SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Hunter Rose
HIST 3331
1/31/16
Introductory Assignment
According to Weigley the “Indian wars” nurtured the American perception of war as that it is
always a contest for total victory. He also talks about how the American people could not coexist
as neighbors with the Indian society and personally I took that even farther then the Second
World War and saw some similarity of that mindset during the Cold War years. Weigley points
out the use of light, mobile troops during the “Indian wars” and draws similarities to the type of
warfare we wage today and also that of Washington during the Revolution. The strategy of total
annihilation of one’s enemy and his unconditional surrender was a factor in many of the major
U.S. wars up until the end of WWII. During the American Civil war the Union had a large
advantage in resources especially in the form of manpower and this skewed balance led to the
eventual Northern victory. It was during this war that two of the main Union generals, Grant and
Sherman, laid out the framework for many of the U.S strategies that would be utilized in WWII.
Grants strategy of the use of overwhelming force is seen at the invasion of Normandy and the
push through Europe as well as the destruction of the Japanese Navy, while Sherman’s strategy
of the total destruction of the enemy’s resources and will to fight are seen in the various bombing
campaigns carried out by the U.S. notably against Japan.
According to Kohn our soldiers are seen through certain “old stereotypes” and that these
ideas drastically influence how we see the American soldier. Kohn describes how throughout our
history our soldiers have been portrayed as the white male enlisting out of patriotism and a love
of liberty but then in turn due to his individualism the goals of a war would have to be explained
to him. Kohn shows how the men and women were seen as “happy-go-lucky” types but if led
correctly were great soldiers. He goes on to point out the ethnic statistics for our armies thus
disproving the “white male” notion while at the same time providing evidence against the other
past stereotypes ultimately putting forth the notion that the “American Soldier” never existed and
it is time to take a fresh look at it.

More Related Content

What's hot

The Lynching of Leo Frank by Jeff Smith
The Lynching of Leo Frank by Jeff SmithThe Lynching of Leo Frank by Jeff Smith
The Lynching of Leo Frank by Jeff SmithPeter Pappas
 
Cold War Proxy Wars !!
Cold War Proxy Wars !!Cold War Proxy Wars !!
Cold War Proxy Wars !!sarahehr
 
Korean War
Korean WarKorean War
Korean Warsnead22
 
Proxywar
ProxywarProxywar
ProxywarEmily
 
The civil war
The civil warThe civil war
The civil warrcrowford
 
reasons the usa lost the vietnam war us public opinion
reasons the usa lost the vietnam war   us public opinionreasons the usa lost the vietnam war   us public opinion
reasons the usa lost the vietnam war us public opinionmrmarr
 
First analysis
First analysisFirst analysis
First analysisj l
 
Korean war
Korean warKorean war
Korean waraward79
 
Political Assassinations
Political AssassinationsPolitical Assassinations
Political Assassinationsguest096bb49
 
The forgotten war
The forgotten warThe forgotten war
The forgotten warlemon-lime
 
Containment policy critique
Containment policy critiqueContainment policy critique
Containment policy critique2ub1
 
Unit plan presentation
Unit plan presentationUnit plan presentation
Unit plan presentationbrandwil1
 
A New Birth of Freedom
A New Birth of FreedomA New Birth of Freedom
A New Birth of FreedomBryan Toth
 
American revolution newspaper project
American revolution newspaper projectAmerican revolution newspaper project
American revolution newspaper projectDave Phillips
 

What's hot (20)

The Lynching of Leo Frank by Jeff Smith
The Lynching of Leo Frank by Jeff SmithThe Lynching of Leo Frank by Jeff Smith
The Lynching of Leo Frank by Jeff Smith
 
Cold War Proxy Wars !!
Cold War Proxy Wars !!Cold War Proxy Wars !!
Cold War Proxy Wars !!
 
Korean War
Korean WarKorean War
Korean War
 
Proxywar
ProxywarProxywar
Proxywar
 
Civil war
Civil warCivil war
Civil war
 
The civil war
The civil warThe civil war
The civil war
 
farley2srcefinal
farley2srcefinalfarley2srcefinal
farley2srcefinal
 
reasons the usa lost the vietnam war us public opinion
reasons the usa lost the vietnam war   us public opinionreasons the usa lost the vietnam war   us public opinion
reasons the usa lost the vietnam war us public opinion
 
The gettysburg address 2
The gettysburg address 2The gettysburg address 2
The gettysburg address 2
 
First analysis
First analysisFirst analysis
First analysis
 
Korean war
Korean warKorean war
Korean war
 
Korean War
Korean WarKorean War
Korean War
 
Political Assassinations
Political AssassinationsPolitical Assassinations
Political Assassinations
 
The forgotten war
The forgotten warThe forgotten war
The forgotten war
 
US Ronal Reagan
US Ronal ReaganUS Ronal Reagan
US Ronal Reagan
 
Containment policy critique
Containment policy critiqueContainment policy critique
Containment policy critique
 
Unit plan presentation
Unit plan presentationUnit plan presentation
Unit plan presentation
 
A New Birth of Freedom
A New Birth of FreedomA New Birth of Freedom
A New Birth of Freedom
 
Vietnam ends
Vietnam endsVietnam ends
Vietnam ends
 
American revolution newspaper project
American revolution newspaper projectAmerican revolution newspaper project
American revolution newspaper project
 

HIST 3331 Introductory Assignment

  • 1. Hunter Rose HIST 3331 1/31/16 Introductory Assignment According to Weigley the “Indian wars” nurtured the American perception of war as that it is always a contest for total victory. He also talks about how the American people could not coexist as neighbors with the Indian society and personally I took that even farther then the Second World War and saw some similarity of that mindset during the Cold War years. Weigley points out the use of light, mobile troops during the “Indian wars” and draws similarities to the type of warfare we wage today and also that of Washington during the Revolution. The strategy of total annihilation of one’s enemy and his unconditional surrender was a factor in many of the major U.S. wars up until the end of WWII. During the American Civil war the Union had a large advantage in resources especially in the form of manpower and this skewed balance led to the eventual Northern victory. It was during this war that two of the main Union generals, Grant and Sherman, laid out the framework for many of the U.S strategies that would be utilized in WWII. Grants strategy of the use of overwhelming force is seen at the invasion of Normandy and the push through Europe as well as the destruction of the Japanese Navy, while Sherman’s strategy of the total destruction of the enemy’s resources and will to fight are seen in the various bombing campaigns carried out by the U.S. notably against Japan. According to Kohn our soldiers are seen through certain “old stereotypes” and that these ideas drastically influence how we see the American soldier. Kohn describes how throughout our history our soldiers have been portrayed as the white male enlisting out of patriotism and a love
  • 2. of liberty but then in turn due to his individualism the goals of a war would have to be explained to him. Kohn shows how the men and women were seen as “happy-go-lucky” types but if led correctly were great soldiers. He goes on to point out the ethnic statistics for our armies thus disproving the “white male” notion while at the same time providing evidence against the other past stereotypes ultimately putting forth the notion that the “American Soldier” never existed and it is time to take a fresh look at it.