Infrastructure 2013: Electricity
The social impact of electrification: Glimpses from Africa and India
Tanja Winther, PhD Social anthropology/MSc Power engineering, Center for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo
The world´s population is moving to the cities. Cities in developing countries are growing especially fast. About one billion of the world´s 3,5 billion urban inhabitants are living in informal settlements, or slums. This number is expected to increase. What kind of access to the cities’ infrastructure do these people have? Do they have access to electricity, drinking water, sewage systems and transportation?
Habitat Norway wishes to address these and other issues in the seminar series «Infrastructure 2013». The third seminar will look at the access to electricity in informal settlements and growing cities. How is the daily life, the outlook of a more prosperous life and security affected by the lack of or insufficient and sporadic access to electricity? And are informal settlements taken into account when calculating and planning improvements on the electric grids? What alternative solutions could be utilized?
For more information see: http://habitat-norge.org/
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
The social impact of electrification: Glimpses from Africa and India
1. The social impact of electrification:
Glimpses from Africa and India
HABITAT series: Infrastructure 2013. Electricity.
Wednesday 12 June, Kulturhuset, Oslo
Tanja Winther, PhD Social anthropology/MSc Power engineering
2. ‘It is like a town here now’
Young man, Uroa village, Zanzibar, 2001
3. Overall message: Electricity matters
1. May positively affect development
(e.g. education, water, health, communication,
comfort and convenience)
2. Does not immediately/alone create economic
growth
3. Tend to benefit privileged groups most
4. Process, outcomes and social impact: conditioned
by gender relations and women’s degree of
involvement
4. Solar PV, Mini-grids, West Bengal
Project: Solar Transitions
Solar PV, Energy Centre, Ikisaya, Kenya
Project: Solar Transitions
Central grid, Zanzibar, Tanzania
Project: Independent PhD
Three different
systems for providing
people with access to
electricity’s services
5. Services provided
Case Zanzibar, Tanzania West Bengal Ikisaya, Kenya
Production Imported from Tanz Solar PV Solar PV
Distribution Centralised grid Local mini-
grids
Energy centre
Initial cost 200-300 USD 12-15 USD 2 USD
Service
available
No limits in theory 6-11 p.m. Opening
schedule
El used for
public services
Yes No Partly (education)
Private
consumption
Light, radio, phone,
TV, fan, iron, fridge,
freezer (el stove) etc.
Light, phone,
fan, TV (b/wh)
Lanterns, phones,
photo copying,
PC, TV and video
10. Income vs. connection fee
the Sunderbans, West Bengal
Monthly
income
(INR)
Monthly
income
(USD)
Connection fee:
share of income
Teacher 20 000 430 5%
Day labourer 3 000 64 33%
Cleaning worker 1 600 34 62%
Electricity: not for all
13. Claim in the literature: ‘Electric light makes
women save time on cooking’
14. Bathroom
Sunderban homes:
Where is the light installed? (n=106)
38%
1%
54%
58%
63%
Veranda / outdoors
Living room / dining room
Bedroom/ store room /shrine
Kitchen
Cow shed
54 %
58 %
63 %
38 %
15. Conclusion
• Development? Yes, through improved public
services, mobile phones, modified consumption
practices and productive activities at home
• Income generation remains a challenge
• Context and gender sensitive approaches increase
the likeliness of positive social impacts
• Generally: enhance broad access
Winni, IT clerk, Ikisaya Energy Centre
16. ‘When I know how the President looks, I will also feel
as beeing part of Kenya’ (Elderly man, Ikisaya, 2011
before the opening of the Energy Centre )
19. Winther, T. The impact of electricity. Development, desires and dilemmas. Berghahn
Books, 2008.
Winther, T. The introduction of electricity in the Sunderban Islands: Conserving or transforming
gender relations? In K.B. Nielsen and A.K.Waldorp (eds), Transforming Gender in India.
Anthem Press (in progress).
Winther, T. Space, time and socio-material relationships: Moral aspects of the arrival of
electricity in rural Zanzibar. In S. Strauss, S. Rupp and T.Love (eds), Cultures of energy.
Power, practices, technologies. California: Left Coast Press, 2013.
Winther, T. Negotiating energy and gender: Ethnographic illustrations from Zanzibar and
Sweden. In K. Bjørkdahl and K. B. Nielsen (eds), Development and Environment.
Practices, theories, policies. Oslo: Akademika Publishing. 2012.
T. Winther. Electricity theft as a relational issue: A comparative look at Zanzibar, Tanzania, and
the Sunderban Islands, India. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2012, 16(1).
K. Ulsrud, T. Winther, D.Palit, H.Roracher and J.Sandgren. The Solar Transitions research on
solar mini-grids in India: Learning from local cases of innovative socio-technical systems”.
Energy for Sustainable Development, 2011, 15.
Editor's Notes
Urban-rural: should be considered in combination. Familiesconnected. El attractspeople (Uroa growing),health staff, teachers, conceptually, thevillagebecomes a bit more like town. Eveningmarkets, socialising, also safer (bugs + spirits). Not alonenewindustry, production in theclassicsensewithoutotherefforts (excepttourism in Zanzibar). India: business bloomingafter el.Becoming dependent on el: Zanzibar powercut for 3 months in 2008. water supply
Development: Not takethis for granted. Depends on 1) othersurroundinginfrastructures and facilities 2) whatkindof system and services available and theircosts/affordability PUBLIC SERVICES most accessible 3) existinghabits, preferencesetcGrowth:althoughcorrelation BNP and energyconsumption: causalexplanations not clear. Depends onmanyotherfactors (e.g. Norway naturalresources + investors + gradual expansionofthe grid and powersupply)
Thethree settings. Zanzibar phd and Solar Transitions, whatmay Kenya learn from india. Inclusiveapproach. All cases: peoplegettingaccess to electricity at the first time. NB Definition ofaccessDifferent systems provide different services + particularsocialorganisation + affectssupplier-customerrelationship
Note initialcost, connectionfee, differences. Public services: benefitthepoorestalso.Mini-grids: canonly live 2 km from thepower plant, hereno meters, trust (always) importantEnergy centre: pay per service, lowbarrier for usingthe services, photo-copying: tremendeouslyimportant service. Choice of services resultofoneyearresearchprocess in closedialoguewithgroups in thecommunity.In thefollowing: Will focusmostlyon Zanzibar, but bring in someexperiences from theotherplaces.
Public services improved (conditioned by healthfacilities, water pumps), link water- girlseducation. Nightclasses and tutoring (but not homework)NB Transport costs (egmedicinesavailable in thevillage, examinationlight at thelocalclinic)
Consumption: manyusesFridge: said to be used for storing fish, butcoldsweetice, small business at homeTouristindustry most important target for incomegeneration, butZanzibaris not includedNo homework (nobooks, notradition for doinghomework)
Paradox: in thelong run, electricity is cheaperthanthe alternative lightingsource, kerosene. Meansthatthe most privileged spend less onfuel for lightthanthepoorest
Development: moreconvenientliving + nextgeneration (health and education)Access: smallinitiatives, considerableeffects. EX copymachine: avoidspendingoneday and bus costs for makingphoto-copies in theclosestvillage (8km) or town 100 km away.Glimses, a final one from the tv-room in Ikisaya Energy Centre, peoplewatchingtelevision: smallinvestment, considerable and largely non-quantifiableeffects