Strategic planning often requires more executive time and energy than the value it produces. Plans are developed outlining lofty goals and objectives, but sit on the shelf. New approaches are needed.
1. Strategic Planning: Part I
Do you Want the Long or Short Version?
By Gregory P. Cofoid || cofoidg@gmail.com ||
www.linkedin.com/in/gregcofoid
Strategic planning has gotten a bad rap during the past several years,
mainly because it requires a lot of time, energy and focus by senior
management. None of us likes to have our schedules pirated by a project
that may or may not have an impact on the organization. However, when
it comes to strategic planning, the commitment often dictates how much
attention is given. Oddly, when a significant amount of time is expected,
the process is shortchanged. People dread working on it and find ways to
procrastinate with deliverables or miss meetings. However, when it is
easy and quick, it is given some modicum of energy and attention.
So, how should one go about this thing called strategic planning?
In Fortune 500 firms, the process often starts in April or May and runs
through November. Senior executives groan when they think of the time
sucked into the process, and often times they are right. In many large