Research Paper On Creationism Vs Evolution

Research Paper On Creationism Vs Evolution
Creationism Versus Evolution One of the most controversial topics in the world today is on the creation of earth. In one sense students are taught in
school that the earth and man was created through evolution. While, on the other hand people that attend church are taught that God created the earth
and all of the inhabitants that live on it. For centuries, scientists have sought scientific evidence that proves either the creationist or evolutionist
approach to the creation of earth. For decades, scientists have sought scientific evidence to prove evolution is the cause for the creation of earth, more
scientific evidence proves that God created earth. Biblical and scientific evidence not only proves that God created earth, but also refutes the argument
that earth was created by evolution.
The Bible states in (Genesis1:1) " In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." This creation is the mark of the material world and all that
can be seen. Christian and Jewish belief declares that God is the creator of the heavens and the earth. God said, "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the
beginning and the ending. Which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty."(Revelation 1:8) This clearly...show more content...
Evolutionists believe that all organisms change slowly over time. If this was true, there would be fossil evidence of organisms changing over time.
Scientists call this fossil evidence "transitional species." Eric Hovind says something about transitional fossils in his article, "Fossils Disproves
Evolution," "One of the most powerful pieces of evidence against evolution is the fossil record. If evolution occurred by slow, minute changes in living
creatures, there would be thousands of times more transitional forms of these creatures in the fossil beds than complete forms. Since the billions of
fossils that have been found are all complete forms, the obvious conclusion is: Evolution never
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Good Vs Evil Research Paper
Good vs. Evil
The world can make or break us, but it depends on if they let society change your way of life and being. Innocence is a trait that we are born with
they do not have enough knowledge to act in evil. It is the way people are raised, society and even human nature that enhances a negative toll on people.
From birth we only learn what we are taught. If their r up bringing is full of corruption and tragedies you are most likely to have a heinous person. As
stated in the article "Roots of Evil" "the unmistakable lesson is that ordinary 'good' people, devoted to their families, their religion and their country, are
capable of inflicting horrific harm on those whom they dehumanize and demonize" (roots of evil, p10,pg 3 sharon begley). This meaning that people
can easily be influenced by the people they trust in the most to lead them to make wrathful decisions, but, ultimately if a person was raised parentless ,
their outcome would be substandard due to the fact that they were never taught any morals and they could not contradict between right and wrong.
Better yet, if a person has a very structured lifestyle with great parents that teach them good morals then there is a better chance they will turn out
congenial.
This goes along with society. "The danger of trying to explain evil is that we risk falling into the abyss of predestination: that given these life events,
this social surround and...show more content...
"The mind is its own place, and in itself Can make a Heav'n of Hell, a Hell of Heav'n...Here we may reign secure, and in my choice to reign is worth
ambition " (Paradise lost.120–21). This explaining humans can't be naturally born to act evil but it can
In the end it is you how chooses if you do the evil thing or a good thing., People are generally born good, but there are many factors that can leave a
person to act watchful. The way someone is raised has an impact as well as society and human

Nature Vs Nurture Research Paper
Both Nature and Nurture have a strong influence in our behavior. Nature is something that you can't control. I heard about a family that adopted a
baby boy, they taught him how to behave in a proper way and they gave him a good education. But as he grew up he was becoming harder to control
and he was a violent guy. This family started asking themselves what was happening to their son, they were sure they raised him good. So they went
to ask the people that gave them the kid about his real parents, and an investigation was started. They found out that his real dad was in prison for
murder, and his mom had been one of the victims. Maybe this boy acted like that because it was in his genes, his nature was stronger than his nurture.
But nurture

Utopia Vs Dystopia Research Paper
Claudia Trost Professor Carrick English 122 04 September 2014 Utopia vs. Dystopia Out of the following words, which do you find resonate with
you most? Pessimism, negativity, cynicism and fear; Optimism, believing, hopeful and positivity. The reason I ask is because these words can easily
be used to explain the thoughts and feelings one could have about our current world. A world with a huge influx of technology, the current climate
change, poverty, power hungry leaders, prejudice and more. The easiest route would be to accept these things as unchangeable and view this world in
a dystopian fashion. Letting the faults in this world drive you to believe we live in a dystopian society; a place filled with terror and oppression. Or
you could have hope. Through a utopian lens, you could...show more content...
The current flood of technology has people concerned about its dystopian effect on our future and then those pessimistic views can supersede an
optimistic views. "Techno–pessimists often exhibit a deep passion about their particular cause and are typically given more that just the benefit of the
doubt in debates about progress and the future; they are treated superior to opponents who challenge their perspective or proposals...Even if their
proposals will often fail to bring about the better state of affairs they claim or derail life–enriching innovations, they are more easily forgiven for those
mistakes precisely because of their fervent claim of noble–minded intentions." (Thierer 7) It's easier to follow a cynic, there is no work involved on our
part to prove them wrong. I fear this dystopian view is more prevalent today than that of the utopian view, due to its ability to sound plausible and
believable. Also due to the way this view is portrayed by people of a higher class, it creates a feeling in the lower class that we cannot do anything to
change the predicament we are

Do you know the similarities and differences between a funding proposal and a research proposal? According to the website learnerassociates.net
/proposal, writing a funding proposal was created to help empower people to be successful in gaining funds for projects that provide worthwhile social
service. Aresearch proposal considers your overall topic ideas, your research question, your research process, and your sources and scaffolds what the
next steps will be for the project. There are similarities and differences between writing a funding proposal and a research proposal.
A research proposal is most often written by scholars seeking grant funding for a research project or it's the first step in getting approval to write a
doctoral dissertation. Even if this is just a course assignment, the introduction is the initial pitch of an idea or a thorough examination of the
significance of a research problem. After reading the introduction, readers should not only understand what is being proposed. Most proposals do not
include an abstract before the introduction. Background and Significance, this section can be melded into your introduction or you can create a
separate section to help with the organization and narrative flow of your proposal. This is where you explain the context of your proposal and describe
in detail why it's important. Approach writing this section with the thought that you can't assume your readers will know as much about the research
problem as you do. Note

Essay On Public Colleges Vs Private Colleges
Colleges and universities exist for one very important reason: to give students a rewarding higher education. Despite this common academic goal, the
classic debate of public vs. private college is one that just doesn't ever seem to resolve itself.
The argument follows a conversation we've heard before. Public universities are perceived as more accessible and economical, while private colleges
have the reputation of prestige and esteem, albeit at a higher cost.
While some of those impressions aren't entirely false, there's much more that defines the difference between public and private colleges. The biggest
fundamental difference between public and private colleges is in the cost.
What explains the difference in price? Public colleges are funded mostly by their respective state governments.
Private schools can be either for–profit or nonprofit, and receive no government funding. Rates need to be adjusted accordingly to keep schools up and
running. The question remains: Why do teenagers decide to attend a private school when the government provides education for a cheaper price? One
reason may be that private universities are more exclusive; the lower cost of attending a public university often translates into a higher rate of
admission and larger...show more content...
public college debate, carefully examine the type of college experience you'd like before you begin applying to universities. Pick your school based
on your field of interest and aim to excel in your major. Future employers want to see what you've learned and how you can apply your skills, instead
of where you attended school. If name recognition is important for your resume, there are plenty of public schools with a sterling reputation, and lower
tuition rates to match. But keep in mind that Harvard, Yale, and other Ivy League universities aside, getting a degree from a prestigious, well–known
university won't guarantee that you'll land that dream

Reason Vs Faith Research Paper
Reason vs. Faith
=========================
Of all that I believe, of all the I think about the world: how much of it is actually true? What's more: how do I know? Human beings have asked
themselves these critical throughout history, and in countless areas of thought. =========================The problem of reason versus faith is,
at root, a problem of how to answer these questions. The problem of faith and reason is, therefore, epistemological: a problem of how we know what
we claim to know. =========================
We will briefly consider this problem, for now, in the religious domain of human thought. For it is here where that problem takes on its most vivid
appearance. =========================
Philosophers have had a great deal of...show more content...
What's the difference between a being that realizes itself in time, and a being that realizes itself beyond time?
=========================Perhaps the following model could suffice: imagine you have a line. But instead of it being a succession of points
in space (measured for some number inches, feet, miles...whatever the unit), let's look at that line in another way. Let's pretend this line is a succession
of moments in time. (Again the units of measurement don't make a difference to us here, whether seconds or eons). =========================
Now, we have atleast two ways to view the passing of time represented by the line (and of course, we're ignoring the faults in this model for
explanatory purposes, for now). One way to view this passage of time would be temporally: seeing each moment as succeeding another from past to
future. In spatial terms, this is like standing outside of a tunnel, watching the cars enter at one end and exit at another: you see a car enter the tunnel at
moment–1, you see it go a fourth of the way through at moment–2, another fourth of the way at moment–3, all the way to when the care finally leaves.

Organic vs. Conventional Foods Essay
With the world's population continuing to increase, the demand for food is higher than ever. This increase in food demand also calls for more efficient
ways of growing and providing the food. Two methods that are very controversial are the organic and conventional method. While many people support
the organic method because of its known benefits, others feel that it is an over inflated industry that cheats consumers out of their money. But recently
many studies have disproved those critics. These studies prove that Organic food is a better choice than conventional because it is better for the
environment, avoids the use of chemicals, and is generally more beneficial. To help keep crops from being destroyed, conventional farmers use...show
more content...
It is also shown that pesticides are partly responsible for the rising cancer rates and birth defects among children ("Pesticides"). Organic farming
methods avoid the use of these chemicals and rely on natural method to control crops ("Farming, Organics"). Examples of these methods are crop
rotation, which consists of planting different crops every year and disrupts the life cycle of pests and provides a natural fertilizer ("Farming,
Organics"). Organic farmers also use natural fertilizers such as sulfur and interplanting methods that alternate crops in the field, which discourages
pests to live there ("Farming, Organics").
By not using multiple chemicals to control crops, organic farming also ends up being better for the environment. Organic farmers use natural fertilizers
such as manure so that they do not release artificial chemicals into the ground ("Organic Food"). In June of 1999 a report made by the U.S. Geologic
Survey, found that most waterways and ground water supplies in both urban and rural areas contained enough pesticides to endanger aquatic life
("pesticides"). These chemicals can also leak into streams and encourage the growth of algae and intoxicate the water ("298 John P. Reganold et.al").
Furthermore studies have found that water contaminated with pesticides may accumulate in the

Vaginal Birth VS C–Section Delivery Ever wonder what form of delivery is safer? Well first off what are the forms of delivery? There are two
forms of delivery. There is either a vaginal delivery or a cesarean delivery. A vaginal delivery is where the baby passes through the birth canal by
normal means. A cesarean section is where the baby is pulled out through an incision made in the mothers stomach and uterus. What are the pros and
cons of a vaginal delivery? "Your body is naturally equipped to give birth vaginally without medical intervention" (Brann) However, even if you can
deliver a baby vaginally without medication women still consider having some form of medication during the birthing process. There are many
positives for the mother during a vaginal...show more content...
"Women who undergo vaginal births avoid major surgery and its associated risks, such as severe bleeding, scarring, infections, reactions to
anesthesia and more longer pain." (Nierenberg) For the mother, "the experience of actively delivering a baby is exciting and empowering. (Why
Choose Vaginal Birth). "Vaginal birth is the essence of femininity to most women. It biologically and physically links all women. It is also an
expression of a woman's sexuality." (Why Choose Vaginal Birth) Another reason that women would rather have a vaginal birth is because, "from a
psychological standpoint, women who go through with a vaginsl delivery are said to have a more positive birthing experience." (Vaginal Delivery vs
C–Section) There are several positives for the baby in a vaginal delivery. One positive is, "during a vaginal delivery, muscles involved in the process
are more likely to squeeze out fluid found in a newborns lungs." (Nierenberg) "Babies born via vaginal delivery tend to

Science Vs Religion Research Paper
To answer the question of science or religion begins a long process of debate. In my opinion, both are right. There is surely science in this world as
well as a creator, God, who began humanity as well as matter. During the initial time of this debate, people were so focused on the Bible and the
religion aspects to this world but just didn't understand that there was too, science involved in our creation. Even today, humans understand that there is
science to this world, which helps to explain life, however, God created the very beginning of life. One of the first people to challenge the Catholic
Church was a Polish mathematician and astronomer named Nicolaus Copernicus. According to an article titled The Scientific Revolution, "In
Copernicus's...show more content...
The Catholic Church believed that the most important creation of God, humanity, would be the center of the universe, earth. However, the new
science suggested that the sun is the center of the universe and that we, earth, revolve around it. Ultimately, this was a mathematical challenge to the
church. Also, once Galileo built himself a telescope, the planets and moons didn't seem to be as pure and perfect as the cosmos portrayed them
being. In fact, there were large craters in the moon making it look rather rocky. All of the new science changed the worldview from a closed world,
to an endless world. Due to such life changing information discovered by people like Galileo and Newton, I think it made it hard to reconcile the
differences. The scientific discoveries were leading to the fact that maybe God didn't create humanity and that maybe mathematics could explain life.
However, some scientists and philosophers still felt that God created human life but he did so in a way that involved mathematics and science as a
guideline for helping us figure things out about the

Research Paper On Science Vs Religion
Science versus Religion: How the universe came to be
Humanity has always struggled with the controversy of how the universe was created, since it is a question without a definite answer. People tend to
look to science and religion to solve this problem. Christianity is the most followed religion, and evolution is the most popular scientific belief.
Christians claim there is a greater being (God), who created the universe.
Evolutionists, on the other hand, claim the earth and humanity came to be through the big bang. The creation debate tends to focus on evolution and
Christianity. Through gapcreationism, evolutionary creationism, and old earth creationism, theologians and scientists are in the process of fusing
scientific creation and religion. Theologians are using old earth creationism, evolutionary creationism, and gap...show more content...
Public schools are only allowed to teach evolution, while private schools tend to only teach Christianity. Studies show when both views, Intelligent
design theory and Evolution, are taught there tends to be more people who accept both sides. The reason why the public schooling system came to
not being able to speak about Christianity is because parents and students claimed it dissuaded and offended their religion. I think this is not fair to
the majority of children, who are not offended by hearing more views on creation. People who are only taught Evolution actually tend to be less
likely to believe in evolution then if they are taught multiple religions. A reason why this is also not taught in school is because science is always
changing with new technology, and obtaining new information about the world. This is a problem because religion is never changing, or at least the
basic principles of religion do not change. The basic principles of science can change, and do change. There does not seem to be a place where both,
Christianity and Evolution, can be taught without

Plessy vs. Ferguson Essay examples
Plessy vs. Ferguson
Plessy v. Ferguson , a very important case of 1896 in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld the legality of racial segregation. At the time
of the ruling, segregation between blacks and whites already existed in most schools, restaurants, and other public facilities in the American South. In
the Plessy decision, the Supreme Court ruled that such segregation did not violate the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This
amendment provides equal protection of the law to all U.S. citizens, regardless of race. The court ruled in Plessy that racial segregation was legal as
long as the separate facilities for blacks and whites were "equal."
This "separate but equal" doctrine, as it...show more content...
As a result, segregation gradually spread. By the mid–1890s railroad cars and other forms of public transportation had become segregated in a number
of southern states.
The Plessy case grew out of a careful strategy to test the legality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 that required railroads to maintain separate train
cars for blacks and whites. In September 1891 a group of blacks in New Orleans, Louisiana, formed the Citizens Committee to Test the Constitutionality
of the Separate Car Law and raised $3000 to mount a formal challenge to segregation in Louisiana. Albion Tourgee, then the nation's best–known white
advocate of black legal rights, agreed to argue the case free of charge.
In June 1892 Homer A. Plessy bought a first–class ticket on the East Louisiana Railroad and sat in the car designated for whites only. Plessy was of
mixed African and European ancestry, and he looked white. Because the Citizens Committee wanted to challenge the segregation law in court, it alerted
railroad officials that Plessy would be sitting in the whites only car, even though he was partly of African descent. Plessy was arrested and brought to
court for arraignment before Judge John H. Ferguson of the U.S. District Court in Louisiana. Plessy then attempted to halt the trial by suing Ferguson
on the grounds that the segregation law was unconstitutional.
In 1896 Plessy's challenge reached the U.S. Supreme Court, where Tourgee argued that segregation violated

Evolution Vs Creationism Research Paper
Evolution vs Creationism
As we all grew up under the guidance and knowledge of our own parents, we had been slowly molded to accept certain beliefs, while rejecting
others. We were also taught to think creatively and question what we were taught, even from them. The status quo is always changing and evolving
and the problem we find in today's society is that sometimes we see and hear things and immediately take them as fact, or even repetitively until we
believe them as fact with no evidence to back those things up. In my opinion, we have lost the ability to, not only think for ourselves, but to truly
question the mass amount of knowledge we consume on a daily basis. I feel that this has a similar effect on the conversation about evolution...show
more content...
As I grew older and learned about evolution my beliefs were strongly challenged with no merit. The problem I had with both scenarios was that they
are both THEORIES. A good example of me questioning what these theories actually meant is when I went through grade–school, the pledge of
allegiance had been removed because it had the word God in it. As a young child I questioned the fact of why I couldn't say it in school. Later on, as I
entered high–school, our class had scratched the surface on evolution and I wondered why we were not taught creationism as well, and why we were
not allowed to make our own decision of what we were being taught throughout school. According to a Gallup poll of 1,016 U.S. adults about 45
percent of those surveyed favored the statement "God created human beings in their present form within the last 10,000 years" (Fitch 1). If the survey
showed an almost even split of both theories then why are we forced to learn only evolution in schools? Scientists and science educators have
concluded that evolution should be taught in science classes because it is the only tested, comprehensive, scientific explanation for the nature of the
biological world today that is supported by overwhelming evidence and widely accepted by the scientific community (National Academy of
Sciences 53). As a society that has proven itself wrong time and time again how can we for sure say the "Big Bang theory" is where our ancestors
came from and everything around us came to be? The problem with religion is that there are many of them and they each have their own opinions. If
creationism were to be taught in schools, it would be too complex to tailor a way for it to be accepted by every one of them. In this conflict of interest,
the final

Research Paper On Brown V Board Of Education
Brown v. Board of Education
The Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court case was a very important case for Americans. This case was a United States Supreme Court case
in where the court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be against the constitution. The U.S.
Supreme Court's decision in this court case changed the history of race relations in the United States. On May 17, 1954, the Court got rid of
segregation by race in schools, and made all education opportunities equal as the law of the land. Without this case, we would not be where we are
today. It shaped the United States completely as a whole. It was the first time something regarding race was put a lot of emphasis on. This case
redefined our nation's values and ideals, and...show more content...
Board of Education was actually the name given to five different cases that were heard by the U.S. Supreme Court already. All of the cases were
about segregation in public schools. The 5 cases were Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Briggs v. Elliott, Davis v. Board of Education of Prince
Edward County (VA.), Bolling v. Sharpe, and Gebhart v. Ethel. Even though there were many differences in the details of the cases, they all dealt
with segregation in public schools. They all happened around the same time so the Supreme Court decided to hear them together. When the cases
were heard in 1952, the Court put all five cases under the name of Brown v. Board of Education. Thurgood Marshall argued the case before the Court
himself. Although he raised a variety of issues, the most common issue was that separate school systems for blacks and whites were very unequal,
which violates the "equal protection clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment.. Based on sociological tests and other data, he also argued that segregated
school systems were used to and purposely made black children feel less important than white children, and this kind of system should not be

Fear Vs Hope Research Paper
Let's say you just finished a huge test. Do you hope for a good mark or fearing failure? Your personality changes if you hope or fear. But it is crucial
to know hope is stronger than fear because it has the ability to heal, it is changing lives, and hope can improve the mindset of one. Firstly, hope is
stronger than fear because it can help heal. On a CNN news article, research showed that during the course of illness, belief and expectation – two
mental states associated with hope – have an impact on the nervous system which, in turn, sets off a chain reaction that makes improvement and
recovery more likely. When a person acquires a serious illness, their family members would hope their family member will survive because it is
the only way to live. In correlation, surgeons have a very tough job performing a surgery. They always do the job hoping they will be successful
because because their job is pretty much healing the victim. With the hope, surgeons would have an easier job doing the work. Next, hope is stronger
than fear because you get a better mindset. For example, when someone consistently hope for a good mark, that person gains a positive mindset and
then they won't feel so bad when they get a bad mark; they'll look or what went wrong and how to improve for. Martin Luther King once...show more
content...
Fear does not cause permanent change because it is easy to get over. Meanwhile, hope can change a person's feelings dramatically. My aunt
recently got cancer and my parents are hoping she is okay. It affects feelings dramatically because it is a family member, part of their life. Hope is
stronger than fear because hope is that extra light when you're in the dark. Terry Fox had ran from Newfoundland all they way to Ontario with cancer
and an amputated leg during his campaign "Marathon of Hope". He had the courage to go for hoping his cancer would be cured and he raised more
than 24 million in the

Hinduism Vs Christianity Research Paper
There are many different religions in the world. Each religion has a vast array of beliefs and followers. There are aspects that most religions share in
some way. Each group associated with these religions believe that they are worshiping and practicing the right thing in the right way. Every religion
can be compared to find similarities and differences. Hinduism and Christianity are two religions seemingly very different. It is possible to explore the
similarities and differences between Hinduism and Christianity on their belief in God or gods, if and what is after death, and their ethical beliefs.
Hinduism is a religion that can be difficult to understand in a Western world. In the Western world where the majority of people are monotheistic the
Hindu beliefs can be difficult to grasp. Hindus worship a number of gods and spirits, but these numerous spirits are all parts of...show more content...
Both religions believe that something happens after you die. What happens is different but they both have an idea about this issue. Both Hinduism
and Christianity have a punishment for not following moral rules, such as, going to Hell or being reincarnated. There are many differences between
Hinduism and Christianity on death. In Christianity there is only one life and a person's actions in that life are factors in deciding if a follower will
go to Heaven or Hell. In Hinduism however, bad actions cause a person to be stuck on Earth, and they will continue to stay here until they learn about
their mistakes. Both religions have ethical beliefs as well. Each religion has beliefs on how to treat people, animals, opinions on war, and modern
medical and technological advances. In Hindu culture eating a cow is forbidden because cows are sacred. Hinduism promotes non–violence.
Non–violence is promoted by things such as treating people with kindness and finding ways that cause the least harm to

Book Vs Movie Research Paper
What would you choose? Would you stay or go? Well, that's what Mia is facing. Mia is a 17 year old cello player who had an audition to Juilliard,
a rock star boyfriend, a future ahead of her. That was until she was in a car accident. Now she has lost her mom, dad, and brother. She doesn't know
whether to stay or go at this point. The main character's in the book is Mia, Adam(Mia's boyfriend), Kim(Mia's best friend), Mia's mom, dad, brother
Teddy, and her gramps. Although there are major differences between the book and the movie, each equally enjoyable. For various reasons I like the
book and the movie equally because it shows the relationships with the characters differently. In this paragraph I will be giving examples as to why the
book is better...show more content...
I prefer the movie because it shows a strong connection just by a glance between Gramps and Mia's spirit. "'So I just wanted to tell you that I
understand if you go. It's okay if you have to leave us. It's okay if you want to stop fighting.'" (pg 181) In the movie Gramps says this same line, but
after he looks over and it's almost as if he can see Mia's spirit. I prefer this part in the book over the movie because it has more detail. "And by the time
he dropped me off from the Yo–Yo–Ma concert, I think we were both aware that we we falling in love." (pg 54) In the book it shows Mia and Adam
falling in love, as in the movie, it jumps right into it. I equally enjoy the book and the movie because in the end they didn't change the ending. Mia
wakes up in both the movie and the book. She can hear Adam as well as her actual body. The relationships with the characters are different in the
book and movie, but makes the movie and book both enjoyable. The relationships are different in the book and movie. It was a refreshing change
seeing the differences between the book and movie. If you're going to read the book or watch the movie, do

Book Vs Movie Research Paper
In the world of modern technology there are many ways to keep one entertained and informed. Two of the best ways are through the reading of
books, and the watching of movies: both are eternal works of art designed for those who would wish to momentarily leave the existent of reality and
dive into a world unknown or to question the known world through stories of factual relevance. Both take the entertained on a journey that has been
created in the minds of a genius, but, it is the way they take the entertained into their imagery worlds that are different. Books, for example require the
reader to use there imagination to mentally visualize the image the author is trying to perceive. Movies, on the other hand, will have the audience
mesmerized as the picture comes to life right before their eyes. Both books and movies are great evening actives...show more content...
Books are the fathers of movies: Books came before movies, and (most) movies get there content from books the director has read. Take the "Harry
Potter" series for example, the first book (Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone) was created in 1995, the movie, however, was created in 2001.
The books and the movies never tell the same story: Directors will always have to cut out some content from the movie just so they can complete
the making of the movie whereas the books will always tell you more of the story. Take "Eargon" for example, in the movie after he finds the dragon
egg and brings it back to the barn it begins to hatch, however in the books Eargon tries to sell it to the town butcher who is about to buy it until Eargon
tells him it's from the Spine (a mountain range that separate's his hometown of Carvahll, and the outside world), Eargon then

Buying Vs Adoption Research Paper
Adopting vs Buying While getting a pet is a milestone in some people's life deciding whether or not one wants to adopt or buy is an important
decision. Joan Miller was interviewed by animal planet and said, "I worry that buying or adopting a pet should not be a spur of the moment thing
(Adoption vs Buying)." It is common for people to get a pet when they are starting a life, whether it be with a spouse or a family, what people do not
see is that they are bringing a living animal into that life too. They do not think about all of the consequences, they see a cute puppy and buy it without
knowing the history. Adopting a pet is not the first thing that comes to mind when someone is thinking about buying a pet. Adopting a pet can be
beneficial...show more content...
Many people believe that just because 2% of people are bad pet owners does not mean the other 98% should have to suffer.(Bornstein) When
adopting a pet one has to go through many procedures just to get a pet that they would love no matter what. "You may need to get a furnished letter
from your landlord, have your home inspected, and pay a high fee (Bornstein)." People believe that all of this is overkill and too much work just to
adopt a pet. On top of the work before one adopts a pet, they may not know what type of pet they are adopting. They argue, "When you buy from a
breeder you know the bloodlines and family history." (Auerbach) This shows that people usually prefer purebred pets but, "you may not know what
breed the dog you pick is mixed with when you adopt (Stilwell)." It bothers people when they do not know where exactly their pet they are buying
is from. People also argue, "more than 20% of people who leave dogs in shelters adopted them from a shelter." (Auerbach) They feel that what is the
point in getting an animal from a shelter if it could just be thrown back in there later. This is not the case in most situations and adopting is not for
everyone, but it is the more rewarding

Research Paper On Creationism Vs Evolution

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Buy A Literature Review Paper Fort Kent

More from Buy A Literature Review Paper Fort Kent (7)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Research Paper On Creationism Vs Evolution