ISRS 4410 (revised) establishes a flexible standard for compilation engagements tailored to clients' accounting needs, effective from September 1, 2013. The standard emphasizes the importance of communication, management's responsibilities, and ethical considerations, allowing accountants to provide valuable services without requiring independence. The document outlines procedures for engagement acceptance and review processes, alongside an overview of ISRE 2400 as a limited assurance alternative.

1. ISRS 4410 (Revised) –
Compilation Engagements
A standard for today‟s financial reporting needs
Kuala Lumpur March 23, 2012
Page 1 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

2. ISRS 4410 (revised)
• A flexible standard for the professional accountant in
public practice
• Adaptable to a wide variety of non-assurance
engagements
• Effective for compilation reports issued on or after
September 1, 2013
• Early adoption permitted
Page 2 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

3. Benefits to the engagement
What your client gains-
• Your expertise in accounting and financial reporting
tailored to their specific needs
• An objective view from a professional accountant
• A clear report outlining the nature of the engagement
What you gain from the engagement-
• Clearly communicated terms of engagement
• Flexibility to deliver a meaningful service
• A happy client 
Page 3 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

4. Why and when to use 4410
• 4410 (Revised) can be tailored to your engagements
• The prescribed report clearly describes:
– Management responsibilities
– Your value added and your responsibilities
– That no assurance is being given by you
• If stating compliance with 4410, you must issue a report
prescribed by 4410
Page 4 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

5. Flexibility in financial reporting
• The basis of accounting can be complex or simple
• It must be appropriate to the engagement
• The basis is always disclosed as part of the compiled
financial information
Page 5 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

6. Understanding your client
• You need sufficient understanding of:
– The entity‟s business and operations and
– The financial reporting framework
To be able to perform the compilation.
This may require a lot or a little depending on the
engagement
Page 6 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

7. Communicating with clients
Communication is required throughout the standard.
Specifically:
– In the engagement acceptance phase
– All significant matters during the engagement
– A report accompanying the compiled information
Page 7 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

8. Significant judgments
Management is responsible for the reported information
• Not required to second guess management judgments
• You must discuss significant judgments with management
where you have provided assistance
• Discussion must be sufficient to allow management to take
responsibility for the compiled information
Page 8 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

9. Ethical responsibilities
• Must comply with the IESBA Code
• No requirement for independence
• If you know compiled information to be materially
misstated or misleading, you must resign. No middle
ground.
Page 9 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

10. Summing it up
ISRS 4410 (Revised)
 New opportunities for professional accountants
 Flexibility permits good client service
 A focus on communication throughout
 Promotes consistent high quality practice
 Clients and accountants will benefit
Page 10 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

11. ISRS 4410 (Revised)
Try it.
You and your clients will benefit.
Page 11 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

12. REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS
AN ASSURANCE ALTERNATIVE
ISRE 2400
• Under revision now
• Completes the suite of standards for professional
accountants and their clients
– Reasonable assurance - audits - the ISAs
– Limited assurance - reviews - ISRE 2400
– No assurance – compilations – ISRS 4410
Page 12 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

13. 2400 – Basic concepts
Limited assurance – what is it?
• Risk of undetected misstatement greater than in an audit
• Assurance must be meaningful to users of the information
Page 13 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

14. A limited assurance engagement
• The report conclusion is evidenced based
• Specified procedures are required
• Professional judgment required throughout
• Ethics based (independence/competence/due care)
• Firms must be in compliance with ISQC1
Page 14 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

15. Challenges in Defining a middle ground
• How much evidence is enough to support the conclusion
“nothing has come to my attention…”?
• Needs a practitioner with up-to-date assurance skills
• A review is not „audit-lite‟. If statements cannot be
audited, they likely cannot be reviewed either
Page 15 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

16. The review process #1
Engagement acceptance
• Confirm management‟s responsibility
• Review management‟s integrity – critical for inquiry
• Are systems likely sufficient to produce data adequate for
meaningful analytical review?
Page 16 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

17. The review process #2
Develop an understanding of what?
1) The entity and its environment and
2) The reporting framework
Sufficient to do what?
To identify areas where material misstatements are likely to
arise
Page 17 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

18. The review process #3
Perform primarily inquiry and analysis on:
1) All material items and
2) Focus on areas where material misstatements likely to
arise
Inquiry to include questions on fraud and going concern
No prohibition on performing other procedures.
Page 18 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

19. How much evidence is needed?
• Sufficient to be able to conclude that nothing has come
to your attention that the statements are materially
misstated.
• This is not a „did nothing, saw nothing‟ conclusion. It is a
conclusion based on a significant understanding of the
entity and evidence gathering procedures by a
professional accountant skilled in assurance techniques.
Page 19 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

20. The review process #4
If you have cause to believe the statements may be
materially misstated, you must perform additional procedures
to:
1) Conclude „nothing has come to your attention…‟ or
2) Determine the statements are misstated and modify the
conclusion accordingly.
Page 20 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

21. Communication critical
Communication is emphasized throughout 2400:
• At the engagement acceptance phase
• At the planning phase with the client and staff
• Inquiry of management and others at every stage
• All significant matters identified in the engagement
• In the review report itself
Page 21 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

22. Summing it all up
• 2400 is a nuanced standard
• Part of the suite of standards covering services offered by
professional accountants to their client
• Result in a meaningful level of assurance to users at an
appropriate price
Page 22 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

23. Reviews and compilations
Thank you for your attention.
Any questions?
Page 23 | Confidential and Proprietary Information

24. www.ifac.org