It’s best to measure all improvement quality analysis in numeric b/s its will easy to calculate the productivity of the organism at each level. In that breakdown measure the standard quality and poor quality to straightforward the result. That analysis conduct on target population that help to investment of cost of good quality and poor quality that directly and indirectly co-related to the product. Bear poor quality.

1. Compare Cost of Good Quality and
cost poor quality and have wise
decision at Developing countries
Noman Aleem
Food Safety Quality Management
Cell#+923084089243

2. Introduction
• It’s best to measure all improvement quality
analysis in numeric b/s its will easy to
calculate the productivity of the organism at
each level. In that breakdown measure the
standard quality and poor quality to
straightforward the result. That analysis
conduct on target population that help to
investment of cost of good quality and poor
quality that directly and indirectly co-related
to the product. Bear poor quality.

3. Purpose of Scope:
• Focus on quantifiable study relation with cost
of good quality and poor quality of the
automobile industry in Pakistan northern area.

4. Design/Method
• By the method COGQ {(Evolved versions of
COGQ are still widely used. Some basic types of
elements of COGQ are points, spirals, lines and
horizontal curves (circular arcs).
• More complex elements can be developed such
as alignments or chains which are made up of a
combination of points, curves or spirals.} and
COPQ structure method format to data collection
(actual and hypothetical) through email and
interview from industry expert.

5. Finding:
• The studies show that cost of good quality in
lower the 22~50 times then poor quality. Due
derive comparative ration and rule of thumb.

6. Originated Value:
• COPQ is used a numeric term and monetary
value. COGQ is compromised and ignorance as
for safeguard.

7. Summary
• A stitch of time save nine: save a future from coming
trouble risks.
• It’s same for the cost of good quality rather than invest
on poor quality.
• In the developing country customer focusing on
primary cost conscious and quality is secondary trait
they having so many reasoning low purchasing power
of customer constant development of the business,
import cost, inflation, exchange rate appreciation &etc.
• Due to that above influence automobile industry not
invests on cost of good quality (prevention appraisal
etc.) industry required to pay it’s a poor quality.

8. Objective:
• Financial relationship b/w cost good quality
and cost poor quality. Its include cost of good
quality product by prevention and appraisal
.That compare with poor quality internal and
external failure cost. That actual case or
hypothesis estimate by industry expert.
• In that study observed the customer how
much bear a cost of ignorance of prevention
and appraisal in each step at least Rs-1000/

9. Scope and Limitation:
• Study systemically investigation at cost good
quality and cost poor quality by analysis.
Targeting population is northern Pakistan
Karachi and Hub which is industrial hub of the
Pakistan it’s the completely blend automobile
industry of Pakistan.

10. Conclusion:
Reducing the COPQ is the best ways to increases
the profitability of organization and reduction of
COPQ shows the effectiveness improvement and
corrective action.
.Higher the prevention cost is not bad but
important to decreases the appraisal cost.
.COPQ having higher cost deviation of preventive
and appraisal cost.