More Related Content Similar to Rothenberg Assessment Report 2009 S A S T A P S Y Conf 10 Similar to Rothenberg Assessment Report 2009 S A S T A P S Y Conf 10 (20) More from cyberspaced educator More from cyberspaced educator (12) Rothenberg Assessment Report 2009 S A S T A P S Y Conf 1011. Historical Data 58.4 2096 2008 51.2 2851 2009 55.5 1996 2007 59.2 1740 2006 59.6 1242 2005 61.3 597 2004 Mean % Enrolment Year 13. Q1: Focus groups are a QUALITATIVE investigation design Question mean: 62.2% 14. Q2: One disadvantage of EXPERIMENTAL investigation design Question mean: 62.5% 16. Q5: Describe CONTENT ANALYSIS Question mean: 29.3% (lowest mean for the exam) 17. Q7: One LIMITATION OF SAMPLE (zoo baboons) Question mean: 84.6% (highest mean for the exam) 18. Q24: EXTENDED RESPONSE 1 (Social Cognition –ALCOHOL CAMPAIGNS and SOCIAL COMPARISON) Question mean: 52.5% (Exam mean 51.2%) 19. Q25: EXTENDED RESPONSE 2 (Altered States and Healthy Minds –STRESS and RESILIENCE IN YEAR 12) Question mean: 52.2% (Exam mean 51.2%) 22. Moderation Impact … generate this! After moderation After stat. mod 58 58 64 82 82 2004 57 57 64 82 82 2005 2006 2003 2002 2001 2000 YEAR 62 62 65 79 80 56 56 65 82 83 63 63 65 82 83 65 65 67 83 83 59 59 68 84 84 Exam Course Work Practical & Social Relevance Editor's Notes ## * * 07/16/96 No evidence of marks being inflated over time Large moderation effects for a few schools in Practical and Social Relevance in 2002 Exam around 60% each year Note that moderated Course Work = Exam mark Course Work moderated slightly by Examination Practical and Social Relevance would be moderated significantly by examination Averages: Practical 82% , Soc Rel 80%