Homeostasis Analogy Explained

Homeostasis: An Analogy
Homeostasis – An Analogy The human body is everything that makes up, well, you. The
fundamental parts of the human body are the head, neck, middle, arms and legs. Our bodies
comprise of various natural frameworks that do particular capacities vital for ordinary living. In this
paper you will learn about: The organization of the human body at its complex levels. Homeostasis
and its relationship to human biology. Homeostatic mechanisms for its internal environment.
Numerous individuals have contrasted the human body with a machine. Consider some normal
machines, for example, bores and clothes washers. Every machine comprises of numerous parts,
and every part makes a particular showing, yet every one of the parts cooperate to perform a general
...show more content...
Since homeostasis is an endeavor to keep up the inner states of a situation by constraining
vacillations, it must include a progression of negative input circles. (Temperature Regulation, 2014)
Homeostasis and its relationship to human biology Homeostasis may be the control from claiming
internal conditions, be it temperature, specific blood states or distinctive variables inside for
existing creatures. The statement "Homeostasis" might have been at first portrayed by those French
physiologist, Claude Bernard, on 1865. Those purpose behind homeostasis may be with provide for
an unfaltering inside surroundings to set methods will happen. Each procedure, or response, need a
charming Main surroundings known as those standard. Impacts, for example, an outside impact,
might realize deviation a long way from this standard level and the form will revise this progress
this will be known as negative information. (Diaz, m., & Becker, d. 2010). Illustrations from
claiming cases about negative criticism. When pulse climbs those heart will
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Paley's Analogy Analysis
In Paley's analogy he compares a watch to the world and human existence. He states that the
watch must have been carefully designed by a watchmaker in order for it to exist. Paley supposes
that humans and our universe must have been designed by a greater power because of the careful
design. He states that the more complex the design the more likely for flaws to occur. He uses this
to explain why people become ill, commit immoral acts, and death. Hume challenges Paley's
analogy saying that our world is so complex that anything made by humans will never be
comparable to the complex design of the universe. He suggests that if there were a creator, it would
not be something our minds be able to perceive or imagine. Also, Hume argues that a watch

Examples Of Analogy In Teaching
1.0 Introduction
Definition: An analogy is a comparison between one thing and another, usually for the purpose of
explanation or interpretation. It is similar to metaphor and simile; they are usually used in
conversation to relate one situation to other.
According to (Heick, 2014) other than conversational analogy there are analogies, which are formal
analogies, used in teaching. They usually are called academic analogies. These analogies are the
research–based tool for teaching in science class rooms. It can also be used in text books and web
based learning environment. Analogy can be used to explain concepts effectively to the students,
which makes sense of the concepts to the students. This also helps them to understand easily than
normal explanation. Especially, the students from primary and lower primary are getting to know
of the science concept for the first time. Analogies make the subject interesting to the students from
the age group of 5 to 12. In Maldives, National Institute of Education has implemented key stage 1
and 2 for the classes from grade 1 to 5 fully, with the help of analogy teachers can easily make the
students to make their...show more content...
The aware idea is called the analog and the unaware one the target. The analog and the target have
attributes; if the analog and the target have similar features then an analogy may be made between
them. An orderly comparison, orally or visually, between the features of the analog and target is
called a mapping. A theoretical illustration of an analogy, with its essential parts, appears in Figure 1.
Figure – 1
An example of an analogy shown between a water circuit and an electric circuit appears below in
Figures – 2 and Figures –

The Usefulness of the Analogy Between Society and a Biological Organism One set of sociologist
that use the Biological or Organic analogy of societies are the Functionalists. Functionalism first
emerged in Europe in the 19th Century. The French sociologist Emile Durkheim was the most
influential of all the early functionalists. The theory became the dominant theoretical perspective in
the 1940's and 1950. The functionalist theory is that within society there are many small parts that
have to work together to maintain the society. I will be assessing how useful this analogy is to show
the likeness between society and a biological organism. The functionalists argue that...show more
content...
The functions of the various parts all contribute into the maintenance of the body to cause effect.
In the functionalist view behaviour in society is structured. relationships between members of
society are organized in terms of rules. Values provide the general guidelines for behaviour in
society and norms and roles are derived from them. The functions of social institutions are to work
in together to help society to work better together e.g. the function of the family is to socialize the
children to behave in the manner that is accepted within that society. Growth Biological organisms
develop through a life cycle and evolve into more complex forms. They do this by adapting and
changing themselves to better suit their environment. Societies in ways do the same, by means of
reproduction to grow and improving technology and knowledge to grow out from their boundaries.
Equilibrium The concept in biology of Homeostasis where the body keeps its temperature at
approximately 37В°c by means of releasing the hormone ADH and controlling the amount of water
lost et cetera. Is used in relation in functionalism from where Parsons' notion of "fit" where social
arrangements adapt to changing condition much like how they grow from change. So in relation to
the biological analogy the values can be seen as the skeletal

Analogy Of Reliability And Validity
Hi Susan, I like your analogy of validity and reliability. It is very critical that the reliability and
validity of the data collection tools that are used in qualitative research are validated because of the
outcome of the research results. If the data tools are not valid, it could have a negative impact to the
outcome of patients such as a treatment or drug that is being researched. The probability of harming
a patient is high if a new treatment is incorrect.

False Analogies In Research
Facts are the sources that the world wants to hear. The bitter truth is what everyone yearns to
receive and sometimes maybe a little spice here and there is added toward the truth. During an
argument, one should not use false analogies to get to their point. Most likely there will be
researches who will look up the evidence and in the end will not go through with the persuaded
speech. False analogies are not some type of evidence one would follow, because it gives the
audience fallacy. For example, if a person were to sit in a room and listen to the speaker about
how cancer can be resolved by one resolution, then that would be a lie and more people would deny
the fact because there has not been one conclusion for cancer. There is evidence that

Cultural Differences Argument Analysis
Cultural Ethical Relativism is a theory that is used to explain differences among cultures, and thus
their moral codes. According to cultural relativists, different cultures have different moral codes, and
there is no objective truth in ethics. They believe there is no independent standard that can be used
to judge one's custom as better than another's. In his article entitled "The Challenge of Cultural
Relativism," James Rachels offers his argument against the theory of Cultural Relativism by proving
the Cultural Differences Argument is unsound and invalid. Further in his article, Rachels reasons
against the claims made by cultural relativists, and he argues there are common values shared by all
cultures and there exists an independent standard...show more content...
If the Cultural Relativism is correct, then each culture will have total freedom in which its people can
do whatever they want within their society because what is right is determined by the moral code of
that society, and we cannot judge them since there is no independent standard that can be used to
judge one's custom. For example, in the late 19th century in the Southern United States, despite the
passages of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendment had abolished slavery and made African Americans
citizens, the majority of White Americans still perceived the Negroes as inferior. Within the society
in the South, the culture determined it was right that whites were superior over blacks and American
Whites could do whatever they pleased to the African Americans. Consequently, the violent actions
White Americans had committed against the Negroes, such as murdering, lynching and preventing
blacks to vote, were culturally acceptable in the South. If the Cultural Ethical Relativism is right,
then what these whites had done is justified as correct and they did not commit any moral mistakes
since their culture permitted such a

The Analogy From The Strict Analogy
The analogy portrayed in equation (1) above shows clashes with the observations implying that
there is not set of parameters that the equation will hold exactly for an arbitrary set of variables.
This becomes the rationale to depart from the strict analogy because the traditional gravity
equation has flexibility for the coefficient of 1 to apply to the mass variables and 2 to apply to the
bilateral distance so that the data generated will fit a statistically deduced relationship among the
flow, the mass variables, and the spatial distance. This implies that the gravity model takes a
stochastic form shown in the equation 2 below: Xij = a0Ea1i Ea2j Г a3ij Eij...show more content...
Sohn (2001) observed that two competing models; Differentiated Product Model and
Heckscher–Ohlin (OH) model provided the analytical options for theoretical justification of the use
of gravity model in analyzing international trade flow patterns. In Anderson (1979) and Krugman &
Helpman (1985), there were attempts to identify clearly, the relationship that exists between the
market size of both countries and the bilateral trade flow using differentiated product model. Under
the imperfect substitute model, Krugman and Helpman argued that each firm produces a product
that is an imperfect substitute for other goods leading to monopoly power leading to consumers'
preference for a wide range of products. The idea is that when the size of domestic economy
expands, consumers increase their utility in terms greater variety of available goods and not the
quantity.
International trade regardless of the form – multilateral or regional can produce a similar result of
providing greater consumers in both countries the opportunity for greater variety. Hummel and
Levinsohn (1995) applied a similar procedure to empirical test a set of data from some non–OECD
nations where chances of monopolistic competition are remote. They were shocked by the result
which

Examples Of False Analogy
The logical fallacy identified in question five is False Analogy. False Analogy is a false
comparison between two objects or two different points of view. In the cartoon two men are
sitting next to each other in their cars. One of them is a member of the National Regulatory
Authority that says "Guns don't kill people do" and the other one is a drug dealer that says,
"Drugs don't kill people do". This cartoon actually comes across comical because both of them are
obviously going to have two different points of view. These two analogies are not something you
can really compare because we have constitutional rights to bear arms, but drugs do not have
constitutional rights. It is like comparing oranges to apples. They are two completely unrelated
topics. However they can both be dangerous, but drugs and guns do not serve the same purpose.
They are two completely different subjects....show more content...
Equivocation works by intentionally using a word that has more than one interpretation. It misleads
the reader or listener by comparing two things that are not necessarily equal. In the cartoon, two
students were caught cheating and tried to explain their actions to the professor by saying "We
weren't cheating. We were consulting." As it shows in the cartoon the professor is clearly
unimpressed by the students witty response. If I were the teacher my response would be consulting
during a test is not allowed. Even though the students tried to twist the truth the professor knew they
were lying. The students did not want to get in trouble so therefore they resulted in twisting the truth
and hoping that the professor would believe

False Analogy
Part One: Overall, the argument presented is strong however, it is not without flaw. The first place
we see this is in the last sentence of paragraph one "Although, having a positive body image is good,
it does not outweigh the negative consequences brought about by the normalization of obesity." The
assertion made here, dismisses the psychological harm brought about by a negative body image. For
example, the prevalence of eating disorders in American women that can bring about equal health
risks. Moving forward, it could be argued that the author makes a false analogy throughout
paragraph one by comparing the health risks of smoking to the health risks of obesity. Furthermore,
even in the absence of the false analogy the assertions made about both the health risks of both lack
any academic backing, consequently, many readers will dismiss the argument immediately.
Paragraph three, makes the assumption that readers adopt a utilitarian moral view. Due to this,
readers who do not hold this view are neglected. In the third paragraph, the author again makes a
generalization about the reader; he assumes that the reader knows that BMI stands for body mass
index. By not making this clear, the reader may become confused. Throughout the entirety of the
essay the author, speaks as if the ideal body type is one that is obese, and it isn't until the final
paragraph that it is even mentioned that the current and most prominent standards of beauty are (for
women anyway) ultra–thin body types. It could be argued that this is irrelevant and that the...show
more content...
Repeatedly throughout the essay the author references outside material, however he never provides a
list of his sources. Although, at face value, the anecdotes and case studies mentioned strengthen the
argument, it is entirely possible that the author just made everything up so that it conveniently
strengthened his

Analogy Assignment
A lot has changed in our houses from the earlier nineteen hundreds to present day furniture that we
think of today. In this illustration by Chris Ware of a Thanksgiving dinner, Chris wants to illustrate
to the viewers of a family from the nineteen–forty's and contrast the family with another family from
the two–thousand era. The cover was published in the year 2006 around the time of the Afghan–Iraqi
war in the Middle–East and, to me, it seems like Chris wants you to see how families interacted
back then and how families interact now. There are a decent amount of subtle images within these
two images that show the viewer's how life was back about seventy years ago and how life is now.
First off, the image at the top of the page has a...show more content...
The bottom family seems to be more interested in the technology than the actual gathering. If you
think about it, it is a little sad because that is how most families are these days. The clothing the
families are wearing are also striking to me because in the top image the family is wearing more
formal clothes with skirts and dress shirts with ties where the other family at the bottom is wearing
more "everyday clothing" such as tank tops and camouflaged t–shirts. It looks like this is more of a
"gathering" than a family Thanksgiving dinner. The reason I think this looks more like a
gathering than a formal dinner is not only because of the clothing but also because there are two
types of tables in the dining room and there are a few different types of chairs that look like they
either came from the back deck or from the basement storage. If you take a look at where the pies
are located you can see that in the top image they are placed right beside the dining room table
where there are multiple types of desserts for the whole family where in the bottom image there is
only one pie and it is located in the kitchen almost out of sight. Where it is located it makes it seem
like the pie is only there for the people that want it and they may not care if they do not have enough
for the entire family. It appears that the bottom family is so caught up into watching the game that
they might have the pie when the game is finished where it

Analogy Essay
What do Kingda Ka and the discoverer of radioactivity, Marie Curie, have in common? Actually,
there is a lot more than you would think. You might say to yourself that they are completely
different, which is correct, yet incorrect. One thing is a rollercoaster and the other is a famous
scientist, but when you look past just their physical descriptions, you will see how much they
actually are alike. They both follow similar paths and they both faced many hardships, but also
many great things. Firstly, they both start off slowly. Marie was just an average girl who was born
in Poland in 1867. Kingda Ka was just a rollercoaster when construction began. They weren't
anything special. Marie grew up like all other girls in Poland did at that...show more content...
Much like Kingda Ka, Marie was struck down by the fact that after a while, Marie had learned all
she could. If she wanted further education, she would have to wait a while to save up enough
money to keep going. As they had before, they didn't let this obstacle stop them. Kingda Ka was
eventually repaired and it continued working as it had before, even though it had many more
light breakdowns than it had before. Marie and her sister had worked out a plan as well. First,
they would save up enough money between them to send Marie's sister to college in France first.
Then, they would send Marie when they had enough money. Of course, there was a small issue.
Since the college was in France, all of the lectures were in French, so Marie would have to learn
French in order to understand what was being taught. But this was only a small issue because
Marie did know some French, so it was easy for her to learn the rest of the language. But after
these early issues, things seemed to be going well. There was nothing major that stopped them.
Kingda Ka ran smoothly for quite some time and Marie's interest in science really grew. This part
in their lives seemed like the initial hill on Kingda Ka. It was a huge obstacle and it seemed
difficult to make it all the way up, but they found a way to make it work. Of course, though, it didn't
stay this way. Marie was a very intelligent person. She had made many huge impacts on science, such
as

Conversational Analogy
1.0 Introduction
Definition: An analogy is a comparison between one thing and another, usually for the purpose of
explanation or interpretation. It is similar to metaphor and simile; they are usually used in
conversation to relate one situation to other.
According to (Heick, 2014) other than conversational analogy there are analogies, which are formal
analogies, used in teaching. They usually are called academic analogies. These analogies are the
research–based tool for teaching in science classrooms. It can also be used in text books and web
based learning environment. Analogy can be used to explain concepts effectively to the students,
which makes sense of the concepts to the students. This also helps them to understand easily than
normal explanation. Especially, the students from primary and lower primary are getting to know of
the science concept for the first time. Analogies make the subject interesting to the students from the
age group of 5 to 12. In Maldives, National Institute of Education has implemented key...show more
content...
The aware idea is called the analog and the unaware one the target. The analog and the target have
attributes; if the analog and the target have similar features then an analogy may be made between
them. An orderly comparison, orally or visually, between the features of the analog and target is
called a mapping. (Dagher, 1995b; Duit, 1991). A theoretical illustration of an analogy, with its
essential parts, appears in Figure 1. ("Ecosystems–Interactive Science Notebook foldable", 2017)
Figure – 1
As ("Science Fun", 2017) an example of an analogy shown between cell & factory and a plant cell
&an animal cell appears below in Figures – 2 and Figures – 3
Figure –

Critical Thinking Analogy
I like the analogy you used with baking the cake and not having icing, to explain the relationship
between language and thinking. The cake will be incomplete without the icing, and without
thinking what we are going to say, the language used can be inappropriate or totally make no sense.
Critical thinking is crucial before we say something, we want to make sure we get our message
across clearly with the proper language, it will avoid a lot of misunderstandings.

Hardin's lifeboat analogy proposes an interesting situation. If a lifeboat with 50 people on board
and a capacity of 60 floated past 100 other people in the water, who would we take, if anyone? If
we tried to take everyone, the boat would capsize and everyone would either become stranded or
die. It would lead to "complete justice, complete catastrophe" (Hardin 1). If we took no one, we
would constantly have to stave off desperate people climbing on board and those who claim
entitlement. If we decide to push our lifeboat to its limits, and add 10 more people, how would
we choose who to take? What I gather from this is that there's no truly correct solution. If we take
everyone, we all die. If we take no one, we get shamed and blamed for leaving others behind. If
we take a select few, we get called out as biased by those who weren't selected.Population is one of
the key points that Hardin stresses. Still thinking in terms of the lifeboat example, "The people in
the lifeboat are doubling in numbers once every 87 years; those swimming around outside are
doubling, on the average, every 35 years..." In the real world, developing countries' populations are
multiplying at an exponential rate, and the world's resources can only dwindle.Hardin states that in
1970 the US had a population of 210 million people, who were increasing at a rate of .08 percent a
year. In terms of the lifeboat example, Hardin says that we should imagine that same number of
people outside the boat, only

Analogy And Participation : Analogy
Analogy and Participation
Analogy, as viewed by Aristotle is a theory of general logic, the theory of predication, which has
only to be applied to the notable case of being. St. Thomas, on the other hand, generally introduces
it as a mode of logical predication, the mode that is neither univocal nor equivocal but in between
(analogical). Focusing on St. Thomas' philosophy, this section will determine how analogy can
bring us to know God analogously. St. Thomas' emphasis is on the analogy of being, a principle that
makes for a better understanding of analogy, when speaking of existence or metaphysics and
knowing true epistemology. This, in turn, leads us to God who is all truth and has always existed.
Since God is existence itself and us as human beings are participants in His Divine plan, there is a
vast separation of what the human intellect truly understands about the Creator. St. Thomas rightly
claims that it is through our senses that we can get to know things but since God is beyond our
senses, the finite mind cannot adequately describe the infinite being that is. God, as St. Thomas has
said, is pure existence in act since it can only be grasped through examples and illustrations. Potency
belonging to those primary analogous notions that cannot be defined and act that cannot be grasped,
reveals one another with the understanding that act is included in every notion of potency but does
not necessarily imply potency. Act, according to Aristotle, is prior

Analogy Means In Relation To The Community
Discuss what this analogy means in relation to the community and world changing possibilities.
God is referring to salt and light as world changing. Salt makes what is good even better! Salt
improves the quality of what is good. "We are the salt of the earth", we as Christians are the ones
walking the earth to better it.
How does Jesus' "forced analogy" of salt and light expand your understanding of how an individual
or organization can significantly impact the world?
Salt and light expanded my understanding of how individuals can make a difference. It only takes
one person to be inspired and keep the light coming through to make the world a better place.

Argument From Analogy Essay
The argument from analogy is an inductive argument that focuses on the problem of other minds
and aims to show that we are justified in inferring the existence of other minds. British philosopher,
Bertrand Russell, describes the argument from analogy as follows: "The behaviour of other people
is in many ways analogous to our own, and we suppose that it must have analogous causes. What
people say is what we should say if we had certain thoughts, and so we infer that they probably have
these thoughts. They give us information which we can sometimes subsequently verify" (Russell,
"Analogy", p89). Norman Malcolm argues that the argument from analogy does poorly in its
attempts to show that we are justified in inferring the existence of other minds. In assessing whether
the argument from analogy succeeds in its aims, I will raise and respond to Malcolm's objection
against the argument from analogy; Austrian–born British philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein's 'Beetle
in a Box' thought experiment; as well as Welsh philosopher H. H. Price's argument and English
philosopher Stuart Hampshire's argument in defence of the argument from analogy....show more
content...
From subjective observation, Russell claims to know that A, which is a thought or feeling,
causes B, which is a bodily act (Russell, "Analogy", p110). Russell argues that believing in the
existence of other minds requires some postulate, and describes this postulate to be "If, whenever
we can observe whether A and B are present or absent, we find that every case of B has an A as a
causal antecedent, then it is probable that most B's have A's as causal antecedents, even in cases
where observation does not enable us to know whether A is present or not" (Russell, "Analogy",

Dramaturgical Analogy
In today's technologically–driven world, you would be hard–pressed to find an individual who was
not apart of social media. Facebook bolsters 1.4 billion users, roughly one–fifth of the entire world's
population. Instagram has 500 million daily active users. And according to data collected from a
security app, which monitors how many times users activate or unlock their smartphones, average
users check their phones 110 times a day. This equates to once every six or seven seconds. It's
easy to say that social media has become an integral part of our everyday lives. And although it has
brought about many benefits, allowing us to easily connect with friends and family across the globe,
has let us mobilize for a cause, and really communicate in...show more content...
It has become construed as a necessity of everyday life. The dark side of social media is often
largely overlooked. Through his dramaturgical analogy, Goffman would have analyzed social media
users' online behavior as cultivating their best 'self'. Through extreme usage of photoshop and filters,
as well as solely sharing positive and appealing content, Goffman would have deemed this as
emphasizing and de–emphasizing sign vehicles to the fullest extent. Only showing this "front–stage"
performance leads to showing other users an altered version of themselves. This in turn leads to
feelings of depression, anxiety, and lowering of self–esteem because it is mostly a false sense of self.
Foucault would have viewed social media as the most effective modern day panoptic model.
These outlets hold the power and capability of controlling individuals and instilling fear and
discipline. Social media even surpasses the expectations of Foucault's Panopticon due to its high
volume traffic reaching billions of users every day. Social media drives an even more conscious
fear when users do become aware they are being watched, altering their actions. With so many
negative aspects linked to usage of social media, many questions are circulated. Do the negative
outcomes outweigh the positive? Should people rebel against social media or

My Analogy Cell Analogy
NameLindsey OlsonPeriod7Date 12–18–15
Cell Analogy Essay
My analogy from a cell is to a city. A cell has a cell membrane and in a city the city border acts as
the cell membrane. The city wall in a cell acts like a cell wall. The cytoplasm can be a lawn in a city.
Highways or road systems act like the endoplasmic reticulum in a city. The ribosomes in a cell
organelle can be considered lumber or brick yard in a city. In a city post offices and UPS act as
the golgi bodies. Solar energy plants are considered chloroplast. A city hall fence with a security
guard can be considered as the nuclear membrane. Energy plants in cities can be considered the
mitochondria. In cell organelles there is the nucleus and in a city the nucleus would

Homeostasis Analogy Explained

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from College Application Essay Help Manchester

More from College Application Essay Help Manchester (17)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Homeostasis Analogy Explained