2. ovarian, lung, and bladder cancer. However, the
use of cisplatin as a chemotherapeutic agent is
frequently restricted by numerous side effects
such as neurotoxicity, ototoxicity, and particularÂ
ly nephrotoxicity.1 There are a number of clinical
presentations which can be seen due to cisplaÂ
tin nephrotoxicity, such as acute kidney injury,
Fanconi-like syndrome, distal renal tubular acidoÂ
sis, hypomagnesemia, renal concentration defects,
etc. But acute kidney injury is the most serious
and relatively common side effect, which can be
seen in nearly 30% of patients after a single dose.2
Although the complete understanding of the mechÂ
anisms involved in cisplatin nephrotoxicity is not
clear, it is thought that cisplatin-induced nephroÂ
toxicity is a complex process involving oxidative
stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA
damage, and inflammation.3 In view of this, many
agents have been used to prevent nephrotoxicity,
interacting with at least one of these underlyÂ
ing mechanisms, and especially oxidative stress.
Antioxidants such as Vitamin C, vitamin E, seleÂ
nium, alpha lipoic acid, super oxide dismutase,
glutathione, and plant-based agents have been
evaluated.4 Several beneficial effects were noted in
in vitro and in vivo mice studies.5 Flavonoids are
one of the most commonly studied plant-based
agents because they are widely distributed and
are thought to have health-promoting properties
due to their high antioxidant capacity.6 DihydroÂ
flavonols, a group of flavonoids, display differÂ
ent biological activities including reactive oxygen
species (ROS) scavenging and metal-binding activÂ
ities. Taxifolin (3,5,7,3â,4â-pentahydroxy-flavanone
or 2,3-dihydroquercetin) is one of the most comÂ
mon dihydroflavonols and a minor component in
complex preparations such as silymarin, pycnogeÂ
nol, and venoruton.7 In nature it is found in French
maritime bark, Douglas fir bark, and Siberian larch
wood and also citrus fruits, grapes, olive oil, and
onions.8 It can be easily extracted and used. Sev-
eral studies show its role in the inhibition of free
radical formation at key stages of apoptosis and
to correct cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury.5,9
Taxifolin was also found to exhibit anticancer and
neuroprotective effects.10-12 In a recent study by
Zhou and colleagues, the high antioxidant cap-
acity of taxifolin was demonstrated.13
These indicate that taxifolin has potential as an
antioxidant agent. However, no study has been re-
ported on the protective effects of taxifolin against
cisplatin-induced oxidative renal injury. In this
study we aimed to show the protective effects of
taxifolin on cisplatin-induced oxidative renal injury.
Materials and Methods
Animals
All the animals used in this study were obtained
from the Ataturk University Medical Experiment-
al Application and Research Center. A total 30 al-
bino Wistar male rats weighing between 280 and
295 g were randomly selected. Before the experiÂ
ment the rats were divided into 3 groups with 10
rats in each group, and the animals were housed
and fed in the pharmacology laboratory at room
temperature (22°C). Animal experiments were perÂ
formed in accordance with the National Guide-
lines for the Use and Care of Laboratory Animals
and were approved by the local animal ethics
committee of Ataturk University, Erzurum, TurÂ
key (Ethics Committee Number 2018/09, dated
09.08.2018).
Chemical Agents Used in the Experiment
Cisplatin vials (50 mg/100 mL; Cisplatin-Ebewe)
were provided by Liba-Turkey, thiopental sodium
(Pental sodium) was provided by I
·
.E. Ulagay TurÂ
key, and Taxifolin was provided by Evalar-Russia.
Experimental Groups
Experimental animals were divided into the folÂ
lowing 3 groups: healthy group, cisplatin group
(given 2.5 mg/kg cisplatin), and taxifolin+cisplatÂ
in group (given 50 mg/kg taxifolin+2.5 mg/kg
cisplatin).
Experimental Procedure
Taxifolin, 50 mg/kg, was administered to the taxiÂ
folin+cisplatin group (n=10) via oral gavage. DisÂ
tilled water was given to the healthy (n=10) and
cisplatin (n=10) groups as the solvent via oral
gavage. One hour after the administration of taxÂ
ifolin and distilled water, 2.5 mg/kg cisplatin
was injected intraperitoneally to the rats in the
taxifolin+cisplatin and cisplatin groups. Taxifolin,
cisplatin, and distilled water were administered
at the indicated doses and volumes mentioned
above once daily for 14 days. At the end of that
period all rats were sacrificed by high dose anesÂ
thesia (50 mg/kg thiopental) and the kidneys were
removed. Malondialdehyde (MDA), total glutaÂ
thione (tGSH), and super oxide dismutase (SOD)
levels were measured in the removed kidney tisÂ
sues. Additionally, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and
48 Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and HistopathologyÂź
Kara et al
3. creatinine levels were measured in the blood samÂ
ples taken before the animals were sacrificed. KidÂ
ney tissues were examined histopathologically.
Finally, biochemical and histopathological results
of the groups were compared.
Biochemical Analysis
Preparing the Samples.â25 mg of the tissue was ho-
mogenized using a solution of 1.15% KCl (Merck,
Germany). The homogenate was centrifuged at
4,000 rpm for 30 minutes at +4°C. Supernatants
were then used for nitric oxide (NO) and MDA
measurements. Tissues (25 mg) taken for tGSH
analysis were washed with isotonic sodium
chloride (I
·
.E. Ulagay, Turkey) and subsequently
brought to 2 mL total volume with phosphate
buffer solution (0.213 g NaH2PO4.2H2O [Merck,
Germany]+1.563 g Na2HPO4.2H2O [Merck]+0.038
g EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany)+100 mL dH2O,
pH=7.4), and then were homogenized in an icy
environment. After that, the tissues were centriÂ
fuged at 1,000 rpm for 15 minutes at a tempera-
ture of +4°C. The supernatant was used as the
sample for analysis. The protein concentration of
the supernatant was measured using the method
described by Bradford.14
MDA Analysis
MDA measurements were based on the methÂ
od used by Ohkawa et al, involving spectropho-
tometric measurement of absorbance of the pink-
colored complex formed by thiobarbituric acid
and MDA.15 The serum/tissue homogenate sam-
ple (0.1 mL) was added to a solution containing
0.2 mL of 80 g/L sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1.5
mL of 200 g/L acetic acid, 1.5 mL of 8 g/L 2-
thiobarbiturate, and 0.3 mL distilled water. The
mixture was incubated at 95°C for 1 hour. Upon
cooling, 5 mL of n-butanol:pyridine (15:1) was
added. The mixture was vortexed for 1 minute
and centrifuged for 30 minutes at 4,000 rpm. The
absorbance of the supernatant was measured at
532 nm. The standard curve was obtained by using
1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane.15
tGSH Analysis
Analysis was made according to the method
described by Sedlak and Lindsay. DTNB (5, 5â-
dithiobis [2-nitrobenzoic acid]) disulfide is chroÂ
mogenic in the medium, and DTNB is reduced
easily by sulfhydryl groups. The yellow color
produced during the reduction is measured by
spectrophotometer at 412 nm. For measurement, a
cocktail solution (5.85 mL 100 mM Na-phosphate
buffer, 2.8 mL 1 mM DTNB, 3.75 mL 1 mM
NADPH, and 80 ”L 625 U/L glutathione reducÂ
tase was prepared. Before measurement, 0.1 mL
meta-phosphoric acid was added to 0.1 mL se-
rum/tissue homogenate and centrifuged for 2
minutes at 2,000 rpm for deproteinization. The
0.15 mL cocktail solution was added to 50 ”L of
supernatant. The standard curve was obtained by
using glutathione disulfide.16
SOD Analysis
Measurements were performed according to the
method of Sun et al.17 When xanthine is con-
verted into uric acid by xanthine oxidase, SOD
forms. If nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) is added to
this reaction, SOD reacts with NBT and a purple-
colored formazan dye occurs. The sample was
weighed and homogenized in 2 mL of 20 mmol/L
phosphate buffer containing 10 mmol/L EDTA at
pH 7.8. The sample was centrifuged at 6,000 rpm
for 10 minutes and then the brilliant supernatant
was used as assay sample. The measurement mixÂ
ture containing 2,450 ÎŒL measurement mixture
(0.3 mmol/L xanthine, 0.6 mmol/L EDTA, 150
ÎŒmol/L NBT, 0.4 mol/L Na2CO3, and 1 g/L bo-
vine serum albumin), 500 ÎŒL supernatant, and
50 ÎŒL xanthine oxidase (167 U/L) was vortexed.
Then it was incubated for 10 min. At the end of
the reaction, formazan occurred. The absorbance
of the purple-colored formazan was measured at
560 nm. As more of the enzyme exists, the least
O2â radical that reacts with NBT occurs.
Serum Creatinine Measurement
Quantitative determination of serum creatinine
levels was determined by spectrophotometry in
a Roche Cobas 8000 auto analyzer. This kinetic
colorimetric test is based on the Jaffe procedure.
Creatinine reaction with picrate in alkaline solu-
tion forms a yellow-orange complex. This com-
plex was measured at a wavelength of 505 nm.
The rate of dye formation is proportional to the
concentration of creatinine in the sample. In the
test, ârate-blankingâ was used to minimize biliruÂ
bin interference. Serum or plasma were corrected
with â26 ÎŒmol/L (â0.3 mg/dL) to correct nonÂ
specific reaction caused by serum/plasma pseudo-
creatinine chromogens, including proteins and
ketones. Creatinine+picric acidâ(Alkaline pH)
yellow-orange complex.
Volume 41, Number 2/April 2019 49
Effect of Taxifolin on Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity
4. Serum BUN Measurement
Quantitative determination of serum urea level
was performed by spectrophotometry in a Roche
Cobas 8000 auto analyser. BUN was calculated
with the equation of BUN=urea*0.48. Kinetic
test was made with urease and glutamate dehyÂ
drogenase. Urea is hydrolyzed by urease, and
ammonium and carbonate are formed (urea+
2 H2Oâ[urease] 2 NH4
+). In the second reaction,
L-glutamate is produced by the reaction of 2-
oxoglutarate and ammonium in the presence of
glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) and NADH
(NH4
++2-oxoglutarate+NADHâ[GLDH] L-
glutamate+NAD++H2O). The rate of decrease in
the NADH concentration is directly proportional
to the urea concentration in the specimen and is
measured photometrically (340 nm wavelength).
Histopathological Examination
All of the tissue samples were first identified in a
10% formaldehyde solution for light microscope
assessment. Following the identification process,
tissue samples were washed under tap water in
cassettes for 24 hours. Samples were then treated
with conventional grade alcohol (70%, 80%, 90%,
and 100%) to remove the water within tissues. TisÂ
sues were then passed through xylol and embedÂ
ded in paraffin. Four-to-five micron sections were
cut from the paraffin blocks, and hematoxylin-
eosin staining was administered. Their photos
were taken following the Olympus DP2-SAL
firmware program assessment. Histopathological
assessment was carried out by the pathologist
blinded to the study groups.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were carried out using the
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Win-
dows version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Descriptive statistics for each variable were deterÂ
mined. Normality of the data distribution was
assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. ReÂ
sults for continuous variables were demonstrated
as mean±standard deviation of the mean (mean±
SD). Significance of differences between the
groups was determined using one-way ANOVA
test followed by Tukeyâs post hoc test. A p value
<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Biochemical Results
Mean and median levels of parameters are shown
in Table I. Serum BUN and creatinine levels were
significantly higher in the cisplatin group as comÂ
pared with the healthy and taxifolin+cisplatin
groups (p<0.001) (Figure 1). There were no signifÂ
icant differences between the healthy and taxifoÂ
lin+cisplatin groups in terms of BUN and creatÂ
inine (p=0.158 and p=0.811, respectively). MDA
level was significantly higher in the cisplatin group
as compared with the healthy and taxifolin+cisÂ
platin groups (p<0.001). SOD and tGSH levels
were significantly lower in the cisplatin group
as compared with the healthy and taxifolin+cisÂ
platin groups (p<0.001). There were no statistiÂ
cally significant differences between the healthy
and taxifolin+cisplatin groups in terms of MDA,
SOD, and tGSH (p=0.057, p=0.067, and p=0.060,
respectively) (Figure 2).
Histopathological Results
According to the conducted microscopic evaluaÂ
tions of kidney tissue, the glomerular structure
and morphology, proximal and distal tubules were
50 Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and HistopathologyÂź
Kara et al
Table Iâ Biochemical Results of the Study
Healthy group (n=10) Cisplatin group (n=10) Taxifolin+cisplatin group (n=10)
Mean±SD Median Mean±SD Median Mean±SD Median
(Min-Max) (Min-Max) (Min-Max)
MDA (nmol/g protein) 3.07±0.37 3.0 (2.5â3.7) 9.13±0.49a 9.05 (8.5â9.9)â 3.51±0.35b
3.6 (3.0â4.0)
tGSH (”mol/g protein) 8.16±0.61 8.15 (7.1â9.1)â 2.72±0.52a 2.75 (2.0â3.4)â 7.57±0.51b
7.4 (6.9â8.5)
SOD (U/mg protein) 15.9±2.8â 16.5 (12â20)â 6.3±0.83a 6.1 (5.1â7.9)â 13.7±2.21b 14 (10â17)
BUN (mg/dL) 48±7â 49 (39â56)
â 246±11aâ 243 (234â265) 58±7bâ 59 (48â66)
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.85±0.08 0.83 (0.77â1.0) 2.78±0.26a 2.8 (2.4â3.1)â 0.91±0.05b 0.90 (0.85â0.98)
Data are the mean±SD of 10 rats in each group.
ap<0.01 compared to healthy group.
bp<0.01 cisplatin group.
BUN = blood urea nitrogen, MDA = malondialdehyde, SOD = super oxide dismutase, tGSH = total glutathione.
5. normal in the control group (Figure 3A). In the cisÂ
platin group, microscopic examinations showed
obvious kidney damage including dilation, severe
necrosis, and degenerative changes in epithelium
of the tubule lumens and congestion in blood
vessels. Glomeruli of kidney tissue were dilated,
following proximal tubules showed vacuolation;
distal tubules were mostly necrotic, and the cells
present in their lumen were seen (Figure 3B). ConÂ
gested blood vessels were outstanding across the
tissue (Figure 3C). In rats treated with taxifolin
prior to cisplatin, marked amelioration of both
glomeruli and tubules of renal tissue was ob-
served and congestion was decreased in blood vesÂ
sels (Figure 3D).
Discussion
Cisplatin as a potent chemotherapeutic drug wideÂ
ly used for the treatment of many solid tumors.
But its potent nephrotoxicity, which occurs in a
significant percentage of patients, is the main limÂ
iting factor for clinical usage and has been a mat-
ter of concern since nearly its introduction.18 There
are several pathogenesis pathways suspected for
cisplatin nephrotoxicity. These are oxidative and
nitrosative stress, activation of glutathione S-
transferase, apoptosis, renal vasoconstriction, inÂ
flammation, inhibition of protein synthesis, and
renal histomorphological damage.19 Oxidative
stress is the most frequent and typically accused
among these pathways. Cisplatin causes ROS
production by the disrupted respiratory chain
and results in mitochondrial dysfunction. ROS in
renal cells also reduces the antioxidant enzyme
activity and intracellular concentrations of anti-
oxidants by reacting with thiol-containing antiÂ
oxidant molecules such as glutathione.20 So, the
majority of studies for prevention of cisplatin
nephrotoxicity have been focused on antioxidant
therapy.
Particularly, plant-based antioxidants are given
more consideration because they may detoxify
ROS without affecting antineoplastic efficacy of
cisplatin.21 Flavonoids make up one of the main
groups of plant phenolic antioxidants and have
high chelating properties.22 They are widely found
in leaves and flowers of plants and also abunÂ
dantly found in foods and beverages made from
plants.23 Taxifolin (3,5,7,3,4-pentahydroxy flavaÂ
none or dihydroquercetin) is a flavanolol which is
a subclass of flavonoids and is abundantly found
in citrus fruits, onion, olive oil, etc.24
Topal and colleagues showed that taxifolin had
a marked antioxidant, radical scavenging, and
chelating activity and concluded that it could be
used in the food and pharmaceutical industry
for delaying formation of toxic oxidation prodÂ
ucts.25 Also, Shubina et al showed the antioxidant
Volume 41, Number 2/April 2019 51
Effect of Taxifolin on Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity
Figure 1â (A) The effects of taxifolin on creatinine levels in rats given cisplatin. Bars are mean±SD. The taxifolin+cisplatin and healthy
groups are compared with the cisplatin group. *p<0.001. (B) The effects of taxifolin on BUN levels in rats given cisplatin. Bars are
mean±SD. The taxifolin+cisplatin and healthy groups are compared with the cisplatin group.
_____
**p<0.001.
BUN = blood urea nitrogen, CG = cisplatin group, HG = healthy group, TCG = taxifolin+cisplatin group.
6. and iron-chelating properties of taxifolin.26 The
strong radical scavenger effect of taxifolin was
also shown by Li et al.27 Recent studies also
showed that taxifolin has anticancer properties10,28
and antibacterial action.29 In a recent study by
Zhao et al it was concluded that taxifolin may
mitigate the effects of streptozotocin-induced diaÂ
betes in rats.30 Rehman et al showed that taxifolin
can prevent postprandial hyperglycemia due to its
antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.31
Although there are several studies which have
shown that flavonoids can prevent cisplatin nephÂ
rotoxicity, there is no study with taxifolin as a
sole agent. In our study, the results of biochemical
tests showed that cisplatin causes oxidative stress
in rat kidneys. MDA was increased as an oxidant
agent, and tGSH and SOD were decreased as anÂ
tioxidant agents. As a result of kidney damage,
serum BUN and creatinine levels were also in-
creased. Obvious kidney damage including dilaÂ
tion, severe necrosis, and degenerative changes in
the epithelium of the tubule lumens and conges-
tion in blood vessels were also shown by microÂ
scopic examination after cisplatin therapy. TreatÂ
ment with taxifolin prior to cisplatin reversed
oxidative damage in kidneys and prevented acute
kidney injury and histopathological damage due
to cisplatin.
52 Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and HistopathologyÂź
Kara et al
Figure 2â (A) The effects of taxifolin on MDA levels in rats given cisplatin. Bars are mean±SD. The taxifolin+cisplatin and healthy groups
are compared with the cisplatin group. (B) The effects of taxifolin on tGSH levels in rats given cisplatin. Bars are mean+SD. The
taxifolin+cisplatin and healthy groups are compared with the cisplatin group. (C) The effects of taxifolin on SOD levels in rats given
cisplatin. Bars are mean±SD. The taxifolin+cisplatin and healthy groups are compared with the cisplatin group.
_____
*p<0.001.
CG = cisplatin group, HG = healthy group, MDA = malondialdehyde, SOD = super oxide dismutase, TCG = taxifolin+cisplatin group, tGSH = total
glutathione.
7. In conclusion, we have demonstrated for the first
time that taxifolin can prevent cisplatin-induced
nephrotoxicity due to its high antioxidant cap-
acity. We believe that our study will inspire more
comprehensive clinical studies.
References
â1.âLebwohl D, Canetta R: Clinical development of platinum
complexes in cancer therapy: an historical perspective and
an update. Eur J Cancer 1998;34(10):1522-1534
â2.âMiller RP, Tadagavadi RK, Ramesh G, Reeves WB: MechÂ
anisms of Cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Toxins 2010;2(11):2490-
2518
â 3.â Hayati F, Hossainzadeh M, Shayanpour S, Abedi-Gheshlaghi
Z, Beladi Mousavi SS: Prevention of cisplatin nephrotoxicity.
J Nephropharmacol 2016;5(1):57-60
â4.âNasri H: Cisplatin and renal injury; current concepts. J Re-
nal Injury Preven 2013;2(3):89-90
â5.âChirino YI, Pedraza-Chaverri J: Role of oxidative and
nitrosative stress in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Exp
Toxicol Pathol 2009;61(3):223-242
â6.âKumar S, Pandey AK: Chemistry and biological activities
of flavonoids: An overview. ScientificWorldJournal 2013;
2013:162750
â 7.â MĂŒlek M, Seefried L, Genest F, Högger P: Distribution of
constituents and metabolites of maritime pine bark extract
(PycnogenolÂź) into serum, blood cells, and synovial fluid of
Patients with severe osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled
trial. Nutrients 2017;9(5)
â8.âSlimestad R, Fossen T, Vagen IM: Onions: A source of
unique dietary flavonoids. J Agric Food Chem 2007;55(25):
10067-10080
â 9.â Maksimovich NY, Dremza IK, Troian EI, Maksimovich YN,
BorodinskiÄ±Ì AN: [The correcting effects of dihydroquercetin
in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury]. [Article in Russian;
Abstract available in Russian from the publisher]. Biomed
Khim 2014;60(6):643-650
10.âManigandan K, Manimaran D, Jayaraj RL, Elangovan N,
Dhivya V, Kaphle A: Taxifolin curbs NF-kappaB-mediated
Wnt/beta-catenin signaling via up-regulating Nrf2 path-
way in experimental colon carcinogenesis. Biochimie 2015;
119:103-112
11.â Zhang ZR, Al Zaharna M, Wong MM, Chiu SK, Cheung HY:
Taxifolin enhances andrographolide-induced mitotic arrest
and apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells via spindle
assembly checkpoint activation. PloS One 2013;8(1):e54577
12.â Dok-Go H, Lee KH, Kim HJ, Lee EH, Lee J, Song YS, Lee YH,
Jin C, Lee YS, Cho J: Neuroprotective effects of antioxida-
tive flavonoids, quercetin, (+)-dihydroquercetin and querÂ
cetin 3-methyl ether, isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica var.
saboten. Brain Research 2003;965(1-2):130-136
13.â Zhou S, Shao Y, Fu J, Xiang L, Zheng Y, Li W: CharacterizaÂ
tion and quantification of taxifolin related flavonoids in Larix
olgensis Henry Var. koreana Nakai extract analysis and its
antioxidant activity assay. Int J Pharmacol 2018;14:534-545
Volume 41, Number 2/April 2019 53
Effect of Taxifolin on Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity
Figure 3â
(A) Hematoxylin-eosin staining
in kidney tissue in the control
group. = glomerulus,
P = proximal tubule, D = distal
tubule, Ă200.
(B) Hematoxylin-eosin staining
in kidney tissue in the
cisplatin group. =
glomerulus, P = vacuolation in
proximal tubule, D = necrotic
distal tubule, « = dilation in
glomerulus, Ă = congestion in
blood vessels, Ă200.
(C) Hematoxylin-eosin staining
in kidney tissue in the
cisplatin group. =
glomerulus, P = vacuolation in
proximal tubule, D = necrotic
distal tubule, Ă = congestion
in blood vessels, Ă200.
(D) Hematoxylin-eosin staining
in kidney tissue in the
taxifolin+cisplatin treated
group. = glomerulus,
P = proximal tubule, D = distal
tubule, Ă200.
8. 14.âBradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quan-
titation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the
principle of protein-dye binding. Analyt Biochem 1976;
72(1):248-254
15.âOhkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K: Assay for lipid peroxides in
animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem
1979;95(2):351-358
16.âSedlak J, Lindsay RH: Estimation of total, protein-bound,
and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellmanâs
reagent. Anal Biochem 1968;25(1):192-205
17.â Sun Y, Oberley LW, Li Y: A simple method for clinical assay
of superoxide dismutase. Clin Chem 1988;34(3):497-500
18.âSastry J, Kellie SJ: Severe neurotoxicity, ototoxicity and
nephrotoxicity following high-dose cisplatin and amifostine.
Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2005;22(5):441-445
19.âBaradaran A TM, Ardalan MR Rafieian-Kopaei M: CisplatÂ
in: Nephrotoxicity and beyond. Ann Res Antioxid 2016;
1(2):e014
20.â Ozkok A, Edelstein CL: Pathophysiology of cisplatin-induced
acute kidney injury. BioMed Res Int 2014;2014:967826
21.â Hajian S, Rafieian-Kopaei M, Nasri H: Renoprotective effects
of antioxidants against cisplatin nephrotoxicity. J NephroÂ
pharmacol 2014;3(2):39-42
22.â Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G: Structure-antioxidant
activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free
Radical Biol Med 1996;20(7):933-956
23.â Panche AN, Diwan AD, Chandra SR: Flavonoids: An overÂ
view. J Nutr Sci 2016;5:e47
24.âWeidmann AE: Dihydroquercetin: More than just an im-
purity? Eur J Pharmacol 2012;684(1-3):19-26
25.âTopal F, Nar M, Gocer H, Kalin P, Kocyigit UM, Gulcin I,
Alwasel SH: Antioxidant activity of taxifolin: An activity-
structure relationship. J Enzyme Inhibit Med Chem 2016;
31(4):674-683
26.âShubina VS, Shatalin YV: Antioxidant and iron-chelating
properties of taxifolin and its condensation product with
glyoxylic acid. J Food Sci Technol 2017;54(6):1467-1475
27.â Li X, Xie H, Jiang Q, Wei G, Lin L, Li C, Ou X, Yang L, Xie
Y, Fu Z, Liu Y, Chen D: The mechanism of (+) taxifolinâs
protective antioxidant effect for âąOH-treated bone marrow-
derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Molec Biol Lett 2017;
22:31
28.â Haque M, Mohd Siddique M, Bose P, Pattanayak S: Taxifolin
possesses anti-cancer activity on the 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)
anthracene-induced breast cancer in the Sprague Dawley
rats by remodeling nuclear factor Erythroid 2- Kelch-like
ECH-associated protein 1-Heme Oxygenase 1 and anti-
oxidant pathways. Pharmacognosy Magazine 2018;14(55):
110-117
29.â Kuspradini H, Mitsunaga T, Ohashi H: Antimicrobial activÂ
ity against Streptococcus sobrinus and glucosyltransferase
inhibitory activity of taxifolin and some flavanonol rhamÂ
nosides from kempas (Koompassia malaccensis) extracts.
J Wood Sci 2009;55(4):308-313
30.âZhao Y, Huang W, Wang J, Chen Y, Huang W, Zhu Y:
Taxifolin attenuates diabetic nephropathy in streptozotocin-
induced diabetic rats. Am J Translat Res 2018;10(4):1205-1210
31.âRehman K, Chohan TA, Waheed I, Gilani Z, Akash MSH:
Taxifolin prevents postprandial hyperglycemia by regulatÂ
ing the activity of alpha-amylase: Evidence from an in vivo
and in silico studies. J Cell Biochem 2019;120(1):425-438
54 Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and HistopathologyÂź
Kara et al