Aristotle Function Argument Essay

Aristotle Function Argument Essay
Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics, aims to explain the necessary to achieve the highest–state of human happiness. A significant argument Aristotle
proposes is the function argument, which aims to demonstrate that humans have a unique function that differs from all other living beings. In effect,
this essay aims to explain Aristotle's function argument, give a critique of his conclusion, then offer a possible Aristotelian response.
Firstly, Aristotle proposes in our pursuit to attaining the highest good, a concept that must be understood is what the function of a human is (1097b,
25). In effect, by comprehending what the human function is, we will be able to direct it towards achieving the finer actions of life that would satisfy our
...show more content...
Secondly, some individuals take genuine delight in activities that are not related to the faculties of reason, and some individuals perform these activities
better than they can reason. An example is an amazing guitarist who frequently makes bad life–choices. Though the agent finds playing the guitar is an
activity that is complete, they may also be deficient in the Aristotelian modes of reasoning. However, it would be controversial to say the guitarist is less
human, because they don't satisfy the standards of critical reasoning. Consequently, many would argue it would be incorrect to propose that reasoning
is the sole function of humans, because we possess many other skills.
Aristotle would respond that the actions of reasoning is the human function, because it is a consistent activity that is always occurring in the mental
background of the agent. This is because we align the faculty of reasoning to perform certain actions, which enables us to attain a complete good from
the activity. Insofar that we apply the uses of reasoning to perform complex actions finely. This is the unique idea behind the concept of reasoning,
because to perform a complex action we need to deliberate what will enable us to properly/safely perform the activity. Arguably, the uses of reasoning
is continually active whenever we are learning/performing a complex action. Furthermore, those who take genuine delight in an
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The expression argument has two meanings in scholarly writing. First, it means a composition that takes a position on one side of a divisive issue.
You might write an argument against the death penalty, or for or against censorship of pornography. But argument has another meaning, too. It means
an essay that, simply, argues a point. You might assemble an argument about the significance of ancestor myths in a certain aborigine culture, or you
might write an argument defending your understanding of any poem or essay that is read in your philosophy class. (Winthrop University) You are not
necessarily taking one side of a divisive issue, but you are required to defend your points with credible evidence. You are taking a position. In a sense,
...show more content...
In emotionally stimulating situations, however, the audience will hold more sturdily to its beliefs the more strongly those beliefs are challenged.
Young, Becker and Pike suggest breaking these barriers to communication by using a variation of Rogers' non–directive therapy. In "Communication:
Its Blocking and its Facilitation," Rogers suggests that in emotional disputes, neither party should put forward a position until she has carefully,
non–judgmentally and with the maximum possible empathy restated the position of the other, to the other's satisfaction. (Brent) This will convey to the
other the sense that he is understood and that the two parties are more similar than different, thereby creating a context for communication. (Brent)
Carl Rogers was born January 8, 1902 in Oak Park, Illinois, the fourth of six children. His education started in the second grade because he could
already read before kindergarten. He spent his adolescence isolated, independent and self–disciplined. He went to the University of Wisconsin as an
agriculture major, but later switched to religion to study for the ministry. He has been quoted as saying "that his new experiences so broadened his
thinking that he began to doubt some of his basic religious views." (Boeree) Carl Rogers later married Ms. Helen Elliot and moved to New York to
start school at the Union Theological Seminary, a famous liberal religious institution.

The Argument Of Arts And Culture
Culture is part of our everyday life; it can be anything from sports, food, clothing or even lifestyle. On the onset, the support of arts and culture should
not be limited to the cultural argument alone, as one cannot deny that arts and culture is important for the growth of society. Apart from the financial
aspect of a society, arts and culture go a long way towards making the society more holistic.
With this in mind, the author will firstly examine the two different approaches to arts and culture; namely cultural arguments as opposed to the creative
industries or economic arguments. Secondly, the author will discuss about why arts and culture should live on and be funded, without putting creative
industries approach towards it.
Throughout...show more content...
On the other hand, creative industry takes the view of economic boom of creative work such in any type of industry. "Creative industries were defined
as those activities which have their origin in individual creativity, skill and talent and which have the potential for wealth and job creation through the
generation and exploitation of intellectual property" (DCMS, 1998) (Quoted from Ozga, Seddon, Popkewitz, 2006)
As Paul Keating suggests,
"This cultural policy is also an economic policy. Culture creates wealth. Broadly defined, our cultural industries generate 13 billion dollars a year.
Culture [employs and] adds value; it makes an essential contribution to innovation, marketing and design. It is a badge of our industry. The level of our
creativity substantially determines our ability to adapt to new economic imperatives. It is a valuable export in itself and an essential accompaniment to
the export of other commodities. It attracts tourists and students. It is essential to our economic success." (Paul Keating,

Analysis Of ' The Structure ' Hamlet '
Stability, Sanity, and Structure
(Analysis of the structure in Shakespeare's Hamlet)
Structure is in our lives all around us; we see it in work lives, our home lives, in our owe bodies, and even more so in the curriculum that kids are
learning at school. Structure, in all aspects, is constructed according to a plan. It gives a sense of assembly and backbone to whatever we are
looking at. We see structure is in the information students are attaining at school, especially in the literary sense. Many authors are not only known
for the message their work sends, but also the literary structure they present. Great literary works are often great not because the author was great, or
the words were great, but because it had great structure. Structure in a piece of literature is pivotal to the success of the work. If an author can 't
decide where to start and finish his ideas, what order to put them in, or what form to put his work in then he lacks structure. One great example of an
author who does this is william shakespeare. Shakespeare was an English poet, playwright, and commonly regarded as the greatest writer in the English
language. He has written quite the handful of plays including Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, and Hamlet. In his work of Hamlet, Shakespeare presents
structure that helps the audience better understand and connect to the play. The structure presented in Shakespeare's Hamlet include his soliloquies, the
play within the play, and finally his play on words.
To begin,

Coles Myer Corporate Structure
Corporate Structure
Introduction
Corporate structure is the way in which the parts of a corporation are put together. Corporations usually have several strategic business units (SBUs).
These SBUs are also called strategy centers, strategic planning units, or independent business units (Jain, 1990, p.17). Kotler (1997, p.71) states that
an SBU is a single business or collection of related businesses that can be planned separately from the rest of the company. An SBU can be a
company division, a product line within a division, or sometimes a single product or brand (Kotler et al., 1998, p.35).
A corporation and its SBUs have structures that must be understood before a marketing plan can be created. These are very important because...show
more content...
has a mission to be the best retailer in every market in which it operates. It wants to produce benefits to its stakeholders. It also wants to be known for
honesty and leadership. For this purpose, it considers communication as a very important aspect. It needs to have an open and responsive
communication with every aspect of the environment to achieve its goals.
Strategic Business Units
As it is explained before, an SBU could be a company division, a product line within a division, or a single product or brand. In Coles Myer Ltd., the
SBUs are the company divisions. Coles Myer Ltd. operates twelve SBUs in order to achieve its organisational goals. The SBUs are:
В· Coles
Coles is a full service supermarket. It provides food and liquor. There are about 407 stores across Australia. It employs more than 52,000 people.
В· Bi–Lo
Bi–Lo is also a supermarket that provides food and liquor. It is known for its tradition of discount grocery retailing. There are about 149 Bi–Lo stores
across Australia.
В· Myer Grace Bros
Myer Grace Bros (MGB) provides shopping places which change overtime in order to fulfill the expectations of the customers. It has about 69 stores in
Australia.

В· Myer Direct
Myer Direct is an Australia's leading mail order business. It was established in 1989 and has been growing rapidly since then.
В· Kmart
Kmart offers general merchandise with very competitive prices. It

Divergent Argument Essay
As for Divergent, the society is divided into five factions which divides citizens through an aptitude test: Abnegation the selfless one, Candor the
honest, Dauntless the brave, and Erudite the intelligent. When teenagers come to age, they are able to control their destiny by receiving options. Stay
with the faction the one they were born into or go to the one that matches their personality by the aptitude test (Divergent). Trice takes her aptitude test
and find out that she is a Divergent. Meaning that she has an aptitude toward more than one faction. The society believes the Divergents are the
greatest threat, since they are unable to be controlled. Trice decides to leave the abnegation and join the dauntless, the brave ones, even without
knowing where she belongs. If she did not choose one out of those five faction she would've been factionless. Meaning that if they do not fit in any of
the five factions or gets kicked out of the factions that society has created in the city of Chicago (Divergent).
When it comes to family, a person would risk their lives to protect their family because of blood unites them. In Anthem, family and love were never
things in their society. Equality explains their reproduction "Each spring, men older than twenty, and woman older than eighteen are sent to the City of
Palace of Mating for one night" (Rand 41). Men and women do not get to choose who to mate with. The Council of Eugenics chooses...show more
content...
Tris knows her sibling, and her parents, and she will do anything to keep her family protected because family is where she belong to, and where her
identity comes from (Divergent).
In conclusion, Anthem and Divergent were destroyed and had to be rebuild. Divergent, and Anthem share greatly of similarities, but yet they also have
differences in storylines like settings, jobs, and family structure to rebuild what has been

The And Structure Of The Intellectual Argument
When you write a persuasive essay, it's good to think about how you will construct your argument, from the way you will organize your key points to
how and where you will disprove opposing views. A lot of students find it hard to identify what it is that makes a good piece of essay writing. At the
core of such writing, it is the nature and structure of the intellectual argument.
So, what is an argument? An argument is well defined as giving of reasons, evidence and support for a claim that something is true. Most importantly,
there are two essential elements involved in addressing arguments as the basis of critical thinking. The first component is argument identification and
the second element is argument evaluation. In this section, we will focus on identification of argument.
It is important that you recognize which kind of essay questions need some judgment, and then be able to construct a compelling, convincing argument
in your essay writing. A key cause of complaint from tutors is that students at all levels do not do this perfectly and end up making their writing
descriptive instead of argumentative.
You may be caught by surprise to hear that the word "argument" does not require to be written anywhere in your assignment for it to be an important
part of your task. In fact, making an argument then later on expressing a point of view on a subject and going ahead to support it with evidence is
often the primary aim of academic writing. Your instructor perhaps assumes

What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
1.The basic parts of an effective argument are a stated clearly defined issue, makes a claim, and offers support for that claim. Sometimes an argument
may also recognize opposing viewpoints and incorporate them into the argument
2.What makes an argument ineffective is when using emotional appeals to distract a reader from a lack of evidence. Also the use of faulty reasoning,
and inaccurate facts.
3.An issue is a problem, controversy, or an idea that people can have different viewpoints about. The term claim is a point in which a writer is trying to
prove. This is typically the writer's viewpoint on the issue. A refutation is recognizing and auguring against opposing viewpoints.
4.A claim of value focuses on an opinion or judgment about

How to Write at 9 Level
IEL TS
Task 2:
How to write at a
!
9 level A brief eBook by Ryan t Higgins .
Task 2: How to write at a 9 level – © 2010 – No part of this work, in whole or in part, may be printed, copied, distributed or sold without the written
permission of the author, Ryan Thomas Higgins. http://www.englishryan.com
Table of Contents
пЃ¬ пЃ¬ Foreword Chapter 1 – Before we begin writing... пЃ® пЃ® пЃ® пЃ® пЃ¬ 1.1 What is required on the IELTS writing exam? 1.2 What is an
essay? 1.3 Analyzing Task 2 essay questions 1.4 Common exam question keywords and instruction words
Chapter 2 – The writing process пЃ® пЃ® 2.1 How to write an introduction paragraph 2.2 Coherence and cohesion
пЃ¬
Chapter 3 – Proving our thesis пЃ® 3.1 How to write supporting...show more content...
The General Training exam differs in task 1. On this exam, students are asked to write a __________(6). For both exams, students are expected to
__________(7) 20 minutes to task one and 40 minutes to task two.
Answers: (1) 60 (2) different (3) 2 (4) descriptive report (5) essay (6) letter (7) allot
Task 2: How to write at a 9 level – © 2010 – No part of this work, in whole or in part, may be printed, copied, distributed or sold without the written
permission of the author, Ryan Thomas Higgins. http://www.englishryan.com

1.2 What is an essay?
Let's start with a review of these basic English structures: What is a word? A word is a group of letters. What is a sentence? A sentence is a group of
words. What is a paragraph? A paragraph is a group of sentences. What is an essay? An essay is a group of paragraphs. Essays present an organized
argument that is supported by examples. exam marker will be looking for: пЃ® пЃ® пЃ® пЃ® пЃ® пЃ® Organized structure with clearly defined
paragraphs Coherent sentences that link together using linking phrases A clear thesis that directly answers the essay question Real life examples that
support the argument A clear introduction and conclusion Adherence to length requirement (minimum 250 words) In your IELTS essay, your
The easiest way to score well on the IELTS Task 2 writing portion is to structure your writing in a solid essay format. A strong argument essay structure
can be split up into 4 paragraphs, each containing 4 sentences

What Is An Argumentative Passage Analysis
What is an argumentative passage analysis?
In a passage analysis, you take some piece of written prose which contains an argument and extract the argument from it. In order to do this, you must
identify the conclusion of the argument, as well as any premises that support the conclusion, and structure them in such a way that the argument is
clearly valid (if indeed it is valid in the passage).
Here is an example of an argumentative passage:
Socrates is a man, and all men are mortal. As such, Socrates is mortal.
Properly analysed, this passage could be put into premise–conclusion form as follows:
Socrates is a man.
All men are mortal.
в€
ґ Socrates is mortal.
That was an easy example. Sometimes it's more difficult to tell which claim is the conclusion and which are the premises. Consider:
But of course, this argument is terribly misguided. After all, by any reasonable definition of the word "human," an unborn child of any age is as much a
human as you or me. That is why abortion is never permissible. The aforementioned argument is right to say that it is never permissible to kill humans,
but wrong to say that fetuses are not humans.
This passage is much more difficult to formalize. The first problem we encounter is that it's not clear which sentence contains the thesis. We may be
tempted to look towards the first and last sentences for a clue, but it seems unlikely that either of these is the main point being argued by the author. At
the very least, those do not seem to be the

This material set–off in this fashion in the handout identifies the revision notation for these matters. Guidelines for the Argumentative/Persuasive Essay
Citing Sources
You are not to employ footnotes or endnotes in your essay. Rather, when you employ another's ideas or quote from a source in youressay, please
employ the Modern Language Association, "MLA," format for in–text citations; the format is set forth in Keys, p. 144 et seq.
Quoting, Citing, and Referencing Source Material
Please also review the material on summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting material set forth in Keys, p. 122–25.
Works Cited Page
Given that your essays will contain references to sources that were employed in constructing the arguments in...show more content...
Con Argument
1.First Con Argument Paragraph: Precis
Summarize the con argument and cite to its expert source with credentials
2.Second Con Argument Paragraph: Example of the Con Argument
3.Third Con Argument: Refutation
Discredit the reliability of the con argument or demonstrate that it is in appositive or irrelevant to the topic by challenging its source, timeliness,
authorship, or logic. For additional information, please review the Refutation Handout available under Course Documents. C. First Pro Argument
1.First Pro Argument Paragraph: Precis
Summarize the first pro argument and provide its expert source with credentials.
2.Second Pro Argument Paragraph: Example of the Pro Argument
3.Third Pro Argument Paragraph
Establish the reliability of the argument by employing one or more of the seven types of evidence discussed in Bedford, p. 518.
D.Analogy Paragraph: See the Analogy Handout available under Course

Documents for additional information
E.Most Compelling Reason to View the Pro Position as the Superior Position on the Topic Paragraph Based upon Belief, Value, Social Mores, or
Tradition. For additional information, please review the Most Compelling Reason Handout available on Blackboard. III.Conclusion A. First Conclusion
Paragraph
1. Summarize the essay in a one to two–sentence "restatement"
2.Either discussion of the greater implication of the

Structure Of Hamlet Soliloquy
In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, soliloquies function anywhere from the development of a character to a piece that moves the play along.
Specifically, the soliloquy Hamlet gives in Act 2 Scene 2 (Lines 577–634) operates as both a window into Hamlet's thoughts and a view of his future
plans. Through several tone shifts and a particular train of thought, this speech develops some of Hamlet's traits as a major character and offers insight
to assist the audience in understanding his intentions and how his thoughts are significant to his actions. Also, the careful dissection of language and
structure in this portion of the play is an important part in developing a theme and revealing Hamlet's purpose. Shakespeare wrote Hamlet's
soliloquy in a certain format to seem realistic to his audience and to align with Hamlet's actions in the course of the text. The sentence structure
varies greatly consisting of rhetorical questions, exclamatory thoughts and complex, declarative sentences. For example, in lines 599 through 602,
Hamlet fires a series of questions into the open air, "Who calls me 'villain'? breaks my pate across? Plucks off my beard and blows it in my face?
Tweaks me by the nose? gives me the lie i' th' throat as deep as to the lungs? Who does me this?" These questions serve as Hamlet's evaluation of his
predicament; he has realized how others around him treat him differently, almost as a child, after the death of his father. Although his questions are
crucial, the most

Cultural Differences Argument Analysis
Cultural Ethical Relativism is a theory that is used to explain differences among cultures, and thus their moral codes. According to cultural relativists,
different cultures have different moral codes, and there is no objective truth in ethics. They believe there is no independent standard that can be used to
judge one's custom as better than another's. In his article entitled "The Challenge of Cultural Relativism," James Rachels offers his argument against the
theory of Cultural Relativism by proving the Cultural Differences Argument is unsound and invalid. Further in his article, Rachels reasons against the
claims made by cultural relativists, and he argues there are common values shared by all cultures and there exists an independent standard...show more
content...
If the Cultural Relativism is correct, then each culture will have total freedom in which its people can do whatever they want within their society
because what is right is determined by the moral code of that society, and we cannot judge them since there is no independent standard that can be used
to judge one's custom. For example, in the late 19th century in the Southern United States, despite the passages of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendment
had abolished slavery and made African Americans citizens, the majority of White Americans still perceived the Negroes as inferior. Within the society
in the South, the culture determined it was right that whites were superior over blacks and American Whites could do whatever they pleased to the
African Americans. Consequently, the violent actions White Americans had committed against the Negroes, such as murdering, lynching and
preventing blacks to vote, were culturally acceptable in the South. If the Cultural Ethical Relativism is right, then what these whites had done is
justified as correct and they did not commit any moral mistakes since their culture permitted such a

Classical Argument Essay: A Class Analysis
Before coming to this class, I already felt prepared to write academic assignments. I took higher level english classes in highschool and I think that the
class structure combined with the excellent teachers helped me prepare for college english classes. In the course, going to the library and learning
about research databases helped me most as a writer. In high school we were given access to some of the same databases, but were only presented with
login information and told we should use it in our papers. All of us were confused by the complexity and ended up just using sources found by a
Google search. In this class, however, it was so helpful for the librarian to sit us in front of the computer and actually have us pull up something to
search. I feel that the sources I discovered with the help of the database were...show more content...
For this essay I chose to write about a program I had been involved with for a very long time, teen court. I enjoyed writing this essay and was able to
provide my own background information on the topic. I especially liked the interviews I was able to include in the paper. These interviews gave me
the opportunity to connect the reader to someone who was actually involved in the process and a leader of the organization. I feel that the interviews
united the paper and provided first hand experiences for better understanding, making it a strong argument. In contrast, my supporting reasons
argument, Essay #1, represents my weakest work this semester. In this essay I felt that I followed too much of a structured format. This format is great
for organization, but falls short in effectively presenting information to the reader. The paper contained too many references to pure research and data
instead of offering a new interpretation of the data to the reader. Overall, the information was all there, but a better presentation of ideas should have
been

The Critical Race Theory Essay example
Introduction
We live in a society where race is seen as a vital part of our personalities, the lack of racial identity is very often an important factor which prevent
people from not having their own identity (Omi & Winant, 1993). Racism is extemely ingrained in our society and it seems ordinary (Delgado &
Stefanic, 2000), however, many people denounce the expression of any racist belief as immoral (Miles & Brown, 2003) highlighting the complicated
nature of racism. Critical Race Theory tries to shed light on the issue of racism claiming that racism is ingrained in our society both in legal, cultural,
and psychological aspects of social life (Tate, 1997). This essay provides us the opportunity to explore this theory and its...show more content...
Critical Race Theory (CRT) claims that racism is quite usual in social life and white superiority is extremely ingrained in educational, legal, and
political structures which is often unrecognizable (Taylor, 2009). According to Delgado and Stefanic (2000):
''CRT begins with an a number of basic insticts. One is that racism is normal, not abberrant, in American society. Because racism is an ingrained feature
of our landscape, it looks ordinary and natural to persons in the culture. Formal equal opportunity – rules and laws that insist on treating blacks and
whites (for example) alike – can thus remedy only the more extreme and shocking forms of injustice, the ones that do stand out. It can do little about
the business–as–usual forms of racism that people of color confront every day and that account for much misery, alienation, and despair'' (Delgado &
Stefanic, 2000: xvi).
Although, this theory began as a part of law sciences, nowadays, there is a great interest of CRT in the field of education, helping people to understand
some forms of discrimination which face the non–white people in education (Delgado & Stefanic, 2001). Moreover, embraces a lot of academic fields
such as history, political science, anthropology etc (Delgado & Stefanic, 2001). CRT main purpose is not only to understand the social structures that
promote inequalities but to eliminate them, it is clear that CRT targets on

The Importance Of Writing An Argumentative Essay
As a student in a beginning English class some elements may seem difficult at the beginning but with practice they become long lasting skills. Writing
an argumentative is not an easy task there is a lot of elements that have to come together to create a successful essay but as many other things, it
requires constant practice and effort. At the start of this course I wasn't a very good writer myself, and I can see the huge improvement this course
made by looking at my first argumentative essay. I was able to identify and apply the requisites of a good argument essay. A well thought structure,
reliable evidence, and a counterargument are three essential components of argumentative writing.
The structure of an essay is the foundation to a good argumentative paper. Throughout this course I learned the importance of having an essay
structure, before I started this class I didn't have a very clear vision of how to correctly format my essay. In my diagnostic essay, which was the
first one I wrote for English 1302, had five paragraphs. That is considered a standard structure of many essays but it is more of a skeleton.
Looking back at that essay I see how poor my introduction was, I did not even have a clear thesis. One only thing even close to one that I could
spot was, "The "millennials," people born in the last two decades of the 20th century, are failing to reflect Rich's model for a good education." It
merely addresses the topic in a simple way. It did not serve the purpose a

Argumentative Essay On Single Parents
Chris Polito Paola Brown Eng102
25 March 2008
Single Parent Struggle
For many years, children growing up in a single parent family have been viewed as different. Being raised by only one parent seems impossible to
many yet over the decades it has become more prevalent. In today's society many children have grown up to become emotionally stable and
successful whether they had one or two parents to show them the rocky path that life bestows upon all human beings. The problem lies in the
difference of children raised by single parents versus children raised by both a mother and a father. Does a child need both parents? Does a young
boy need a father figure around? Does the government provide help for single parents? What role do step–parents and step–siblings play? With much
speculation, this topic has become a very intriguing argument. What people must understand is that properly raising a child does not rely on the
structure of a family but should be more focused on the process or values that are taught to these children as they learn to mature. Children of single
parents can be just as progressive with emotional, social and behavioral skills as those with two parents.
People claim that the only way for children to gain full emotional and behavioral skills is to be raised by both a mother and a father. When a topic
such as this one has a broad amount of variables it is impossible to simply link these problems to only having one parent. In the article, "Single–parent
families cause juvenile crime", author Robert L. Maginnis states, "Children from single–parent families are more likely to have behavior
Polito 1 problems because they tend to lack economic security and adequate time with parents". The simple statement that raw criminals are products of
single–parent adolescence is absurd. What this writer must understand is that it can be extremely difficult for one parent to raise a child by themselves
for many reasons. A single–parent must work full time to be able to afford to provide for themselves and their child. They must also be able to still
have time to offer an exuberant amount of emotional time for the well being of their child. However, even though this may seem impossible, it can be
done.
As this

Structure and Agency Essay
Structure and agency are two theoretical terms used to explain the capacity at which we as people are able to be individuals, and to what extent those
influences limit our individuality. Structure refers to the ways in which a society is organized. Agency refers to the behaviors and actions of the
individuals within the social structure. Agency is limited by the structure due to cultural barriers and inequalities within the structure. In this essay, I
will present an overview of why critical theorists are concerned with those inequalities, and I will further identify the problems within the system
contributing to the unequal access to the public sphere, relating specifically to class and gender inequalities. Society is highly...show more content...
As Habermas puts it "the relationship of the individual to the state has increasingly become one of client or consumer services, rather than citizen"
(Roberts & Crossley, 5). Due to the limited agency (citizens' roles) within this sphere, we can conclude that the ongoing competition and negotiation
for a role in the public sphere ends with strictly dominant views. In such a monarchy, ordinary citizens such as lower classes and women have limited
input when debating politics among other things. The ideal of a place where all opinions are counted, so to speak, fails to provide a sense of
individual identity. This is due to the fact that it is pre–destined by the state itself and then turned back to the people– telling them what they will think
about particular issues; shown especially through the controlling lens of the media. According to Marx, those who have power over society exert their
control as a result of economic power and therefore determine the dominant ideologies within the superstructure model. Being the greater economical
and cultural barrier, the structure provides the social world with norms, rules and beliefs pertaining to age, gender, class and one's cultural identity.
Within that structure it becomes apparent that inequalities restrict your agency in terms of nationality, geographical location, class etc. In agreement
with Marx, the dominant views are generally the views of the superior class; the elite. One example

Aristotle Function Argument Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Aristotle Function Argument Essay

Similar to Aristotle Function Argument Essay (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Aristotle Function Argument Essay