In this presentation, Gerry Nicolaas & Patten Smith provide a framework for understanding the process for gaining online response when using postal contact. A presentation given at the International Workshop on Household Survey Nonresponse, held in Utrecht 31 Aug-1 Sept 2017.
2. 2Document Name Here | Month 2016 | Version 1 | Public | Internal Use Only | Confidential | Strictly Confidential (DELETE CLASSIFICATION)
Background
Increasing use of push-to-web designs using postal contact
Highly variable response rates
Need to understand the process of gaining online cooperation in
order to find effective methods for increasing the response rate
Framework inspired by TDM to inform discussions with clients
3. 3Document Name Here | Month 2016 | Version 1 | Public | Internal Use Only | Confidential | Strictly Confidential (DELETE CLASSIFICATION)
Framework for push-to-web response
Motivated to
read the
mailing
Motivated to
go online
Motivated to
take part in
survey
Motivated to
open the
mailing
Motivated to
complete
questionnaire
Personalisation
Type of mailing;
e.g. envelope with
letter, postcard
Appearance of
mailing before
opening; e.g. logo
Personalisation
Easy to read; e.g.
length, font,
vocabulary
Appearance; e.g.
important,
professional
Clarity about the
purpose of the
mailing
Clarity about the
survey request
Use persuasive
reasons for taking
part
Clear instructions
for logging into
the questionnaire
Minimal effort
needed to enter
login details
Multiple access
methods; e.g. any
internet-enabled
device
Use multiple mailings:
• An optimum number of mailings
• An optimum length of time between mailings
• A diverse and yet coherent package of multiple mailings
Landing page
looks authentic
with clear
instructions
Design for mobile;
e.g. short, reduce
clutter and text
Avoid question
types that are
prone to break-
offs
Reduce cognitive
burden
4. 4Document Name Here | Month 2016 | Version 1 | Public | Internal Use Only | Confidential | Strictly Confidential (DELETE CLASSIFICATION)
Fairly confident that the following has a positive impact
on P2W response
Motivated to open and read mailing
– Personalisation, authoritative logos
Motivated to take part in survey
– Multiple and varied contact attempts, use of incentives, offer
alternative mode to web non-respondents
Motivated to go online and complete web
questionnaire
– Device agnostic, avoid use of complex question formats &
cognitively difficult questions
5. 5Document Name Here | Month 2016 | Version 1 | Public | Internal Use Only | Confidential | Strictly Confidential (DELETE CLASSIFICATION)
Suggested priorities for further research
Open the mailing (particularly unnamed samples)
– Type and appearance of mailing
Selected respondent(s) motivated to take part in survey
– Respondent selection method, type of incentive (incl. cost
effectiveness), persuasive messages
Selected respondent(s) motivated to go online
– Reducing the effort of moving from postal contact to online data
collection
The optimal package of multiple contact attempts
– Dillman (ESRA 2017): Too often surveyors focus individually on
these six concerns, and ignore the operational connectivity
among them that is essential.
6. 6Document Name Here | Month 2016 | Version 1 | Public | Internal Use Only | Confidential | Strictly Confidential (DELETE CLASSIFICATION)
Questions for discussion
Based on what you all know about research in this area,
have we identified the right priorities for further research?
Is a more thorough review of the literature required? If
yes, where can we find the resources to do this?
Do you know of any unpublished research in this area,
either forthcoming or grey literature?
This area of research is developing fast. How can we
ensure that evidence and best practice is shared with
survey agencies in a timely fashion?
7. 7Document Name Here | Month 2016 | Version 1 | Public | Internal Use Only | Confidential | Strictly Confidential (DELETE CLASSIFICATION)
Thank you.
