Descartes' Cogito Argument and Proof of God's Existence

Essay Descartes
Descartes is famed by is familiar notion, &#8220;I think therefore I am (Cogito, ergo sum.).'; It is a conclusion he has reached in his second
meditation after much deliberation on the existence of anything certain. After he discovers his ability to doubt and to understand , he is able to
substantiate his necessary existence as a consequence. What we doubt or understand may not ultimately correspond, but we can never be uncertain that
we are in the process of thought. This idea is a major component in Descartes&#8217; proof of the external world.
He relies on the existence of a non–deceiving God to ensure that an external world exists after calling it into doubt by the invocation of the dream
...show more content...
Nothing is more obvious than the judgment that this object (rather than something else) grafts its likeness on to me.';
Since however, he has called upon anything to be false that provokes any doubt he does not believe this explanation to be enough for the proof of
the external world. Relying on this sort of natural impulse has led him astray in the past, so what is to keep it from happening all the time. He also
calls upon the dream argument in this instance. Ideas come to be in dreams independent of external objects and perhaps this is true of ideas when we
are awake.
It seems that Descartes finds it necessary to first establish the existence of a non–deceiving God before he can be assured of the existence of anything
beyond himself and his mode of thought. He does this by the rationalization that his perception of God is that of a perfect being. In order for a being
to be perfect it must exist. Since he himself is an imperfect being, he can not conceive the idea of perfection on his own. Therefore, it must have come
from some other faculty that must be perfect, which is God.
It is after his proof of the existence of God that Descartes comes to accept that clear and distinct ideas can be trusted. After this deliberation his process
of coming to the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Rene Descartes: Cartesian Dualism Essay example
Descartian dualism is one of the most long lasting legacies of Rene Descartes' philosophy. He argues that the mind and body operate as separate entities
able to exist without one another. That is, the mind is a thinking, non–extended entity and the body is non–thinking and extended. His belief elicited a
debate over the nature of the mind and body that has spanned centuries, a debate that is still vociferously argued today. In this essay, I will try and
tackle Descartes claim and come to some conclusion as to whether Descartes is correct to say that the mind and body are distinct.
For one to begin the quest into Descartes' dualism, one must first look at the argument of the real distinction. In Descartian thought, the "real distinction"
...show more content...
For Descartes, this means that a substance is really distinct from anything else other than God whom Descartes credits as the creator of such an
object. The ramification of such a principle leads Descartes to believe that the mind and body could exist completely separately of one another,
allowing that God chose to create them in this particular way. Despite this, the possibility that the two could exist separately does not mean they
actually do. This is an issue of its own entirely.
The clarity of the real distinction argument may be blurred by Descartes himself. His numerous uses of the argument in a number of his books may
lead the reader down an aisle of confusion. Despite various versions of the argument, it is important to understand that Descartes does not consider
different arguments under the same title but simply approaches the same argument in a number of different forms. For this reason alone, I will focus
on but one of the formulations postulated by Descartes.
One may first look at the argument contained within Descartes' book Meditations on First Philosophy. In the sixth meditation Descartes states "On the
one hand I have a clear and distinct idea of myself, in so far as I am simply a thinking, non–extended thing and on the other hand I have a distinct idea
of body, in so far as this is simply an extended, non–thinking thing. And accordingly, it is certain that I am really distinct from my body, and can

Descartes Essay
In the early 17th century a philosopher named Descartes, questioned his existence. His life was dedicated to the founding of a philosophical and
mathematical system in which all sciences were logical.
Descartes was born in 1596 in Touraine, France. His education consisted of attendance to a Jesuit school of La Fleche. He studied aliberal arts program
that emphasized philosophy, the humanities, science, and math. He then went on to the University of Poitiers where he graduated in 1616 with a law
degree. Descartes also served as a volunteer in several different armies to broaden his horizons.
After all of Descartes' study and contemplation of math and science, he decided to...show more content...
His God must also be omnipotent to do the things he wished to describe later, so he proved God to be omnipotent. The main literary work in which
he published these proofs was his Meditations. The other major philosophical work, which was publisher later, was his Discourse on Method. These
two main works have paved the path for modern philosophy throughout the world. Although Descartes proved the existence of God, he did not believe
him to be imminent, but rather, transcendent. He was by definition a Deity. He believed that God created the world and the laws by which it works.
Then, set the cosmos in motion by these natural laws and simply watches it operate.
Once Descartes proved his own existence and that of God's, he proceeded on to the sciences. He showed that mathematics was the truest of all
sciences. Descartes studied math intensely at the Jesuit school. His zeal for the subject continued into his later life. Gradually, he became more and
more disgusted with the current system of math. He sought to revise it and ended up revolutionizing it. Math today is based upon the Cartesian
system. Descartes is called the "Father of Modern Mathematics" for several reasons. His major contribution is the application of algebra
to geometry. In his treatise, Geometry, Descartes reveals his analytic geometry. Analytic geometry allows any curve to be addressed from an algebraic
view by means of a coordinate system. This is taught to all

Rene Descartes Essay
Rene Descartes
Rene Descartes was a math philosopher, he was born in Toures, on March 31
1596, and he died at Stockholm on February 11 1650. His father was forced to spend half the year at Rennes, where he was a councilman. The rest
of the time he spent with his family of Les Cartes at La Haye. Rene was the second child out of four kids. At the age of eight, he was sent to the
Jesuit School at La Fleche. The school had very good education and discipline. On account of his delicate health, he was permitted to lie in bed until
late in the mornings. In 1647, he visited Pascal, he told himself that the only way to do good work in math, and to keep his health was to never allow
anyone to make him get up in the morning before he felt...show more content...
The values of "x" and "y" determined the co–coordinates of a number of points which forms a curve, of which the equation "f(x,y)=0" has a
geometrical property.
Rene said that a point in a space could be determined by three co–coordinates. Rene pointed out the very important facts that two or more curves can be
referred to one and the same system of co–coordinates, and that the points in which two curves intersect can be determined by finding the roots
common to their equations. Rene wrote three Geometric books. The first two are about analytical geometry, and the third is an analysis of algebra that
was current then. Rene also paid particular attention to the theory of tangents to curves. Back then the current definition of a tangent at a point was a
straight line through the point such that between it and the curve no other straight line could be drawn, that is the straight line of closet contact.
Rene described his theory by giving the general rule for drawing tangents and normals to a roulette. The method that Rene used to find the tangent or
normal at any point of a given curve was he determined the center and radius of a circle, which should cut the curve in two consecutive points. The
tangent to the circle at that point will be the required tangent to the curve.
In modern text books it is

Essay on RenГ© Descartes
RenГ© Descartes
RenГ© Descartes was a French philosopher and also mathematician. His method of doubt led him to the famous "cogito ergo sum" when translated
means "I am thinking, therefore I exist". This cogito was the foundation for Descartes' quest for certain knowledge. He explored doubt and how we
can prove our own existence, by taking the first steps of scepticism. His book "Meditations On First Philosophy", was written in six parts. Each
representing the six days that God took to create the world. Not to upset the Church, Descartes would need to prove the existence of God, and the soul.
Within Descartes' argument, we find some important areas. Two, which require focus, are his...show more content...
He came to the conclusion, that to doubt is to think; and to think is to exist. An example in Russell's "Western philosophical thought" is that "anything,
which doubts, understands, affirms, conceives, wills, denies, imagines and feels is something, which is thinking. And feeling, when it occurs in
dreams, is thought". So therefore anything which thinks, also too exists.
In Descartes' wax example, he takes a piece of wax from the honeycomb in it's solid form. He observes that there are certain things, which are
apparent towards the senses. The taste of the honey, its temperature (cold), the size, the colour, and when you tap it, it makes a sound. Yet, if we
place the wax near heat, or a fire, the features and qualities change. No longer is the shape the same. It has become hot, and when you tap it there is
no sound. This is the wax in its liquid form. So is the wax we see now, the same wax we saw before these changes?
Before these changes were apparent, Descartes pointed out the difficulties of relying on the senses, of the physical body. In section 31 of Meditation
two, he says that the perception he has, "is a case not of vision or touch or imagination – nor has it ever been, despite previous appearances – but of
purely mental scrutiny". Descartes shows that our senses cannot be used to have knowledge of things in the external world, and that knowledge of
these things must come through the mind alone.

Essay on Descartes' Meditations
Descartes' Meditations
Descartes' meditations are created in pursuit of certainty, or true knowledge. He cannot assume that what he has learned is necessarily true, because he
is unsure of the accuracy of its initial source. In order to purge himself of all information that is possibly wrong, he subjects his knowledge to methodic
doubt. This results in a (theoretical) doubt of everything he knows. Anything, he reasons, that can sustain such serious doubt must be unquestionable
truth, and knowledge can then be built from that base. Eventually, Descartes doubts everything. But by doubting, he must exist, hence his "Cogito ergo
sum". It is from this thought that Descartes is able to determine God exists and create his first...show more content...
He reasons that, through these principals, his idea of God cannot have come from himself, as he is an imperfect being. He does not have the
capability of thinking of an infinite substance or a perfect substance, such as God, because he has lesser reality than these ideas and cannot be the
cause of them. The only way these ideas could exist is if they were created by something of equal (greater being impossible, as infinite perfection
cannot have a superior) reality. Because God is the only infinite Descartes can recognize at this state, it must be God that planted the idea in his mind.
Descartes' first argument for the existence of God can be summarized as follows:
1)I have an idea of a perfect being
2)There are two forms existence– contingent and necessary
3)Necessary existence has greater reality than contingent
4)A perfect being must have necessary existence
5)A perfect being must exist, if it has necessary existence
6)Therefore, God exists (Notes) This allows Descartes to begin to gain true knowledge, because his perfect being exists and would not allow him to be
deceived all the time because perfection does not allow for that behavior. In the Fifth Mediation, Descartes purports his ontological argument for the
existence of God. It is simpler than his first and based on God's essence. For anything else that exists, the essence of that thing only implies it's
existence. For God, however, essence

Rene Descartes Essay
Rene Descartes was a famous French mathematician, scientist and philosopher. He was arguably the first major philosopher in the modern era to
make a serious effort to defeat skepticism. His views about knowledge and certainty, as well as his views about the relationship between mind and
body have been very influential over the last three centuries. Descartes was born at La Haye (now called Descartes), and educated at the Jesuit
College of La FlГЁche between 1606 and 1614. Descartes later claimed that his education gave him little of substance and that only mathematics had
given him certain knowledge. In this lament he joins a chorus of seventeenth century philosophers including Bacon, Hobbes and Locke. In 1618 he
went to Holland to serve...show more content...
So, the search was on for the method used by the ancient mathematicians to make their discoveries (the method of analysis). Descartes is clearly
convinced that the discovery of the proper method is the key to scientific advance. For a more extended and detailed discussion of these methods,
see John Cottingham , The Rationalists, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1982. Chapter 2. In November 1628 Descartes was in Paris, where he
made himself famous in a confrontation with Chandoux. Chandoux claimed that science could only be based on probablitiies. This view reflected the
dominance in French intellectual circles of Renaissance skepticism. This skptical view was rooted in the religious crisis in Europe resulting from the
Protestant Reformation and had been deepened by the publication of the works of Sextus Empiricus and reflections on disagreements between
classical authors. It was strengthend again by considerations about the differences in culture between New World cultures and that of Europe, and by
the debates over the new Copernican system. All of this had been eloquently formulated by Montaigne in his Apology for Raymond Sebond and
developed by his followers. Descartes attacked this view, claiming only that certainty could serve as a basis for knowledge, and that he himself had a
method for attaining such certainty. In the same year Descartes moved to Holland where he remained with only brief interruptions until 1649. In
Holland Descartes produced

Descartes and the Real Distinction Essay
Descartes' formulation of what he calls the "Real Distinction" has proved foundational to our modern concepts of being and consciousness. His
contention has irreversibly influenced the fields of psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and others while cementing into the popular consciousness
the notion of a definite dichotomy between the mind and the body. In this paper, I will flesh out what Descartes' meant by the term "real distinction,"
discuss the arguments he uses in its' defense, and then argue myself that this distinction between mind and body (at least as Descartes frames it) goes
much too far, and that it is a much more viable probability to believe that mind and body are actually intertwined, one and the same.
Descartes'...show more content...
This argument requires the knowledge first that God exists, and second that It is not a deceiver; only by first knowing these two things can Descartes
be sure that those things which he clearly and distinctly perceives are actually true. From here, Descartes asserts that if something can be clearly and
distinctly understood without recourse to another thing, then the two can be considered to be different and separable. For example, both a lemon and
a lime can be conceived of without reliance on the other, despite their relation; I can clearly and distinctly understand a lemon without having to think
about a lime, so therefore there are two objects: the lemon and the lime. However, the same does not hold for a lemon and sour; I cannot clearly and
distinctly understand a lemon without sour, so these cannot be considered to be two different objects. Descartes utilizes this process to show that the
mind is distinct from the body. As a previously–established "thinking thing," he realizes that since he can understand himself without having to consult
the body or senses (as he has avoided throughout the Meditations), then the body must be a distinct object. Yet, Descartes seems hesitant to separate the
two completely, as he denies the naturally–following notion that the mind

Essay on Descartes Dream Argument
How do we know we are not dreaming some particular experience we are having, or we are not dreaming all our experience of this world? When
we dream we imagine things happening often with the same sense of reality as we do when we are awake. In Descartes dream argument, he states
there are no reliable signs distinguishing sleeping from waking. In his dream argument, he is not saying we are merely dreaming all of what we
experience, nor, is he saying we can distinguish dreaming from being awake. I think his point is we cannot be for sure what we experience as being
real in this world is actually real. When Descartes remembers occasions when he is dreaming, he falsely believes he is awake. Reflecting on this,
Descartes thinks he cannot...show more content...
The last step in Descartes argument says if he cannot tell whether he is dreaming, then how can he trust any of his senses telling him about the
environment? To know anything about the external world on the basis of his sensory experiences, it seems like Descartes would have to know those
experiences are not all just a dream: 4.To know anything about the external world on the basis or your sensory experiences, you have to know that
you are not dreaming.I believe the things in my dreams must have been patterned after real things. So, even if I might be dreaming now, I know the
world has colors, things that take up space, have shape, quantity, and a place in space and time. Now if you pull premises 1–4 together, we get the
result of the conclusion: 5. Therefore, you can't know anything about the external world based on your sensory experiences. In an interpretation of
Descartes Dream Argument, premise 1 supports premise two and premise 3a and 3b support premise 4. So let us take a look at premise 2, 4, and the
conclusion. This looks like the valid inference rule, such as modus ponens. P пѓ Q P__________ Therefore, Q However, that is not what is exactly
happening in the dream argument. For premise 4 says to know you would have to know you are not dreaming. But premise 3 says you cannot know
you are dreaming. In order for Modus Ponens argument to work, it would have to contain the premise: "I know I am dreaming." Since Descartes
cannot actually

How Did Rene Descartes Contribute To Psychology
"I think, therefore I am"
Rene Descartes was a man obsessed with finding things out for himself, an intellectual who contributed to the field of psychology. Born in the 16th
century, Descartes grew up in a society where ideas, thoughts and perceptions were not questioned but were supposed to be understood and supported.
While growing up and through his studies, Descartes began to make strides in the fields of philosophy, mathematics and science. Descartes was a man
who challenged accepted ideas and aided the field of psychology through his contributions to reflex theory, helping describe the mind–body problem,
and challenging accepted theological ideas. An automaton is a mechanical robot that can be defined as a machine that moves...show more content...
(Watson 159). Just like shadowing or closing your eye when a bright light is flashed, humans cannot always control the reflex of their eyes
blinking. Another example of an uncontrollable reflex for Descartes is when someone falls, they naturally try to brace and ultimately break their
fall. (Watson 162). A final example were Descartes adds to the reflexive theory also has to do with eyes again. If a person knew that someone was
going to take a punch at their face but intentionally miss, that person would still flinch and their eyelids would still shut (Bolles 26). Descartes did not
create the reflex theory, but he added validity to the idea of involuntary actions of the human body. This idea was important because many scientist
and philosophers viewed all actions voluntarily (Lowry 8). To take this idea another step further, they viewed the mind and body as one completely
separate and controlling of the other. They believed that the mind controlled all movements of the body. Descartes viewed this as incorrect and did his
own critical analysis of the mind–body problem. An analogy that will help describe the mind–body problem is the relationship between a puppet and a
puppeteer. A puppet has control but that control is limited, while the puppeteer actually controls most of the movements of the puppet. Descartes
describes this idea further in his book

Research Paper On Rene Descartes
Descartes
Is our education complete once a degree has been earned? Have we learned all there is to know? Can we be sure of what we have come to know? Only
a completely self–assured person might answer yes to these questions, but for Rene Descartes (1596–1650) the completion of his formal education left
him feeling and thinking he was still ignorant about the certainties of human experience and existence. This prominent Renaissance philosopher
conquered the world of uncertainty in a work written in the 17th century. Mr. Descartes', Discourse on Method, quelled the skeptics with the assertion,
"I think, therefore I am". Most important to Descartes, however, was the method for which he was able to arrive at this axiom. The...show more
content...
Only know that which is "clearly and distinctly to my mind". Second, to "divide each difficulty I should examine into as many parts as possible." The
third stage he set out to organize his thoughts into the easiest to the most complex, therefore, creating an orderly examination of the "objects of
knowledge." Finally, critical reviews of the "links in [the] argument" furthered his examination of the entire puzzle. Mr. Descartes' methodology was
paramount to the period in which it was born. However, it's important to note that Descartes didn't think we could, as humans, understand all existence
or phenomena. We cannot come to know God's purposes. Mr. Descartes was optimistic of the fact that all men are capable of rational thought or
reasoning. He took to a quiet environment and contemplated the serious problem for which he wanted to reconcile within himself; ho can man learn
knowledge. Facilitating the process of reason is the element Descartes terms, "the natural light of the mind." He argues that if we are to attain axiomatic
truths we must be free of "precipitancy and prejudice", whereby reason, the natural light of the mind, shall guide us to the certainties which define our
existence. Descartes' methodology was realized through his Metaphysical Doctrine, which asserted man and god's existence. In deep mediation the
philosopher set out to deny everything which his senses told him. Descartes

The Dream Argument by Rene Descartes Essay
One of Rene Descartes's most famous arguments, from his not only from his first meditation but all of the meditations, is his Dream Argument.
Descartes believes that there is no way to be able to distinguish being in awake from being in a state of dreaming. In fact you could actually be in a
dream right now. Rene Descartes's theory that one is unable distinguish being awake from dreaming, as interesting as it is, can be at times a little
farfetched, along with a few contradictions to himself, Descartes's dream argument does not entitle himself to any sort of claim.
Descartes wrote the Meditations on First Philosophy were first published in the year 1641 in Latin. There are six total Meditations that Descartes had
written. One thing that...show more content...
It is deception from the sense that causes this mistrust for Descartes and brings forth the Dream Argument. The human senses as well feel very
real, just as they do in reality, and this is one of the first things that have Descartes question the differences between being awake and dream. Due to
the trust issues it he becomes unsure of whether he is dreaming or not. When it comes to dreaming Descartes thinks that there could possibility that
some certain God that may have easily deceived him in falsely believing in things could appear to be correct but are not. However Descartes says
that it God is described as a supremely good being (Descartes, 21). God has always been a being that is worshiped and why would so many people
worship an evil God if he brings no positives to their lives. Descartes however is not 100 percent positive on whether God is being deceptive or not
being deceptive. James Hill says that "[the] key move that Descartes then makes is to highlight the lack of insight one has into one's condition when
dreaming. It is this lack of insight, and Descartes' way of interpreting it, which forms the backbone of the dreaming argument" (Hill, 2). To shorten that
down, the minimal explanations to why and how dreams occur is the foundation for Descartes's Dream Argument.
The main idea of Descartes is that there is no difference between being awake and dreaming. Descartes says there are no definite signs to differ
dreaming from being awake. You could be possibly

Descartes
In the Meditations, Rene Descartes attempts to doubt everything that is possible to doubt. His uncertainty of things that existence ranges from God to
himself. Then he goes on to start proving that things do exist by first proving that he exists. After he establishes himself he can go on to establish
everything else in the world. Next he goes to prove that the mind is separate then the body. In order to do this he must first prove he has a mind, and
then prove that bodily things exist. I do agree with Descartes that the mind is separate from the body. These are the arguments that I agree with
Descartes.
In his six Meditations, only four contain his argument about corporeal things and establishing himself as a...show more content...
Since he can only be certain of the existence of himself insofar as he is a thinking thing, then he has knowledge of his existence of only a thinking thing.
After he has established himself as a thinking thing, he then goes on to argue that the mind is more certainly known then the body. He goes on to
say that it is possible that all knowledge of external objects, including his body, could be false as the result of the actions of an evil demon. It is not,
however, possible that he could be deceived about his existence or his nature as a thinking thing. This is true because if he can be deceived about
anything, then he can be certain, as he is a thinking thing.
Even corporeal objects, such as his body, are known much more distinctly through the mind than through the body.
This is where the wax argument comes into play. All the properties of the piece of wax that we perceive with the senses change as the wax melts.
This is true as well of its primary properties, such as shape, extension and size. Yet the wax remains the same piece of wax as it melts. We know the
wax through our mind and judgement, not through our senses or imagination. Therefore, every act of clear and distinct knowledge of corporeal matter
also provides even more certain evidence for the existence of Descartes as a thinking thing. Therefore his mind is much clearer and more distinctly
know to him than his body. At this

Descartes' Wax Argument Essay
The purpose of the wax argument is designed to provide a clear and distinct knowledge of "I", which is the mind, while corporeal things, "whose
images are framed by thought, and which the senses themselves imagine are much more distinctly known than this mysterious 'I' which does not fall
within the imagination" (66). Through the wax argument, Descartes' demonstrates that corporeal things are perceived neither through our senses nor
imagination, but through our intellect alone. In this argument, you will see that there is cause to doubt Descartes' analysis of the wax and his method
of philosophical reasoning.
Descartes makes a careful examination of what is involved in the recognition of a specific physical object, like a piece of...show more content...
Despite this problem, we believe it is the same piece of wax we see, touch, or imagine. But it is not our feelings or imagination that gives us the idea. If
we had evaluated these abilities, and if the wax is distorted, we would not be able to agree that it is the same wax. This study enables us to recognize
that the imagination, just like sensation, does not convey the true nature of wax; rather, this difficulty indicates that only understanding, exercising its
powers of conception and judgment, performs the unifying function that constitutes the self–identity of the piece of wax: "our perception of the wax is
neither a seeing, nor a touching, nor an imagining... but the mind alone" (68). Although the changing characteristics of the body has been transported
through our senses and imagination, the identity of the matter is provided by the understanding of the wax itself. This analysis confirms Descartes'
view that "what we thought we had seen with our eyes, we actually grasped solely with the faculty of judgment, which is in our mind" (68). Therefore,
any sense of the body is actually an introspection of our mind, not an external inspection.
In his defense, Descartes argues that our knowledge of the wax depends only on the ideas we conceive in our mind. This creates the difficulty of
reaching an agreement on the identity of the wax, and that understanding the body can vary for each individual perception. As it is evident that the
substantiality of

Essay on Descartes Knowledge
Descartes Knowledge
The question of our existence in reality is a question which philosophers have tackled throughout time. This essay will look at the phrase, cogito ergo
sum or I think therefore I am, a phrase brought about by Rene Descartes. This phrase is the backbone of Descartes whole philosophy of our existence in
reality. As long as we are thinking things, we exist.
When we look at this approach to our existence we must first deny that any sensory data that we receive is believable or it is conceivable that it is
false. This means that we can't really know that anything we perceive through our senses is actually an accurate interpretation of reality. After we've
established that our senses aren't totally reliable we then have to...show more content...
A thinking thing really has a very vague description and cannot really be applied to us as beings which we perceive. So what is the connection between
what we believe to be us and what is us? Descartes would say we have experiences of what we think we are. For example, even though our senses
aren't reliable, when we see things we still have the experience of seeing that thing. Even if in a dream, an apple is still experienced as our
definition of an apple. An apple in a dream will still look and smell the same as an apple to us in wakefulness because the experience is the same.
Because we really don't definitely know if we are awake or asleep at any time we can only say that the experience of the apple is certain in our
minds. So we are thinking things which are constantly having experiences of what we think is reality or the world without. These experiences are
what define the outside world, if in fact there is an outside world to us. Descartes says that all of these things aren't learnt but that we know them a
priori or without experience. Descartes gives the example of a ball of wax. When this ball of wax is heated it becomes soft and changes shape.
When it is heated more it becomes a liquid and some may even evaporate but we know as it is in us to know that it is the same piece of wax that it
was to start with. Even though the description of this wax has changed we still know as an a priori

Descartes Chapter 1 Analysis
1.No, Descartes clearly states, in a pedantic garble, that he believes in a perfect being, that he appropriately refers to as 'God'. In his own words he
writes, "Thus the only remaining option was that this idea was put in me by a nature that was really more perfect than I was...that is...in a single
word... God." (Descartes 26) Furthermore, Descartes believes that it is human imperfection and lack of abstract contemplation that manifests into a lack
of understanding about the concept of a perfect being. Descartes writes about how metaphysical perceptions are closely related to reality for they
would not be thought of if the human mind could not conceptualize such abstract ideas. (Descartes 28)
2.Descartes' four rules go as follows:
a.To only...show more content...
Descartes' publisher offered suggestions to Descartes and he seemed to take offense to them. The publisher's first suggestion was to change the title
from Discourse to Treatise. Descartes objected because, "I do not plan to teach the method here but merely speak about it." (Descartes 59) The final
complaint concerned Descartes' basic outline of very complex topics and how he avoided acknowledging the deeper issues. However, Descartes wished
to dispel readers who opposed his argument by offering additional readings to supplement further discussion and accommodate a more simplistic
observation "clearer than any geometrical demonstration." (Descartes

Descartes Dualism Essay
Descartes makes the claim that both the body and the mind are two separate entities. This is what is often referred to as his dualism view. According to
Descartes, both the body and the mind are two completely different components and neither is needed for the other one to exist. To Descartes the mind
is simply a thinking thing, while the body is an extended and unthinking object or thing. However, these two things interact with one another. Descartes
goes on to state that actions taken by the mind can cause bodily effects, while bodily effects may affect the mind. Both the body and the mind work
together in order for us as humans to survive and get around in the world. An example of this is when we are hungry the mind sends our body a signal

Essay about Descartes
Descartes 1.In the Discourse on the Method, Descartes laments that as a young man he was forced to conclude at the end of all his studies that
"there was no doctrine [i.e., teaching or body of knowledge] in the world that was of the sort that I had previously been led to hope for." In your
essay, I would like you to discuss the nature of the body of knowledge he was looking for a s well as the place of the cogito (that is, the utterance "I
think, therefore I am") in it. You may discuss his criticism of the learning of the time, but do not spill much ink over it; the focus of your paper
should be on the new science he is seeking, not the old. Rene Descartes is considered by many to be the father of modern philosophy. His new...show
more content...
He decided to pretend that all he had previously learned is false and start all over by rebuilding his knowledge from the ground up. This is were he
developed "the method." The rules of the method were to reject everything that you believe to be true unless you know with absolute certainty it is
true. The second rule dealt with solving complicated problems. He discovered that you needed breakdown complicated problems into smaller
problems to solve them. Thirdly, Descartes figured that the best way to learn about big things that were hard to analyze would be to look for
similar, smaller things and attempt to understand them. By this I mean if you want to learn about larger things start small and work your way up.
The final rule in Descartes method was to go over calculations again and again to be very thorough. The first rule was a very radical rule. It
knocked down the "old house of philosophy in order to build a new one over from the foundation. Descartes was in search of the truth. He realized
that the principle of his new philosophy could in no way be doubted. Instead of going through all of ideas and theorems to find an indubitable piece
of knowledge he boiled everything down to three things. Descartes decided that if these bases could ever be a source of error then we should not
look any farther into what these three things lead up to because their base was a possible source of

Essay on Descartes
Rene Descartes was one of the most influential thinkers in the history of the philosophy. Born in 1596, he lived to become a great mathematician,
scientist, and philosopher. In fact, he became one of the central intellectual figures of the sixteen hundreds. He is believed by some to be the father of
modern philosophy, although he was hampered by living in a time when other prominent scientists, such as Galileo, were persecuted for their
discoveries and beliefs. Although this probably had an impact on his desire to publish controversial material, he went on to devise works such as the
Meditations on First Philosophy and the Principles of Philosophy Aside from these accomplishments, his most important and lasting mathematical
work was the...show more content...
How can I doubt something if I do not exist. By the same token, maybe I am deceived into thinking I don&#8217;t exist by some other entity.
But then I must exist for it is I who is being deceived. This is the basic premise of Descartes&#8217; famous Cogito Ergo Sum &#8211; I
think therefor I am. Here Descartes is not saying anything about what we are here, just that we are. Next his desire is to find out exactly what he is.
Well, Descartes states, if I exist, for how long do I exist? I exist for as long as I think, and if I cease to think, then I shall also cease to exist. Therefor,
I am nothing but a thinking thing &#8211; that is, a thing that &#8220;doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and that also
imagines and senses.'; Although saying he is all of these things is indeed a bold statement, Descartes feels that in his attempt to prove that he exists he
has done all of those things, therefor they must be a part of what he is.
Descartes wants to show that &#8220;nothing can be perceived more easily and more evidently than my own mind.'; He starts of with an example
of a piece of wax. It seems that this piece of wax, or any corporeal thing for that matter, is more distinctly known by me than exactly what it is that I
know. However, we do not really grasp what the wax(or any corporeal object) is through seeing, touching, or imagining, but rather by way of reason
&#8211;

Descartes' Cogito Argument and Proof of God's Existence

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Papers Review Bluffton University

More from Custom Papers Review Bluffton University (15)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Descartes' Cogito Argument and Proof of God's Existence