Group 2's presentation received high marks according to the evaluation. It had a clear structure with an introduction, body, and conclusion. The group demonstrated knowledge about the key topics and provided valuable information. Specifically, the presentation covered what a language corpus is, how concordance data can be used to study patterns in language, and how modern corpora and software allow for sociolinguistic analysis of authentic communication. The evaluators concluded that the group fulfilled the presentation requirements and provided an informative discussion of the role and uses of corpora in linguistic study.

1. Group Presentation Evaluation Form
Your Name: TRƯƠNG MINH VŨ
Group2: GIA-ĐỨC-YẾN
1. PresentationStructure: SCORE: (out of 20 points)
____20_____
o Does the presentation have a clear planned structure? Yes (introduction,
body and conclusion)
o Could you identify the ‘key points’ being made during the presentation?
YES
o Did the presenters adhere to the planned presentation format? YES
o Were there good transitions between key points? YES
o Were there good transitions between team presenters? YES
o Did the graphics (PowerPoint slides) support the presentation? YES
o Were the graphics (PowerPoint slides) informative? YES
o Were the graphics (PowerPoint slides) easy to read and understand? YES
2. PresentationContent: SCORE: 20 (out of 20 points)
o Did the group provide a clear purpose for their presentation? YES
o Did the group advance ‘key points’ or main topics that clearly supported
the purpose of the presentation? YES
o Did the presenters seem knowledgeable on the information being
presented? YES
o Did the group include a summary of important points discussed in the
presentation?YES
o Were the points discussed in the presentation valuable? YES
3. Conclusion: SCORE: 20 (out of 20 points)
o Was there a group conclusion? YES
o Did the presenters “sum up” what had been said by the individuals?YES
o Did the team invite questions? NO
o Did the team adequately answer any questions? NO
o Did the presenters maintain their professionalism throughout the
Conclusion and Q&A? NO
4. Overall oral presentation: SCORE: 20 (out of 20 points)
o Were the presenters properly dressed for the presentation? YES
o Did the presenters maintain eye contact with the audience? NO
o Did the presenters maintain a proper presentation posture?YES
o Did the presenters eliminate “uh’s”, “ah’s” or “um’s” and other distracting
speech-related occurrences from their presentation? YES
o Did the presenters speak clearly? YES

2. Group Presentation Evaluation Form
o Did the presenters vary tones and speech patterns to emphasize key points?
NO
o Were the presenters enthusiastic about the information being presented?
YES
o Did the presenters seem confident? NO
o Did the team seem like they had practiced the presentation? YES
o Did the presenters deliver a “team presentation” (individuals giving a talk
together)? YES
5. Overall impression: SCORE: 10 (out of 20 points)
o Did you enjoy the way the speakers gave the presentation? Not really
o Was the information in the presentation informative and valuable? Yes
o Was the presentation “polished” and professional? Polished.
Total Score: __90___
Individuals’ scores
Student 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Scores 9 9 8
Please use the next page of the form to give specific details.

3. Group Presentation Evaluation Form
Comments:
PresentationStructure:
Group 2 has well-organized structure of the presentation.
PresentationContent:
All three members in this group have very impressive performance. They provide
much knowledge about LANGUAGE CORPORA
Conclusion:
they totally give much valuable information and share experience to me. Their
pronunciation are very clear and impressive. They have conveyed the main content
through the presentation.
Overall oral presentation:
They are quite good. Very clear voice and impressive.
Overall impression:

4. Group Presentation Evaluation Form
THEY ARE QUITE GOOD. THEY HAVE FULFILED THE PRESENTATION.
SUMMARY OF THE CONTENT (120-150 words)
Through the presentation, there are many things that I can learn and remember.
The first thing is that a corpus is a principled and large collection(body) of
authentic texts which are stored in a computer and analyzed using software
designed for corpus analysis. The second thing is that factor of observation which
is not restrictedto any single method, but concordances are essential for studying
lexical, grammatical, and semantic patterns. Concordance data are often especially
good at distinguishing words with related propositional meanings, but different
connotations and patterns of usage. Corpora allow individual utterances to be
interpreted against the usage of many speakers and the intertextual norms of
general language use. Many facts about frequency, grammar, and meaning are
systematic and evident in corpora, but unrecorded in pre-corpus dictionaries. The
next thing is that Modern Corpora and Software. Corpus study is inherently
sociolinguistic, since the data are authentic acts of communication. A corpus
reveals what frequently recurs, sometimes hundreds or thousands of times, and
cannot possibly be due to chance.
In conclusion, Corpus in terms of linguistic is very important in language learning
and language teaching.