IP Valuation

1,349 views

Published on

Beyond specialized IP law practices, business, commercial, tax and estate practioners are increasingly involved in identifying, protecting, applying, and defending intangible assets owned by clients.

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,349
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
8
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
80
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

IP Valuation

  1. 1. IP Valuation <br />September, 2011<br />1<br />CONSOR Intellectual Asset Management<br />
  2. 2. Why IP Valuation?<br />2<br />Beyond specialized IP law practices, <br />business, commercial, tax and estate practitioners <br />Increasingly involved in identifying, protecting, applying, and defending intangible assets owned by clients.<br />Context<br />Purpose<br />Value to whom?<br />How much value?<br />How and when does value change?<br />Buy, sell or transfer <br />Disputed ownership<br />Improve performance <br />Collateralization<br />
  3. 3. What is IP?<br />3<br />Intellectual Property vs. Intangible Assets<br />Bundles of IP and IA Assets<br />
  4. 4. Context: Property Types<br />4<br />Intangible Assets<br />Intellectual Properties<br />Customer & Vendor Relationships<br />Data Bases<br />Patents<br />Trademarks<br />Proprietary Systems<br />Internet Assets<br />Copyrights<br />Trade Secrets<br />IA vs. IP: Commercialized Separate from Other Assets<br />
  5. 5. IP Property Types<br />5<br />Bundles of Intangible Assets (IA), <br />each contains Intellectual Properties (IP)<br />Marketing<br />Relationship (Customer / Supplier)<br />Marks, brands, names, domains<br />Trade-dress, packaging, logos<br />Non-competes, key-person<br />Customer / Supplier relationships <br />Distribution networks<br />Order backlog<br />Technology<br />Contract<br />Technologies, know-how, systems, methods<br />Patents, software, recipes, content, databases<br />License / royalty, lease, franchise<br />Permits, use rights, broadcast rights<br />
  6. 6. Valuation Methodologies<br />6<br />Income<br />Market<br />Cost<br />Economic principal of substitution<br />Measures expense required to replace<br />Neglects future benefit<br />Present value of future economic benefit<br />Requires projections and a risk assessment<br />Requires allocation of benefit specific to the asset<br />Value based on price of similar assets<br />Requires suitable comparable assets<br />Description<br />Replication / replacement feasible<br />Benchmarking <br />DCF<br />Relief from Royalty<br />Comparable transactions<br />Benchmarking<br />Application<br />Valuation as Art and Science<br />
  7. 7. Valuation Tools of the Trade<br />7<br />The “Science” of Valuation<br />Discounted Cash Flow Models<br />Comparable Valuation Ratios<br />Replacement Cost<br />Relief from Royalty<br />Allocation / Excess Earnings<br />Option Models<br />Proprietary Approaches<br />
  8. 8. Changing Valuation Terminology<br />8<br />Level of Value<br />Value Definitions<br />Fair Market Value<br />Fair Value<br />Strategic Value<br />Liquidation Value<br />MVIC<br />= Assets + Liabilities<br />MVE<br />= Equity Ownership<br />Minority Interests<br />Who’s Setting Standards?<br />AICPA, ASA, ISO, NACVA, IRS, Courts, FASB, LESI, and more<br />Defining the Assignment to Avoid “Bad Art” <br />
  9. 9. Case: Improper Use of a Character<br />9<br />Background<br />Defendants used a character to promote products outside of the permitted terms of agreement with IP owner<br />Financial data from the defendants unavailable<br />Multiple methodologies applied<br />Income approach calculation yields different value than market and cost approaches<br />
  10. 10. Case: Improper Use of a Character<br />10<br />Case Take-away: Context is Key<br />
  11. 11. 11<br />A more complex case showing <br />the importance of Context, and <br />the importance of identifying IP<br />
  12. 12. Case: Identifying IP<br />12<br />Client assists municipal agencies issue bonds for public interest projects (a Public Private Partnership)<br />Client has achieved substantial profits for several years<br />Key competitor is a state-run agency<br />State accuses client of gouging the parties it serves<br />Has Client developed IP that justifies the excess profits? <br />
  13. 13. Case: Identifying IP<br />13<br />
  14. 14. Case: Identifying IP<br />14<br />We can see IP exists . . . <br />What are the key types of IP Assets?<br />IA at the CLIENT<br />Proprietary systems (some could be commercialized)<br />Proprietary methods<br />Relationships / key people (can’t be commercialized)<br />History / Longevity / 1st to Market (can’t be commercialized)<br />Case Take-away: Both IP and IA Contribute to Value<br />
  15. 15. Value Constraints<br />15<br />Present Value of Expected Future Benefit<br />Intangible Assets<br />Brand / Trade Names<br />Intellectual Properties<br />Value of Business<br />=<br />=<br />=<br />Intangible Assets<br />Tangible Assets<br />Tangible Assets<br />Could a company’s IP assets exceed the market value of the business?<br />Context: Fair Market Value (transaction did occur)<br />Context Implication: Value driven by expected future benefits<br />
  16. 16. Case: Impact of Context<br />16<br />Could a company’s IP assets exceed the market value of the business?<br />Frequent Context for IP Valuation: Purchase Price Allocation (FAS 141/142)<br />Purchase Price Creates Goodwill<br />What Portion of the Acquired Goodwill should be allocated to IP?<br />What are the components of the IP Allocation?<br />
  17. 17. Can Value of IP > MVIC?<br />17<br />Context Drives the Science<br />Value of IP cannot exceed MVIC in a purchase price allocation<br />Value of each IP = PV of future benefit each IP provides to Company’s cash flow<br />Tools / Science<br />Forecast cash flows by product<br />Quantify the interaction of IP Assets and their contribution to earnings<br />Case Take-away: <br />Context is key / Context Can Be Forced on the Value Analyst<br />
  18. 18. What if the Context Changes?<br />18<br />What if we don’t have a completed transaction between <br />a wiling buyer and a willing seller?<br />Frequent Contexts<br />Infringement Damages<br />Licensing / Endorsement<br />Damage Calculations: require application of traditional valuation methodologies to determine value of economic benefits lost, or not achieved (often when an arm’s length transaction would never have occurred)<br />Licensing: requires both parties understand and estimate the present value of future economic commitments (without the benefit of an existing arms-length transaction)<br />
  19. 19. What if the Context Changes?<br />19<br />What if we don’t have a completed transaction between <br />a wiling buyer and a willing seller?<br />IP Valuation Methodologies<br />Comparable Transactions<br />Relief from Royalty<br />Discount Future Benefit<br />Replacement Cost<br />All these approaches construct a hypothetical agreement between IP Owner and IP User<br />Crafting the Hypothetical Agreement Requires Art and Science <br />
  20. 20. Hypothetical Agreements<br />20<br />No More Rules of Thumb<br />Replacing Rules of Thumb<br />Uniloc USA v. Microsoft Corp: applicable specifically to IP analysis <br />End of the 25% rule = “End of the unsupported conclusion”<br />Averages & Surveys as the lemming’s rule of thumb<br />If it’s a universal norm, it can’t meet the criteria for comparables<br />Licensing agreement = contractual financial agreement<br />Commitments can and do take many forms<br />Hypothetical agreements must reflect their real-world counterparts<br />This Shouldn’t be Shocking<br />
  21. 21. Reflecting Real-world Complexity?<br />21<br />A Typical Relief From Royalty Calculation<br />Did Consider . . . <br />Forecast benefit (sales, term)<br />Industry dynamics (rate)<br />Risk assessment<br />Assumed . . . <br />Constant sales<br />Industry average royalty rate <br />No changes during term<br />
  22. 22. Case: Alternative Royalty Rate Analyses<br />22<br />Value of trademark and related brand assets to a partner business?<br />Method Applied: PV of license-derived economic benefits<br />Subject IP did not resemble comparable IP transactions<br />Parties had a standing relationship<br />Ranges observed in Comparable Transactions<br />
  23. 23. Case: Alternative Royalty Rate Analyses<br />23<br />Royalty Rate Build-up Method: BVEq<br />BVEQ= CBV + (IVE1 + IVE2 + …. + IVEN)<br />Surveys and Comparable Transactions are not The Only Tools Available<br />
  24. 24. Case: Reflecting Reality<br />24<br />Take-away: “Hypothetical Negotiation” Drives Greater Analytical Burden<br />
  25. 25. When Valuation Issues Arise?<br />25<br />
  26. 26. The Valuation Answer<br />26<br />Reconcile results from multiple approaches<br />Reconcile the calculations to the context<br />Context + Time = Value<br />There Are No Valuation Answers: Only Good Choices<br />
  27. 27. 27<br />Handouts<br />Law 360 on Rules of Thumb<br />Considerations for Hypothetical Negotiations<br />20 Licensing Structure Alternatives<br />Criteria for Comparable Transactions<br />
  28. 28. 28<br />Discussion<br />
  29. 29. CONSOR’s Services<br />29<br />www.consor.com<br />858 454 9091<br />IP Valuation<br />IP Litigation Support<br />Valuing patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, celebrity rights, and technology<br />Helping businesses understand the value of their IP<br />Valuation for transactions, tax purposes, litigation, licensing deals, and more<br />Assisting attorneys with damage calculation parameters & case strategy<br />Proven success as expert witnesses<br />Economic damages in litigation<br />Federal, state & international experience<br />Arbitration, and mediation <br />Licensing Consulting<br />IP Transactions<br />Assisting clients in maximizing the licensing value of their IP assets<br />Develop licensing strategies, execute, negotiate license agreements<br />Licensing experts in litigation<br />Evaluate financial and economic commitments of a potential transaction<br />Maximize the value of bankrupt assets<br />Identify valuable IP in bankruptcy<br />Market and sale of bankrupt IP assets<br />Value and dispose of intellectual property<br />

×