SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
Restoring credit flows:
Does confidence matter?
An empirical analysis
Daniele Fraietta
January, 2016
Background
2Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief
The ECB hopes that higher confidence
in the EA banking system, prompted
by broadly positive stress tests results,
may eventually lead to a revival in
credit supply conditions: does
confidence really matter?
How to proxy confidence in the banking
system?
3Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief
 Through the STOXX Europe 600 Bank Index, one of the
most comprehensive European banking indices:
Confidence and credit supply:
VECM and SURE models
4Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief
Vector Error Correction Estimates
Sample (adjusted): 2004Q1 2014Q3
Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ]
Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1
LOG(SUPPLY(-1)) 1.000000
LOG(STOXX(-1)) -1.229635
(0.50409)
[-2.43933]
C -2.362827
Error Correction: D(LOG(SUPPLY)) D(LOG(STOXX))
CointEq1 -0.013880 -0.077018
(0.00436) (0.11324)
[-3.18483] [-0.68012]
D(LOG(SUPPLY(-1))) 0.065157 3.470062
(0.16906) (4.39268)
[ 0.38541] [ 0.78996]
D(LOG(SUPPLY(-2))) 0.292827 -6.492546
(0.15669) (4.07118)
[ 1.86887] [-1.59476]
D(LOG(SUPPLY(-3))) -0.054962 -2.571893
(0.17038) (4.42709)
[-0.32258] [-0.58094]
D(LOG(STOXX(-1))) -0.002785 0.360790
(0.00858) (0.22304)
[-0.32446] [ 1.61758]
D(LOG(STOXX(-2))) 0.001628 -0.433413
(0.00741) (0.19243)
[ 0.21978] [-2.25230]
D(LOG(STOXX(-3))) -0.007487 0.041174
(0.00753) (0.19559)
[-0.99466] [ 0.21051]
C 0.006015 0.046343
(0.00215) (0.05585)
[ 2.79799] [ 0.82971]
R-squared 0.884501 0.298151
System: SURE_SUPPLY_STOXX
Estimation Method: Seemingly Unrelated Regression
Date: 11/09/14 Time: 12:55
Sample: 2004Q1 2014Q3
Included observations: 43
Total system (balanced) observations 86
Linear estimation after one-step weighting matrix
Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C(1) -0.013880 0.003932 -3.530099 0.0007
C(2) 0.065157 0.152525 0.427193 0.6706
C(3) 0.292827 0.141361 2.071476 0.0420
C(4) -0.054962 0.153719 -0.357547 0.7218
C(5) -0.002785 0.007745 -0.359632 0.7202
C(6) 0.001628 0.006682 0.243609 0.8082
C(7) -0.007487 0.006791 -1.102492 0.2740
C(8) 0.006015 0.001939 3.101317 0.0028
C(9) -0.077018 0.102165 -0.753855 0.4535
C(10) 3.470062 3.963050 0.875604 0.3842
C(11) -6.492546 3.672994 -1.767644 0.0815
C(12) -2.571893 3.994090 -0.643925 0.5217
C(13) 0.360790 0.201228 1.792943 0.0773
C(14) -0.433413 0.173610 -2.496471 0.0149
C(15) 0.041174 0.176461 0.233333 0.8162
C(16) 0.046343 0.050392 0.919656 0.3609
Highly significant Error
Correction term:
In the long-run, confidence
seems to matter for credit
supply
No short-run effect:
Higher confidence
does not seem to
lead to higher
lending in the SR
D(LOG(SUPPLY)) = C(1)*( LOG(SUPPLY(-1)) - 1.22963528685*LOG(STOXX(-1)) -
2.36282664678 ) + C(2)*D(LOG(SUPPLY(-1))) + C(3)*D(LOG(SUPPLY(-2))) +
C(4)*D(LOG(SUPPLY(-3))) + C(5)*D(LOG(STOXX(-1))) + C(6)*D(LOG(STOXX(-2))) +
C(7)*D(LOG(STOXX(-3))) + C(8)
 Econometric analysis points to a significant and positive relation between confidence in the
banking sector and credit demand in the long-run but not in the short-run
Confidence and credit supply: the
Impulse-Response function*
5Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Response of SUPPLY to SUPPLY
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Response of SUPPLY to STOXX
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Response of STOXX to SUPPLY
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Response of STOXX to STOXX
Response to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations
(*) Cholesky ordering: stoxx, credit supply
How to proxy the evolution of credit demand?
6Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief
 Through latest ECB’s bank lending survey
 Households’ credit demand:
– Over the past three months, how has the demand for loans to households
changed at your bank, apart from normal seasonal fluctuations?
 Net percentage is defined as the difference between the "sum of
percentages for increased considerably and increased somewhat"
and the "sum of percentages for decreased somewhat and
decreased considerably“:
– Negative changes  lower demand for credit
– Positive changes  higher demand for credit
How to proxy the evolution of credit demand?
7Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief
Confidence and credit demand:
VECM and SURE models
8Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief
Highly significant Error
Correction term:
In the long-run, confidence
seems to matter for credit
demand
Significant short-
run effect:
Higher confidence
seems to have a
positive impact on
credit demand in
the SR
D(DEMAND_CC) = C(1)*( DEMAND_CC(-1) - 0.0503412362964*STOXX(-1) +
19.3434634972 ) + C(2)*D(DEMAND_CC(-1)) + C(3)*D(DEMAND_CC(-2)) +
C(4)*D(STOXX(-1)) + C(5)*D(STOXX(-2)) + C(6)
System: UNTITLED
Estimation Method: Seemingly Unrelated Regression
Sample: 2003Q4 2014Q3
Included observations: 44
Total system (balanced) observations 88
Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C(1) -0.378260 0.137312 -2.754751 0.0073
C(2) -0.212901 0.166224 -1.280809 0.2042
C(3) -0.046850 0.156593 -0.299183 0.7656
C(4) 0.130339 0.052394 2.487672 0.0150
C(5) 0.062628 0.056821 1.102200 0.2739
C(6) 0.567305 1.296493 0.437569 0.6629
C(7) -0.125458 0.421832 -0.297412 0.7670
C(8) -0.133926 0.510653 -0.262265 0.7938
C(9) 0.290152 0.481065 0.603145 0.5482
C(10) 0.624007 0.160958 3.876837 0.0002
C(11) -0.153480 0.174559 -0.879244 0.3820
C(12) -1.462376 3.982922 -0.367162 0.7145
Vector Error Correction Estimates
Sample (adjusted): 2003Q4 2014Q3
Included observations: 44 after adjustments
Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1
DEMAND_CC(-1) 1.000000
STOXX(-1) -0.050341
(0.03096)
[-1.62587]
C 19.34346
Error Correction: D(DEMAND_CC) D(STOXX)
CointEq1 -0.378260 -0.125458
(0.14776) (0.45392)
[-2.56005] [-0.27639]
D(DEMAND_CC(-1)) -0.212901 -0.133926
(0.17887) (0.54949)
[-1.19028] [-0.24373]
D(DEMAND_CC(-2)) -0.046850 0.290152
(0.16850) (0.51765)
[-0.27804] [ 0.56051]
D(STOXX(-1)) 0.130339 0.624007
(0.05638) (0.17320)
[ 2.31184] [ 3.60282]
D(STOXX(-2)) 0.062628 -0.153480
(0.06114) (0.18783)
[ 1.02430] [-0.81710]
C 0.567305 -1.462376
(1.39510) (4.28584)
[ 0.40664] [-0.34121]
R-squared 0.289971 0.300495
 Econometric analysis points to a significant and positive relation between confidence
in the banking sector and credit demand both in the short- and long-run.
Confidence and credit demand: the
Impulse-Response function*
9Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Response of DEMAND_CC to DEMAND_CC
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Response of DEMAND_CC to STOXX
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Response of STOXX to DEMAND_CC
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Response of STOXX to STOXX
Response to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations
(*) Cholesky ordering: stoxx, credit demand

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

апталык
апталыкапталык
апталыкadok8787
 
Jiang huihua Resume
Jiang huihua ResumeJiang huihua Resume
Jiang huihua Resumehuihua Jiang
 
impact of int_rate on mortgages_savings
impact of int_rate on mortgages_savingsimpact of int_rate on mortgages_savings
impact of int_rate on mortgages_savingsDaniele Fraietta
 
ashyk sabak
ashyk sabakashyk sabak
ashyk sabakadok8787
 
фалес теоремасы
фалес теоремасыфалес теоремасы
фалес теоремасыadok8787
 
Matem alemi
Matem alemiMatem alemi
Matem alemiadok8787
 
9 сынып алгебра
9 сынып алгебра9 сынып алгебра
9 сынып алгебраadok8787
 

Viewers also liked (12)

New Resume
New ResumeNew Resume
New Resume
 
Lider2
Lider2Lider2
Lider2
 
апталык
апталыкапталык
апталык
 
Ashyk7
Ashyk7Ashyk7
Ashyk7
 
Capital budgeting
Capital budgetingCapital budgeting
Capital budgeting
 
Jiang huihua Resume
Jiang huihua ResumeJiang huihua Resume
Jiang huihua Resume
 
WEM_June
WEM_JuneWEM_June
WEM_June
 
impact of int_rate on mortgages_savings
impact of int_rate on mortgages_savingsimpact of int_rate on mortgages_savings
impact of int_rate on mortgages_savings
 
ashyk sabak
ashyk sabakashyk sabak
ashyk sabak
 
фалес теоремасы
фалес теоремасыфалес теоремасы
фалес теоремасы
 
Matem alemi
Matem alemiMatem alemi
Matem alemi
 
9 сынып алгебра
9 сынып алгебра9 сынып алгебра
9 сынып алгебра
 

Similar to Credit flows and confidence in the short and long-run

Edexcel Practise AS Paper - Theme 2 Mark Scheme
Edexcel Practise AS Paper - Theme 2 Mark SchemeEdexcel Practise AS Paper - Theme 2 Mark Scheme
Edexcel Practise AS Paper - Theme 2 Mark Schememattbentley34
 
Industrial engineering sk-mondal
Industrial engineering sk-mondalIndustrial engineering sk-mondal
Industrial engineering sk-mondaljagdeep_jd
 
1 forecasting SHORT NOTES FOR ESE AND GATE
1 forecasting SHORT NOTES FOR ESE AND GATE1 forecasting SHORT NOTES FOR ESE AND GATE
1 forecasting SHORT NOTES FOR ESE AND GATEAditya Pal
 
Sub project management
Sub   project managementSub   project management
Sub project managementsmumbahelp
 
Tianjin power plant case study. With solution
Tianjin power plant case study. With solutionTianjin power plant case study. With solution
Tianjin power plant case study. With solutionssusera939a4
 
IRJET- A Study on the Homogeneous Cone x2 + 7y2 = 23z2
IRJET- A Study on the Homogeneous Cone x2 + 7y2 = 23z2IRJET- A Study on the Homogeneous Cone x2 + 7y2 = 23z2
IRJET- A Study on the Homogeneous Cone x2 + 7y2 = 23z2IRJET Journal
 
Android application for the engineering economy
Android application for the engineering economyAndroid application for the engineering economy
Android application for the engineering economyHamza Al-Jaghbeer
 
IIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's Classes
IIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's ClassesIIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's Classes
IIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's ClassesSOURAV DAS
 
Effect of project cost and time monitoring on
Effect of project cost and time monitoring onEffect of project cost and time monitoring on
Effect of project cost and time monitoring oneSAT Publishing House
 
Effect of project cost and time monitoring on progress of construction projct
Effect of project cost and time monitoring on progress of construction projctEffect of project cost and time monitoring on progress of construction projct
Effect of project cost and time monitoring on progress of construction projcteSAT Journals
 
CG-LIMS Mission Needs Statement
CG-LIMS Mission Needs StatementCG-LIMS Mission Needs Statement
CG-LIMS Mission Needs Statementdan.p.taylor
 
Middle income traps - Michal Pleva EN Final
Middle income traps - Michal Pleva EN FinalMiddle income traps - Michal Pleva EN Final
Middle income traps - Michal Pleva EN FinalMichal Pleva
 
Productivity Mgs In Spain Acede05 Tenerife
Productivity Mgs In Spain Acede05 TenerifeProductivity Mgs In Spain Acede05 Tenerife
Productivity Mgs In Spain Acede05 TenerifeLuis Carlos
 
IFRS 9: London versus Basel
IFRS 9: London versus BaselIFRS 9: London versus Basel
IFRS 9: London versus BaselLászló Árvai
 
Assignment 2 Macro Economics B. Student 8069 FD Roodt email .docx
Assignment 2 Macro Economics B. Student 8069 FD Roodt email .docxAssignment 2 Macro Economics B. Student 8069 FD Roodt email .docx
Assignment 2 Macro Economics B. Student 8069 FD Roodt email .docxsherni1
 
Predicting Business Confidence using News and Social Media
Predicting Business Confidence using News and Social MediaPredicting Business Confidence using News and Social Media
Predicting Business Confidence using News and Social MediaJohn Cai
 
Quality By Design
Quality By DesignQuality By Design
Quality By Designrealmayank
 

Similar to Credit flows and confidence in the short and long-run (20)

Edexcel Practise AS Paper - Theme 2 Mark Scheme
Edexcel Practise AS Paper - Theme 2 Mark SchemeEdexcel Practise AS Paper - Theme 2 Mark Scheme
Edexcel Practise AS Paper - Theme 2 Mark Scheme
 
Industrial engineering sk-mondal
Industrial engineering sk-mondalIndustrial engineering sk-mondal
Industrial engineering sk-mondal
 
1 forecasting SHORT NOTES FOR ESE AND GATE
1 forecasting SHORT NOTES FOR ESE AND GATE1 forecasting SHORT NOTES FOR ESE AND GATE
1 forecasting SHORT NOTES FOR ESE AND GATE
 
Sub project management
Sub   project managementSub   project management
Sub project management
 
Tianjin power plant case study. With solution
Tianjin power plant case study. With solutionTianjin power plant case study. With solution
Tianjin power plant case study. With solution
 
IRJET- A Study on the Homogeneous Cone x2 + 7y2 = 23z2
IRJET- A Study on the Homogeneous Cone x2 + 7y2 = 23z2IRJET- A Study on the Homogeneous Cone x2 + 7y2 = 23z2
IRJET- A Study on the Homogeneous Cone x2 + 7y2 = 23z2
 
Android application for the engineering economy
Android application for the engineering economyAndroid application for the engineering economy
Android application for the engineering economy
 
IIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's Classes
IIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's ClassesIIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's Classes
IIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's Classes
 
Chapter 6
Chapter 6Chapter 6
Chapter 6
 
Effect of project cost and time monitoring on
Effect of project cost and time monitoring onEffect of project cost and time monitoring on
Effect of project cost and time monitoring on
 
Effect of project cost and time monitoring on progress of construction projct
Effect of project cost and time monitoring on progress of construction projctEffect of project cost and time monitoring on progress of construction projct
Effect of project cost and time monitoring on progress of construction projct
 
CG-LIMS Mission Needs Statement
CG-LIMS Mission Needs StatementCG-LIMS Mission Needs Statement
CG-LIMS Mission Needs Statement
 
Middle income traps - Michal Pleva EN Final
Middle income traps - Michal Pleva EN FinalMiddle income traps - Michal Pleva EN Final
Middle income traps - Michal Pleva EN Final
 
hw4analysis
hw4analysishw4analysis
hw4analysis
 
Productivity Mgs In Spain Acede05 Tenerife
Productivity Mgs In Spain Acede05 TenerifeProductivity Mgs In Spain Acede05 Tenerife
Productivity Mgs In Spain Acede05 Tenerife
 
IFRS 9: London versus Basel
IFRS 9: London versus BaselIFRS 9: London versus Basel
IFRS 9: London versus Basel
 
Assignment 2 Macro Economics B. Student 8069 FD Roodt email .docx
Assignment 2 Macro Economics B. Student 8069 FD Roodt email .docxAssignment 2 Macro Economics B. Student 8069 FD Roodt email .docx
Assignment 2 Macro Economics B. Student 8069 FD Roodt email .docx
 
Predicting Business Confidence using News and Social Media
Predicting Business Confidence using News and Social MediaPredicting Business Confidence using News and Social Media
Predicting Business Confidence using News and Social Media
 
forecasting
forecastingforecasting
forecasting
 
Quality By Design
Quality By DesignQuality By Design
Quality By Design
 

Credit flows and confidence in the short and long-run

  • 1. Restoring credit flows: Does confidence matter? An empirical analysis Daniele Fraietta January, 2016
  • 2. Background 2Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief The ECB hopes that higher confidence in the EA banking system, prompted by broadly positive stress tests results, may eventually lead to a revival in credit supply conditions: does confidence really matter?
  • 3. How to proxy confidence in the banking system? 3Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief  Through the STOXX Europe 600 Bank Index, one of the most comprehensive European banking indices:
  • 4. Confidence and credit supply: VECM and SURE models 4Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief Vector Error Correction Estimates Sample (adjusted): 2004Q1 2014Q3 Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ] Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1 LOG(SUPPLY(-1)) 1.000000 LOG(STOXX(-1)) -1.229635 (0.50409) [-2.43933] C -2.362827 Error Correction: D(LOG(SUPPLY)) D(LOG(STOXX)) CointEq1 -0.013880 -0.077018 (0.00436) (0.11324) [-3.18483] [-0.68012] D(LOG(SUPPLY(-1))) 0.065157 3.470062 (0.16906) (4.39268) [ 0.38541] [ 0.78996] D(LOG(SUPPLY(-2))) 0.292827 -6.492546 (0.15669) (4.07118) [ 1.86887] [-1.59476] D(LOG(SUPPLY(-3))) -0.054962 -2.571893 (0.17038) (4.42709) [-0.32258] [-0.58094] D(LOG(STOXX(-1))) -0.002785 0.360790 (0.00858) (0.22304) [-0.32446] [ 1.61758] D(LOG(STOXX(-2))) 0.001628 -0.433413 (0.00741) (0.19243) [ 0.21978] [-2.25230] D(LOG(STOXX(-3))) -0.007487 0.041174 (0.00753) (0.19559) [-0.99466] [ 0.21051] C 0.006015 0.046343 (0.00215) (0.05585) [ 2.79799] [ 0.82971] R-squared 0.884501 0.298151 System: SURE_SUPPLY_STOXX Estimation Method: Seemingly Unrelated Regression Date: 11/09/14 Time: 12:55 Sample: 2004Q1 2014Q3 Included observations: 43 Total system (balanced) observations 86 Linear estimation after one-step weighting matrix Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C(1) -0.013880 0.003932 -3.530099 0.0007 C(2) 0.065157 0.152525 0.427193 0.6706 C(3) 0.292827 0.141361 2.071476 0.0420 C(4) -0.054962 0.153719 -0.357547 0.7218 C(5) -0.002785 0.007745 -0.359632 0.7202 C(6) 0.001628 0.006682 0.243609 0.8082 C(7) -0.007487 0.006791 -1.102492 0.2740 C(8) 0.006015 0.001939 3.101317 0.0028 C(9) -0.077018 0.102165 -0.753855 0.4535 C(10) 3.470062 3.963050 0.875604 0.3842 C(11) -6.492546 3.672994 -1.767644 0.0815 C(12) -2.571893 3.994090 -0.643925 0.5217 C(13) 0.360790 0.201228 1.792943 0.0773 C(14) -0.433413 0.173610 -2.496471 0.0149 C(15) 0.041174 0.176461 0.233333 0.8162 C(16) 0.046343 0.050392 0.919656 0.3609 Highly significant Error Correction term: In the long-run, confidence seems to matter for credit supply No short-run effect: Higher confidence does not seem to lead to higher lending in the SR D(LOG(SUPPLY)) = C(1)*( LOG(SUPPLY(-1)) - 1.22963528685*LOG(STOXX(-1)) - 2.36282664678 ) + C(2)*D(LOG(SUPPLY(-1))) + C(3)*D(LOG(SUPPLY(-2))) + C(4)*D(LOG(SUPPLY(-3))) + C(5)*D(LOG(STOXX(-1))) + C(6)*D(LOG(STOXX(-2))) + C(7)*D(LOG(STOXX(-3))) + C(8)  Econometric analysis points to a significant and positive relation between confidence in the banking sector and credit demand in the long-run but not in the short-run
  • 5. Confidence and credit supply: the Impulse-Response function* 5Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Response of SUPPLY to SUPPLY -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Response of SUPPLY to STOXX -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Response of STOXX to SUPPLY -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Response of STOXX to STOXX Response to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations (*) Cholesky ordering: stoxx, credit supply
  • 6. How to proxy the evolution of credit demand? 6Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief  Through latest ECB’s bank lending survey  Households’ credit demand: – Over the past three months, how has the demand for loans to households changed at your bank, apart from normal seasonal fluctuations?  Net percentage is defined as the difference between the "sum of percentages for increased considerably and increased somewhat" and the "sum of percentages for decreased somewhat and decreased considerably“: – Negative changes  lower demand for credit – Positive changes  higher demand for credit
  • 7. How to proxy the evolution of credit demand? 7Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief
  • 8. Confidence and credit demand: VECM and SURE models 8Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief Highly significant Error Correction term: In the long-run, confidence seems to matter for credit demand Significant short- run effect: Higher confidence seems to have a positive impact on credit demand in the SR D(DEMAND_CC) = C(1)*( DEMAND_CC(-1) - 0.0503412362964*STOXX(-1) + 19.3434634972 ) + C(2)*D(DEMAND_CC(-1)) + C(3)*D(DEMAND_CC(-2)) + C(4)*D(STOXX(-1)) + C(5)*D(STOXX(-2)) + C(6) System: UNTITLED Estimation Method: Seemingly Unrelated Regression Sample: 2003Q4 2014Q3 Included observations: 44 Total system (balanced) observations 88 Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C(1) -0.378260 0.137312 -2.754751 0.0073 C(2) -0.212901 0.166224 -1.280809 0.2042 C(3) -0.046850 0.156593 -0.299183 0.7656 C(4) 0.130339 0.052394 2.487672 0.0150 C(5) 0.062628 0.056821 1.102200 0.2739 C(6) 0.567305 1.296493 0.437569 0.6629 C(7) -0.125458 0.421832 -0.297412 0.7670 C(8) -0.133926 0.510653 -0.262265 0.7938 C(9) 0.290152 0.481065 0.603145 0.5482 C(10) 0.624007 0.160958 3.876837 0.0002 C(11) -0.153480 0.174559 -0.879244 0.3820 C(12) -1.462376 3.982922 -0.367162 0.7145 Vector Error Correction Estimates Sample (adjusted): 2003Q4 2014Q3 Included observations: 44 after adjustments Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1 DEMAND_CC(-1) 1.000000 STOXX(-1) -0.050341 (0.03096) [-1.62587] C 19.34346 Error Correction: D(DEMAND_CC) D(STOXX) CointEq1 -0.378260 -0.125458 (0.14776) (0.45392) [-2.56005] [-0.27639] D(DEMAND_CC(-1)) -0.212901 -0.133926 (0.17887) (0.54949) [-1.19028] [-0.24373] D(DEMAND_CC(-2)) -0.046850 0.290152 (0.16850) (0.51765) [-0.27804] [ 0.56051] D(STOXX(-1)) 0.130339 0.624007 (0.05638) (0.17320) [ 2.31184] [ 3.60282] D(STOXX(-2)) 0.062628 -0.153480 (0.06114) (0.18783) [ 1.02430] [-0.81710] C 0.567305 -1.462376 (1.39510) (4.28584) [ 0.40664] [-0.34121] R-squared 0.289971 0.300495  Econometric analysis points to a significant and positive relation between confidence in the banking sector and credit demand both in the short- and long-run.
  • 9. Confidence and credit demand: the Impulse-Response function* 9Follow us on Twitter @DnBEconomy | #DnBEconBrief -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Response of DEMAND_CC to DEMAND_CC -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Response of DEMAND_CC to STOXX -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Response of STOXX to DEMAND_CC -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Response of STOXX to STOXX Response to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations (*) Cholesky ordering: stoxx, credit demand