SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Download to read offline
1
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia
Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación
Course: English Conversation
Code: 551015
Activity guide and evaluation rubric - Task 4 - Speaking Part of Cambridge C1
Advanced
1. Activity Description
Type of activity: In Collaborative Group
Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
Highest score of the activity: 80 points
The activity starts on: Tuesday,
November 2, 2021
The activity ends on: Sunday, November
28, 2021
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcome(s):
Learning Outcome 3: interpret extended speech even when it is not clearly
structured and when relationships are only implied and not signaled explicitly.
Learning Outcome 4: describe complex subjects with clear and detailed information
developing particular points and rounding off with an appropriate conclusion.
The activity consists of:
Step 1 – Getting information in the course internal mail and the student’s
institutional email about schedules to participate in the mock of a Cambridge
C1 Advanced interview
Task 4 consists of your participation in a synchronic interview in couples via Teams or
Skype to demonstrate your ability to provide descriptions and discuss about diverse
topics. The interview is similar to the speaking paper of the standardized test
Cambridge C1 Advanced.
Go over the following reference in Unit 3 in the contents section in the Learning
Environment for you to understand the nature and dynamics of Cambridge C1
Advanced test: Cambridge Assessment English (2021). Get ready to have a high
performance in each one of the four parts of the interview.
2
In the course internal mail and your institutional email, you will get from the course
director the guidelines and information to register in one of the available interview
sessions for a couple of students. The interview will be conducted by a tutor.
Step 2 – Being interviewed in the mock of speaking part of Cambridge C1
Advanced
According to your subscription in Step 1, be ready the set day and time to participate
in the interview, which will last about 15 minutes for each couple of students. You
need to be ready to interact in real-time with a peer regarding the examiner’s
assigned tasks through Teams or Skype.
The interview will have four parts: 1) Answer some personal questions; 2) Compare
and answer questions about some pictures; 3) Discuss viewpoints based on a piece of
visual input; and 4) Answer questions based on the topic of Part 3.
At the beginning of the interview take a screenshot and save it as part of the
evidence of Task 4 that you will deliver to the Evaluation environment. Avoid getting
the evidence of the activity in the middle of the interview; otherwise, your
concentration and performance might be affected.
NOTE: The use of microphone and camera is mandatory.
Step 3 – Submitting a reflection about your performance in the interview
Right after your participation in the interview, write a reflection in at least one
paragraph about the perception of your performance in the interview. Remember that
there are not correct or incorrect reflections. Just express freely how you felt during
the activity and what you would do differently if you had the chance to apply for a
real standardized test. You can include an opinion of your peer’s performance too. Do
not forget to include at least a screenshot as evidence of your participation in this
task.
For the development of the activity consider that:
In the Initial Information Environment, you must:
- Check the course agenda to be aware of the synchronic activities this course
implies.
- Go over the course rules and conditions to double check your commitment to
subscribe and participate in the synchronic activities of the course accordingly.
- Be attentive to the informative web conferences schedule to assure your
attendance.
3
In the Learning Environment, you must:
- Read thoroughly the course syllabus to understand the dynamics and nature of
English Conversation course, which is atypical from other courses due to real-time
interaction and overlapping of several activities.
- Be aware of the guidelines and evaluation rubrics of each one of the tasks to
assure an excellent performance in the course.
In the Evaluation Environment, you must:
- Submit your individual outcome consisting of a PDF file with the screenshot of the
interview and the personal reflection (at least one paragraph long) about your
performance in the activity.
Evidence of independent work:
The independent evidence to be submitted is:
A PDF document with the reflection of the interview session and at least a screenshot
of the activity as evidence.
Evidence of group work:
No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.
No group submission is required apart from the performance and real-time
interaction of every couple of students in the interview.
2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit
For Independent evidence, consider the following:
The PDF file to be submitted to the Evaluation environment must include a cover
page, the reflection about the activity, and the screenshot that shows your
participation in the synchronic interview through Skype or Teams.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
4
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artĂ­culo 99)
The academic penalties students will face are:
a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.
3. Evaluation Rubric Template
Type of activity: In Collaborative Group
Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
The highest score in this activity is 80 points
First evaluation
criterion:
Perform the four
parts of the
interview accurately
This criterion
represents 36
points of the total
of 80 points of
the activity.
High level: Participation in the interview by couples evidences
the strengthening of sociolinguistic skills as student shows a high
quality performance in the four parts of the speaking paper of
Cambridge C1 Advanced through clear explanations,
descriptions, and discussion of the addressed topics and visuals
used during the activity. The student can handle time
management for each task in the interview as well.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 25 points
and 36 points
Average level: Sociolinguistic skills seem to be partially
affected when some shortcomings are present during one or
some of the four parts of the interview. Performance might be
affected by lack of understanding of the assigned tasks or failure
in time management in one or more tasks during the interview.
5
If your work is at this level, you can get between 13 points
and 24 points
Low level: Participation in the interview does not show a good
performance due to a total lack of understanding of the assigned
tasks or a deficient management of time when performing them.
No accurate interaction with the other person might be present
as well.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point
and 12 points
Second evaluation
criterion:
Produce speech with
appropriate
pronunciation and
intonation
This criterion
represents 12
points of the total
of 80 points of
the activity.
High level: Phonological features are used effectively to convey
and enhance meaning, and intonation patterns and stress are
appropriate or show minor difficulties.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
and 12 points
Average level: It is unclear with pronunciation at times, and
intonation patterns and stress show some difficulties.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 5 points
and 8 points
Low level: Listener requires a high effort due to unclear
articulation and awkward intonation.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point
and 4 points
Third evaluation
criterion:
Demonstrate
effortless fluency
and delivery
This criterion
represents 12
points of the total
High level: Speech is effortless and smooth to express ideas in
a clear and concise manner.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
and 12 points
Average level: Response level can sometimes cause slow,
stumbling, nervous, or uncertain speech and delivery.
6
of 80 points of
the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 5 points
and 8 points
Low level: Delivery shows choppy rhythm and pace, and
frequent pauses and hesitation are evident.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point
and 4 points
Fourth evaluation
criterion:
Convey ideas with
effective use of
grammar and
vocabulary
This criterion
represents 12
points of the total
of 80 points of
the activity.
High level: Ideas are expressed with effective use of grammar
and vocabulary including control of a wide range of structures
and appropriate vocabulary to exchange views on familiar and
unfamiliar topics.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
and 12 points
Average level: Expression of ideas may exhibit some imprecise
or inaccurate use of grammar and vocabulary, with control of a
limited range of structures and vocabulary to exchange views
only about familiar topics.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 5 points
and 8 points
Low level: Range and control of grammar and vocabulary
severely limit expression of ideas and connections among them,
with control of only very basic vocabulary and expressions.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point
and 4 points
Fifth evaluation
criterion:
Reflect about
performance in the
oral test
This criterion
represents 8
points of the total
High level: The reflection fulfills the requirements of the
guidelines regarding length (one paragraph) and contents, and
the text has no or almost no vocabulary, spelling, punctuation
or grammar issues. The screenshot evidence is attached as well.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 6 points
and 8 points
Average level: The reflection is just from two to five sentences
long or might not include all the required aspects in the
7
of 80 points of
the activity.
guidelines. Some issues related to vocabulary, spelling,
punctuation or grammar might affect the quality of the text. The
screenshot of evidence is not included.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 3 points
and 5 points
Low level: The reflection about the performance in the
interview is not submitted to the Evaluation Environment or its
contents does not meet the requirements of the guidelines, or
there are plenty of writing issues in it.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 2 points

More Related Content

What's hot

Task 4.2 tr
Task 4.2 trTask 4.2 tr
Task 4.2 trTony Perez
 
Analysis of feedback webinar
Analysis of feedback webinarAnalysis of feedback webinar
Analysis of feedback webinarjisc-elearning
 
A Methodology for Enhancing Programming Competence of Students Using Parikshak
A Methodology for Enhancing Programming Competence of Students Using ParikshakA Methodology for Enhancing Programming Competence of Students Using Parikshak
A Methodology for Enhancing Programming Competence of Students Using ParikshakArchana Rane-Sharma
 
Collaborative assignment
Collaborative assignmentCollaborative assignment
Collaborative assignmentpengliu24
 
Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)
Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)
Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)Tyler Anton
 
Online session 1 ACFE Faciliate eLearning
Online session 1 ACFE Faciliate eLearning Online session 1 ACFE Faciliate eLearning
Online session 1 ACFE Faciliate eLearning Yum Studio
 
(4b) Tsl641 Principles For Call Evaluation (2)
(4b) Tsl641   Principles For Call Evaluation (2)(4b) Tsl641   Principles For Call Evaluation (2)
(4b) Tsl641 Principles For Call Evaluation (2)Izaham
 
Sue Lewis presenting on raising student aspirations
Sue Lewis presenting on raising student aspirationsSue Lewis presenting on raising student aspirations
Sue Lewis presenting on raising student aspirationsLTDUMcNab
 
Adolescent3
Adolescent3Adolescent3
Adolescent3schma3
 
583 proj learning phases
583 proj   learning phases583 proj   learning phases
583 proj learning phases1970kh7584
 
Training and development
Training and developmentTraining and development
Training and developmentSnehali Bagchi
 
Designing with content
Designing with contentDesigning with content
Designing with contentmpfazioli
 
Sem 2 lesson plan
Sem 2 lesson planSem 2 lesson plan
Sem 2 lesson planAndy Cruz
 
Fsoss 2010
Fsoss 2010Fsoss 2010
Fsoss 2010Dru Lavigne
 

What's hot (16)

Task 4.2 tr
Task 4.2 trTask 4.2 tr
Task 4.2 tr
 
Analysis of feedback webinar
Analysis of feedback webinarAnalysis of feedback webinar
Analysis of feedback webinar
 
A Methodology for Enhancing Programming Competence of Students Using Parikshak
A Methodology for Enhancing Programming Competence of Students Using ParikshakA Methodology for Enhancing Programming Competence of Students Using Parikshak
A Methodology for Enhancing Programming Competence of Students Using Parikshak
 
Mentors workshop 2019 final
Mentors workshop 2019 finalMentors workshop 2019 final
Mentors workshop 2019 final
 
Collaborative assignment
Collaborative assignmentCollaborative assignment
Collaborative assignment
 
Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)
Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)
Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)
 
Online session 1 ACFE Faciliate eLearning
Online session 1 ACFE Faciliate eLearning Online session 1 ACFE Faciliate eLearning
Online session 1 ACFE Faciliate eLearning
 
(4b) Tsl641 Principles For Call Evaluation (2)
(4b) Tsl641   Principles For Call Evaluation (2)(4b) Tsl641   Principles For Call Evaluation (2)
(4b) Tsl641 Principles For Call Evaluation (2)
 
Sue Lewis presenting on raising student aspirations
Sue Lewis presenting on raising student aspirationsSue Lewis presenting on raising student aspirations
Sue Lewis presenting on raising student aspirations
 
Adolescent3
Adolescent3Adolescent3
Adolescent3
 
583 proj learning phases
583 proj   learning phases583 proj   learning phases
583 proj learning phases
 
Training and development
Training and developmentTraining and development
Training and development
 
14514
1451414514
14514
 
Designing with content
Designing with contentDesigning with content
Designing with content
 
Sem 2 lesson plan
Sem 2 lesson planSem 2 lesson plan
Sem 2 lesson plan
 
Fsoss 2010
Fsoss 2010Fsoss 2010
Fsoss 2010
 

Similar to Speaking Interview Performance

Task 2 important events
Task 2   important eventsTask 2   important events
Task 2 important eventsLorzCatalina
 
6062 comp cwk2 17 18 new template
6062 comp cwk2 17 18 new template6062 comp cwk2 17 18 new template
6062 comp cwk2 17 18 new templateElliot Byrne
 
Assignment 2 1 MITS5501 Software Quality, Chan.docx
Assignment 2  1      MITS5501 Software Quality, Chan.docxAssignment 2  1      MITS5501 Software Quality, Chan.docx
Assignment 2 1 MITS5501 Software Quality, Chan.docxbraycarissa250
 
Online session 2
Online session 2Online session 2
Online session 2Yum Studio
 
BA 606 Team ManagementHybrid CourseInstructor InformationN.docx
BA 606 Team ManagementHybrid CourseInstructor InformationN.docxBA 606 Team ManagementHybrid CourseInstructor InformationN.docx
BA 606 Team ManagementHybrid CourseInstructor InformationN.docxwilcockiris
 
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)
Edu 702   group presentation (questionnaire)Edu 702   group presentation (questionnaire)
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)Azura Zaki
 
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)
Edu 702   group presentation (questionnaire)Edu 702   group presentation (questionnaire)
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)Adibah H. Mutalib
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
EvaluationNelly Kamel
 
Syllabus Course # Page 1 of 15 BA 602 Management Info.docx
Syllabus Course #  Page 1 of 15 BA 602 Management Info.docxSyllabus Course #  Page 1 of 15 BA 602 Management Info.docx
Syllabus Course # Page 1 of 15 BA 602 Management Info.docxmabelf3
 
To help you explore ways of developing more powerful learnin.docx
To help you explore ways of developing more powerful learnin.docxTo help you explore ways of developing more powerful learnin.docx
To help you explore ways of developing more powerful learnin.docxjuliennehar
 
Busent24002syllabus fall 2011
Busent24002syllabus fall 2011Busent24002syllabus fall 2011
Busent24002syllabus fall 2011cdjames2
 
collette-chambers-8984366-a3c2171ba1884011897983f39ffa5c56
collette-chambers-8984366-a3c2171ba1884011897983f39ffa5c56collette-chambers-8984366-a3c2171ba1884011897983f39ffa5c56
collette-chambers-8984366-a3c2171ba1884011897983f39ffa5c56Pastor Collette Chambers
 
Assessment & feedback for learning module induction
Assessment & feedback for learning module inductionAssessment & feedback for learning module induction
Assessment & feedback for learning module inductionNeil Currant
 
Activities guide and evaluation rubric task 3 - writing task forum
Activities guide and evaluation rubric   task 3 - writing task forumActivities guide and evaluation rubric   task 3 - writing task forum
Activities guide and evaluation rubric task 3 - writing task forumJOHNYRIVERA1
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationRickey Warner
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationRickey Warner
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationRickey Warner
 
Communication Practical Assessment
Communication Practical Assessment  Communication Practical Assessment
Communication Practical Assessment hortykim
 

Similar to Speaking Interview Performance (20)

Task 2 important events
Task 2   important eventsTask 2   important events
Task 2 important events
 
6062 comp cwk2 17 18 new template
6062 comp cwk2 17 18 new template6062 comp cwk2 17 18 new template
6062 comp cwk2 17 18 new template
 
Assignment 2 1 MITS5501 Software Quality, Chan.docx
Assignment 2  1      MITS5501 Software Quality, Chan.docxAssignment 2  1      MITS5501 Software Quality, Chan.docx
Assignment 2 1 MITS5501 Software Quality, Chan.docx
 
Online session 2
Online session 2Online session 2
Online session 2
 
BA 606 Team ManagementHybrid CourseInstructor InformationN.docx
BA 606 Team ManagementHybrid CourseInstructor InformationN.docxBA 606 Team ManagementHybrid CourseInstructor InformationN.docx
BA 606 Team ManagementHybrid CourseInstructor InformationN.docx
 
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)
Edu 702   group presentation (questionnaire)Edu 702   group presentation (questionnaire)
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)
 
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)
Edu 702   group presentation (questionnaire)Edu 702   group presentation (questionnaire)
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Syllabus Course # Page 1 of 15 BA 602 Management Info.docx
Syllabus Course #  Page 1 of 15 BA 602 Management Info.docxSyllabus Course #  Page 1 of 15 BA 602 Management Info.docx
Syllabus Course # Page 1 of 15 BA 602 Management Info.docx
 
Assessment (11)
Assessment (11)Assessment (11)
Assessment (11)
 
To help you explore ways of developing more powerful learnin.docx
To help you explore ways of developing more powerful learnin.docxTo help you explore ways of developing more powerful learnin.docx
To help you explore ways of developing more powerful learnin.docx
 
Busent24002syllabus fall 2011
Busent24002syllabus fall 2011Busent24002syllabus fall 2011
Busent24002syllabus fall 2011
 
collette-chambers-8984366-a3c2171ba1884011897983f39ffa5c56
collette-chambers-8984366-a3c2171ba1884011897983f39ffa5c56collette-chambers-8984366-a3c2171ba1884011897983f39ffa5c56
collette-chambers-8984366-a3c2171ba1884011897983f39ffa5c56
 
PGPTP Orientation Session Notes
PGPTP Orientation Session NotesPGPTP Orientation Session Notes
PGPTP Orientation Session Notes
 
Assessment & feedback for learning module induction
Assessment & feedback for learning module inductionAssessment & feedback for learning module induction
Assessment & feedback for learning module induction
 
Activities guide and evaluation rubric task 3 - writing task forum
Activities guide and evaluation rubric   task 3 - writing task forumActivities guide and evaluation rubric   task 3 - writing task forum
Activities guide and evaluation rubric task 3 - writing task forum
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendation
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendation
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendation
 
Communication Practical Assessment
Communication Practical Assessment  Communication Practical Assessment
Communication Practical Assessment
 

Recently uploaded

Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024Neo4j
 
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptxMaking_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptxnull - The Open Security Community
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...Alan Dix
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
costume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentationcostume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentationphoebematthew05
 
Understanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC ArchitectureUnderstanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC ArchitecturePixlogix Infotech
 
Bluetooth Controlled Car with Arduino.pdf
Bluetooth Controlled Car with Arduino.pdfBluetooth Controlled Car with Arduino.pdf
Bluetooth Controlled Car with Arduino.pdfngoud9212
 
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsAI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsMemoori
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationSafe Software
 
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning eraArtificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning eraDeakin University
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsRizwan Syed
 
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power SystemsUnlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power SystemsPrecisely
 
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks..."LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...Fwdays
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticscarlostorres15106
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
 
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptxMaking_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
costume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentationcostume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentation
 
Understanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC ArchitectureUnderstanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
 
Hot Sexy call girls in Panjabi Bagh 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
Hot Sexy call girls in Panjabi Bagh 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort ServiceHot Sexy call girls in Panjabi Bagh 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
Hot Sexy call girls in Panjabi Bagh 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
 
Bluetooth Controlled Car with Arduino.pdf
Bluetooth Controlled Car with Arduino.pdfBluetooth Controlled Car with Arduino.pdf
Bluetooth Controlled Car with Arduino.pdf
 
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsAI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
 
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning eraArtificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
 
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power SystemsUnlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
 
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks..."LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
 

Speaking Interview Performance

  • 1. 1 Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia VicerrectorĂ­a AcadĂ©mica y de InvestigaciĂłn Course: English Conversation Code: 551015 Activity guide and evaluation rubric - Task 4 - Speaking Part of Cambridge C1 Advanced 1. Activity Description Type of activity: In Collaborative Group Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3 Highest score of the activity: 80 points The activity starts on: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 The activity ends on: Sunday, November 28, 2021 With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning outcome(s): Learning Outcome 3: interpret extended speech even when it is not clearly structured and when relationships are only implied and not signaled explicitly. Learning Outcome 4: describe complex subjects with clear and detailed information developing particular points and rounding off with an appropriate conclusion. The activity consists of: Step 1 – Getting information in the course internal mail and the student’s institutional email about schedules to participate in the mock of a Cambridge C1 Advanced interview Task 4 consists of your participation in a synchronic interview in couples via Teams or Skype to demonstrate your ability to provide descriptions and discuss about diverse topics. The interview is similar to the speaking paper of the standardized test Cambridge C1 Advanced. Go over the following reference in Unit 3 in the contents section in the Learning Environment for you to understand the nature and dynamics of Cambridge C1 Advanced test: Cambridge Assessment English (2021). Get ready to have a high performance in each one of the four parts of the interview.
  • 2. 2 In the course internal mail and your institutional email, you will get from the course director the guidelines and information to register in one of the available interview sessions for a couple of students. The interview will be conducted by a tutor. Step 2 – Being interviewed in the mock of speaking part of Cambridge C1 Advanced According to your subscription in Step 1, be ready the set day and time to participate in the interview, which will last about 15 minutes for each couple of students. You need to be ready to interact in real-time with a peer regarding the examiner’s assigned tasks through Teams or Skype. The interview will have four parts: 1) Answer some personal questions; 2) Compare and answer questions about some pictures; 3) Discuss viewpoints based on a piece of visual input; and 4) Answer questions based on the topic of Part 3. At the beginning of the interview take a screenshot and save it as part of the evidence of Task 4 that you will deliver to the Evaluation environment. Avoid getting the evidence of the activity in the middle of the interview; otherwise, your concentration and performance might be affected. NOTE: The use of microphone and camera is mandatory. Step 3 – Submitting a reflection about your performance in the interview Right after your participation in the interview, write a reflection in at least one paragraph about the perception of your performance in the interview. Remember that there are not correct or incorrect reflections. Just express freely how you felt during the activity and what you would do differently if you had the chance to apply for a real standardized test. You can include an opinion of your peer’s performance too. Do not forget to include at least a screenshot as evidence of your participation in this task. For the development of the activity consider that: In the Initial Information Environment, you must: - Check the course agenda to be aware of the synchronic activities this course implies. - Go over the course rules and conditions to double check your commitment to subscribe and participate in the synchronic activities of the course accordingly. - Be attentive to the informative web conferences schedule to assure your attendance.
  • 3. 3 In the Learning Environment, you must: - Read thoroughly the course syllabus to understand the dynamics and nature of English Conversation course, which is atypical from other courses due to real-time interaction and overlapping of several activities. - Be aware of the guidelines and evaluation rubrics of each one of the tasks to assure an excellent performance in the course. In the Evaluation Environment, you must: - Submit your individual outcome consisting of a PDF file with the screenshot of the interview and the personal reflection (at least one paragraph long) about your performance in the activity. Evidence of independent work: The independent evidence to be submitted is: A PDF document with the reflection of the interview session and at least a screenshot of the activity as evidence. Evidence of group work: No collaborative evidence is required in this activity. No group submission is required apart from the performance and real-time interaction of every couple of students in the interview. 2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit For Independent evidence, consider the following: The PDF file to be submitted to the Evaluation environment must include a cover page, the reflection about the activity, and the screenshot that shows your participation in the synchronic interview through Skype or Teams. Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide. Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must comply with APA style. In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism. You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual campus.
  • 4. 4 Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order, among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13 de diciembre de 2013, artĂ­culo 99) The academic penalties students will face are: a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived. b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived. 3. Evaluation Rubric Template Type of activity: In Collaborative Group Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3 The highest score in this activity is 80 points First evaluation criterion: Perform the four parts of the interview accurately This criterion represents 36 points of the total of 80 points of the activity. High level: Participation in the interview by couples evidences the strengthening of sociolinguistic skills as student shows a high quality performance in the four parts of the speaking paper of Cambridge C1 Advanced through clear explanations, descriptions, and discussion of the addressed topics and visuals used during the activity. The student can handle time management for each task in the interview as well. If your work is at this level, you can get between 25 points and 36 points Average level: Sociolinguistic skills seem to be partially affected when some shortcomings are present during one or some of the four parts of the interview. Performance might be affected by lack of understanding of the assigned tasks or failure in time management in one or more tasks during the interview.
  • 5. 5 If your work is at this level, you can get between 13 points and 24 points Low level: Participation in the interview does not show a good performance due to a total lack of understanding of the assigned tasks or a deficient management of time when performing them. No accurate interaction with the other person might be present as well. If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point and 12 points Second evaluation criterion: Produce speech with appropriate pronunciation and intonation This criterion represents 12 points of the total of 80 points of the activity. High level: Phonological features are used effectively to convey and enhance meaning, and intonation patterns and stress are appropriate or show minor difficulties. If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points and 12 points Average level: It is unclear with pronunciation at times, and intonation patterns and stress show some difficulties. If your work is at this level, you can get between 5 points and 8 points Low level: Listener requires a high effort due to unclear articulation and awkward intonation. If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point and 4 points Third evaluation criterion: Demonstrate effortless fluency and delivery This criterion represents 12 points of the total High level: Speech is effortless and smooth to express ideas in a clear and concise manner. If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points and 12 points Average level: Response level can sometimes cause slow, stumbling, nervous, or uncertain speech and delivery.
  • 6. 6 of 80 points of the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 5 points and 8 points Low level: Delivery shows choppy rhythm and pace, and frequent pauses and hesitation are evident. If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point and 4 points Fourth evaluation criterion: Convey ideas with effective use of grammar and vocabulary This criterion represents 12 points of the total of 80 points of the activity. High level: Ideas are expressed with effective use of grammar and vocabulary including control of a wide range of structures and appropriate vocabulary to exchange views on familiar and unfamiliar topics. If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points and 12 points Average level: Expression of ideas may exhibit some imprecise or inaccurate use of grammar and vocabulary, with control of a limited range of structures and vocabulary to exchange views only about familiar topics. If your work is at this level, you can get between 5 points and 8 points Low level: Range and control of grammar and vocabulary severely limit expression of ideas and connections among them, with control of only very basic vocabulary and expressions. If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point and 4 points Fifth evaluation criterion: Reflect about performance in the oral test This criterion represents 8 points of the total High level: The reflection fulfills the requirements of the guidelines regarding length (one paragraph) and contents, and the text has no or almost no vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or grammar issues. The screenshot evidence is attached as well. If your work is at this level, you can get between 6 points and 8 points Average level: The reflection is just from two to five sentences long or might not include all the required aspects in the
  • 7. 7 of 80 points of the activity. guidelines. Some issues related to vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or grammar might affect the quality of the text. The screenshot of evidence is not included. If your work is at this level, you can get between 3 points and 5 points Low level: The reflection about the performance in the interview is not submitted to the Evaluation Environment or its contents does not meet the requirements of the guidelines, or there are plenty of writing issues in it. If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points and 2 points