2. Problem
• Vital information must be gathered by medical staff
• Patients cannot recall their own medical information
• Communication processes are long and complex
• It is difficult to attain vital information needed to draw
conclusions
3. Symptoms of the Problem
• Long wait times in Emergency Departments. (MoH, 2013)
• Delay before informed decisions can be made by
healthcare provider (GPs and ED)
• Lack of efficiency in quality and speed of service in
Emergency Departments
• Patients end up guessing their medications or dosages,
which can result in harm to health (Howell, 2014)
4. Causes of the problem
• Patients lack health information
• Poor communication between hospital specialists and
GPs
• GPs are not available 24 hours
• Lack of universal standardised IT system that supports
and backs up patient data
5. SYMPTOMS
* Long wait times *Delay before informed decisions are made
*Lack of efficiency
*Slow communication process
*Patients make guesses about needs
PROBLEM!!!
CAUSES
*Patients lack health information
*Poor communication between hospital specialists and GPs
*GPs are not available 24 hours
*Lack of standardised IT data system
6. Width and depth of the problem
• General Practitioners need to be kept up-to-date on
patient admission into hospital, diagnoses, care and
discharge (North, 1999).
• General Practitioners may not be able to provide
continuity of care without implementation of an electronic
database (Scott. et. al., 1985)
• It is a national health target to reduce waiting times in
Emergency Departments. (MoH, 2013).
• On average, waiting times in Emergency Departments
nationwide currently exceed 6 hours. (MoH, 2013).
7. Solution
• Patient Database
• Will consist of information such as patient booking times,
scans, reports, blood tests and current morbidities
(healthAlliance, 2011).
• Easily Accessible for all sectors of the healthcare system- from
hospitals, community specialists and nurses through to GPs
• Improves quality of information transfer between GPs and
hospital specialists.
• Password Protection to maintain patient privacy
• Information is readily available
• Promotes efficiency
8. Addressing Underlying Causes
• Facilitating information transfer amongst different
providers
• Information is available at the point of care
• More quality care based on transparent info
• Being part of a patient database results in more equitable
healthcare for patients who are not well-educated on what
their needs are.
9. Innovation
• Greater usability
• Currently, hospital and ED staff have to access multiple
databases and avenues in order to collect the right information.
• Solution provides timely and up to date information
• Current systems are not compatible or standardised.
• Information available in Primary health care is not transferrable
or available to hospitals.
• Standardized national system that promotes high benefit from
use
• Limits access to records, and promotes patient privacy
10. Value
• The expected benefits of a standardized national system are:
• Makes healthcare more efficient and effective
• More effective health plans prepared with more transparent
information
• Saves provider time that they can use to tend to more patients
• Reduction in ED wait times
• GPs are better informed of their patients needs- therefore can
provide more appropriate care and prevent re-hospitalizations
(Scott et. al., 1985)
11. KPI’s
• In order to measure efficiency, throughput of patients/hour
from ED pre and post implementation can be used as a
measure.
• Clinician satisfaction can be used as a measure of
effectiveness of the innovation.
12. References
• References
• healthAlliance. (2011). Care Connect. Retrieved from http://www.testsafe.co.nz/
• Howell, D. (2014, May 6), Nurses: Leveraging Medication Reconciliation to Deliver Quality Care [blog post].
Retrieved from http://www.fdbhealth.com/blog/2014/may/nurses-leveraging-medication-reconciliation-to-
deliver-quality-care/
• Witting, B., Hayes, B., Schenkel, S., & Drucker, B. (2013). Emergency Department Medication History
Taking: Current Inefficiency and Potential for a Self-Administered Form. The Journal of Emergency
Medicine , 105-110.
• Kirk. S, (2011). System gives easy access to patients' files. Retrieved from
http://www.stuff.co.nz/manawatu-standard/news/5478903/System-gives-easy-access-to-patients-files
• Ministry of Health. 2013. Targeting Waiting Times. Wellington: Ministry of Health
• Orion Health. (2014). Electronic Health Records. Retrieved August 16, 2014, from Orion Health:
https://www.orionhealth.com/nz/electronic-health-record
• Scott, R., Brown, L., & Clifford, P. (1985). Use of Health Services by Diabetic Persons II. Hospital
Admissions. 43-47.
• North, N. (2007). reforming New Zealand's health care system. International Journal of Public
Administration , 525-558.
Editor's Notes
When a patient is admitted to an Emergency Department, medical staff must gather vital patient information. This prevents doctors and nurses from administering care that may harm patient health. Unfortunately, patients often have trouble recalling their medical history.Hospital staff also find it difficult communicating with GPs.Difficulty in communication between separate medical centres makes it difficult to attain information.
Symptoms of the problem include: long waiting times for patients, a delay before decisions can be made by healthcare providers, and a lack of efficiency in quality and speed of service.
Furthermore, patients end up guessing what types of medication to take, and guessing dosages before their healthcare provider has been able to make a well informed decision. This can result in harm to health.
Such delays and inefficiency in health services are caused by a number of factors such as that; patients lack health information and records, the quality of communication between medical centres is poor, which is not helped by the fact that GPs are not available 24 hours a day.
Although database systems do exist that record some medical history items, there is a lack of a universal standardised IT system that supports and backs up patient data.
The complicated communication process that takes place in order to get health records is a problem.
GPs need to be kept up-to-date. The best way to do this is via an electronic database that will give access to the latest developments in patient health statuses, thereby enabling continuity of care.