SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Intro and Purposes
Currently, the reference values of normal range of
motion of the wrist joint are for an open palm hand
position with fingers extended. However, the
functional range of motion when grasping or
pinching an object is likely to be significantly
different from traditional range of motion practiced
today, which may have a profound effect in
occupational therapy practice.
The purpose of this study is to examine the
functional range of motion of the wrist joint under
varied grasping tasks by position and applied
force. The study will provide preliminary data for
functional wrist range of motion with grasping
techniques commonly used in daily activities.
Methods
General demographic information was collected.
The maximum voluntary contraction force (MVC)
of each subject was obtained for each position (1)
neutral, (2) supination, and (3) pronation using a
Jamar Grip Dynamometer.
Maximum wrist flexion, extension, radial and ulnar
deviation joint range of motion (ROM) were
measured using a photo and digitalization method
under the following conditions:
• By position (1) neutral, (2) supination, and (3)
pronation, and;
• By applied grip force (1) none, fingers open, (2)
5% MVC, (3) 25% MVC, and (4) 50% MVC
Descriptive statistics and repeated two-way
ANOVAs for position, grip force, and interactions
between position and grip force in each joint ROM
were used.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this research study was supported
through grants awarded by the organization,
Support for Undergraduate Research Fellows
(SURF).
Results
For each joint ROM (1) wrist extension, (2) wrist
flexion, (3) radial deviation, and (4) ulnar
deviation:
• A position effect was found for all positions (1)
neutral, (2) supination, and (3) pronation
(p<0.001),
• A grip force effect was found for each grip force
(1) none, fingers are open, (2) 5% maximum
voluntary contraction (MVC), (3) 25% MVC, and
(4) 50% MVC (p<0.001), and
• No interaction effect was found between
position and grip force (p>0.05).
Participants
A convenience sample of 26 healthy participants
was attained:
• 18 to 36 years of age
• 12 male and 14 female
• 23 right-handed and 3 left-handed
• Mean height of 1.74 meters (SD=0.1)
• Mean weight of 74.48 kilograms
Conclusions
The results of this pilot study suggest that the
functional range of motion of the wrist is
influenced by the measurement position and
applied grip force.
Statistically significant effects were found for each
position and grip force applied (p<0.001).
However, no statistically significant interaction
effects were found between the position and grip
force factor (p>0.05).
Future studies should examine the functional
range of motion using a larger and more
representative sample.
Functional Range of Motion of the Wrist Joint Under
Varied Grasping Tasks
Jessica Marie DeGroot; Hanna Rae Paul; Ying-Chih Wang, OTR, PhD; Bhagwant Singh Sindhu, OTR, PhD; Arun Garg, PhD
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee – Department of Occupational Science & Technology
For further information
Jessica M. DeGroot
Department of Occupational Science and
Technology, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee
P.O. Box 413, 2200 E. Kenwood Blvd., Milwaukee,
WI 53201-0413
Tel: (920) 979-0194, Email: jmplasky@uwm.edu
Literature cited
Bostrom, C., Harms-Ringdahl, K. and Nordemar, R. (1997). Shoulder,
elbow and wrist movement impairment: Predictors of disability in
female patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rehabil Med
29(4): 223-232.
Byl, N. N., Kohlhase W. and Engel, G. (1999). Functional limitation
immediately after cast immobilization and closed reduction of distal
radius fractures: Preliminary report. J Hand Ther 12(3): 201-211.
Cerveri, P., Lopomo, N., Pedotti, A. and Ferrigno, G. (2005). Derivation of
centers and axes of rotation for wrist and fingers in a hand kinematic
model: Methods and reliability results. Ann Biomed Eng 33(3): 402-
412.
Gunal, I., Kose, N., Erdogan, O., Gokturk, E. and Seber, S. (1996).
Normal range of motion of the joints of the upper extremity in male
subjects with special reference to side. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(9):
1401-1404.
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Age 26 18 36 23.42 4.319
Height_Meter 26 1.57 1.93 1.7389 .10267
Weight_Kg 26 56.70 131.54 74.4763 18.34129
Valid N (listwise) 26
Estimates
Measure: MEASURE_1
Position Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 57.411 1.512 54.283 60.540
2 59.753 1.341 56.979 62.526
3 46.505 1.377 43.656 49.355
Fig. 3 Wrist Extension by Position
Fig. 4 Wrist Extension by Grip Force
Estimates
Measure: MEASURE_1
GripForce Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 55.187 .953 53.216 57.159
2 56.174 1.224 53.642 58.705
3 54.969 1.281 52.318 57.619
4 51.896 1.504 48.784 55.008
Fig. 5 Wrist Flexion by Position
Estimates
Measure: MEASURE_1
Position Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 26.310 1.087 24.055 28.565
2 20.484 1.206 17.983 22.985
3 24.492 1.940 20.468 28.516
Fig. 6 Wrist Flexion by Grip Force
Estimates
Measure: MEASURE_1
GripForce Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 22.134 .801 20.473 23.795
2 25.779 1.589 22.484 29.074
3 24.243 1.505 21.122 27.363
4 22.891 1.404 19.980 25.803
Fig. 9 Wrist Radial Deviation by Position
Estimates
Measure: MEASURE_1
Position Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 26.310 1.087 24.055 28.565
2 20.484 1.206 17.983 22.985
3 24.492 1.940 20.468 28.516
Fig. 10 Wrist Radial Deviation by Grip Force
Estimates
Measure: MEASURE_1
GripForce Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 22.134 .801 20.473 23.795
2 25.779 1.589 22.484 29.074
3 24.243 1.505 21.122 27.363
4 22.891 1.404 19.980 25.803
Fig. 11 Wrist Ulnar Deviation by Position
Estimates
Measure: MEASURE_1
Position Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 23.479 .838 21.732 25.227
2 23.185 1.138 20.810 25.559
3 15.875 1.369 13.020 18.730
Fig. 12 Wrist Ulnar Deviation by Grip Force
Estimates
Measure: MEASURE_1
GripForce Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 24.472 .846 22.707 26.238
2 20.976 .993 18.904 23.048
3 19.694 1.035 17.535 21.854
4 18.242 1.101 15.945 20.539
Fig. 1 Wrist Extension:
Position x Grip Force
Fig. 2 Wrist Flexion:
Position x Grip Force
Fig. 7 Wrist Radial Deviation:
Position x Grip Force
Fig. 8 Wrist Ulnar Deviation:
Position x Grip Force

More Related Content

What's hot

ACL Project
ACL ProjectACL Project
ACL Projectkush3187
 
Assessment Of Glenoid Bone Loss In Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation
Assessment Of Glenoid Bone LossIn Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation Assessment Of Glenoid Bone LossIn Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation
Assessment Of Glenoid Bone Loss In Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation Samir Dwidmuthe
 
A Study on 3D Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Behavior ...
A Study on 3D Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Behavior ...A Study on 3D Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Behavior ...
A Study on 3D Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Behavior ...ijsrd.com
 
Sma 2015 hamstring symposium
Sma 2015 hamstring symposiumSma 2015 hamstring symposium
Sma 2015 hamstring symposiumNicol van Dyk
 
LOWER LIMB ANGULAR KINEMATICS AND HOW IT EFFECTS GAIT SPEED
LOWER LIMB ANGULAR KINEMATICS AND HOW IT EFFECTS GAIT SPEEDLOWER LIMB ANGULAR KINEMATICS AND HOW IT EFFECTS GAIT SPEED
LOWER LIMB ANGULAR KINEMATICS AND HOW IT EFFECTS GAIT SPEEDJohn Joe Magee
 
Fabrizio Tencone - experiences in hamstrings
Fabrizio Tencone - experiences in hamstrings Fabrizio Tencone - experiences in hamstrings
Fabrizio Tencone - experiences in hamstrings MuscleTech Network
 
Choice Lab Presentation (final)
Choice Lab Presentation (final)Choice Lab Presentation (final)
Choice Lab Presentation (final)Thomas Cornette
 
Turf Cleats Poster Ver2[1]
Turf Cleats Poster Ver2[1]Turf Cleats Poster Ver2[1]
Turf Cleats Poster Ver2[1]Rafaelgarcilazo
 
Xavier Valle -Aspetar and FCB classification of muscle injuries
Xavier Valle -Aspetar and FCB classification of muscle injuries Xavier Valle -Aspetar and FCB classification of muscle injuries
Xavier Valle -Aspetar and FCB classification of muscle injuries MuscleTech Network
 
Laudner kajiyama the relationship between anterior gh laxity and propriocepti...
Laudner kajiyama the relationship between anterior gh laxity and propriocepti...Laudner kajiyama the relationship between anterior gh laxity and propriocepti...
Laudner kajiyama the relationship between anterior gh laxity and propriocepti...Satoshi Kajiyama
 
Crimson Publishers- The Effect of Medial Hamstring Weakness on Soft Tissue Lo...
Crimson Publishers- The Effect of Medial Hamstring Weakness on Soft Tissue Lo...Crimson Publishers- The Effect of Medial Hamstring Weakness on Soft Tissue Lo...
Crimson Publishers- The Effect of Medial Hamstring Weakness on Soft Tissue Lo...CrimsonPublishers-SBB
 
Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care
Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care
Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care Alexander Ohmes, PT, DPT
 
A study of selected biomechanical variables as a factor of hitting performanc...
A study of selected biomechanical variables as a factor of hitting performanc...A study of selected biomechanical variables as a factor of hitting performanc...
A study of selected biomechanical variables as a factor of hitting performanc...IOSR Journals
 
Non linear 3 d finite element analysis of the femur bone
Non linear 3 d finite element analysis of the femur boneNon linear 3 d finite element analysis of the femur bone
Non linear 3 d finite element analysis of the femur boneeSAT Publishing House
 

What's hot (18)

ISBS_2015_Gal-2
ISBS_2015_Gal-2ISBS_2015_Gal-2
ISBS_2015_Gal-2
 
ACL Project
ACL ProjectACL Project
ACL Project
 
Assessment Of Glenoid Bone Loss In Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation
Assessment Of Glenoid Bone LossIn Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation Assessment Of Glenoid Bone LossIn Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation
Assessment Of Glenoid Bone Loss In Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation
 
A Study on 3D Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Behavior ...
A Study on 3D Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Behavior ...A Study on 3D Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Behavior ...
A Study on 3D Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Behavior ...
 
Spring Final Report
Spring Final ReportSpring Final Report
Spring Final Report
 
Sma 2015 hamstring symposium
Sma 2015 hamstring symposiumSma 2015 hamstring symposium
Sma 2015 hamstring symposium
 
LOWER LIMB ANGULAR KINEMATICS AND HOW IT EFFECTS GAIT SPEED
LOWER LIMB ANGULAR KINEMATICS AND HOW IT EFFECTS GAIT SPEEDLOWER LIMB ANGULAR KINEMATICS AND HOW IT EFFECTS GAIT SPEED
LOWER LIMB ANGULAR KINEMATICS AND HOW IT EFFECTS GAIT SPEED
 
Fabrizio Tencone - experiences in hamstrings
Fabrizio Tencone - experiences in hamstrings Fabrizio Tencone - experiences in hamstrings
Fabrizio Tencone - experiences in hamstrings
 
Choice Lab Presentation (final)
Choice Lab Presentation (final)Choice Lab Presentation (final)
Choice Lab Presentation (final)
 
Project no 5
Project no 5Project no 5
Project no 5
 
Turf Cleats Poster Ver2[1]
Turf Cleats Poster Ver2[1]Turf Cleats Poster Ver2[1]
Turf Cleats Poster Ver2[1]
 
Xavier Valle -Aspetar and FCB classification of muscle injuries
Xavier Valle -Aspetar and FCB classification of muscle injuries Xavier Valle -Aspetar and FCB classification of muscle injuries
Xavier Valle -Aspetar and FCB classification of muscle injuries
 
Laudner kajiyama the relationship between anterior gh laxity and propriocepti...
Laudner kajiyama the relationship between anterior gh laxity and propriocepti...Laudner kajiyama the relationship between anterior gh laxity and propriocepti...
Laudner kajiyama the relationship between anterior gh laxity and propriocepti...
 
Crimson Publishers- The Effect of Medial Hamstring Weakness on Soft Tissue Lo...
Crimson Publishers- The Effect of Medial Hamstring Weakness on Soft Tissue Lo...Crimson Publishers- The Effect of Medial Hamstring Weakness on Soft Tissue Lo...
Crimson Publishers- The Effect of Medial Hamstring Weakness on Soft Tissue Lo...
 
Mechanics of Biomaterials
Mechanics of Biomaterials Mechanics of Biomaterials
Mechanics of Biomaterials
 
Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care
Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care
Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care
 
A study of selected biomechanical variables as a factor of hitting performanc...
A study of selected biomechanical variables as a factor of hitting performanc...A study of selected biomechanical variables as a factor of hitting performanc...
A study of selected biomechanical variables as a factor of hitting performanc...
 
Non linear 3 d finite element analysis of the femur bone
Non linear 3 d finite element analysis of the femur boneNon linear 3 d finite element analysis of the femur bone
Non linear 3 d finite element analysis of the femur bone
 

Similar to Wrist ROM Poster 1

Measuring inter-vertebral range of motion: how and why with clinical examples
Measuring inter-vertebral range of motion: how and why with clinical examplesMeasuring inter-vertebral range of motion: how and why with clinical examples
Measuring inter-vertebral range of motion: how and why with clinical examplesFiona Mellor
 
Results of Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure in Failed in Arthroscopic Bankart Rep...
Results of Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure in Failed in Arthroscopic Bankart Rep...Results of Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure in Failed in Arthroscopic Bankart Rep...
Results of Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure in Failed in Arthroscopic Bankart Rep...TheRightDoctors
 
Is Medial Ridge Sign a Reliable Indicator Glenoid Bone Loss-Dr. Dhanasekarapr...
Is Medial Ridge Sign a Reliable Indicator Glenoid Bone Loss-Dr. Dhanasekarapr...Is Medial Ridge Sign a Reliable Indicator Glenoid Bone Loss-Dr. Dhanasekarapr...
Is Medial Ridge Sign a Reliable Indicator Glenoid Bone Loss-Dr. Dhanasekarapr...TheRightDoctors
 
Comparison of 3 d shoulder complex kinematic part 1
Comparison of 3 d shoulder complex kinematic part 1Comparison of 3 d shoulder complex kinematic part 1
Comparison of 3 d shoulder complex kinematic part 1Satoshi Kajiyama
 
Mri in corellation to surgery
Mri in corellation to surgeryMri in corellation to surgery
Mri in corellation to surgeryShoulder Library
 
Grip Strength Rehabilitation Using a Monocular Camera(AsianCHI2020)
Grip Strength Rehabilitation Using a Monocular Camera(AsianCHI2020)Grip Strength Rehabilitation Using a Monocular Camera(AsianCHI2020)
Grip Strength Rehabilitation Using a Monocular Camera(AsianCHI2020)sugiuralab
 
Shoulder clinical tests validity eleanor richardson
Shoulder clinical tests validity eleanor richardsonShoulder clinical tests validity eleanor richardson
Shoulder clinical tests validity eleanor richardsonLennard Funk
 
Relationship between extrinsic factors and the acromio humeral distance (1)
Relationship between extrinsic factors and the acromio humeral distance (1)Relationship between extrinsic factors and the acromio humeral distance (1)
Relationship between extrinsic factors and the acromio humeral distance (1)The Arm Clinic
 
Rotator cuff evidence update
Rotator cuff evidence updateRotator cuff evidence update
Rotator cuff evidence updatePuneet Monga
 
Rotator Cuff Evidence Update
Rotator Cuff Evidence Update  Rotator Cuff Evidence Update
Rotator Cuff Evidence Update The Arm Clinic
 
Towards diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in 3-D MRI using 3-D convolutional ne...
Towards diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in 3-D MRI using 3-D convolutional ne...Towards diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in 3-D MRI using 3-D convolutional ne...
Towards diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in 3-D MRI using 3-D convolutional ne...Wesley De Neve
 
Cervical Manipulation - EDM - Research Day - OU-5-13-2012
Cervical Manipulation - EDM - Research Day - OU-5-13-2012Cervical Manipulation - EDM - Research Day - OU-5-13-2012
Cervical Manipulation - EDM - Research Day - OU-5-13-2012Erik De Meulemeester
 
Ideal placement of the counterforce brace
Ideal placement of the counterforce braceIdeal placement of the counterforce brace
Ideal placement of the counterforce braceMOHSEN RADPASAND
 
Short Term Analysis of Clinical, Functional Radiological Outcome of Total Kne...
Short Term Analysis of Clinical, Functional Radiological Outcome of Total Kne...Short Term Analysis of Clinical, Functional Radiological Outcome of Total Kne...
Short Term Analysis of Clinical, Functional Radiological Outcome of Total Kne...iosrjce
 
Difference in Early Results Between Sub-Acute and Delayed ACL reconstruction:...
Difference in Early Results Between Sub-Acute and Delayed ACL reconstruction:...Difference in Early Results Between Sub-Acute and Delayed ACL reconstruction:...
Difference in Early Results Between Sub-Acute and Delayed ACL reconstruction:...Henrik Illerström
 

Similar to Wrist ROM Poster 1 (20)

Measuring inter-vertebral range of motion: how and why with clinical examples
Measuring inter-vertebral range of motion: how and why with clinical examplesMeasuring inter-vertebral range of motion: how and why with clinical examples
Measuring inter-vertebral range of motion: how and why with clinical examples
 
Results of Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure in Failed in Arthroscopic Bankart Rep...
Results of Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure in Failed in Arthroscopic Bankart Rep...Results of Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure in Failed in Arthroscopic Bankart Rep...
Results of Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure in Failed in Arthroscopic Bankart Rep...
 
Is Medial Ridge Sign a Reliable Indicator Glenoid Bone Loss-Dr. Dhanasekarapr...
Is Medial Ridge Sign a Reliable Indicator Glenoid Bone Loss-Dr. Dhanasekarapr...Is Medial Ridge Sign a Reliable Indicator Glenoid Bone Loss-Dr. Dhanasekarapr...
Is Medial Ridge Sign a Reliable Indicator Glenoid Bone Loss-Dr. Dhanasekarapr...
 
Comparison of 3 d shoulder complex kinematic part 1
Comparison of 3 d shoulder complex kinematic part 1Comparison of 3 d shoulder complex kinematic part 1
Comparison of 3 d shoulder complex kinematic part 1
 
Mri in corellation to surgery
Mri in corellation to surgeryMri in corellation to surgery
Mri in corellation to surgery
 
Candiani poster sif_
Candiani poster sif_Candiani poster sif_
Candiani poster sif_
 
Grip Strength Rehabilitation Using a Monocular Camera(AsianCHI2020)
Grip Strength Rehabilitation Using a Monocular Camera(AsianCHI2020)Grip Strength Rehabilitation Using a Monocular Camera(AsianCHI2020)
Grip Strength Rehabilitation Using a Monocular Camera(AsianCHI2020)
 
PracticumPoster_AR - MH
PracticumPoster_AR - MHPracticumPoster_AR - MH
PracticumPoster_AR - MH
 
Shoulder clinical tests validity eleanor richardson
Shoulder clinical tests validity eleanor richardsonShoulder clinical tests validity eleanor richardson
Shoulder clinical tests validity eleanor richardson
 
Relationship between extrinsic factors and the acromio humeral distance (1)
Relationship between extrinsic factors and the acromio humeral distance (1)Relationship between extrinsic factors and the acromio humeral distance (1)
Relationship between extrinsic factors and the acromio humeral distance (1)
 
johnson2007.pdf
johnson2007.pdfjohnson2007.pdf
johnson2007.pdf
 
Rotator cuff evidence update
Rotator cuff evidence updateRotator cuff evidence update
Rotator cuff evidence update
 
Zambaldi et al.
Zambaldi et al.Zambaldi et al.
Zambaldi et al.
 
Rotator Cuff Evidence Update
Rotator Cuff Evidence Update  Rotator Cuff Evidence Update
Rotator Cuff Evidence Update
 
Towards diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in 3-D MRI using 3-D convolutional ne...
Towards diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in 3-D MRI using 3-D convolutional ne...Towards diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in 3-D MRI using 3-D convolutional ne...
Towards diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in 3-D MRI using 3-D convolutional ne...
 
Cervical Manipulation - EDM - Research Day - OU-5-13-2012
Cervical Manipulation - EDM - Research Day - OU-5-13-2012Cervical Manipulation - EDM - Research Day - OU-5-13-2012
Cervical Manipulation - EDM - Research Day - OU-5-13-2012
 
Ideal placement of the counterforce brace
Ideal placement of the counterforce braceIdeal placement of the counterforce brace
Ideal placement of the counterforce brace
 
Short Term Analysis of Clinical, Functional Radiological Outcome of Total Kne...
Short Term Analysis of Clinical, Functional Radiological Outcome of Total Kne...Short Term Analysis of Clinical, Functional Radiological Outcome of Total Kne...
Short Term Analysis of Clinical, Functional Radiological Outcome of Total Kne...
 
Distal radius fracture fixed angle volar plate
Distal radius fracture fixed angle volar plateDistal radius fracture fixed angle volar plate
Distal radius fracture fixed angle volar plate
 
Difference in Early Results Between Sub-Acute and Delayed ACL reconstruction:...
Difference in Early Results Between Sub-Acute and Delayed ACL reconstruction:...Difference in Early Results Between Sub-Acute and Delayed ACL reconstruction:...
Difference in Early Results Between Sub-Acute and Delayed ACL reconstruction:...
 

Wrist ROM Poster 1

  • 1. Intro and Purposes Currently, the reference values of normal range of motion of the wrist joint are for an open palm hand position with fingers extended. However, the functional range of motion when grasping or pinching an object is likely to be significantly different from traditional range of motion practiced today, which may have a profound effect in occupational therapy practice. The purpose of this study is to examine the functional range of motion of the wrist joint under varied grasping tasks by position and applied force. The study will provide preliminary data for functional wrist range of motion with grasping techniques commonly used in daily activities. Methods General demographic information was collected. The maximum voluntary contraction force (MVC) of each subject was obtained for each position (1) neutral, (2) supination, and (3) pronation using a Jamar Grip Dynamometer. Maximum wrist flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation joint range of motion (ROM) were measured using a photo and digitalization method under the following conditions: • By position (1) neutral, (2) supination, and (3) pronation, and; • By applied grip force (1) none, fingers open, (2) 5% MVC, (3) 25% MVC, and (4) 50% MVC Descriptive statistics and repeated two-way ANOVAs for position, grip force, and interactions between position and grip force in each joint ROM were used. Acknowledgments Funding for this research study was supported through grants awarded by the organization, Support for Undergraduate Research Fellows (SURF). Results For each joint ROM (1) wrist extension, (2) wrist flexion, (3) radial deviation, and (4) ulnar deviation: • A position effect was found for all positions (1) neutral, (2) supination, and (3) pronation (p<0.001), • A grip force effect was found for each grip force (1) none, fingers are open, (2) 5% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), (3) 25% MVC, and (4) 50% MVC (p<0.001), and • No interaction effect was found between position and grip force (p>0.05). Participants A convenience sample of 26 healthy participants was attained: • 18 to 36 years of age • 12 male and 14 female • 23 right-handed and 3 left-handed • Mean height of 1.74 meters (SD=0.1) • Mean weight of 74.48 kilograms Conclusions The results of this pilot study suggest that the functional range of motion of the wrist is influenced by the measurement position and applied grip force. Statistically significant effects were found for each position and grip force applied (p<0.001). However, no statistically significant interaction effects were found between the position and grip force factor (p>0.05). Future studies should examine the functional range of motion using a larger and more representative sample. Functional Range of Motion of the Wrist Joint Under Varied Grasping Tasks Jessica Marie DeGroot; Hanna Rae Paul; Ying-Chih Wang, OTR, PhD; Bhagwant Singh Sindhu, OTR, PhD; Arun Garg, PhD University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee – Department of Occupational Science & Technology For further information Jessica M. DeGroot Department of Occupational Science and Technology, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee P.O. Box 413, 2200 E. Kenwood Blvd., Milwaukee, WI 53201-0413 Tel: (920) 979-0194, Email: jmplasky@uwm.edu Literature cited Bostrom, C., Harms-Ringdahl, K. and Nordemar, R. (1997). Shoulder, elbow and wrist movement impairment: Predictors of disability in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rehabil Med 29(4): 223-232. Byl, N. N., Kohlhase W. and Engel, G. (1999). Functional limitation immediately after cast immobilization and closed reduction of distal radius fractures: Preliminary report. J Hand Ther 12(3): 201-211. Cerveri, P., Lopomo, N., Pedotti, A. and Ferrigno, G. (2005). Derivation of centers and axes of rotation for wrist and fingers in a hand kinematic model: Methods and reliability results. Ann Biomed Eng 33(3): 402- 412. Gunal, I., Kose, N., Erdogan, O., Gokturk, E. and Seber, S. (1996). Normal range of motion of the joints of the upper extremity in male subjects with special reference to side. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(9): 1401-1404. Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Age 26 18 36 23.42 4.319 Height_Meter 26 1.57 1.93 1.7389 .10267 Weight_Kg 26 56.70 131.54 74.4763 18.34129 Valid N (listwise) 26 Estimates Measure: MEASURE_1 Position Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 57.411 1.512 54.283 60.540 2 59.753 1.341 56.979 62.526 3 46.505 1.377 43.656 49.355 Fig. 3 Wrist Extension by Position Fig. 4 Wrist Extension by Grip Force Estimates Measure: MEASURE_1 GripForce Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 55.187 .953 53.216 57.159 2 56.174 1.224 53.642 58.705 3 54.969 1.281 52.318 57.619 4 51.896 1.504 48.784 55.008 Fig. 5 Wrist Flexion by Position Estimates Measure: MEASURE_1 Position Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 26.310 1.087 24.055 28.565 2 20.484 1.206 17.983 22.985 3 24.492 1.940 20.468 28.516 Fig. 6 Wrist Flexion by Grip Force Estimates Measure: MEASURE_1 GripForce Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 22.134 .801 20.473 23.795 2 25.779 1.589 22.484 29.074 3 24.243 1.505 21.122 27.363 4 22.891 1.404 19.980 25.803 Fig. 9 Wrist Radial Deviation by Position Estimates Measure: MEASURE_1 Position Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 26.310 1.087 24.055 28.565 2 20.484 1.206 17.983 22.985 3 24.492 1.940 20.468 28.516 Fig. 10 Wrist Radial Deviation by Grip Force Estimates Measure: MEASURE_1 GripForce Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 22.134 .801 20.473 23.795 2 25.779 1.589 22.484 29.074 3 24.243 1.505 21.122 27.363 4 22.891 1.404 19.980 25.803 Fig. 11 Wrist Ulnar Deviation by Position Estimates Measure: MEASURE_1 Position Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 23.479 .838 21.732 25.227 2 23.185 1.138 20.810 25.559 3 15.875 1.369 13.020 18.730 Fig. 12 Wrist Ulnar Deviation by Grip Force Estimates Measure: MEASURE_1 GripForce Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 24.472 .846 22.707 26.238 2 20.976 .993 18.904 23.048 3 19.694 1.035 17.535 21.854 4 18.242 1.101 15.945 20.539 Fig. 1 Wrist Extension: Position x Grip Force Fig. 2 Wrist Flexion: Position x Grip Force Fig. 7 Wrist Radial Deviation: Position x Grip Force Fig. 8 Wrist Ulnar Deviation: Position x Grip Force