2. rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979 www.therrc.co.uk
• Ecosystem restoration is a fast growing¹, yet evidence-
based assessments are limited
• Still only ~18% of completed projects have some form
of monitoring²
• Essential step to:
– Develop scientific understanding
– Improve best practice in the field
– Adaptive management
– Meet legal requirements (e.g. WFD, EU Directives)
Sources: ¹UN Environment Programme
²RRC’s National River Restoration Inventory (NRRI) – April 2015
Monitoring ecological restoration
3. rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979 www.therrc.co.uk
Constraints
• Little money for monitoring and assessment of
river restoration projects
• Needed a cost effective approach to increase
understanding of the effectiveness of different
river restoration approaches.
4. rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979 www.therrc.co.uk
Water low in pollution
Full of native wildlife
Natural
structure and
connectivity
Sufficient water
flow
Rivers are complex and
dynamic so need clear
integrated objectives and
clear foci
But………..
5. rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979 www.therrc.co.uk
• SMART project objectives provides framework of
monitoring
• Helps define ‘success’ and identify what needs
monitoring
• Reduces risk of not being able to show what is
happening
• Also helps you to identify what baseline data to collect
and when
So…….
6. rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979 www.therrc.co.uk
Specific
• Set tangible, detailed and well defined targets which
can be evaluated by specific monitoring methods.
Measurable
• What is feasible related to quantity, quality,
equipment, expertise and time.
Achievable
• Determined from a review of evidence of success on
other, similar sites.
Realistic
• Consider available resources (money, people, time)
and factor in longer-term post-project management
Time-bound
• Set deadlines for actions, but allow some flexibility.
Timing is crucial both for works and monitoring.
The SMART approach
8. rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979 www.therrc.co.uk
Objective
Aim: Increase salmon spawning and egg
survival by introducing gravels and narrowing
the river to increase flow velocity variability.
10. rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979 www.therrc.co.uk
Setting objectives – stage 1
Determine the overall project aim.
For example:
• Restore floodplain
dynamics by reconnecting
to the river
This is what you wish to achieve,
but does not define how to do it or measure
success.
11. rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979 www.therrc.co.uk
Setting objectives – stage 2
Aim : Restore floodplain dynamics by reconnecting the
river
So specific targets:
• Cut new sinuous course at a new bed level to
encourage more natural floodplain connectivity
Establish floodplain vegetation by planting
• Lessen flood risk to properties
Now identify your key aim(s)
and specific targets
12. Example
rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979
www.therrc.co.uk
SMART objectives:
Remove the weir structure by August 20XX and complete channel narrowing works within one
month
Reduce the channel width by 30% for 60m upstream of the weir using locally-sourced tethered
wood
Increase the total number of fish (abundance) passing through the reach in November
Increase total number of Brown Trout spawning on upstream gravels within two seasons
13. Then set your monitoring programme
• Why – do the project? What are the objectives/specific
targets that will be monitored? (e.g. increase no of
riffles and clean gravel habitat by 80% over 2km of
river).
• What – are you trying to observe?
(monitor increased habitat diversity/
change in macro-invertebrate
assemblages).
• How – are you going to monitoring? What techniques
will used to collect data and what assessment methods
are you using? (e.g. habitat mapping, 3 min macro-
invertebrate kick-sampling).
rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979
www.therrc.co.uk
14. Planning you monitoring cont…
• Data – Do you have access to any pre-
project/baseline data? If not, can this be
collected? If not ask yourself what your data
collection will show.
• When will data be collected?
(month/season, duration of
monitoring, sampling repeats)?
• Who is responsible for monitoring and will all
data be comparable?
rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979
www.therrc.co.uk
15. The RRC support tool
rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979
www.therrc.co.uk
16. The check list
rrc@therrc.co.uk 01234 752979
www.therrc.co.uk
• Have you set SMART project objectives?
• Can these be measured and thereby
monitored?
• Have you checked what base line data
there is… can it be replicated?
• Will your monitoring tell you if you have
achieved your objectives and targets?
Editor's Notes
Link to previous days sessions and understanding what all of the above means….
The figure illustrates these linkages and enables the project manager to think about what a project is setting out to achieve either from a natural process or biodiversity perspective. It ensures that both aspects are considered as part of the objective setting evaluation.
The two examples associated with Figure 1 demonstrate how an objective can begin to be defined that links the ecological and hydro-morphological elements together.
This process is designed to help the project manager think about the key aspects of the river restoration project and what it is setting out to achieve and to recognise the inherent complexity.
There is lots of good information already available…..
FP7 WISER – Ended 2012. ‘methods for assessing and restoring aquatic ecosystems’
Key messages
Restoration can only be successful when all pressures tackled simultaneously
Recovery needs time (a long time)
Monitoring of restoration needs a BACI (before after control impact) approach to learn by doing
stand alone ‘Local’ restoration is often unsuccessful – needs that wider consideration
Restoration more likely to be successful if u/s habitat is good and land use impacts are low.
Conceptual models for linking restoration measures (riparian buffers, in-stream enhancement, removing low head weirs) with effect on in-stream env. Variables and the impact of changing them. E.g. riparian buffers above based on 146 scientific references. Interactive - shows the links and sifts the refs.