SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Precept Week 12
Groupthink & Culture of Honor
Janis (1971)
• What is groupthink?
• Examples? (Personal, historical?)
Janis (1971)
Groupthink: Causes
• Group cohesiveness/closeness
• Stress
• Group norms/priorities
– Morale
– Unity
– Loyalty
• Suppression of “deviant thoughts”
• Is this an automatic process?
Janis (1971)
Groupthink: Symptoms
1. Invulnerability beliefs
2. Rationalizing behaviors
3. Beliefs in inherent morality
4. Stereotyping outgroups
5. Pressuring dissenters
6. Self-censorship
7. Illusion of unnanimity
8. Mindguards
Janis (1971)
Groupthink: Consequences
• What are some consequences of
“groupthink”?
– Types of decisions reached
– Outcomes of decisions
– Response from other group(s)
Janis (1971)
Groupthink: Remedies
• Open discussion of criticisms
• Input from outsiders
• Leader sets (impartial) tone
Janis (1971)
Groupthink: Remedies
1. Prioritize open objecting/doubting
2. Leaders adopt impartial stance (no stated
preferences)
3. Set up outside groups (not insulated)
4. Leaders discuss with (outside) others & report
reactions
5. Invite outside experts
6. Play devil’s advocate
7. Analyze rivals’ intentions/warning signs
8. Meet separately in subgroups
9. Final “second chance” meeting to re-visit doubts &
criticisms
Janis (1971)
Groupthink
• Value of this article/framework?
• Empirics vs. other methodologies
• Potential future directions
Nisbett & Cohen (1996)
Culture of Honor
Nisbett & Cohen (1996)
Culture of Honor
• What is the “culture of honor”?
– When is violence okay?
– Boundary conditions?
– Politeness?
• Who is from N vs. S?
– Reactions?
• Is the “culture of honor” unique to the
South?
• Other examples of cultural differences that
could impact interpersonal perception?
• Types of cultures?
Nisbett & Cohen (1996)
Culture of Honor
Nisbett & Cohen (1996)
Culture of Honor
• Is culture an example of a “situation”?
• Is culture an example of a “disposition”?
• What is culture, & how does it affect
behavior?
• How did “culture” affect you during the in-
class exercise?
Style Notes
• Affect (v) – to influence (ah-FECT)
– The manipulation affects the outcome.
• Affect (n) – emotional reaction (AH-fect)
– The sad movie induced negative affect.
• Effect (n) – a result
– The study detected no effect – the control and experimental
conditions were identical.
Citation examples (year always goes right after authors):
Sim, Correll, & Sadler (2013) found that automatic biases can sometimes be
controlled.
As shown by Platt (1973), social traps can be tricky.
Groupthink can be detrimental to decision making (Janis, 1971).

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (6)

Groupthink - Dangerous Effect on Group Decision Making
Groupthink - Dangerous Effect on Group Decision MakingGroupthink - Dangerous Effect on Group Decision Making
Groupthink - Dangerous Effect on Group Decision Making
 
Issues in Group Decision Making
Issues in Group Decision MakingIssues in Group Decision Making
Issues in Group Decision Making
 
Class slides - decision making and judgment
Class slides - decision making and judgmentClass slides - decision making and judgment
Class slides - decision making and judgment
 
Reflective thinking
Reflective thinkingReflective thinking
Reflective thinking
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 
Groupthink presentation
Groupthink presentationGroupthink presentation
Groupthink presentation
 

Similar to psy313_wk12 - groupthink & culture of honor - Copy

Groupproject h cfinaldraft
Groupproject h cfinaldraftGroupproject h cfinaldraft
Groupproject h cfinaldraft
aremethy
 
SOCIAL INFLUENCE (Psych 201 - Chapter 9 - Spring 2014)
SOCIAL INFLUENCE (Psych 201 - Chapter 9 - Spring 2014)SOCIAL INFLUENCE (Psych 201 - Chapter 9 - Spring 2014)
SOCIAL INFLUENCE (Psych 201 - Chapter 9 - Spring 2014)
Melanie Tannenbaum
 
PSYC 1113 Chapter 12
PSYC 1113 Chapter 12PSYC 1113 Chapter 12
PSYC 1113 Chapter 12
jarana00
 
2013 apa conference poster jones final qr
2013 apa conference poster jones final qr2013 apa conference poster jones final qr
2013 apa conference poster jones final qr
Shawn Jones
 
2013 apa conference poster jones final
2013 apa conference poster jones final2013 apa conference poster jones final
2013 apa conference poster jones final
Shawn Jones
 
Bgcp 2013 jones poster final
Bgcp 2013 jones poster finalBgcp 2013 jones poster final
Bgcp 2013 jones poster final
Shawn Jones
 

Similar to psy313_wk12 - groupthink & culture of honor - Copy (20)

Psychology 102: Social processes, society & culture
Psychology 102: Social processes, society & culturePsychology 102: Social processes, society & culture
Psychology 102: Social processes, society & culture
 
Sociocultural Level of Analysis: Sociocultural Cognition
Sociocultural Level of Analysis: Sociocultural CognitionSociocultural Level of Analysis: Sociocultural Cognition
Sociocultural Level of Analysis: Sociocultural Cognition
 
Social Psychology
Social PsychologySocial Psychology
Social Psychology
 
Social Psychology
Social PsychologySocial Psychology
Social Psychology
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 
Peerpressure 110520140409-phpapp01
Peerpressure 110520140409-phpapp01Peerpressure 110520140409-phpapp01
Peerpressure 110520140409-phpapp01
 
attribution & values.ppt
attribution & values.pptattribution & values.ppt
attribution & values.ppt
 
social_psych_arm.ppt
social_psych_arm.pptsocial_psych_arm.ppt
social_psych_arm.ppt
 
Groupproject h cfinaldraft
Groupproject h cfinaldraftGroupproject h cfinaldraft
Groupproject h cfinaldraft
 
Personality
PersonalityPersonality
Personality
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 
Socialpsychology 160330142748
Socialpsychology 160330142748Socialpsychology 160330142748
Socialpsychology 160330142748
 
10 social
10  social10  social
10 social
 
Group Influence
Group InfluenceGroup Influence
Group Influence
 
SOCIAL INFLUENCE (Psych 201 - Chapter 9 - Spring 2014)
SOCIAL INFLUENCE (Psych 201 - Chapter 9 - Spring 2014)SOCIAL INFLUENCE (Psych 201 - Chapter 9 - Spring 2014)
SOCIAL INFLUENCE (Psych 201 - Chapter 9 - Spring 2014)
 
PSYC 1113 Chapter 12
PSYC 1113 Chapter 12PSYC 1113 Chapter 12
PSYC 1113 Chapter 12
 
2013 apa conference poster jones final qr
2013 apa conference poster jones final qr2013 apa conference poster jones final qr
2013 apa conference poster jones final qr
 
2013 apa conference poster jones final
2013 apa conference poster jones final2013 apa conference poster jones final
2013 apa conference poster jones final
 
Bgcp 2013 jones poster final
Bgcp 2013 jones poster finalBgcp 2013 jones poster final
Bgcp 2013 jones poster final
 

psy313_wk12 - groupthink & culture of honor - Copy

  • 1. Precept Week 12 Groupthink & Culture of Honor
  • 2. Janis (1971) • What is groupthink? • Examples? (Personal, historical?)
  • 3. Janis (1971) Groupthink: Causes • Group cohesiveness/closeness • Stress • Group norms/priorities – Morale – Unity – Loyalty • Suppression of “deviant thoughts” • Is this an automatic process?
  • 4. Janis (1971) Groupthink: Symptoms 1. Invulnerability beliefs 2. Rationalizing behaviors 3. Beliefs in inherent morality 4. Stereotyping outgroups 5. Pressuring dissenters 6. Self-censorship 7. Illusion of unnanimity 8. Mindguards
  • 5. Janis (1971) Groupthink: Consequences • What are some consequences of “groupthink”? – Types of decisions reached – Outcomes of decisions – Response from other group(s)
  • 6. Janis (1971) Groupthink: Remedies • Open discussion of criticisms • Input from outsiders • Leader sets (impartial) tone
  • 7. Janis (1971) Groupthink: Remedies 1. Prioritize open objecting/doubting 2. Leaders adopt impartial stance (no stated preferences) 3. Set up outside groups (not insulated) 4. Leaders discuss with (outside) others & report reactions 5. Invite outside experts 6. Play devil’s advocate 7. Analyze rivals’ intentions/warning signs 8. Meet separately in subgroups 9. Final “second chance” meeting to re-visit doubts & criticisms
  • 8. Janis (1971) Groupthink • Value of this article/framework? • Empirics vs. other methodologies • Potential future directions
  • 9. Nisbett & Cohen (1996) Culture of Honor
  • 10. Nisbett & Cohen (1996) Culture of Honor • What is the “culture of honor”? – When is violence okay? – Boundary conditions? – Politeness? • Who is from N vs. S? – Reactions?
  • 11. • Is the “culture of honor” unique to the South? • Other examples of cultural differences that could impact interpersonal perception? • Types of cultures? Nisbett & Cohen (1996) Culture of Honor
  • 12. Nisbett & Cohen (1996) Culture of Honor • Is culture an example of a “situation”? • Is culture an example of a “disposition”? • What is culture, & how does it affect behavior? • How did “culture” affect you during the in- class exercise?
  • 13. Style Notes • Affect (v) – to influence (ah-FECT) – The manipulation affects the outcome. • Affect (n) – emotional reaction (AH-fect) – The sad movie induced negative affect. • Effect (n) – a result – The study detected no effect – the control and experimental conditions were identical. Citation examples (year always goes right after authors): Sim, Correll, & Sadler (2013) found that automatic biases can sometimes be controlled. As shown by Platt (1973), social traps can be tricky. Groupthink can be detrimental to decision making (Janis, 1971).

Editor's Notes

  1. Are all necessary? Which seem most important?
  2. Culture can be situation – norms in a given environment/time Cultures become internalized -carry those expectations and perceptions with them, becoming indiv. Difference Bicultural people – different cultural responses in diff situations., Hong et al., 2000, found that Hong Kong Chinese primed with Mickey Mouse will make more individual attributions for a school of fish following a single fish than those primed with a Chinese dragon.)