SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
30 Surveyor • Summer 2007
D
ecisions made in the first 24 hours
after a marine casualty can greatly
affect a vessel’s chances of survival,
as well as the casualty’s impact on the marine
environment. With this in mind, the US Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 mandated that every
oil tanker have a vessel emergency response
plan that names the provider of its emergency
shore-based technical services. In response
ABS, through its affiliate ABS Consulting,
created the Rapid Response Damage
Assessment (RRDA) program, a vessel
emergency response service run by the ABS
Marine Casualty Response Center (MCRC)
in Houston, Texas. Its job is to provide
comprehensive support during a marine
casualty to the vessel, its owner or operator
and the salvors.
On 1 January 2007 a new requirement to
the International Convention on Prevention
of Pollution from Ships (Marpol Annex VI)
came into effect, mandating that all oil
tankers over 5,000 dwt have “prompt access
to computerized, shore-based damage stability
and residual structural strength calculation
programs” in the event of an emergency.
Made up of engineers and experts in struc-
tures, stability, machinery, operations and
survey, the RRDA technical team’s basic role
is to assist the vessel master and the operator’s
The Paramedics
of Marine
Casualties
The first responders to a marine casualty
can greatly affect its outcome.
B
eing prepared for an emergency includes
being familiar with the available tools.
Through regular training sessions and
drills, HECSALV users keep in touch with the
latest software developments and exchange
information on actual experiences and solutions.
Training in HECSALV is given by its lead software
developers – who are also practicing naval
architects – and gives salvors, class societies,
navies, coast guards,
shipowners and operators
a chance to find out
how the program is
used and to transfer
knowledge to the
users through
a breadth of
experiences.
In this way, HECSALV
continuously expands
its capabilities. Its ongoing
development includes incorporation into third-
party software as the engine behind specialized
user interfaces, finite element methods to handle
side forces and deflections, plan development
for dry docking, offshore platforms and stability
surfaces, complicated grounding arrangements
and two-ship problems (using its ‘macro’
interface and heavy lift analyses).
HECSALV utilizes a transparent XML based data
format to store both ship data and analyses. This
has already been used, independently, by others
to integrate HECSALV into both design and risk
reduction packages.
HECSALV is used frequently, all over the world.
Starting with the US Navy vessel Princeton
in the first Gulf war, which hit a mine, and
the British ship Trent, which burst into flames
while carrying gasoline after a collision in the
English Channel, to the removal of the SS Jacob
Luckenbach wreck that was leaking oil into
a marine sanctuary off California, HECSALV
has been applied to old, new and almost-
forgotten ships. Recent incidents where
HECSALV has played an important role include
the groundings of the MSC Napoli and the
MV Montrose, and the near-capsize of the
car carrier MV Cougar Ace.
Development of HECSALV Involves Users
31Summer 2007 • Surveyor
technical personnel by calculating
the effects on hull structure and vessel
stability of various remedial actions.
Available round the clock every
day of the year, the RRDA program
currently supports over 1,100 ships
and, in what is an expanding off-
shore oil and gas business, a dozen
floating production units and a
handful of jackup drilling rigs.
The core of the RRDA service since
its inception in 1990 has been Herbert
Engineering’s HECSALV salvage engi-
neering software, which the responders
use to model vessels in distress and run the
response scenarios on which they base their
advice to the salvage decision-makers.
A vessel model is created when the vessel is
enrolled in the program based on a massive
amount of technical data supplied by the
owner. The process begins with digitizing the
hullform from such information as lines plans,
body plans and the table of offsets. The digi-
tized hull is then divided into holds, tanks
and other compartments using the general
arrangement and construction plans, while
internal volumes and other information are
validated against the vessel’s capacity plan.
Lightship weight and center of gravity are
added to the model along with allowable
shear force and bending moment values.
The midship hull girder section is modeled
and its section modulus compared against
existing calculations, and the entire model
is vetted by comparing load simulations
against the vessel’s loading manual.
It can take an experienced engineer 30 to
40 hours to create a vessel model. There are
over 1,100 models in the active program,
and the MCRC estimates that over the past
17 years RRDA engineers have created more
than 2,000 models in total.
Types of analysis performed during a casualty
include: stability with compartments
breached, water ingress and liquid outflow;
calculation of the still-water bending
moments, shear forces and stresses acting on
the hull girder; assessment of effective hull
girder strength and changes in stability result-
ing from offloading attempts; approval for
deballasting or cargo transfer plans; effects of
tidal change on salvage operations and on the
vessel itself; physical behavior of the vessel in
a grounding – which can mean changes
in stability and hull integrity under the
combined attacks of the ground, the tides,
weather, flooding and cargo loss or shifting.
During the response, information about
the vessel’s loading, physical condition and
behavior is relayed by the owner or crew to
the RRDA team, who input this data into the
model to create a live simulation of the ves-
sel’s situation. Once the model is updated, the
RRDA staff can simulate the vessel’s reaction
to various attempts to deal with the casualty.
Standard Approach to
Unique Situations
Each marine casualty is unique, and it is difficult
to know until the model is running whether
a situation is fairly simple or complex. But
whether it’s a bulk carrier stuck on a soft sand
bar in the tranquility of the Azores or a fully
loaded tanker aground in an ice-ridden pas-
sage hard by the Alaskan coast, the RRDA
team strives for as much standardization to
its approach as possible.
Within the first hour after the call, the team
assembles at the Marine Casualty Response
Center, contacts the vessel and gets the model
up and running. Within the next hour, they
create the casualty model and develop a
preliminary assessment of the situation. The
first response is usually an attempt to try to
free the vessel from its situation, or at least
mitigate the risks it is facing. Often, the team
recommends ballasting changes or lightering
operations at this stage. Sometimes, however,
the vessel can’t do very much; for example if
its pumping capacity is limited or if there is
no free space for cargo shifting.
32 Surveyor • Summer 2007
“The great thing about computer models
is they let us try any number of mitigating
options to find the best one, without suffering
the consequences of bad decisions,” says
Fernando Lehrer, Marine Service Technical
Manager for ABS Consulting and former
Operations Manager of the MCRC. “HEC-
SALV, which may be the most widely used
salvage program in the world, allows us to
simulate the ‘what if’ questions of a response:
what will happen to the ship if we deballast,
or move 3,000 tons of cargo from Hold No. 4
onto a barge, etc.”
This is accomplished using two basic compo-
nents of HECSALV, the Ship Project Editor
(SPE) and the analysis tool. The SPE enables
the creation of the model with data from
drawings and hydrostatic analysis. Once the
model is done the engineers check it against
the existing ship documentation such as
the loading manual from the builders or the
hydrostatic tables and stability criteria from
the designers. The analysis tool allows them
to run simulations of the vessel’s reaction to
various response actions.
Because undersea topographic data is very
rarely on hand, one of the most difficult
aspects of a casualty to assess is exactly how
the ship is sitting on the seabed in a ground-
ing. Over the past year, Herbert developed a
sophisticated approach to the problem that
defines transverse loads and points of contact
along the breadth of the ship, called the
‘multiple pinnacle’ approach. Though refining
this model is a complex and difficult effort,
it ultimately helps the responders calcu-
late how much weight is needed to
be removed from the vessel for it
to float free.
Conditions aboard a vessel in dis-
tress can change dramatically from
one hour to the next. RRDA engi-
neers maintain a continuous dialog
with the people onboard. Constantly
sounding tanks, measuring drafts,
checking conditions of weather, sea
and tide, the crew report to
the RRDA engineers
who input the data
into the model
so that it is
reflective of
reality as they
test remedial
scenarios.
Key to Effective Response
Over the years the RRDA has been called
on an average 14 casualties per year, about
evenly divided between groundings and
collisions or other cases where the hull is
breached – and sometimes, both causes
combined. Because they never know what
to expect, they keep their skills fresh
through frequent drills.
“We work with the operators to simulate
emergency situations,” says Lehrer. “We treat
the drill like the real thing. In fact, because
our job is performed remotely in our Center,
a drill is very much like a real situation. We
know it is different, of course, but physically
we don’t see the difference because in both
cases we are consulting a model and drawings
and simulating responses. So there is, in one
sense, only a small difference between a real
situation, which involves simulating respons-
es, and a drill, which involves simulating
the casualty.”
Altogether, the RRDA team’s involvement
usually lasts about two days, until a salvor
takes over the job. “We assist the salvage
team when they arrive to take over the front
line,” says Lehrer. “Usually, salvors have their
own engineering team as well as a naval
architect on the scene. They typically don’t
have vessel models, and so the first thing they
ask when they arrive on scene is that we give
them the model, the analyses and the salvage
plans we have developed to that point. At
that point our mission is accomplished, unless,
say, they need us to review a lightering or
unloading plan.
“We can transfer all the important data
to them during an emergency because
they all use HECSALV. It is very close to
a universal tool in ship salvage. Likewise,
in cases where the US Coast Guard is
involved, they bring in their SERT (Salvage
Engineering Response Team) division, which
also uses HECSALV.
“It is fascinating work and quite exciting,
although it can also be quite tense because
we have to work very quickly and with
great precision – which is possible because
the modeling response time of HECSALV,
if you know how to handle the program,
is very fast,” he adds. “Stress management
for these situations, however, is another
subject entirely.”
Fernando Lehrer
Marine Service
Technical Manager,
ABS Consulting

More Related Content

What's hot

INTERNSHIP PROJECT REPORT FINAL Saransh
INTERNSHIP PROJECT REPORT FINAL SaranshINTERNSHIP PROJECT REPORT FINAL Saransh
INTERNSHIP PROJECT REPORT FINAL SaranshSaransh Tewari
 
Introduction CMS (Coastal Modeling System) SMS
Introduction CMS (Coastal Modeling System) SMS Introduction CMS (Coastal Modeling System) SMS
Introduction CMS (Coastal Modeling System) SMS bahar fahmi
 
CMS Wave Model Project
CMS Wave Model ProjectCMS Wave Model Project
CMS Wave Model Projectbahar fahmi
 
Mahmoud Salama C.V 2015
Mahmoud Salama C.V 2015Mahmoud Salama C.V 2015
Mahmoud Salama C.V 2015Mahmoud Shawky
 
IRJET- Preliminary Design of Floating Dry Dock
IRJET- Preliminary Design of Floating Dry DockIRJET- Preliminary Design of Floating Dry Dock
IRJET- Preliminary Design of Floating Dry DockIRJET Journal
 
Doug raber cv 8 1-16
Doug raber cv 8 1-16Doug raber cv 8 1-16
Doug raber cv 8 1-16Doug Raber
 
CRS Report on Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle and MPC (Jan 2014)
CRS Report on Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle and MPC (Jan 2014)CRS Report on Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle and MPC (Jan 2014)
CRS Report on Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle and MPC (Jan 2014)Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Design & Analyse Ship Floating Dry Dock
Design & Analyse Ship Floating Dry DockDesign & Analyse Ship Floating Dry Dock
Design & Analyse Ship Floating Dry DockANWAR FARIS SOBRI
 
The Application of Unmanned Marine Vehicles to Maritime Rescue - John Dalziel
The Application of Unmanned Marine Vehicles to Maritime Rescue - John DalzielThe Application of Unmanned Marine Vehicles to Maritime Rescue - John Dalziel
The Application of Unmanned Marine Vehicles to Maritime Rescue - John DalzielVR Marine Technologies
 
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics compressed - color
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics   compressed - colorAuv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics   compressed - color
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics compressed - colorCory Treffiletti
 

What's hot (20)

INTERNSHIP PROJECT REPORT FINAL Saransh
INTERNSHIP PROJECT REPORT FINAL SaranshINTERNSHIP PROJECT REPORT FINAL Saransh
INTERNSHIP PROJECT REPORT FINAL Saransh
 
Introduction CMS (Coastal Modeling System) SMS
Introduction CMS (Coastal Modeling System) SMS Introduction CMS (Coastal Modeling System) SMS
Introduction CMS (Coastal Modeling System) SMS
 
CMS Wave Model Project
CMS Wave Model ProjectCMS Wave Model Project
CMS Wave Model Project
 
CV_mki2015Nov
CV_mki2015NovCV_mki2015Nov
CV_mki2015Nov
 
Alexander Wilson CV
Alexander Wilson CVAlexander Wilson CV
Alexander Wilson CV
 
Mahmoud Salama C.V 2015
Mahmoud Salama C.V 2015Mahmoud Salama C.V 2015
Mahmoud Salama C.V 2015
 
Elton_Williams_Resume
Elton_Williams_ResumeElton_Williams_Resume
Elton_Williams_Resume
 
BD CV NOV 13 2014
BD CV   NOV 13 2014BD CV   NOV 13 2014
BD CV NOV 13 2014
 
Jaeger Water Business Jet
Jaeger Water Business JetJaeger Water Business Jet
Jaeger Water Business Jet
 
IRJET- Preliminary Design of Floating Dry Dock
IRJET- Preliminary Design of Floating Dry DockIRJET- Preliminary Design of Floating Dry Dock
IRJET- Preliminary Design of Floating Dry Dock
 
Jody Voss
Jody VossJody Voss
Jody Voss
 
Resume 2015 2
Resume 2015 2 Resume 2015 2
Resume 2015 2
 
ReyfernandoSparrow
ReyfernandoSparrowReyfernandoSparrow
ReyfernandoSparrow
 
Doug raber cv 8 1-16
Doug raber cv 8 1-16Doug raber cv 8 1-16
Doug raber cv 8 1-16
 
CRS Report on Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle and MPC (Jan 2014)
CRS Report on Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle and MPC (Jan 2014)CRS Report on Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle and MPC (Jan 2014)
CRS Report on Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle and MPC (Jan 2014)
 
Rushikesh CV
Rushikesh CVRushikesh CV
Rushikesh CV
 
Design & Analyse Ship Floating Dry Dock
Design & Analyse Ship Floating Dry DockDesign & Analyse Ship Floating Dry Dock
Design & Analyse Ship Floating Dry Dock
 
The Application of Unmanned Marine Vehicles to Maritime Rescue - John Dalziel
The Application of Unmanned Marine Vehicles to Maritime Rescue - John DalzielThe Application of Unmanned Marine Vehicles to Maritime Rescue - John Dalziel
The Application of Unmanned Marine Vehicles to Maritime Rescue - John Dalziel
 
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics compressed - color
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics   compressed - colorAuv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics   compressed - color
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics compressed - color
 
Sauls Master resume
Sauls Master resumeSauls Master resume
Sauls Master resume
 

Similar to Paramedics of Marine Casualties

Risk assessments of harbour operations involving lng carriers
Risk assessments of harbour operations involving lng carriersRisk assessments of harbour operations involving lng carriers
Risk assessments of harbour operations involving lng carriersLars Petter Blikom
 
294662379-Lecture-3-Ship-Operations-ppt.ppt
294662379-Lecture-3-Ship-Operations-ppt.ppt294662379-Lecture-3-Ship-Operations-ppt.ppt
294662379-Lecture-3-Ship-Operations-ppt.pptDrMohammedSayed1
 
DISSERTATION-Abstract
DISSERTATION-AbstractDISSERTATION-Abstract
DISSERTATION-AbstractFilippo Pavan
 
Sneak preview - SMM presentation
Sneak preview - SMM presentationSneak preview - SMM presentation
Sneak preview - SMM presentationdkane27
 
Proboat - Practical Impact Exposure Testing
Proboat - Practical Impact Exposure TestingProboat - Practical Impact Exposure Testing
Proboat - Practical Impact Exposure TestingJussi Mannerberg
 
WhitePaper_LoadSpreadingandSeafastening
WhitePaper_LoadSpreadingandSeafasteningWhitePaper_LoadSpreadingandSeafastening
WhitePaper_LoadSpreadingandSeafasteningLeah Martinez
 
MECHENG-776-PROJECT-REPORT-2016-Jithendr-Sudev-Kahanendr-482900395
MECHENG-776-PROJECT-REPORT-2016-Jithendr-Sudev-Kahanendr-482900395MECHENG-776-PROJECT-REPORT-2016-Jithendr-Sudev-Kahanendr-482900395
MECHENG-776-PROJECT-REPORT-2016-Jithendr-Sudev-Kahanendr-482900395Kahan Sudev
 
Dynamic positioning
Dynamic positioningDynamic positioning
Dynamic positioningZaw Aung
 
Hatcher Corps resume JAN2016
Hatcher Corps resume JAN2016Hatcher Corps resume JAN2016
Hatcher Corps resume JAN2016John Hatcher
 
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r. l .docx
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r.   l .docxyf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r.   l .docx
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r. l .docxadampcarr67227
 
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r. l .docx
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r.   l .docxyf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r.   l .docx
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r. l .docxodiliagilby
 
IRJET-Analysis of Offshore Jacket Structure
IRJET-Analysis of Offshore Jacket StructureIRJET-Analysis of Offshore Jacket Structure
IRJET-Analysis of Offshore Jacket StructureIRJET Journal
 
LOW WAKE WASH USING DIFFERENT HULL SHAPES
LOW WAKE WASH USING DIFFERENT HULL SHAPESLOW WAKE WASH USING DIFFERENT HULL SHAPES
LOW WAKE WASH USING DIFFERENT HULL SHAPESJeetBanerjee13
 
MSRC TUG SIMULATORS
MSRC TUG SIMULATORSMSRC TUG SIMULATORS
MSRC TUG SIMULATORSPaul Racicot
 
80 2 (dragged) 2 from lulu
80 2 (dragged) 2 from lulu80 2 (dragged) 2 from lulu
80 2 (dragged) 2 from luluMarianne Molchan
 

Similar to Paramedics of Marine Casualties (20)

Risk assessments of harbour operations involving lng carriers
Risk assessments of harbour operations involving lng carriersRisk assessments of harbour operations involving lng carriers
Risk assessments of harbour operations involving lng carriers
 
294662379-Lecture-3-Ship-Operations-ppt.ppt
294662379-Lecture-3-Ship-Operations-ppt.ppt294662379-Lecture-3-Ship-Operations-ppt.ppt
294662379-Lecture-3-Ship-Operations-ppt.ppt
 
DISSERTATION-Abstract
DISSERTATION-AbstractDISSERTATION-Abstract
DISSERTATION-Abstract
 
Sneak preview - SMM presentation
Sneak preview - SMM presentationSneak preview - SMM presentation
Sneak preview - SMM presentation
 
WEN_Issue25_GMS_01pdf
WEN_Issue25_GMS_01pdfWEN_Issue25_GMS_01pdf
WEN_Issue25_GMS_01pdf
 
Proboat - Practical Impact Exposure Testing
Proboat - Practical Impact Exposure TestingProboat - Practical Impact Exposure Testing
Proboat - Practical Impact Exposure Testing
 
WhitePaper_LoadSpreadingandSeafastening
WhitePaper_LoadSpreadingandSeafasteningWhitePaper_LoadSpreadingandSeafastening
WhitePaper_LoadSpreadingandSeafastening
 
MECHENG-776-PROJECT-REPORT-2016-Jithendr-Sudev-Kahanendr-482900395
MECHENG-776-PROJECT-REPORT-2016-Jithendr-Sudev-Kahanendr-482900395MECHENG-776-PROJECT-REPORT-2016-Jithendr-Sudev-Kahanendr-482900395
MECHENG-776-PROJECT-REPORT-2016-Jithendr-Sudev-Kahanendr-482900395
 
Dynamic positioning
Dynamic positioningDynamic positioning
Dynamic positioning
 
STS article 2007
STS article 2007STS article 2007
STS article 2007
 
Hatcher Corps resume JAN2016
Hatcher Corps resume JAN2016Hatcher Corps resume JAN2016
Hatcher Corps resume JAN2016
 
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r. l .docx
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r.   l .docxyf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r.   l .docx
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r. l .docx
 
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r. l .docx
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r.   l .docxyf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r.   l .docx
yf-,~ .. lt& 557575.P .. · . a -r. l .docx
 
Embedding Risk in Everything we do
Embedding Risk in Everything we doEmbedding Risk in Everything we do
Embedding Risk in Everything we do
 
OceanicSpring 2008
OceanicSpring 2008OceanicSpring 2008
OceanicSpring 2008
 
IRJET-Analysis of Offshore Jacket Structure
IRJET-Analysis of Offshore Jacket StructureIRJET-Analysis of Offshore Jacket Structure
IRJET-Analysis of Offshore Jacket Structure
 
LOW WAKE WASH USING DIFFERENT HULL SHAPES
LOW WAKE WASH USING DIFFERENT HULL SHAPESLOW WAKE WASH USING DIFFERENT HULL SHAPES
LOW WAKE WASH USING DIFFERENT HULL SHAPES
 
Balancing act
Balancing actBalancing act
Balancing act
 
MSRC TUG SIMULATORS
MSRC TUG SIMULATORSMSRC TUG SIMULATORS
MSRC TUG SIMULATORS
 
80 2 (dragged) 2 from lulu
80 2 (dragged) 2 from lulu80 2 (dragged) 2 from lulu
80 2 (dragged) 2 from lulu
 

More from Fernando Lehrer

Tanker Shipping & Trade Aug-Sept 2011
Tanker Shipping & Trade Aug-Sept 2011Tanker Shipping & Trade Aug-Sept 2011
Tanker Shipping & Trade Aug-Sept 2011Fernando Lehrer
 
Shipmanagement International Article July 2013
Shipmanagement International Article July 2013Shipmanagement International Article July 2013
Shipmanagement International Article July 2013Fernando Lehrer
 
World Maritime News - USA_ ABS Nautical Systems Announces Partnership with Eu...
World Maritime News - USA_ ABS Nautical Systems Announces Partnership with Eu...World Maritime News - USA_ ABS Nautical Systems Announces Partnership with Eu...
World Maritime News - USA_ ABS Nautical Systems Announces Partnership with Eu...Fernando Lehrer
 
MEC FebMar 10 page 40-my article
MEC FebMar 10 page 40-my articleMEC FebMar 10 page 40-my article
MEC FebMar 10 page 40-my articleFernando Lehrer
 

More from Fernando Lehrer (6)

Tanker Shipping & Trade Aug-Sept 2011
Tanker Shipping & Trade Aug-Sept 2011Tanker Shipping & Trade Aug-Sept 2011
Tanker Shipping & Trade Aug-Sept 2011
 
Shipmanagement International Article July 2013
Shipmanagement International Article July 2013Shipmanagement International Article July 2013
Shipmanagement International Article July 2013
 
World Maritime News - USA_ ABS Nautical Systems Announces Partnership with Eu...
World Maritime News - USA_ ABS Nautical Systems Announces Partnership with Eu...World Maritime News - USA_ ABS Nautical Systems Announces Partnership with Eu...
World Maritime News - USA_ ABS Nautical Systems Announces Partnership with Eu...
 
Paint Magazine
Paint MagazinePaint Magazine
Paint Magazine
 
MEC FebMar 10 page 40-my article
MEC FebMar 10 page 40-my articleMEC FebMar 10 page 40-my article
MEC FebMar 10 page 40-my article
 
Class NK references
Class NK referencesClass NK references
Class NK references
 

Paramedics of Marine Casualties

  • 1. 30 Surveyor • Summer 2007 D ecisions made in the first 24 hours after a marine casualty can greatly affect a vessel’s chances of survival, as well as the casualty’s impact on the marine environment. With this in mind, the US Oil Pollution Act of 1990 mandated that every oil tanker have a vessel emergency response plan that names the provider of its emergency shore-based technical services. In response ABS, through its affiliate ABS Consulting, created the Rapid Response Damage Assessment (RRDA) program, a vessel emergency response service run by the ABS Marine Casualty Response Center (MCRC) in Houston, Texas. Its job is to provide comprehensive support during a marine casualty to the vessel, its owner or operator and the salvors. On 1 January 2007 a new requirement to the International Convention on Prevention of Pollution from Ships (Marpol Annex VI) came into effect, mandating that all oil tankers over 5,000 dwt have “prompt access to computerized, shore-based damage stability and residual structural strength calculation programs” in the event of an emergency. Made up of engineers and experts in struc- tures, stability, machinery, operations and survey, the RRDA technical team’s basic role is to assist the vessel master and the operator’s The Paramedics of Marine Casualties The first responders to a marine casualty can greatly affect its outcome. B eing prepared for an emergency includes being familiar with the available tools. Through regular training sessions and drills, HECSALV users keep in touch with the latest software developments and exchange information on actual experiences and solutions. Training in HECSALV is given by its lead software developers – who are also practicing naval architects – and gives salvors, class societies, navies, coast guards, shipowners and operators a chance to find out how the program is used and to transfer knowledge to the users through a breadth of experiences. In this way, HECSALV continuously expands its capabilities. Its ongoing development includes incorporation into third- party software as the engine behind specialized user interfaces, finite element methods to handle side forces and deflections, plan development for dry docking, offshore platforms and stability surfaces, complicated grounding arrangements and two-ship problems (using its ‘macro’ interface and heavy lift analyses). HECSALV utilizes a transparent XML based data format to store both ship data and analyses. This has already been used, independently, by others to integrate HECSALV into both design and risk reduction packages. HECSALV is used frequently, all over the world. Starting with the US Navy vessel Princeton in the first Gulf war, which hit a mine, and the British ship Trent, which burst into flames while carrying gasoline after a collision in the English Channel, to the removal of the SS Jacob Luckenbach wreck that was leaking oil into a marine sanctuary off California, HECSALV has been applied to old, new and almost- forgotten ships. Recent incidents where HECSALV has played an important role include the groundings of the MSC Napoli and the MV Montrose, and the near-capsize of the car carrier MV Cougar Ace. Development of HECSALV Involves Users
  • 2. 31Summer 2007 • Surveyor technical personnel by calculating the effects on hull structure and vessel stability of various remedial actions. Available round the clock every day of the year, the RRDA program currently supports over 1,100 ships and, in what is an expanding off- shore oil and gas business, a dozen floating production units and a handful of jackup drilling rigs. The core of the RRDA service since its inception in 1990 has been Herbert Engineering’s HECSALV salvage engi- neering software, which the responders use to model vessels in distress and run the response scenarios on which they base their advice to the salvage decision-makers. A vessel model is created when the vessel is enrolled in the program based on a massive amount of technical data supplied by the owner. The process begins with digitizing the hullform from such information as lines plans, body plans and the table of offsets. The digi- tized hull is then divided into holds, tanks and other compartments using the general arrangement and construction plans, while internal volumes and other information are validated against the vessel’s capacity plan. Lightship weight and center of gravity are added to the model along with allowable shear force and bending moment values. The midship hull girder section is modeled and its section modulus compared against existing calculations, and the entire model is vetted by comparing load simulations against the vessel’s loading manual. It can take an experienced engineer 30 to 40 hours to create a vessel model. There are over 1,100 models in the active program, and the MCRC estimates that over the past 17 years RRDA engineers have created more than 2,000 models in total. Types of analysis performed during a casualty include: stability with compartments breached, water ingress and liquid outflow; calculation of the still-water bending moments, shear forces and stresses acting on the hull girder; assessment of effective hull girder strength and changes in stability result- ing from offloading attempts; approval for deballasting or cargo transfer plans; effects of tidal change on salvage operations and on the vessel itself; physical behavior of the vessel in a grounding – which can mean changes in stability and hull integrity under the combined attacks of the ground, the tides, weather, flooding and cargo loss or shifting. During the response, information about the vessel’s loading, physical condition and behavior is relayed by the owner or crew to the RRDA team, who input this data into the model to create a live simulation of the ves- sel’s situation. Once the model is updated, the RRDA staff can simulate the vessel’s reaction to various attempts to deal with the casualty. Standard Approach to Unique Situations Each marine casualty is unique, and it is difficult to know until the model is running whether a situation is fairly simple or complex. But whether it’s a bulk carrier stuck on a soft sand bar in the tranquility of the Azores or a fully loaded tanker aground in an ice-ridden pas- sage hard by the Alaskan coast, the RRDA team strives for as much standardization to its approach as possible. Within the first hour after the call, the team assembles at the Marine Casualty Response Center, contacts the vessel and gets the model up and running. Within the next hour, they create the casualty model and develop a preliminary assessment of the situation. The first response is usually an attempt to try to free the vessel from its situation, or at least mitigate the risks it is facing. Often, the team recommends ballasting changes or lightering operations at this stage. Sometimes, however, the vessel can’t do very much; for example if its pumping capacity is limited or if there is no free space for cargo shifting.
  • 3. 32 Surveyor • Summer 2007 “The great thing about computer models is they let us try any number of mitigating options to find the best one, without suffering the consequences of bad decisions,” says Fernando Lehrer, Marine Service Technical Manager for ABS Consulting and former Operations Manager of the MCRC. “HEC- SALV, which may be the most widely used salvage program in the world, allows us to simulate the ‘what if’ questions of a response: what will happen to the ship if we deballast, or move 3,000 tons of cargo from Hold No. 4 onto a barge, etc.” This is accomplished using two basic compo- nents of HECSALV, the Ship Project Editor (SPE) and the analysis tool. The SPE enables the creation of the model with data from drawings and hydrostatic analysis. Once the model is done the engineers check it against the existing ship documentation such as the loading manual from the builders or the hydrostatic tables and stability criteria from the designers. The analysis tool allows them to run simulations of the vessel’s reaction to various response actions. Because undersea topographic data is very rarely on hand, one of the most difficult aspects of a casualty to assess is exactly how the ship is sitting on the seabed in a ground- ing. Over the past year, Herbert developed a sophisticated approach to the problem that defines transverse loads and points of contact along the breadth of the ship, called the ‘multiple pinnacle’ approach. Though refining this model is a complex and difficult effort, it ultimately helps the responders calcu- late how much weight is needed to be removed from the vessel for it to float free. Conditions aboard a vessel in dis- tress can change dramatically from one hour to the next. RRDA engi- neers maintain a continuous dialog with the people onboard. Constantly sounding tanks, measuring drafts, checking conditions of weather, sea and tide, the crew report to the RRDA engineers who input the data into the model so that it is reflective of reality as they test remedial scenarios. Key to Effective Response Over the years the RRDA has been called on an average 14 casualties per year, about evenly divided between groundings and collisions or other cases where the hull is breached – and sometimes, both causes combined. Because they never know what to expect, they keep their skills fresh through frequent drills. “We work with the operators to simulate emergency situations,” says Lehrer. “We treat the drill like the real thing. In fact, because our job is performed remotely in our Center, a drill is very much like a real situation. We know it is different, of course, but physically we don’t see the difference because in both cases we are consulting a model and drawings and simulating responses. So there is, in one sense, only a small difference between a real situation, which involves simulating respons- es, and a drill, which involves simulating the casualty.” Altogether, the RRDA team’s involvement usually lasts about two days, until a salvor takes over the job. “We assist the salvage team when they arrive to take over the front line,” says Lehrer. “Usually, salvors have their own engineering team as well as a naval architect on the scene. They typically don’t have vessel models, and so the first thing they ask when they arrive on scene is that we give them the model, the analyses and the salvage plans we have developed to that point. At that point our mission is accomplished, unless, say, they need us to review a lightering or unloading plan. “We can transfer all the important data to them during an emergency because they all use HECSALV. It is very close to a universal tool in ship salvage. Likewise, in cases where the US Coast Guard is involved, they bring in their SERT (Salvage Engineering Response Team) division, which also uses HECSALV. “It is fascinating work and quite exciting, although it can also be quite tense because we have to work very quickly and with great precision – which is possible because the modeling response time of HECSALV, if you know how to handle the program, is very fast,” he adds. “Stress management for these situations, however, is another subject entirely.” Fernando Lehrer Marine Service Technical Manager, ABS Consulting