SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
A “Set-Up” is an individual event that has historically been seen as a
necessary evil in order to produce parts.
Traditional Thought Process of the “Set-Up”
Modern Thought Process of the “Set-Up”
A “Set-Up” is a team event that has allows a business to
be more competitive by using the manufacturing team to
reducing costs, inventory levels and scrap.
SMED Exercise for 45 Ton Presses
Manufacturing is a team effort
Being organized and prepared wins the race
Using the example of NASCAR we reasoned that preparation and teamwork
are essential to the success of the team
With this in mind the following recommendations are made
By using averages we were able to
determine the larger segments that
were common and needed to be
addressed, in order to develop a
standard to work to most times
The goal being to move as much time
from the internal time to the external
time, taking advantage of completing
set-up tasks while production is being
ran
Task 1 2 3 Average
QC 25.4 14.09 22.3 20.60
Remove material 11 0 5.5 8.25
Bolt die down 9.1 9.1 6.5 8.23
Hunt chute 1.4 5.17 10.2 5.59
Lace up 6.9 2.15 0 4.53
Load new material 5.3 2.41 4.3 4.00
Unbolt and remove die 5.7 1.2 4.07 3.66
Transport die to press 2.9 2.48 4.3 3.23
Set feed hgt 1.4 2.3 1 1.57
Press Problem 1.5 0 0 1.50
Move air line 1.1 0 0 1.10
Place die on Bolster 1.2 1 1 1.07
Get tools 1 0 0 1.00
Get Paperwork 0.2 1.55 0 0.88
74.1 41.45 59.17 58.24
37.64
Average time (all internal Time) 37.64
Estimated time to tranfer to external 17.77
Time internal 19.87
Internal Time 37.64
External Time 0
Time internal 19.87
Estimated time to tranfer to external 17.77
Base line Internal 37.64
Potential Internal 19.87
Baseline External 0
Potential Internal 17.77
Net Adjusted time (no QC)
Set-Up
time too long
Potential Root Causes for Long Set-Up Times
MANMACHINE
METHOD MATERIAL
No slots have
to use bolts
Tools not ready
Die not staged
Paper work not
at press
Material not
stagedSet feed with
calipers
Payoff not easy to
remove material
No standardization
QC delays
One man show
Not available
Lift not available
Hit Changes
No organization
No. Internal External
1 Inspection time x
2 Bolt Die down x Die not standard Standardize / slot dies and bolster
3 Hunt/Install chute x Chutes not organized Store with die or in die location
4 Lace Up / Set feed x Method of calipers Use progression bar
5 Load New Material x Wait for press to stop Stage ready to go
6 Unbolt and remove die x NA
7 Transport die to press x Die not available Stage ready to go
8 Set Feed Hgt x Die not standard Standize heights
9 Press Problem x Repaired Repaired
10 Move air line x Part specific
11 Place die on bolster x NA
12 Get Tools x NA
13 Get Paperwork x Location of paper work Paperwork staged at press or w material
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 Denotes recommended changes to reduce time
Task Type
Constraint Potential Correction
Set-Up Reduction Review : Time and Task Anaylsis , Constraint Identification, Constraint ResolutionPress Number 45 Ton
Part Number Average of 3 set-ups
Define individual task
Time for task completion
Total
20.6
8.25
5.59
4.53
4
3.66
3.23
1.57
1.5
1.1
1.07
1
1
Preparation Makes a Difference
Traditional – wait until production
stops, gather and go
Proposed – stage , team effort
Current Method Proposed Changes
Locate and install shank
adaptor
Each die should be standard
and have in place
Payoff difficult to band and
remove material
Add ½ round stock (minimum
height) to permit passing of
band stock
Bolt die in as best as possible
Hunt and find parallels
Mount parallels to each die
and have slots in each, slot
bolster never hunt clamps
again, 2 bolts vs. 4 bolts
Set feed with calipers Avoid variation-make
individual progression bars
Traditional Methods Proposed Methods
Band material end of run
Remove material from payoff
Retrieve next material
Unload on payoff
Cut bands
Stock Material
Stage next run material on
payoff, bands cut and
exchange payoffs while die
being set. Material is secured
afterwards and restocked
Remove die and restock on
shelve
Retrieve die and place on
bolster
Stage die on rolling table so
that when die is removed,
next die is on same table and
stored after setup is complete
Hunt and/or modify chutes
that are laying around
Identify chutes and store with
die or in die location as
needed
Summary of Team
Efforts and Recommendations
The original goal of a 25% reduction with little to no cost was not only
achieved but surpassed – by moving tasks to external (staging) we were
able to move at least 38% of the efforts which will directly reduce cost
We feel that by following the recommendations that the set – up of 45 ton
presses can be further reduced to bring the total under 50% and that the
potential to be under 10 minutes does exist
Summary of Team
Efforts and Recommendations
The original goal of a 25% reduction with little to no cost was not only
achieved but surpassed – by moving tasks to external (staging) we were
able to move at least 38% of the efforts which will directly reduce cost
We feel that by following the recommendations that the set – up of 45 ton
presses can be further reduced to bring the total under 50% and that the
potential to be under 10 minutes does exist

More Related Content

Similar to Reduce Press Set-Up Times 38

5 s and lean manufacturing
5 s and lean manufacturing5 s and lean manufacturing
5 s and lean manufacturingNouman Ali
 
Implémentation Méthode Single Minute Exchange of Dies(SMED)
Implémentation Méthode Single Minute Exchange of Dies(SMED)Implémentation Méthode Single Minute Exchange of Dies(SMED)
Implémentation Méthode Single Minute Exchange of Dies(SMED)MohammedLahssaini1
 
Kaizen Blitz multicoat loading area April 2005
Kaizen Blitz multicoat loading area April 2005Kaizen Blitz multicoat loading area April 2005
Kaizen Blitz multicoat loading area April 2005D9 Process Improvement
 
05. Process Mapping tools for 6 sigma.ppt
05. Process Mapping tools for 6 sigma.ppt05. Process Mapping tools for 6 sigma.ppt
05. Process Mapping tools for 6 sigma.ppthari534691
 
Optimizing Sterile Processing Workflow
Optimizing Sterile Processing WorkflowOptimizing Sterile Processing Workflow
Optimizing Sterile Processing Workflowdpjphx
 
SMED - 6.pptx.pptx
SMED - 6.pptx.pptxSMED - 6.pptx.pptx
SMED - 6.pptx.pptxssuser820b7a
 
Joe Weiss 2008 Presentation
Joe Weiss 2008 PresentationJoe Weiss 2008 Presentation
Joe Weiss 2008 PresentationSeadweller23
 
Lean Smpl 1
Lean Smpl 1Lean Smpl 1
Lean Smpl 1jsgerges
 
Lean Bski Essentials
Lean Bski EssentialsLean Bski Essentials
Lean Bski Essentialsbstawski
 
Aminullah Assagaf_P5-Ch.7_Capacity and Facility_32.pptx
Aminullah Assagaf_P5-Ch.7_Capacity and Facility_32.pptxAminullah Assagaf_P5-Ch.7_Capacity and Facility_32.pptx
Aminullah Assagaf_P5-Ch.7_Capacity and Facility_32.pptxAminullah Assagaf
 
project-presentation
project-presentationproject-presentation
project-presentationronybste
 

Similar to Reduce Press Set-Up Times 38 (20)

5 s and lean manufacturing
5 s and lean manufacturing5 s and lean manufacturing
5 s and lean manufacturing
 
Smed simulation game_intro
Smed simulation game_introSmed simulation game_intro
Smed simulation game_intro
 
Implémentation Méthode Single Minute Exchange of Dies(SMED)
Implémentation Méthode Single Minute Exchange of Dies(SMED)Implémentation Méthode Single Minute Exchange of Dies(SMED)
Implémentation Méthode Single Minute Exchange of Dies(SMED)
 
Kaizen Blitz multicoat loading area April 2005
Kaizen Blitz multicoat loading area April 2005Kaizen Blitz multicoat loading area April 2005
Kaizen Blitz multicoat loading area April 2005
 
05. Process Mapping tools for 6 sigma.ppt
05. Process Mapping tools for 6 sigma.ppt05. Process Mapping tools for 6 sigma.ppt
05. Process Mapping tools for 6 sigma.ppt
 
Optimizing Sterile Processing Workflow
Optimizing Sterile Processing WorkflowOptimizing Sterile Processing Workflow
Optimizing Sterile Processing Workflow
 
SMED - 6.pptx.pptx
SMED - 6.pptx.pptxSMED - 6.pptx.pptx
SMED - 6.pptx.pptx
 
Joe Weiss 2008 Presentation
Joe Weiss 2008 PresentationJoe Weiss 2008 Presentation
Joe Weiss 2008 Presentation
 
Benchmarking.ppt
Benchmarking.pptBenchmarking.ppt
Benchmarking.ppt
 
Benchmarking.ppt
Benchmarking.pptBenchmarking.ppt
Benchmarking.ppt
 
Benchmarking.ppt
Benchmarking.pptBenchmarking.ppt
Benchmarking.ppt
 
OMTEC-2015_Mazzeo_BIQ.pdf
OMTEC-2015_Mazzeo_BIQ.pdfOMTEC-2015_Mazzeo_BIQ.pdf
OMTEC-2015_Mazzeo_BIQ.pdf
 
Basics Of Lean
Basics Of LeanBasics Of Lean
Basics Of Lean
 
JUST IN TIME PRODUCTION SYSTEM
JUST IN TIME PRODUCTION SYSTEMJUST IN TIME PRODUCTION SYSTEM
JUST IN TIME PRODUCTION SYSTEM
 
Lean Smpl 1
Lean Smpl 1Lean Smpl 1
Lean Smpl 1
 
Lean Bski Essentials
Lean Bski EssentialsLean Bski Essentials
Lean Bski Essentials
 
Aminullah Assagaf_P5-Ch.7_Capacity and Facility_32.pptx
Aminullah Assagaf_P5-Ch.7_Capacity and Facility_32.pptxAminullah Assagaf_P5-Ch.7_Capacity and Facility_32.pptx
Aminullah Assagaf_P5-Ch.7_Capacity and Facility_32.pptx
 
7. cqia (kaizen, 5 s, tpm)
7. cqia (kaizen, 5 s, tpm)7. cqia (kaizen, 5 s, tpm)
7. cqia (kaizen, 5 s, tpm)
 
project-presentation
project-presentationproject-presentation
project-presentation
 
Jit And Lean
Jit And LeanJit And Lean
Jit And Lean
 

Reduce Press Set-Up Times 38

  • 1. A “Set-Up” is an individual event that has historically been seen as a necessary evil in order to produce parts. Traditional Thought Process of the “Set-Up” Modern Thought Process of the “Set-Up” A “Set-Up” is a team event that has allows a business to be more competitive by using the manufacturing team to reducing costs, inventory levels and scrap. SMED Exercise for 45 Ton Presses
  • 2. Manufacturing is a team effort Being organized and prepared wins the race Using the example of NASCAR we reasoned that preparation and teamwork are essential to the success of the team With this in mind the following recommendations are made
  • 3. By using averages we were able to determine the larger segments that were common and needed to be addressed, in order to develop a standard to work to most times The goal being to move as much time from the internal time to the external time, taking advantage of completing set-up tasks while production is being ran Task 1 2 3 Average QC 25.4 14.09 22.3 20.60 Remove material 11 0 5.5 8.25 Bolt die down 9.1 9.1 6.5 8.23 Hunt chute 1.4 5.17 10.2 5.59 Lace up 6.9 2.15 0 4.53 Load new material 5.3 2.41 4.3 4.00 Unbolt and remove die 5.7 1.2 4.07 3.66 Transport die to press 2.9 2.48 4.3 3.23 Set feed hgt 1.4 2.3 1 1.57 Press Problem 1.5 0 0 1.50 Move air line 1.1 0 0 1.10 Place die on Bolster 1.2 1 1 1.07 Get tools 1 0 0 1.00 Get Paperwork 0.2 1.55 0 0.88 74.1 41.45 59.17 58.24 37.64 Average time (all internal Time) 37.64 Estimated time to tranfer to external 17.77 Time internal 19.87 Internal Time 37.64 External Time 0 Time internal 19.87 Estimated time to tranfer to external 17.77 Base line Internal 37.64 Potential Internal 19.87 Baseline External 0 Potential Internal 17.77 Net Adjusted time (no QC)
  • 4. Set-Up time too long Potential Root Causes for Long Set-Up Times MANMACHINE METHOD MATERIAL No slots have to use bolts Tools not ready Die not staged Paper work not at press Material not stagedSet feed with calipers Payoff not easy to remove material No standardization QC delays One man show Not available Lift not available Hit Changes No organization
  • 5. No. Internal External 1 Inspection time x 2 Bolt Die down x Die not standard Standardize / slot dies and bolster 3 Hunt/Install chute x Chutes not organized Store with die or in die location 4 Lace Up / Set feed x Method of calipers Use progression bar 5 Load New Material x Wait for press to stop Stage ready to go 6 Unbolt and remove die x NA 7 Transport die to press x Die not available Stage ready to go 8 Set Feed Hgt x Die not standard Standize heights 9 Press Problem x Repaired Repaired 10 Move air line x Part specific 11 Place die on bolster x NA 12 Get Tools x NA 13 Get Paperwork x Location of paper work Paperwork staged at press or w material 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Denotes recommended changes to reduce time Task Type Constraint Potential Correction Set-Up Reduction Review : Time and Task Anaylsis , Constraint Identification, Constraint ResolutionPress Number 45 Ton Part Number Average of 3 set-ups Define individual task Time for task completion Total 20.6 8.25 5.59 4.53 4 3.66 3.23 1.57 1.5 1.1 1.07 1 1
  • 6. Preparation Makes a Difference Traditional – wait until production stops, gather and go Proposed – stage , team effort
  • 7. Current Method Proposed Changes Locate and install shank adaptor Each die should be standard and have in place Payoff difficult to band and remove material Add ½ round stock (minimum height) to permit passing of band stock Bolt die in as best as possible Hunt and find parallels Mount parallels to each die and have slots in each, slot bolster never hunt clamps again, 2 bolts vs. 4 bolts Set feed with calipers Avoid variation-make individual progression bars
  • 8. Traditional Methods Proposed Methods Band material end of run Remove material from payoff Retrieve next material Unload on payoff Cut bands Stock Material Stage next run material on payoff, bands cut and exchange payoffs while die being set. Material is secured afterwards and restocked Remove die and restock on shelve Retrieve die and place on bolster Stage die on rolling table so that when die is removed, next die is on same table and stored after setup is complete Hunt and/or modify chutes that are laying around Identify chutes and store with die or in die location as needed
  • 9. Summary of Team Efforts and Recommendations The original goal of a 25% reduction with little to no cost was not only achieved but surpassed – by moving tasks to external (staging) we were able to move at least 38% of the efforts which will directly reduce cost We feel that by following the recommendations that the set – up of 45 ton presses can be further reduced to bring the total under 50% and that the potential to be under 10 minutes does exist
  • 10. Summary of Team Efforts and Recommendations The original goal of a 25% reduction with little to no cost was not only achieved but surpassed – by moving tasks to external (staging) we were able to move at least 38% of the efforts which will directly reduce cost We feel that by following the recommendations that the set – up of 45 ton presses can be further reduced to bring the total under 50% and that the potential to be under 10 minutes does exist