Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Deskmag's 2018 Global Coworking Survey, Coworking in Europe -- Carsten Foertsch

909 views

Published on

Coworking Europe Conference 2018, Amsterdam, Day 1
#CoworkingEU

Published in: Real Estate
  • I made $2,600 with this. I already have 7 days with this... ◆◆◆ https://tinyurl.com/realmoneystreams2019
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Just got my check for $500, Sometimes people don't believe me when I tell them about how much you can make taking paid surveys online... So I took a video of myself actually getting paid $500 for paid surveys to finally set the record straight. I'm not going to leave this video up for long, so check it out now before I take it down! ■■■ https://tinyurl.com/make2793amonth
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

Deskmag's 2018 Global Coworking Survey, Coworking in Europe -- Carsten Foertsch

  1. 1. 2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY COWORKING IN EUROPE COWORKING EUROPE, AMSTERDAM, NOVEMBER 14, 2018
  2. 2. LOCATION, AVERAGE MEMBER NUMBERS & SIZE OF COWORKING SPACES ≥ 1M INHABITANTS < 1M - 500K INHABITANTS < 100K INHABITANTS < 500 - 100K INHABITANTS 25% 33% 27% 15% -1 PP -3 PP +5 PP DISTRIBUTION OF COWORKING SPACES IN EUROPE THE SHARE OF COWORKING SPACES IN MID-SIZED CITIES HAS RISEN.
  3. 3. LOCATION, AVERAGE MEMBER NUMBERS & SIZE OF COWORKING SPACES ≥ 1M INHABITANTS < 1M - 500K INHABITANTS < 100K INHABITANTS < 500 - 100K INHABITANTS 91 133 195 100 MEAN MEDIAN 83 109 60 5% TRIMMED MEAN 62 74 40 26 15 40 MEMBERS SQUARE METERS 168 42 25% 33% 27% 15% +34 -1 PP -3 PP +23 +6 (65 +7) 1630 907 525 293 2950 1000 600 1700 360 890 230 390 +713 -25 (650 -30) 881 +212 THE CATEGORY < 1M - 100K INHABITANTS WAS SPLIT INTO TWO GROUPS IN 2018 FOR THE FIRST TIME. FOR THIS REASON, THOSE RESULTS CAN'T BE COMPARED WITH THE PREVIOUS YEAR. THE SHARE OF COWORKING SPACES IN MID-SIZED CITIES HAS RISEN. AVERAGE MEMBER NUMBERS ARE UP BY A THIRD. +5 PP DISTRIBUTION OF COWORKING SPACES IN EUROPE
  4. 4. LOCATION, AVERAGE MEMBER NUMBERS & SIZE OF COWORKING SPACES ≥ 1M INHABITANTS < 1M - 500K INHABITANTS < 100K INHABITANTS < 500 - 100K INHABITANTS 91 133 195 100 MEAN MEDIAN 83 109 60 5% TRIMMED MEAN 62 74 40 26 15 40 MEMBERS SQUARE METERS 168 42 25% 33% 27% 15% +34 -1 PP -3 PP +23 +6 (65 +7) 1630 907 525 293 2950 1000 600 1700 360 890 230 390 +713 -25 (650 -30) 881 +212 THE CATEGORY < 1M - 100K INHABITANTS WAS SPLIT INTO TWO GROUPS IN 2018 FOR THE FIRST TIME. FOR THIS REASON, THOSE RESULTS CAN'T BE COMPARED WITH THE PREVIOUS YEAR. 1 IS KING IN TERMS OF AVERAGE MEMBER NUMBERS (121) & THE AVERAGE SIZE OF SPACES (1400 SQM). THE SHARE OF COWORKING SPACES IN MID-SIZED CITIES HAS RISEN. AVERAGE MEMBER NUMBERS ARE UP BY A THIRD. +5 PP DISTRIBUTION OF COWORKING SPACES IN EUROPE
  5. 5. EUROPE 21% 25%GLOBAL SHARE OF PRIVATE OFFICES* +7 PP +6 PP REVENUE SHARE UP TO 22% REVENUE SHARE UP TO 27%*ARITHMETIC MEAN BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF COWORKING SPACES
  6. 6. EUROPE 21% 25%GLOBAL SHARE OF PRIVATE OFFICES* +7 PP +6 PP REVENUE SHARE UP TO 22% REVENUE SHARE UP TO 27%*ARITHMETIC MEAN SHARE OF ENTITIES WITH ONLY ONE COWORKING SPACE 68% AVERAGES OF NUMBER OF SPACES IN OPERATION: 5% TRIMMED: MEAN 1,8 -MEAN 3,3 CHAIN AVERAGES: 5% TRIMMED: MEAN 5,7 -MEAN 8,3 AVERAGES OF NUMBER OF SPACES IN OPERATION: 5% TRIMMED: MEAN 1,6 -MEAN 3,7 71% -3 PP 0 BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF COWORKING SPACES
  7. 7. BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF COWORKING SPACES EUROPE 21% 25% 84% GLOBAL SHARE OF PRIVATE OFFICES* +7 PP +6 PP REVENUE SHARE UP TO 22% REVENUE SHARE UP TO 27%*ARITHMETIC MEAN SHARE OF ENTITIES WITH ONLY ONE COWORKING SPACE 68% AVERAGES OF NUMBER OF SPACES IN OPERATION: 5% TRIMMED: MEAN 1,8 -MEAN 3,3 CHAIN AVERAGES: 5% TRIMMED: MEAN 5,7 -MEAN 8,3 AVERAGES OF NUMBER OF SPACES IN OPERATION: 5% TRIMMED: MEAN 1,6 -MEAN 3,7 71% -3 PP 0 81% 52% 6% 4% 58% 9% 4% FOCUS STRONGLY ON COMPANIES WITH < 10 10 - 100 > 100 EMPLOYEES FOCUS STRONGLY ON COMPANIES WITH < 10 10 - 100 > 100 EMPLOYEES FOCUS STRONGLY ON INDIVIDUAL CUSTOMERS
  8. 8. LOCAL PARTNERS OF COWORKING SPACES QUESTION: WHICH POTENTIAL PARTNER DO YOU WORK ON A LOCAL BASIS? WITHOUT N.A. IF ALL RESPONSE OPTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN CHOSEN: 17,5 35 52,5 70 PURPOSE LOCAL EDUCATIONAL LOCAL OTHER REAL NO PARTNERS 14% 23% 36%35% 41%45% 66% 13%15% 35%38% 45%48% 65% EUROPE GLOBAL DRIVEN ORGANIZATIONS SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS COWORKING SPACES GOVERN- MENT ESTATE FIRMS PURPOSE-DRIVEN
 ORGANIZATION ARE THE MOST POPULAR LOCAL PARTNER OF COWORKING SPACES.
  9. 9. LOCAL PARTNERS OF COWORKING SPACES QUESTION: WHICH POTENTIAL PARTNER DO YOU WORK ON A LOCAL BASIS? WITHOUT N.A. IF ALL RESPONSE OPTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN CHOSEN: 17,5 35 52,5 70 PURPOSE LOCAL EDUCATIONAL LOCAL OTHER REAL NO PARTNERS 14% 23% 36%35% 41%45% 66% 13%15% 35%38% 45%48% 65% EUROPE GLOBAL DRIVEN ORGANIZATIONS LOCAL GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE FIRMS LOCAL GOVERNMENT OTHER COWORKING SPACES NO PARTNERS PURPOSE DRIVEN ORGANIZATIONS LOCAL SERVICES LOCAL SERVICES REAL ESTATE FIRMS ≥ 1M INHABITANTS < 1M - 100 K INHABITANTS > 100K INHABITANTS EUROPE ESTATE FIRMS = SHARE IS ABOVE AVERAGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES EDUCATIONAL SERVICES OTHER COWORKING SPACES PURPOSE-DRIVEN
 ORGANIZATION ARE THE MOST POPULAR LOCAL PARTNER OF COWORKING SPACES. SHARE OF LOCAL PARTNERS THAT ARE ABOVE-AVERAGE - BY NUMBER OF INHABITANTS IN EUROPE: SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS COWORKING SPACES GOVERN- MENT
  10. 10. AVERAGE DAILY EXPENDITURE OF MEMBERS NEARBY A COWORKING SPACE € 10
  11. 11. AVERAGE DAILY EXPENDITURE OF MEMBERS NEARBY A COWORKING SPACE € 10 PER MEMBER & WORKING DAY
  12. 12. AVERAGE DAILY EXPENDITURE OF MEMBERS NEARBY A COWORKING SPACE € 10 ... IF 100 MEMBERS WORK 5 TIMES A WEEK, LOCAL SERVICES NEARBY RECEIVE... PER MEMBER & WORKING DAY
  13. 13. AVERAGE DAILY EXPENDITURE OF MEMBERS NEARBY A COWORKING SPACE € 10 € 5 000 ... IF 100 MEMBERS WORK 5 TIMES A WEEK, LOCAL SERVICES NEARBY RECEIVE... PER WEEK PER MEMBER & WORKING DAY
  14. 14. AVERAGE DAILY EXPENDITURE OF MEMBERS NEARBY A COWORKING SPACE € 10 € 20 000 ... IF 100 MEMBERS WORK 5 TIMES A WEEK, LOCAL SERVICES NEARBY RECEIVE... PER MONTH PER MEMBER & WORKING DAY (BASED ON 20 WORKING DAYS PER MONTH)
  15. 15. AVERAGE DAILY EXPENDITURE OF MEMBERS NEARBY A COWORKING SPACE € 10 € 240 000 ... IF 100 MEMBERS WORK 5 TIMES A WEEK, LOCAL SERVICES NEARBY RECEIVE... PER MEMBER & WORKING DAY (BASED ON 240 WORKING DAYS PER YEAR)PER YEAR
  16. 16. € AVERAGE DAILY EXPENDITURE OF MEMBERS NEARBY A COWORKING SPACE EURO-ZONE ! " # 9 € GERMANY FRANCE 10 € ITALY 12 € $ 5 % TRIMMED MEAN - RESULTS ROUNDED. DAILY EXPENSES OF > € 100 OR EQUIVALENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED. BASED ON AN EXCHANGE RATE OF €1 = *CHF 1.142 **GBP 0.872 ***HUF 321.4 - °WITHOUT FREQUENT NON-RESPONSES %THE UK &SWITZERLAND 16 €** €* **CHF 17,9 *GBP 10,5 'HUNGARY 6 €*** ***HUF 1833 12 10 € MEMBERS IN EUROPE SPEND 10 EURO PER DAY NEARBY THEIR SPACES WHEN PRESENT - WITH
 SOME EXCEPTIONS.
  17. 17. € AVERAGE DAILY EXPENDITURE OF MEMBERS NEARBY A COWORKING SPACE ≥ 1M < 1M - 500K < 500K - 100K > 100K 2,75 5,5 8,25 11 7 € 11 € 10 € EURO-ZONE ! EURO-ZONE - BY NUMBER OF INHABITANTS ! " # 9 € GERMANY FRANCE 10 € ITALY 12 € $ 5 % TRIMMED MEAN - RESULTS ROUNDED. DAILY EXPENSES OF > € 100 OR EQUIVALENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED. BASED ON AN EXCHANGE RATE OF €1 = *CHF 1.142 **GBP 0.872 ***HUF 321.4 - °WITHOUT FREQUENT NON-RESPONSES %THE UK &SWITZERLAND 16 €** €* **CHF 17,9 *GBP 10,5 'HUNGARY 6 €*** ***HUF 1833 12 10 € NOT ENOUGH DATA AVAILABLE € MEMBERS IN EUROPE SPEND 10 EURO PER DAY NEARBY THEIR SPACES WHEN PRESENT - WITH
 SOME EXCEPTIONS. THE SMALLER THE CITY, THE LESS OFTEN MEMBERS USE OR PAY FOR LOCAL SERVICES.
  18. 18. € AVERAGE DAILY EXPENDITURE OF MEMBERS NEARBY A COWORKING SPACE ≥ 1M < 1M - 500K < 500K - 100K > 100K 2,75 5,5 8,25 11 7 € 11 € 10 € EURO-ZONE ! EURO-ZONE - BY NUMBER OF INHABITANTS ! " # 9 € GERMANY FRANCE 10 € ITALY 12 € $ 5 % TRIMMED MEAN - RESULTS ROUNDED. DAILY EXPENSES OF > € 100 OR EQUIVALENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED. BASED ON AN EXCHANGE RATE OF €1 = *CHF 1.142 **GBP 0.872 ***HUF 321.4 - °WITHOUT FREQUENT NON-RESPONSES %THE UK &SWITZERLAND 16 €** €* **CHF 17,9 *GBP 10,5 'HUNGARY 6 €*** ***HUF 1833 12 10 € NOT ENOUGH DATA AVAILABLE 9% 7% 84% WITH DAILY EXPENSES NO DAILY EXPENSES NO RESPONSE SHARE OF MEMBERS WITH DAILY EXPENDITURES NEARBY° 85% 85% 75% € MEMBERS IN EUROPE SPEND 10 EURO PER DAY NEARBY THEIR SPACES WHEN PRESENT - WITH
 SOME EXCEPTIONS. THE SMALLER THE CITY, THE LESS OFTEN MEMBERS USE OR PAY FOR LOCAL SERVICES.
  19. 19. MOST FREQUENT ACTIVITIES DONE AT COWORKING SPACES MOST FREQUENT ACTIVITIES ONLY (“ALWAYS” OR “OFTEN”) , WITHOUT N.A. FOR ALL FIVE ACTIVITIES. QUESTION: WHAT DO YOU USE YOUR COWORKING SPACE FOR? PLEASE RATE THE FREQUENCY OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES. 22,5 45 67,5 90 REGULAR MEETINGS NETWORKING EVENTS BASE FOR 25%25% 32% 47% 84% 19%16% 28% 39% 80% EUROPE GLOBAL WORK LOCAL ERRANDS & ACTIVITIES EVERY FIFTH MEMBER USES A COWORKING SPACE NOT FOR REGULAR WORK -
  20. 20. MOST FREQUENT ACTIVITIES DONE AT COWORKING SPACES MOST FREQUENT ACTIVITIES ONLY (“ALWAYS” OR “OFTEN”) , WITHOUT N.A. FOR ALL FIVE ACTIVITIES. QUESTION: WHAT DO YOU USE YOUR COWORKING SPACE FOR? PLEASE RATE THE FREQUENCY OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES. = SHARE IS ABOVE AVERAGE 22,5 45 67,5 90 REGULAR MEETINGS NETWORKING EVENTS BASE FOR 25%25% 32% 47% 84% 19%16% 28% 39% 80% EUROPE GLOBAL WORK LOCAL ERRANDS & ACTIVITIES EVENTS NETWORKINGREGULAR WORK ≥ 1M INHABITANTS < 1M - 100 K INHABITANTS > 100K INHABITANTS EUROPE MEETINGS BASE FOR LOCAL
 ERRANDS & ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES THAT ARE ABOVE-AVERAGE - BY NUMBER OF INHABITANTS IN EUROPE: FREQUENCY OF ACTIVITIES ARE IN BETWEEN EVERY FIFTH MEMBER USES A COWORKING SPACE NOT FOR REGULAR WORK - ESPECIALLY IN SMALLER CITIES.
  21. 21. MEMBERSHIP DECISION MAKERS & PAYERS RESULTS ARE ROUNDED THE VAST MAJORITY CHOSE TO WORK AT A
 COWORKING SPACE ON THEIR OWN. 0 25 50 75 100 79% DECIDED BY MEMBERS 18% BY EMPLOYERS OR CLIENTS WHO DECIDED TO WORK AT A COWORKING SPACE? EUROPE
  22. 22. MEMBERSHIP DECISION MAKERS & PAYERS RESULTS ARE ROUNDED 0 25 50 75 100 79% DECIDED BY MEMBERS 18% BY EMPLOYERS OR CLIENTS 0 25 50 75 100 61% PAID BY MEMBERS 28% PAID BY EMPLOYERS OR CLIENTS OTHER: FREE MEMBERSHIPS (4%), PAID BY OTHER CAPITAL TYPES (2%) & OTHER WHO DECIDED TO WORK AT A COWORKING SPACE? WHO PAYS FOR A MEMBERSHIP? EUROPE -3 PP +2 PP THE VAST MAJORITY CHOSE TO WORK AT A
 COWORKING SPACE ON THEIR OWN - EVEN IF EMPLOYERS PAY FOR IT.
  23. 23. REASONS FOR CHOOSING THE CURRENT COWORKING SPACE A SOCIAL & ENJOYABLE ATMOSPHERE: 65% INTERACTION WITH OTHERS: 60% COMMUNITY: 60% LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE: 55% A CLOSE DISTANCE TO MY HOME: 58% GOOD TRANSPORT CONNECTIONS NEARBY: 44% OFFICE INFRASTRUCTURE 2 BASIC OFFICE INFRASTRUCTURE: 57% A BIG OPEN WORKSPACE: 54% A CLEAN WORKSPACE: 50% GOOD INTERNET CONNECTIONS: 46% TREND REPORTED BY MEMBERS WHO DECIDED THEMSELVES TO WORK AT THEIR CURRENT COWORKING SPACES(AS WELL) GLOBAL RESULTS - RESULTS ARE ROUNDED PROXIMITY 2 TREND SOCIAL INTERACTIONS 1 TRENDSOCIAL CRITERIA REMAIN THE MOST POPULAR FACTORS WHEN CHOOSING A COWORKING SPACE.
  24. 24. 98%63% REASONS FOR CHOOSING THE CURRENT COWORKING SPACE REPORTED BY MEMBERS WHO DECIDED THEMSELVES TO WORK AT THEIR CURRENT COWORKING SPACES - GLOBAL RESULTS - RESULTS ARE ROUNDED FREELANCERS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYERS A COMMUNITY CLOSE TO HOME INTERACTIONS WITH OTHERS & A SOCIAL ATMOSPHERE BASIC OFFICE INFRASTRUCTURE 71% 68% 54% LIKE MINDED PEOPLE SPECIAL MINOR REASONS: FRIENDS WHO WORK THERE 87% DECIDED THEMSELVES TO WORK AT THEIR CURRENT COWORKING SPACES FREELANCERS LOOK FOR COMMUNITY.
  25. 25. 98%63% REASONS FOR CHOOSING THE CURRENT COWORKING SPACE REPORTED BY MEMBERS WHO DECIDED THEMSELVES TO WORK AT THEIR CURRENT COWORKING SPACES - GLOBAL RESULTS - RESULTS ARE ROUNDED FREELANCERS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYERS A COMMUNITY CLOSE TO HOME A SOCIAL ATMOSPHERE INTERACTIONS WITH OTHERS & A SOCIAL ATMOSPHERE BASIC OFFICE INFRASTRUCTURE 71% 68% 54% 79% CLOSE TO HOME 65% GOOD TRANSPORT CONNECTIONS 61% 68% OFFICE INFRASTRUCTURES60-65% GOOD VALUE
 FOR MONEY 64% COMPANY PAYS FOR ITLIKE MINDED PEOPLE SPECIAL MINOR REASONS: LIKE MINDED PEOPLE FRIENDS WHO WORK THERE FLEXIBLE WORK TIMES A SOCIAL ATMOSPHERE COMMUNITY: 55% COMMUNITY: 59% 87% DECIDED THEMSELVES TO WORK AT THEIR CURRENT COWORKING SPACES FREELANCERS LOOK FOR COMMUNITY. EMPLOYERS & EMPLOYEES VALUE THE SOCIAL ATMOSPHERE RATHER THAN BECOMING PART OF A COMMUNITY.
  26. 26. 39%62% 55% COMMUNITY & COWORKING SPACE RATING FREELANCERS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYERS FEEL STRONGLY THAT THEY ARE PART OF THE COMMUNITY AT THEIR COWORKING SPACE EUROPE EMPLOYEES FEEL LESS STRONGLY CONNECTED TO A COWORKING COMMUNITY.
  27. 27. 55% EMPLOYERS 62% 39% COMMUNITY & COWORKING SPACE RATING FREELANCERS EMPLOYEES FEEL STRONGLY THAT THEY ARE PART OF THE COMMUNITY AT THEIR COWORKING SPACE EUROPE EMPLOYEES FEEL LESS STRONGLY CONNECTED TO A COWORKING COMMUNITY.
  28. 28. 55% EMPLOYERS 39%62% COMMUNITY & COWORKING SPACE RATING FREELANCERS EMPLOYEES FEEL STRONGLY THAT THEY ARE PART OF THE COMMUNITY AT THEIR COWORKING SPACE 8,1 7,8 7,6 IS THE RATING OF THEIR CURRENT COWORKING SPACE EUROPE 2017: 8,0 - 2016: 8,7 2017: 7,8 - 2016: 7,9 2017: 7,2 - 2016: 8,6 EMPLOYEES FEEL LESS STRONGLY CONNECTED TO A COWORKING COMMUNITY. BUT GIVE THEIR A
 COWORKING SPACE A SURPRISINGLY HIGH RATING.
  29. 29. COWORKING SPACE RATINGS IN EUROPE TAKE THE NEW SURVEY: COWORKINGSURVEY.COM OCEANIA GLOBAL ASIA EUROPE 2,5 5 7,5 10 7,8 7,9 8,1 8,2 8,3 8,3 AVERAGE RATING PER CONTINENT IN 2018* NORTH AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA *MEAN OUT OF 10 EUROPE'S COWORKING SPACES HAVE RECEIVED A LOWER RATING FROM MEMBERS...
  30. 30. COWORKING SPACE RATINGS IN EUROPE TAKE THE NEW SURVEY: COWORKINGSURVEY.COM OCEANIA GLOBAL ASIA EUROPE 2,5 5 7,5 10 7,8 7,9 8,1 8,2 8,3 8,3 AVERAGE RATING PER CONTINENT IN 2018* NORTH AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA *MEAN EUROPE GLOBAL 5 5,9 6,8 7,7 8,6 8,3 8,3 8,3 8,4 8,1 7,9 8,3 8,1 7,8 2018 2017 2016 & OVER THE PAST THREE YEARS OUT OF 10 OUT OF 10 NORTH AMERICA EUROPE'S COWORKING SPACES HAVE RECEIVED A LOWER RATING FROM MEMBERS... FOR THE PAST TWO YEARS.
  31. 31. 8,7 ≥ 1M INHABITANTS < 1M - 100K INHABITANTS < 100K INHABITANTS 7,5 7,8 2017: 7,5 - 2016: 8,3 2017: 8,1 - 2016: 8,1 2017: 8,2 - 2016: 8,8 7,9 ≥ 500K < 500K 8,3 PLEASE NOTE: THE MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF PEOPLE WHO CAN WORK FROM A COWORKING SPACE IS REPORTED BY MEMBERS! THEY ONLY CAN REPORT WHAT THEY SEE, AND THAT'S LIKELY RESTRICTED TO AREAS WITH OPEN ACCESS. BY NO. OF INHABITANTS COWORKING SPACE RATINGS IN EUROPE WITHIN THE PAST THREE YEARS MEAN BETWEEN 1 AND 10 STARS EUROPE RATINGS SIGNIFICANTLY 
 DROPPED IN SMALLER SPACES AND SMALLER CITIES, BUT VERY BIG SPACES ARE ALSO AFFECTED BY LOWER RATINGS.
  32. 32. 8,7 ≥ 1M INHABITANTS < 1M - 100K INHABITANTS < 100K INHABITANTS 7,5 7,8 2017: 7,5 - 2016: 8,3 2017: 8,1 - 2016: 8,1 2017: 8,2 - 2016: 8,8 7,9 ≥ 500K < 500K 8,3 < 25 MEMBERS 25 - 49 MEMBERS ≥ 50 MEMBERS PLEASE NOTE: THE MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF PEOPLE WHO CAN WORK FROM A COWORKING SPACE IS REPORTED BY MEMBERS! THEY ONLY CAN REPORT WHAT THEY SEE, AND THAT'S LIKELY RESTRICTED TO AREAS WITH OPEN ACCESS. 8,0 8,3 7,2 2017: 7,8 - 2016: 8,4 2017: 8,2 - 2016: 8,6 2017: 7,5 - 2016: 8,1 BY NO. OF INHABITANTS BY MAXIMUM CAPACITY COWORKING SPACE RATINGS IN EUROPE WITHIN THE PAST THREE YEARS MEAN BETWEEN 1 AND 10 STARS EUROPE RATINGS SIGNIFICANTLY 
 DROPPED IN SMALLER SPACES AND SMALLER CITIES, BUT VERY BIG SPACES ARE ALSO AFFECTED BY LOWER RATINGS.
  33. 33. MAIN REASONS FOR CONSIDERING TO LEAVE A COWORKING SPACE GLOBAL RESULTS - REPORTED BY MEMBERS THAT CONSIDER TO LEAVE A COWORKING SPACE IN LESS THAN THREE MONTHS LACK OF INTERACTION WITH OTHER MEMBERS INTERESTED IN WORKING AT ANOTHER SPACE LIVE IN THIS AREA JUST FOR A SHORT WHILE NOT ABLE TO FOCUS ON WORK IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE JUST WANNA CHANGE MY WORKING ENVIRONMENT COMMUTING TIME IS TOO LONG 0 4,5 9 13,5 18 9% 10% 10% 10% 12% 14% 18%LACK OF INTERACTION IS THE #1 REASON FOR LEAVING A COWORKING SPACE FOLLOWED BY INTEREST IN OTHER COWORKING SPACES AND JOB NOMADS. SELECTION OF OTHER REASONS: JOB PROJECT AT A COWORKING SPACE ENDED, PREGNANCY
  34. 34. MAIN TAKE AWAYS 1 2 3 MEMBER NUMBERS & SIZE OF COWORKING SPACES ARE STILL ON THE RISE - ESPECIALLY IN BIG CITIES COWORKING SPACES SUPPORT THE LOCAL ECONOMY ABOUT 10 EURO PER MEMBER PER WORKING DAY COMMUNITY IS NOT EVERYTHING - BUT A SOCIAL ATMOSPHERE AND INTERACTION IS!
  35. 35. THANKS FOR LISTENING. CARSTEN@DESKMAG.COM
  36. 36. C O W O R K I N G RENTAL STATUS & AVERAGE LEASE TERMS FULL 0% 2 125% 4 250% 6 375% 5% TRIMMED MEAN MEAN: 64 MONTHS MEDIAN:60 MONTHS 78% OF US COWORKING SPACES
 LEASE OR RENT THEIR LOCATION 61 MONTHS EUROPE GLOBALLY: 70% LEASE TERM EUROPEAN SPACES PREFER TO RENT A LOCATION.
  37. 37. C O W O R K I N G RENTAL STATUS & AVERAGE LEASE TERMS *5% TRIMMED MEAN I SIGN EVERYTHING FULL 0% 2 125% 4 250% 6 375% 5% TRIMMED MEAN MEAN: 64 MONTHS MEDIAN:60 MONTHS ≥ 1M INHABITANTS < 1M - 500K INHABITANTS < 500K - 100K INHABITANTS < 100K INHABITANTS 0% 2 000% 4 000% 6 000% 8 000% BY NO. OF INHABITANTS LOCAL TO A COWORKING SPACE* 78% OF US COWORKING SPACES
 LEASE OR RENT THEIR LOCATION 61 MONTHS 74 MONTHS 73 MONTHS 60 MONTHS 41 MONTHSEUROPE GLOBALLY: 70% LEASE TERM EUROPEAN SPACES PREFER TO RENT A LOCATION.
  38. 38. C O W O R K I N G RENTAL STATUS & AVERAGE LEASE TERMS *5% TRIMMED MEAN I SIGN EVERYTHING FULL 0% 2 125% 4 250% 6 375% 5% TRIMMED MEAN MEAN: 64 MONTHS MEDIAN:60 MONTHS ≥ 1M INHABITANTS < 1M - 500K INHABITANTS < 500K - 100K INHABITANTS < 100K INHABITANTS 0% 2 000% 4 000% 6 000% 8 000% BY NO. OF INHABITANTS LOCAL TO A COWORKING SPACE* 78% OF US COWORKING SPACES
 LEASE OR RENT THEIR LOCATION 61 MONTHS 74 MONTHS 73 MONTHS 60 MONTHS 41 MONTHSEUROPE 6% ARE PART OF A MANAGEMENT CONTRACT OR JOINT-VENTURE WITH THE LOCATION OWNER 12% OWN THEIR LOCATION GLOBALLY: 70% GLOBALLY: 11% GLOBALLY: 16% LEASE TERM REMAINING PERCENTAGES: OTHER & N.A. EUROPEAN SPACES PREFER TO RENT A LOCATION. MANAGING CONTRACTS & JOINT-VENTURES WITH LOCATION OWNERS HAVE BECOME MORE POPULAR - JUST NOT IN EUROPE YET.
  39. 39. 98%63% REASONS FOR CHOOSING THE CURRENT COWORKING SPACE REPORTED BY MEMBERS WHO DECIDED THEMSELVES TO WORK AT THEIR CURRENT COWORKING SPACES - GLOBAL RESULTS - RESULTS ARE ROUNDED FREELANCERS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYERS 87% DECIDED THEMSELVES TO WORK AT THEIR CURRENT COWORKING SPACES
  40. 40. BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF COWORKING SPACES EUROPE 21% 25% 6% GLOBAL SHARE OF PRIVATE OFFICES* HAVE A MANAGEMENT CONTRACT OR JOINT-VENTURE WITH THEIR LANDLORD +7 PP +6 PP REVENUE SHARE UP TO 22% REVENUE SHARE UP TO 27%*ARITHMETIC MEAN SHARE OF ENTITIES WITH ONLY ONE COWORKING SPACE 68% AVERAGES OF NUMBER OF SPACES IN OPERATION: 5% TRIMMED: MEAN 1,8 -MEAN 3,3 CHAIN AVERAGES: 5% TRIMMED: MEAN 5,7 -MEAN 8,3 AVERAGES OF NUMBER OF SPACES IN OPERATION: 5% TRIMMED: MEAN 1,6 -MEAN 3,7 71% -3 PP 0 11% 70% 16% 78% 12% RENT A LOCATION OWN A LOCATION RENT A LOCATION OWN A LOCATION
  41. 41. BUDAPEST EDINBURGH COWORKING SPACE RATINGS EUROPEAN
 COUNTRIES WITH ABOVE- AVERAGE RATINGS: EUROPEAN CITIES WITH BEST-RATED COWORKING SPACES *MEAN LISBON PLEASE NOTE: THE NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PER CITY IS STILL TOO LOW TO TAKE THIS RESULT TOO SERIOUSLY. FRANCE HUNGARY PORTUGAL SWITZERLAND ' & " ( IN ALPHABETIC ORDER IN ALPHABETIC ORDER ZURICH
  42. 42. MEMBER PLANS TO REMAIN AT THEIR CURRENT COWORKING SPACES EUROPE GLOBAL 3%6% 14% 21% 55% NOT PLANNING TO LEAVE AT LEAST FOR ONE MORE YEAR AT LEAST FOR THREE MONTHS AT LEAST FOR ONE MONTH PLANNING TO LEAVE IN LESS THAN A MONTH N.A. 3%4% 15% 18% 60%

×