Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) involves injecting chemically treated water at high pressure to extract natural gas and oil. While fracking provides economic benefits, it requires large amounts of freshwater and risks environmental disruption if wastewater is improperly managed. The process is regulated by states and laws allow companies to keep fracking chemical contents private, raising concerns among environmentalists. Native American opinions on fracking are mixed, as some support economic gains while others believe it violates spiritual obligations. Parts of Europe have banned fracking out of water contamination worries, while others research its risks and benefits. Careful consideration is needed to maximize fracking's upsides and minimize downsides.

1. Emilie Blunt
Controversial Issues Seminar
October 9, 2015
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
Abstract
Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is the process of obtaining natural gas and oil through drilling
techniques that are coupled with the high pressure insertion of chemically treated water. Fracking was first
practiced in the 1940’s and its methods have increase in complexity since then. Benefits to fracking in the
US are positive impacts on the economy and a surplus of energy available to citizens. Significant risks of
fracking is the vast consumption of freshwater and improper wastewater management that can lead to
environmental disruption. Denton, TX attempted to ban fracking due to these risks, but faced several
lawsuits from the Texas Oil and Gas Association (TXOGA) in response. Fracking is a state regulated event
with trade secret laws able to be applied and acknowledged, which allow the non-disclosure of chemicals
inside of the water used in fracking operations. The acknowledgement of these laws causes controversy
among environmentalist groups, due to the usage of biocides which cause harm upon ingestion. In
comparison, fracking is both endorsed and opposed by the Native American people. Some of them wish to
enjoy the economic benefits of fracking. However, others feel that their spiritual obligations are not being
fulfilled by allowing fracking to commence. Parts of Europe have already enforced bans on fracking due to
their fear of water contamination, while others are allocating resources into researching the benefits and
risks of its usage. The application of fracking should be carefully considered in order to reap its benefits
and avoid negative consequences.
Bibliography
[Anonymous]. May 2015. US government orders disclosure of fracking chemicals. TCE: The Chemical
Engineer:12.<http://0-search.ebscohost.com.umhblib.umhb.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h
&AN=102912677&site=ehost-live>. [Accessed 2015 Oct 1.]
[Anonymous]. Jul/Aug 2015. Netherlands puts five-year ban on fracking. TCE:The Chemical
Engineer:21.<http://0-search.ebscohost.com.umhblib.umhb.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&
AN=108988630&site=ehost-live>.[Accessed 2015 Oct 1.]
[BBC] British Broadcasting Corporation. 2013 June. What is fracking and why is it controversial? BBC
News UK. <http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-14432401>. [Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
Brantley SL, Meyendorff A. 2013 Mar 13. The Facts on Fracking. The New York Times.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/opinion/global/the-facts-on-fracking.html?_r=0>.
[Accessed 2015 Oct 1]

2. Broder JM. 2012 May 4. New proposal on fracking gives ground to industry. The New York Times.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/05/us/new-fracking-rule-is-issued-by-obama
administration.html?_r=0>. [Accessed 2015 Oct 1.]
Cheren RD. 2014. Fracking bans, taxation, and environmental policy. Case West Reserve Law Rev [serial
online]; 64:1483-1517. Available from: EBSCOhost via the INTERNET. [Accessed 2015 Sept
18.]
Colman Z. 2014 Aug 7. Stakes are high in fracking debate on Indian reservations. Washington Examiner.
<http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/stakes-are-high-in-fracking-debate-on-indian-
reservations/article/2551746>. [Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
Craven J. 2014. Fracking secrets:the limitations of trade secret protection in hydraulic fracturing. Vand J
Ent L & Prac [serialonline]; 16(2):395-424. Available from: EBSCOhost via the INTERNET.
[Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
[EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2014 Feb 11. Regulation of hydraulic fracturing
under the safe drinking water act. <http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/class2/hydraulic
fracturing/wells_hydroreg.cfm.>. [Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
Ferrer I, Thurman EM. 2015. Anaylsis of hydraulic fracturing additives by lc/q-tof-ms. Anal Bioanal
Chem [serial online]; 1618-2650. Available from: SpringerLink via the INTERNET. [Accessed
2015 Sept 18.]
Gordalla BC, Ewers U,Frimmel FH. 2013. Hydraulic fracturing: a toxicological threat for groundwater
and drinking-water? Environ Earth Sci [serial online]; 1866-6299. Available from: SpringerLink
via the INTERNET. [Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
Ludvig, Szonja. 2013. The tribes must regulate: Jurisdictional, environmental and religious considerations
of hydraulic fracturing on tribal lands. Brigh Young Univ Law Rev [serial online]; 2013(3):727-
57. Available from: EBSCOhost via the INTERNET. [Accessed 2015 Sept 30.]
McFeeley M. 2014. Fallng through the cracks: public information and the patchwork of hydraulic
fracturing disclosure laws. VT Law Rev [serial online]; 38(4):849-901. Available from:
EBSCOhost via the INTERNET. [Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
*Mohan AM, Bibby KJ, Lipus D, Hammack RW, Gregory KB. 2014. The functional potential of
microbial communities in hydraulic fracturing source water and produced water from natural gas
extraction characterized by metagenomics sequencing. PLoS ONE [serial online]; 9:1-12.
Available from: EBSCOhost via the INTERNET. [Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
*Mohan AM, Hartsock A,Hammack RW, Vidic RD, Gregory KB. 2013. Microbial communities in
flowback water impoundments from hydraulic fracturing for recovery of shale gas. FEMS
Microbiol Ecol [serial online]; 86:567-80. Available from: EBSCOhost via the INTERNET.
[Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
Malewitz J. 2014 Nov 5. First lawsuits filed over Denton’s new fracking ban. The Texas Tribune.
<http://www.texastribune.org/2014/11/05/denton-fracking-ban-sees-first-lawsuit/>. [Accessed
2015 Oct 8.]

3. Malewitz J. 2014 Nov 13. Courts will take up case of fracking v drilling. The Texas Tribune.
<http://www.texastribune.org/2014/11/13/denton-fracking-fight-sheds-light-misunderstood-te/>.
[Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
*Papoulias DM, Velasco AL. 2013. Histopathological analysis of fish from Acorn Fork Creek,Kentucky,
exposed to hydraulic fracturing fluid releases. Southeast Nat [serial online]; 12:92-111. Available
from: EBSCOhost via the INTERNET. [Accessed 2015 Sept 18.]
Spence D. 2013 May 2. Psychological and cultural biases distort fracking debates. Texas Enterprise.
<http://www.texasenterprise.utexas.edu/2013/05/02/policy/psychological-and-cultural-biases-
distort-fracking-debates>. [Accessed 2015 Oct 8.]
*Stringfellow WT, Domen JK, Camarillo MK, Sandelin WL, Borglin S. 2014. Physical, chemical and
biological characteristics of compounds used in hydraulic fracturing. J Hazard Mater [serial
online]; 275:37-54. Available from: ScienceDirect via the INTERNET. [Accessed 2015 Sept 30.]
*Yaal L, Ferrer I, Thurman EM, Sitterly AK, Korak JA, Aiken G, Linden KG. 2015. Characterization of
hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: implications for water treatment. SciTotal
Environ [serial online]:512-13:637-44. Available from: ScienceDirect via the INTERNET.
[Accessed 2015 Sept 30.]