1. Leadership in Action:
Collaborative Leadership
Framework
Debbiesha Smith
American College of Education
ED5091 Capstone Experience for
Advance Studies
October 25, 2020TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 1
3. Rationale
This PowerPoint will guide educators on ways to foster their skills in different
setting to help learners effective. The training will outline the different
collaborative leadership framework. As it builds strategies for all stakeholders in
a learning community. It will improve the learning programs for students, their
pedagogy and develop a community of effective collaborative leaders.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 3
4. Collaborative Leadership Framework
Framework in a learning community.
LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 4
Professional
Learning
Community
(PLC)
Community of
Practice (CoP)
Critical
Friends Group
(CFG)
5. Professional Learning
Community (PLC)
PLC Explanation
Dufour (2004), PLC members engaged in an
ongoing cycle of continuous improvement,
committed to and continuously reaching
toward the institutions’ ideal mission and
vision.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 5
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC
7. Characteristics of Professional Learning
Community
Share mission, values, goals and visions
Collaborative teams focuses on learning
Collective inquiry
Action orientation and experimentation
Commitment to continuous improvement
Results
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 7
10. Community of
Practice (CoP)
Seaman (2008) “different
communities explore different
commonalities and work in
different ways. While no two
communities are alike, some tend
to take on similar characteristics
regarding their structure,
operation, and goals. Quite often,
the goal of a community is
improvement: neighborhood
development, public community
service, or improvement of
practice.”
LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 10
12. CoP Structural Elements
Elements:
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 12
Mutual Engagements
Joint enterprise
Share repertoire
According to Wenger (1998), CoP members'
negotiation of meanings in practice leads to the
development of three structural
elements of CoPs: mutual engagement (how
and what people do together as part of practice),
joint enterprise (a set of problems and topics that
they care about), and shared repertoire (the
concepts and artifacts that they create).
14. Community of Practices Learning
Environment
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 14
The communities of practice framework
(Lave & Wenger, 1991; Wenger, 1998) puts
into place important elements of context and
process that support social constructivist
learning in a practice environment. The
communities of practice framework (Lave &
Wenger, 1991; Wenger, 1998) puts into place
important elements of context and process that
support social constructivist learning in a practice
environment.
16. Critical Friend Groups (CFG)
Critical friends listen and ask insightful
questions that encourage presenting
instructors of those who are seeking
guidance, to define and articulate the
rational and intended outcome of their
work. This technique is called a “turning
process,” (Cox 2010).
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 16
17. Critical Friends
Group
Characteristics (Ban, 2004)
• Focuses on teaching and how to
learn students
• Consistent and focused
• Principal support
• Small supportive group
Improvement Cycle (Ban, 2004)
.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 17
Improvement
Cycle Ban
(2004)
Action
Teacher
Reflection
Feedback
Student
Achievements
18. The Possibilities of Critical Friends
Groups
Evaluating students work
Evaluating teacher work
Problem solving
Discussing texts
Observing peers
Setting goals
Building teams
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 18
19. Which Collaborative
Framework
Works for the Team?
Pros Cons
PLC-PLCs revolve around collaboration. This
collaboration encourages teachers to work
together to solve problems and try new things.
Through PLCs, teachers learn more about their
profession through discussion, trial and error,
and data.
PLC – Incorrect
Implementation
CoP – This is an internal
collaboration framework.
Based on passion and
interest. This could be a
good starting point.
CoP – No
Structure/products (Now
will we know if there is
success) Unclear focus
CFG-Primary focus is
teaching skills – this could
be used to focus on
classroom management.
CFG- Strick protocol to be
follow. Not data driven
• Are we data driven
• Are we willing to be routinely
observe by one another?
• Is there a share focus
or concern?
• Is the focus on improving or
teaching?
• Will there be protocol for our meeting?
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 19
20. Summary
This presentation is developed to inform educators they are not alone. As an
educator, to be successful leaders in what we do in a globalized world, it is vital
to work together in unison as a team. Analyzing the educational community of
teachers, there is a gap in how teachers communicate, and the school
community takes on leadership role. Educators need to collaborate more, work
as a team a develop effective strategies that will help leaders identify triggers in
the learning method
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 20
21. Summary
Through globalization, the school community is changing and when educators
work together, the burden will be lessened. The training is designed too to help
new teachers and even older educators to effectively integrate into the
educational institution and how to be effective collaborators. This training
should help teachers communicate successfully and develop a more effective
lesson plan, improve in collaborative strategies for learning outcomes and
cultural environment.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 21
22. Summary
Throughout my period at the American College of Education (ACE), I have
learned the importance of effective collaboration and how vital it is as an
educator. The learning experience gain helps me to better-implement the
training, how to be an effective speaker, reach my students based on the
cultural background, and how-to effectively trains the minds of my learners. As
the training presentation improve and direct the needs of the learning
community.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 22
23. Conclusion
A community of practice will be our best bet when trying to involve the entire
school. All staff has a vested interest in our plan, we just must make this clear
to them!
Eventually, a Critical Friendship element could be incorporated for specific
responses to student behaviors, but we are far from that at this point.
The PLC gives reliability in the professional learning community, as it remove
faults and reoccurrence and improve the overall aspect of the learning
community.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 23
25. References
Cox, E. (2010). Critical friends' groups: Learning experiences for teachers. School Library Monthly, 27(1), 32-34.
DuFour, R. (2004). Culture shift doesn’t occur overnight – or without conflict. Journal of Staff Development,
25(4), 63-64.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Seaman, M. (2008). Birds of a feather? Communities of practice and knowledge communities. Curriculum and
Teaching Dialogue, 10(1 & 2), 269–279.
Wenger E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity., Cambridge: Cambridge University
press.
http://plcresource.weebly.com/plc-cycle.html
https://www.slideshare.net/DebbieshaSmith/capstone-original-contribution-debbiesha-smith
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 25
26. Video Reference
Creating Communities of Practice Long Version (2016). You-Tube.
Retrieve from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJQDY-qdatU
Critical Friends Group Promotional Video (2009). You - Tube. Retrieve
from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJi5qxy2vDc
Professional Leaning Community (2019). PLC – YouTube. Retrieve
from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r--tAcsrI48
TEACHER LEADERSHIP IN ACTION 26
Editor's Notes
The learning community will better understand the effectiveness of collaborative learning and sharing ideas with each other. This task will help to increase professional and personal development strategies.
This video give an overview of the Professional Learning Community (PLC). The group is familiar with the PLC, it will improve the newer members of the group how learning will improve the students life and the overall institution.
According to Wenger (1998), communities of practice provide five critical functions. They: Educate by collecting and sharing information related to questions and issues of practice. Support by organizing interactions and collaboration among members of the group.
The teacher work together to develop a teaching instructional strategy to help develop their practice. As its shows students how to learn the content or develop the skills need to acquire. The method provides clear strategies to help them process, remember, and express the information they learn. The group woks together to share expertise and their passion for joint enterprise. The group discussed how they can share ideas with each other to build a better institution.
This video is an introduction to what is CFG and how it applies to individual learning.
The critical friends’ groups meet and discussed the complexity of teaching. The group acknowledge the task ahead and provides structures for new teacher that will improve their teaching strategies by giving and receiving feedback. The team working together will improve the daily learning of all their students, as it is crucial to the success of the friend’s groups. The group also discussed training for groups that will be returning to schools, as the group joined additional colleagues in forming critical friends’ groups. Each group will meet to examine their professional skills, students work and the teaching methods.
Critical Friends Groups have many possibilities for productive teacher work and improvement. I can see this model fitting right into our current PLCs. I am going to discuss this model with my PLC and offer this process to our team. I think allowing teachers to identify their own areas of need, and to become vulnerable with teachers they trust and gather honest feedback can be so powerful for our students.
The team looks at the different pros and cons of the collaborative framework, as these answers will help the teachers choose the best framework for the team. The group will also use the question to help the team make constructive decisions to improve the overall guidelines. The team mission also is to focus on improving new teacher, training individuals and older teacher in the process to become more technological savvy. This measure is taken because of the change of the current school system because of the pandemic.