доклад на конференции http://kesw.ifmo.ru/kesw2012/ Моделирование комплексов городского хозяйства для системного развития ИКТ города // Костырко А., Кудрявцев Д., Григорьев Л., Кислова В., Жулин А., Синятуллина Л., Ермаков Р. // Сборник трудов конференции «Инженерия знаний и технологии семантического веба - 2012», 1-9 октября 2012, г. Санкт-Петербург, Россия. СПб: СПбГУ ИТМО, 2012. – С. 81-88.

1. Regional enterprise architecture (EA)
modeling for systemic development
of city's ICT
(рус. Моделирование комплексов городского хозяйства
для системного развития средств ИКТ города)
Kostyrko Artem1, Kudryavtsev Dmitry 2,3, Grigoriev Lev2, Kislova Valentina2,
Zhulin Andrey1, Sinyatullina Leila1, Ermakov Roman4
1 NRU HSE, 2 Business Engineering Group, 3 NRU SPbSPU, 4 КТЕ Labs.

2. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Agenda
1. The role of regional EA modeling for systemic
ICT development
2. Regional EA modeling methodology
3. Decision support / reference system for
systemic (consistent) ICT development
4. Related work
5. Conclusions

3. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Information city 2011-2016 Program
Development of
advertising and
mass media
Program Implementation Management
Building public ICT
environment
Creation of the Intelligent
City Management System
ICT Development aimed
at improving city
inhabitants
quality of life and
facilitating business
conduct
Quality of life
High-level
infrastructure
Efficient
government
Information city 2011-2016 Program
Moscow city strategic goals

4. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Program Implementation Management
Carrying out integrated analysis and assessment of applicability and relevancy of the existing Moscow city
information systems and resources
1.
Integrated simulation of the processes of implementation of functions of Moscow city authorities and
institutions, and description of their targeted state
2.
Development of the risk management system, including development of the package of risk prevention
measures
3.
KEY FIGURE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE SYSTEMIC PROJECT OF THE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
4.
• The share of Moscow city information systems and resources meeting the system project
requirements: 100% by 2016
1.
Developing requirements to the solution architecture within the framework of the systemic project of the
Program implementation
Developing of training methodology and vocational training of state civil officials and employees of
Moscow city institutions; creating and providing methodological component of the technology training
center activity
2.
3.
Development and execution of public control and technical supervision procedures

5. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Models within systemic project
Process and performance model
Information modelOrganizational structure model
Information system model
Public function
Business area Line of business
City process
Outcome Output
Indicators
Government authorities
Lower organizations
Positions
Information entity
Attributes Domains
Business entity
Information resources (register,
repository, database…)
Information
system (IS)
IS functions IS passports
Interfaces
Informatizationactivities
(program“Informationcity”)

6. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Systemic project ontology

7. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Онтология для моделирования комплексов
городского хозяйства (фрагмент иерархии классов)
7

8. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Онтология для моделирования комплексов
городского хозяйства (свойства классов)
8

9. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Decision support /
Reference system
Portal
Project and
performance
management system
IS audit IS
Modeler
Projects and KPIs which are
related to government
authorities and IS IS passports
Comments and
moderation
Semi-automatic
amendment
System architecture

10. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Modeler
Ontology-based
enterprise model
editor
Ontology-based
enterprise model
Reporting and
query module
Documents
Diagrams
(visual, svg)
Modeling process wizard
Integration wizard
Diagram editor
Query results
Semi-
structured
data
OWL
XML

11. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Structure of the model
Classifier Matrix

12. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Classifier example: City processes

13. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Classifier example: Information resources

14. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Matrix example:
Organizational structure - City processes
Matrix examples:
• What processes are controlled by authority (Organizational structure -
City processes)
• What information resources are used by the process (City processes –
Information resources)
• What information resources are used by the authority
(Organizational structure – Information resources)

15. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Matrix example: Outcomes (Values) – City processes

16. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Metamodeling language - ORLAN (ORganizational LANguage)
This language allows to structure, represent and query enterprise model.
ORLAN :: = <TYPES, CL, MX, InferPR, D, TASKS, SPEC >, where:
TYPES – types descriptions, which specify the CLASSES, RELATIONSHIPS AND
PROPERTIES of enterprise ontology, together with their taxonomies,
CL – classifier, the representation format for entities, hierarhical relationships between
them and values for the properties of entities (including ontological types).
Hierarchy is the main feature of classifies and the main relationship types are
“part-of ”, “class-subclass”, “be subordinated to” etc.
MX – matrix (or table), the representation format for relationships between entities
from classifiers. Example relationship types are “perform”, “help achieve” etc.
InferMX – inference matrix, allows to infer implicit knowledge via transitive property
of relationships in several matrixes,
D – modeling domains (activities, norms, information resources, etc),
TASKS – enterprise engineering method specification,
SPEC – views specifications.

17. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Classes (metamodel)

18. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Outputs from the model: analytical reports
This data is not recorded by
any government authority yet
This data is already recorded by
another government authority
8

19. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Data is recorded in several
information resources
(repositories) by different
authorities
9
Outputs from the model: diagrams

20. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Portal – the tool for final users
Main users:
• managers of department of information
technologies of Moscow city,
• government authorities managers, responsible for
informatization
Future: Public

21. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Portal examples: line of business key activities

22. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Portal examples: Public function passport

23. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Portal examples: Public function context diagram

24. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Portal examples: Faceted search

25. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Related work
Enterprise architecture research and practice
Traditional methodologies:
• NGOSS (англ. New Generation Operations Support
System) from TMForum,
• FEA — Federal enterprise architecture,
• Business Systems Planning (BSP)— Information
Systems Planning Guide, IBM Corporation.
Semantic methods and tools:
Allemang D., Polikoff I. , Hodgson R. Enterprise Architecture Reference
Modeling in OWL/RDF // International Semantic Web Conference,
2005. — P. 844–857.

26. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Conclusions
• Regional enterprise architecture (EA)
modeling supports systemic development
of city's ICT (explicit link between outcomes,
city processes and information systems),
• Currently we are creating regional enterprise
architecture models and collecting feedback,
• Work in progress.

27. NRU HSE, Business Engineering Group, NRU SPbSPU, КТЕ Labs
Publications
1. Моделирование комплексов городского хозяйства для системного развития ИКТ города //
Костырко А., Кудрявцев Д., Григорьев Л., Кислова В., Жулин А., Синятуллина Л., Ермаков Р.
// Сборник трудов конференции «Инженерия знаний и технологии семантического веба -
2012», 1-9 октября 2012, г. Санкт-Петербург, Россия. СПб: СПбГУ ИТМО, 2012. – С. 81-88.
2. Административное моделирование на основе онтологий // Кудрявцев Д. В., Григорьев Л.
Ю., Кислова В. В., Жулин А. Б. // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления.
– 2009. № 1. – с. 157-169.
3. Технология наполнения баз знаний онтологического типа // Григорьев Л. Ю., Заблоцкий А.
А., Кудрявцев Д. В. // Журнал «Научно-технические ведомости СПбГПУ. Серия
«Информатика. Телекоммуникации. Управление». №3. 2012. – С. 27–36.
4. Организационное проектирование на основе онтологий: методология и система ОРГ-
Мастер // Григорьев Л. Ю., Кудрявцев Д. В. // Журнал «Научно-технические ведомости
СПбГПУ. Серия «Информатика. Телекоммуникации. Управление». №1. 2012. – С. 21–28.
5. Ontology-based business architecture engineering technology // Kudryavtsev, D., Grigoriev, L. //
The 10th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and
Techniques, September 28-30, 2011. P. 233-252.
27

28. Thanks!
Questions?
Kostyrko Artem1, Kudryavtsev Dmitry 2,3, Grigoriev Lev2, Kislova Valentina2,
Zhulin Andrey1, Sinyatullina Leila1, Ermakov Roman4
1 NRU HSE artem.kost@gmail.com, a.zhulin@gmail.com,
l.sinyatullina@gmail.com.
2 «Business Engineering Group», dmitry.ku@gmail.com, griglev@gmail.com,
valya@big.spb.ru.
3 SPbSPU
4 КТЕ Labs, roman.ermakov@gmail.com.