint. An economic analysis of genetically modified food labeling, as well as challenges and opportunities related to the topic are discussed.
2. Agenda
• Introduction
• Food Labeling Legislation
o History
o Current Regulation
o Contributing Agencies
• Producers
o Industry Reactions
• Consumers
o Millennial Consumer Impacts
• Economic Analysis
• Challenges & Opportunities
3. Introduction
Genetically Modified Foods:
oOrganisms in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that would not
occur naturally
• Consumers calling for increased transparency in food industry
• Voluntary vs. Mandatory GM food labeling
• Labeling = Differentiation and Communication
o Food labeling functions as the primary means of communication between producers and
consumers
4. Food Labeling Legislation
Pure Food &
Drugs Act
1906
Federal Food, Drug
& Cosmetic Act
1938
Fair Packaging
& Labeling Act
1966
Nutrition Labeling
& Education Act
1990
5. Current Legislation
Safe & Accurate Food Labeling Act
• Introduced to U.S. Senate, March 2015
• Preempts all state laws relating to mandatory labeling of GM products
o Standards for uniform, national GM labeling
- Utilizes QR codes, websites, phone numbers
o Certification process for non-GM foods
• Trade groups vs. Advocacy groups
6. Production
• United States = largest global producer of GM crops
o Corn, Soybeans, Rapeseed, Cotton are the most common
o In “Corn Belt” States as much as 90% of corn & soybeans planted are GMO
• Consolidation among GM seed producers
o Top 10 GM Seed producing firms = 73% market share in 2013
7. Producer Reactions
• Mandatory Labeling is Inherently misleading
o Concerns with mandatory GM labeling related to economics not safety
• Some producers are taking matters into their own hands
Campbell Company Example
- Beginning January 2016, voluntarily labeling all GM food products
PepsiCo’s Tropicana Example
- Manufacturer choosing to label some products for GM ingredients is a marketing ploy
8. Consumers
• 93% of American consumers want to know if food products contain GM ingredients
• 56% of American adult consumers seek nutritional information on food labels
• 1.3 million American consumers have signed a petition – demanding FDA mandates GM food
labeling
“It [GM labeling] will encourage hysterical reaction and discourage thoughtful
deliberation about the risks posed by biotechnology”
- - Johnathan Frenzen
(Clinical Professor of Marketing, University of Chicago)
9. Millennial Consumers
• Consumers born after 1980
• Account for greatest percentage of food buying market share
• Mintel reports, 2/3 of Millennials pay close attention to food labels
“Real - Searchers”
o Millennials are quick to fact-check
“Ultimate Day Traders”
o willing to trade up or down, depending on preferences
10. Millennial Consumers Continued…
• Price Elasticity increases as uniqueness, authenticity, & meaningfulness increases for product
• Organic food purchases increasing among Millennials
o Among Household leaders purchasing organic, more than 52% are now Millennials
• Social Media Effect
11. Economic Analysis of GM Food Labeling
“An Economic Analysis of Nanofood Labeling” By: Tran, Yiannaka, & Giannakas
of University of Nebraska-Lincoln
• Consumers willing to pay more as a means of avoiding risk
o Participating consumers support argument that GM labeling results in risks & benefits
• Adverse consumer response = slower adaptation
• Cost Effect vs. Preference Effect Under Mandatory Labeling Regime
o Increased cost for consumers
o When Preference & Cost Effect work in same direction more consumers switch to substitute product
12. Economic Analysis Continued…
Tran, V. T., Yiannaka, A., & Giannakas, K. (2014). An economic of nanofood labeling. American Agricultural Economics Association.
13. Consumer Impacts of GM Labeling
• Cost Effect > Preference Effect:
o Price of GM Foods will increase
o Consumers will switch to substitute for GM food product
• Preference Effect > Cost Effect:
o Consumers more averse to GM food products
o Price of GM Foods will increase
• Certainty Effect > Stigma Effect
o Consumers who prefer GM food products
14. Producer Impacts
• For GM Food Producers/Manufacturers
o Consumer preference decreases Leftward shift of demand curve
o Leading to Decreased Profit Margins
- Increased cost of production
- Decreased consumer demand
• For Organic Food Producers/Manufacturers
o Increased demand & Profits
15. Conclusions: Challenges
• Producers
o Changing Consumer Preferences
o Conforming to future GM Labeling Legislation
• Consumers
o Unknown labeling methods
o Continued concerns with Transparency
• Legislation/Regulatory
o International Trade
- Anti GM Food Legislation in importing countries
- Cultural Differences (Hofstede’s Dimensions)
16. Conclusions: Opportunities
• Producers
o Organic food markets
o Capitalizing on Millennial eating habits
• Consumers
o USDA Certified Organic foods
o Additional information about food through Safe & Accurate Food
Labeling Act
• Legislation/Regulatory
o Solving Food Insecurity
o Possible solution to domestic & international “Food Deserts”
17. References
(2000). U.S. farmers losing domestic markets while Japan sets new restrictions for GMO corn imports. PR Newswire. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
(2002). How consumers process information at heart of debate over labeling of genetically modified foods. PR Newswire. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
(2014). Taking sides: Mandatory GMO labeling. Supermarket News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
(2015). Should companies be required to label genetically modified foods? Backers of the idea say consumers deserve to know what’s in the food they eat. Critics
say labeling is a ploy to make consumers worry. Wall Street Journal (Online). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
(2015). Trade groups applaud House passage of GMO bill. Supermarket News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
(2016). GMO labeling: The great debate. PR Newswire. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
(2016). Just Label It chairman says PepsiCo’s Tropicana ‘non-GMO’seal is “disingenuous”. Business Wire. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
(2016). Millennials and organic: A winning combination. PR Newswire. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
(2016). Packaged facts: Congress decides on GMO labeling, but will consumers be happy?: 56% of U.S. adults seek information and transparency on food &
beverage labels. PR Newswire. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
(2016). United States: U.S. Congress passes bill on GMO food labeling. Asia News Monitor. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Amos, C., Pentina, I., Hawkins, T. G., & Davis, N. (2014). “Natural” labeling and consumers’ sentimental pastoral notion. The Journal of Product and Brand
Management, 23.4/5, 268-281. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
18. References
Fairfield-Sonn, J.W. (2016). Political economy of GMO foods. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 17.1, 60-70. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomlete/.
Frazao, E., & Lynch, L. (1991). Food labeling regulations changing. FoodReview, 14. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Golan, E., Kuchler, F., & Krissoff, B. (2007). Do food labels make a difference?...sometimes. Economic Research Service – USDA, 5, 10-17. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Haddon, H. (2016). U.S. Senate approves legislation requiring GMO labels: GMO label bill to be considered by House. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Harrison, R. W., McLennon, E. (2004). Analysis of consumer preferences for biotech labeling formats. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 36.1, 159-171. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
H. Hutt, P. B. (1993). FDA regulation of product claims in food labeling. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Landi, H.(2015). Labels under scrutiny. Beverage World, 134. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Premanandh, J. (2011). Global consensus – need of the hour for genetically modified organisms (GMO) labeling. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 17.1, 37-44. Retrieved
from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Radke, A. (2016). How the beef industry can capitalize on millennial meat buying habits. Beef. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Shearer, P. S. (2016). GMO labeling bill passes Senate. National Hog Farmer. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Spencer, J. (2016). Bill outlawing state GMO labeling laws passes Senate committee. TCA Regional News. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Starzee, B. (2015). Food manufacturers applaud food labeling act, Long Island Business News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
19. References
Tran, V. T., Yiannaka, A., & Giannakas, K. (2014). An economic of nanofood labeling. American Agricultural Economics Association. Retrieved from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu.
Trotter, G. (2016). GMO labeling debate puts food industry on defensive. TCA Regional News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Vigani, M., Raimondi, V., & Olper, A. (2012). International trade and endogenous standards: the case of GMO regulations. World Trade Review, 11.3. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Vogt, W. (2016). Taking on the GMO labeling question. Farm Industry News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Zhao, L., Gu, H., Chengyan, Y., & Ahlstrom, D. (2013). Consumer welfare and GM food labeling: A simulation using an adjusted Kumaraswamy distribution. Food Policy, 42, 58-70.
Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.
Zook, K. “Food Buying Habits: Organic versus Conventional.” MBA 512. Wilkes University, 2016. https://voicethread.com/myvoice/#thread/7857465/42984220/43840311.