Armenian Genocide Research Paper

Armenian Genocide Research Paper
The war between the Young Turks and the Armenians did not solve any problems, but rather just further deepened tensions between countries. It
started off as a war for power because the Armenians demanded equal rights with the Turks in the government of the Ottoman Empire. However, due
to the differing religions between the two groups, the Armenians were denied of their request as they were the minority. This lead the Turks to form a
committee, the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), to reach a compromise with the Armenians so they could all live together in peace.
However, out of fear that they would take over, the Young Turks completely disregarded this plan and decided to slaughter them by the thousands
because they posed a slight threat. This increased tensions between opposing races and opposing countries since their Allies, such as Germany, would
also be expected to take the side of the Turks and deny the brutality of the events that took place....show more content...
On this historic day, also known as Remembrance Day, the Armenian people lead a march up an extensive hill to the memorial of those who died in
the genocide. The people sport shirts of various colors and symbols, some with slogans relating to the genocide such as, "forget–me–not." Many stores
and attractions are closed on this day to observe the holiday and there are flyers and signs put up to advertise events going on around the city in honor
of the country. Contrary to most, this march was a peaceful one filled with numerous people with one common goal at hand, to honor their fellow
friends and family members who died tragically during the genocide and raise awareness toward the reality of the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Write An Essay On The Armenian Genocide
Armenian Genocide Essay
Have you ever heard of the Armenian Genocide war? Let me explain to you how it all started. The Armenian Genocide was a mass extermination of
Armenians, Assyrians, and greeks carried out by the Ottoman from 1915 until 1923. It was the first major genocide of the 20th century. DuringWorld
war I, the Turkish national government had overseen the deportations and killings of all the millions Armenians in eastern Turkey. They had caused the
beginning of the Armenian Genocide. The Turkish national government had seen this as them being able to take over the Armenians.
The Russian government had planned to reform six Turkish provinces that were almost populated by Armenian people/citizens. The government slowly
was taking away their things such as their weapons, they arrested many intellectuals, and they started deporting the Armenian citizens to a
concentration camps in the Syrian desert where they were starved to death or exiled. By the end of the year 1915, 75% of the Armenian population
were extinct. The Turks killed over one million armenian citizens and other people who lived there. They made the armenians go extinct so they could
win/take over their territory. Thousands of armenians were murdered during the...show more content...
But they still ended up getting massacred by the Turkish government. When the genocide occurred, people were arrested and tortured. Their enemy
made Armenians strip their clothes and walked during daylight until they couldn't anymore. People were tortured and murdered. If they stopped doing
what they were doing to rest or take a break, they were shot. The special organization the turks created was just more torture to the citizens. They were
drowned, pushed off cliffs, starved to death, exiled, or buried alive. The armenians did not deserve this because all they wanted was to fight for
independence and they end up getting assassinated in their own home and

The Armenian Genocide
Armenian Genocide
Andy Leeds
Ms. Bullis
English 1
April 24 Armenians are a Christian nation, and when they were a country, they were the first to proclaim Christianity as the state religion. The Ottoman
Empire took control of Armenia during the 15th century, and they were mistreated for quite a while due to religious differences (Christians vs.
Muslims), and this mistreatment culminated and peaked during 1915–1918. During World War I, the Ottoman Empire took the opportunity among a
world of chaos to exterminate its Christian population, after years of hate propaganda sponsored by the government, they struck, and the Ottoman
Empire's successor denies it to this day. The Ottoman Empire divided its people decades before the genocide; the...show more content...
Simultaneously, the Ottomans managed to eliminate the more dangerous Armenians, as the ones that are truly violent and hateful were massacred in
these miniature killings. "commisioned write articles for publication in the Sura– yi Ummet, demonstrating that Britain was no longer pursuing friendly
policies as she had done in the past, in particular, in the 1830's and 1840's. On the contrary, she was now inciting the Armenian, the Macedonians
revolutionaries, and even the Arabs against Turkish rule" (Unal) To the Ottomans, Britain meant Christianity, so to hear that Britain didn't want to be
allies anymore meant that Christians didn't want to be with the Ottomans either. That the Ottomans would connect the Easter Orthodox church of the
Armenians with the Protestant Church of England, two very different sects of Christianity, is bizarre. This connection ultimately hurt the Armenians.
"The CUP was always at pains to disguise its Turkish nationalist an, by implication, anti–Christian leanings particularly in its Ottoman–Turkish
publications." (Morganthau) By hiding the fact that they are anti–Christian, the subliminal messages attacking the subconscious are much more
effective than a conscious message. The CUP was a very effective propaganda making machine, and very effectively caused Ottoman to be polarized
into two groups, Muslim

Armenian Genocide Report
Both articles consisted of two witnesses of the Armenian Genocide in their town. The first eyewitness goes by the name of Zakar Kloian, who
was born in 1900, in the Village of Darman, in Turkey. He was a naturalized citizen of the United States, with a naturalization certificate issued to
him by the District Court of the United States. On May 15, 1915, all the townspeople were kicked out of their homes from the Turkish gendarmerie.
They were forced to travel on foot towards a destination they were not familiar of. But several days later, a group of armed mobs attacked the group
of Armenians, which distracted the Turkish gendarmes from watching their group. This made an easy opportunity for the group of Armenians to
make an escape, which some of them did. Zakar was one of those people who fled safely. The second article was also about a woman who
experienced the massacre of the Armenians. Khanum Palootzian, born in 1898, was also from the Village of Darman....show more content...
This was a very tragic event in history especially for the Armenians. The Armenians were innocent group of people. More than half of the population
were killed. Most Armenians today want acknowledgement for the horrible things the Turks did, but Turkey still denies it and even uses reasons such
as it was during the first World War. Despite what the Turks say, a lot of the older Armenian survivors are still alive and telling people what horror
they saw. I feel that if the United States and other major countries of the world accept that the atrocities were done on the Armenians, this matter would
be put under a microscope and reviewed carefully. But until that day that it is agreed upon that the genocide happened, which it did, the Armenians will
keep bringing it up year after year in the month of April during the Armenian genocide's

Armenian Genocide Summary
The Armenian Genocide is commonly recognized as the persecution and death of Armenian citizens of the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to 1918, during
the First World War. The Ottoman Empire, headed by the Committee of Union and Progress, was responsible for the deaths of the Armenian population
and their migration to other countries. Many countries have been guilty of atrocities throughout the history. Most were chastised by the world within a
short period of time. This is also true of Turkey as the new country after the fall of the Ottoman Empire. It was warned and reprehended by the UN, the
US Government and 42 American States individually (including California) as well as many other countries of the world within 25 years of that event ().
Furthermore,...show more content...
She also claims, "Many scholars are history experts but we are not, so we have to look at all opinions fairly." (Kiper). She might think like this
because of where she comes from and where she belongs to; a country, which refuses to label this historical event as "genocide" and the general
assumption that Turkey, should feel ashamed for doing genocide. However, it was recognized that the government of the Ottoman Empire killed many
Armenian citizens in 1915 and 1916. Thus, anyone reading Kiper's comments might laugh at the idea that an event, which occurred over 100 years
ago, can be judged, even by historians. There is no serious scholarly debate about the facts of this historical event other than whether or not to actually
call it "genocide" – justifiably doing so has traditionally met with fierce resistance from Turkey, which was not a country at the time of the

I'm not as fascinated on topics of Genocide as i am on cultures and political relations.My interest in this particular topic rose when i remember the
commemoration of the Armenian genocide took place and there was a debate on the importance of it being claimed as such or let it be ignored. I was
always to certain extent intrigued by how as a student i was taught about the Holocaust and Rwanda when speaking about genocide but Armenia was
ignored .Last year my friend asked about a topic for her extended essay involving a genocide which wasn't the holocaust, I mentioned Armenia and at
first she didn't know what i was talking about since it wasn't common knowledge; now she is writing her extended essay on this topic.I like to link the
authoritative

Armenian Genocide: A Case Study
French government was less committed to the Armenian national cause and did not contribute a lot to help the Armenians. Although, French did play
few humanitarian roles, such as when Russian authorities requested the French government to subsidize the relief work for Armenian refugees in
Aleppo, then French made the payment in secret to avoid the attention of CUP (Bloxham 2005, 139). French had missionaries in the Ottoman Empire
that were trying to provide aid to Armenians, but failed to do so because violence was rapidly increasing and extreme famine that resulted into people
dying of starvation. French requested the British to provide food aid, but British refused indirectly and said that Entente Allies are simply being
blackmailed to remedy

The Armenian Genocide Essay
The Armenian Genocide, also known as the Armenian Holocaust, the Great Calamity, and the Armenian Massacre, was the organized killing of nearly
1.5 million Armenians. It occurred in the Ottoman Empire – present–day Turkey – where 2 million Armenians lived. The Armenian Genocide is the
second–most studied massacre, after the Nazi Holocaust. Twenty–two countries have officially recognized it as genocide, but the Republic of Turkey
rejects the characterization of the events as genocide. Many Armenians who are descendants of survivors are fighting for its recognition.
Under the Millet system, the Ottoman Empire did not give nearly as many rights to Armenians as to Muslims. They couldn't serve in the military, they
couldn't testify...show more content...
land, livestock, and homes included ? was to be confiscated by the authorities.
The Empire?s wartime allies offered little protest, but the New York Times called the massacres ?systematic?, ?authorized?, and ?organized by the
government?.
With the passage of the Tehcir Law, all Armenians were to be disarmed, demobilized, and assigned to labor battalions. Chetes, Ottoman squads,
executed many recruits. In December of 1911 a ?special organization? was founded by the Ottoman government. Ittihad ve Terraki founded a second
special organization composed entirely of released criminals. The organizations marched Armenians out to the Syrian town of Deir ez–Zor. They were
not allowed any rest, supplies, or facilities. The New York Times in August of 1915 stated ?The roads and the Euphrates are strewn with corpses of
exiles, and those who survive are doomed to certain death.? Troops escorting Armenians often robbed, killed, and raped them, and encouraged others to
do the same. Twenty–five major concentration camps existed in total. Armenians were killed in large groups via mass burning, poisoning, and drowning.
Many foreign officials offered to intervene on behalf of the Armenians, but were turned away by Ottoman government officials. The events were
reported daily in newspapers and literary journals around the world. Many famous Americans, including Theodore Roosevelt, William Jennings Bryan,
and Alice Stone Blackwell, spoke out against the

Turkish Armenian Genocide
In cases such as the Turkish–Armenian conflict, contrary sources are available. Several sources claim that the conflict was in fact a genocide, whilst
others maintain that a mass ethnic cleansing was never even thought of by government officials. This issue arises because of a variety of perspectives
from which historical accounts are told. However, there is physical evidence from both the Hamidian Massacres (1894–1896) and the Adana Massacre
(1909) which clearly indicate that there was a significant and harmful attack on the Armenian people who lived within the borders of the Ottoman
Empire. Armenians were subjected to subhuman conditions in concentration camps, not unlike those constructed by the Nazis in Germany, which
included malnutrition and disease. Despite the plethora of information regarding the Ottoman Empire's actions toward the Armenians, it is still denied
in an official capacity by the Turkish government to this day.
Unfortunately, the Turkish–Armenian conflict is not the only unacknowledged or marginalized genocide; there are several other incidents of this
happening, just in the past century. One of the most prominent being the Rwandan Genocide, which...show more content...
As responsible members of the society, we must legally define the term genocide so that it may be used effectively and efficiently in international
courts of law, in order to hold those who do not value human lives accountable for their actions. Genocides must also be acknowledged internationally
in order to honor those who died; continuing to disavow these mass murders or ethnic cleansings on an international stage is an insult to those who

The political leaders of Armenia were targeted during the genocide, the loss of the Armenian leaders left the population vulnerable and made the
rebuilding of Armenian even more difficult. This planned out tactic proves that the Armenian genocide was purposeful and thought out.
The beginning of the Armenian Genocide was marked by the murder of the political leaders of Armenia. Leaders of the Armenian nationalist Dashnak
party organization and Nazaret Chavush, the most notable Armenian leader in Zeitun were of the first Armenian leaders to be murdered, beginning in
October 1914.
These planned killings left the Armenian's vulnerable, and without procedure while under the extreme pressure under threat of the genocide. Following
the murder of

The Armenian Genocide was a terrible atrocity that was committed against the Armenian people. During the time the genocide took place and
afterwards, there had been people who had witnessed the tragedy that befell the Armenians and wrote poems in order to show the world what had truly
happened to their people, and to get us, the readers, the emphasize with them as well. Some poets that highlighted the atrocious acts that happened
during the Armenian genocide were Siamanto who wrote "The Dance" and Vahan Tekeyan who wrote "Dream" and "The Country of Dust." What is the
Armenian Genocide? It is "the atrocities committed against the Armenian people of the Ottoman Empire during W.W.I. The Armenian people were
subjected to deportation,...show more content...
/ "Dance," they thundered – / "here's a fragrance you can't get in Arabia." (59). Those who were a part of the Ottoman empire burned Armenians
without remorse. They had corpses being piled high as trees, you could hear the loud whips being cracked and the yelling of the Ottoman
authorities to have the Armenians continue their so called 'dancing.' It was had been so horrible to watch that at the end of the poem, the poet asks
"how can I dig my eyes out?" When reading the poem, it shows you the bloody and gruesome details of what had gone on during the Armenian
genocide. Many people might not be able to handle such a thing, but it is being told to make us all aware of what truly happened. Some people might
sugar coat it or avoid it, but when you realize what had actually happened, it makes us feel more empathetic towards the victims and the survivors of
the genocide. It's one thing to know what happened, but to hear or read about from someone who had experienced it is a different thing altogether. We
are given the truth of what happened, we envision what had been done and how they had endured these atrocities.
Vahan Tekeyan was another Armenian poet who was one of the few who had survived the Armenian Genocide. During his time alive, he became a
very influential person and was seen as the 'Prince of Armenian Poetry.' During his lifetime, he had published many books/poems that were praised for
its meaning. One of these poems was called "Dream," which was about

Armenian Genocide Case Study
FOCUS The focus of this inquiry is the conflict between the Armenians and Turkish Government in the 20th century between 1915–1918 and how it
was caused and also if there was a resolution to this conflict or has it continued through to modern times. INTRO The armenian genocide happened
between 1915–1918 where 1.5 million Armenians were massacred at the hands of the Turkish government. This genocide came about in 1915 due to
the muslim government threatened by the Christian Armenians who were thriving in a society that was forced to exclude them. Suspicions grew that
the armenians were not loyal to the Muslim leaders but were loyal to other Christian governments like Russia, who shared a border with the Turks. It
was a suspicion by military

Evidence of the Armenian Genocide Essay
The Armenian genocide was a systematic eradication of the Armenian population who lived under the Ottoman government. The genocide took
place before and after World War I and it was set out in two phases. The first phase was to kill all able bodied men by massacre and forced labor.
The second phase was to deport women, children, and the elderly and make them walk through the Syrian Desert in which a lot of people died from
lack of food, water and the climate. The total population that had died was between one and one and a half million. Despite the high death rates,
Turkey still denies the Armenian genocide took place. The evidence that the genocide took place is that one and a half million of Armenians died, the
Armenian genocide is...show more content...
After that, the Turks started arresting Armenian men throughout the entire country. They took the men and they were sent to the outskirts of town. The
troops then tied up the men and shot or bayoneted them to death. After the murder of the men came the children, women and elderly. The Turks told
the women, children and elderly to pack their things so they can relocate them to a safer area, but their real intentions were to send them out in a death
march. The Armenians walked through the Syrian Desert with lack of food and water and the weather of the Syrian Desert only made it worse for
them. Many of the Armenians did not survive the march and died. This was planned out by the Turkish government; they brought no food or water for
the Armenians and in some instances, even killed the women, children or elderly. One million people just do not die from starvation without the help
of the government. The Turks did not try to help the starving Armenians in their march. In the picture below, you will see evidence of women and
children starving throughout the march to the Syrian Desert. Figure 1: Starved Armenian woman with her son in Syrian Desert, 1916. Collection of the
Armenian Genocide Museum & Institute Archive – See more at: http://www.genocide–museum.am/eng/online_exhibition_3.php#sthash.A1g3Js9s.dpuf
The National Archives – Armenian Genocide There are many historical documents, photographs, witness reports that have been recorded and have been

Since a hundred years ago, the discussion over the barbarous actions of the Ottoman Empire murdering and deporting of its Armenian community has
come down to one question. Was the viscous acts of the Ottoman Empire considered Genocide or not? This is the real global issue that has been
debated for so long throughout the world. While the vast American–Armenian community truly believes the word Genocide should be openly used to
describe the massacre that took place a hundred years ago, the United States has not let the word out of their mouth. Many Armenians wonder why the
United States choose not to express the G–Word when they know more than a million Armenians were massacred during the final days of the Ottoman
Empire....show more content...
In the Realism perspective of international relations, the United States were mainly looking out for their self–interest. While the United States would
like to adopt the word of Genocide, knowing how important it is to the American–Armenian community, they simply couldn't risk their relationship
with Turkey. Since the U.S had access to military and air bases on Turkish lands, they did not want jeopardize their relationship with the Turks. Turkey
did not want the G–word to be used and the U.S will stand by it as long as they have interests in

The Armenian Genocide Essay
The Armenian genocide has several main causes: European meddling in Ottoman internal affairs, nationalism, economic jealousy, and Armenian
involvement in the Russian war effort. Though, a lot of the causes are interrelated. For example, nationalism and European meddling go hand in hand.
What exactly was the Armenian genocide? Well, the Armenian genocide was a state orchestrated machine of mass
–murder and rape of the Armenian
people, and several other ethnic groups, of the Ottoman Empire 1915–1923. The Armenians were one of many ethnic groups of the Ottoman Empire,
and they had lived in eastern Asia Minor for around three thousand years prior to the atrocity . The Ottoman Empire was a theocracy where the Sultan,
or emperor, was also the...show more content...
Nationalism is defined as a nation's, or ethnicities, desire to become an independent autonomous state. The Greek, Albanian, Serbian, Bosnian, and
Macedonian nations' nationalistic centrifugal force started the break up of the Empire in mid 19th century. All of the nations listed above became
states by the time World War One began in 1914. This nationalistic movement happen under many Sultans, but it intensified under AbdГ
јlhamid II and
finally under Murad V. It was AbdГ
јlhamid II who tried to curve the nationalistic movements, which were also sweeping through Europe, by
introducing the Tanzimat Reforms of 1834 and 1856, at the request of European pressure. The main goal of these reforms was to move the
non–Muslims from an inferior national to a full subject of the Empire. The thought was that if the Sultan gave his minority subjects more rights, per
say, than they would not form a separatist movement. Or worse the subjects separatist movement lobby international support; for example, in the Greek
national movement in 1821. The Greeks were assisted by France, Romanov Russia, and The United Kingdom. In this way two causes for the Armenian
genocide interweave. At the same time as nationalistic centrifugal forces are pulling the Empire apart, Europe is sticking their hands in Ottoman
internal affairs. The Tanzimat Reforms were really a failure, and did not promote equal citizenship among citizens. Nor

Argumentative Essay On The Armenian Genocide
The Armenian Genocide:The Armenians are a group of people who were attacked repeatedly throughout history, gained and lost territory, and were
subject to discrimination. The highest level of discrimination ever demonstrated is genocide. These discriminatory acts toward the Armenians first
arose after the First Balkan War of 1912 tore Europe apart and broke the bonds between previously united countries (Cooper and Akcam par. 7). During
the decline of the Ottoman Empire, Armenians banded themselves together and fought against the Turks, Michael Gunter, a professor and author,
believes that, "This was an inevitable result of psychology on which the Armenian people had nourished itself during an entire generation" (par. 19).
Afterwards in 1915, when the genocide truly began, the Van Rebellion and suspected collaboration with the Russian Ottomans signaled the deportation
of Armenians to Iraq. While the Armenians were in Iraq, the Turks organized killings and death by privation, a state in which essential aspects of life
such as food and warmth are lacking (Cooper and Akcam par. 8). Within months of their arrival, the nearby Tigris and Euphrates rivers were filled with
bodies of Armenians; dysentery and other diseases became prevalent due to the pollution of this important water source. Others who did not die or
become ill due to the contaminated water water suffered through concentration camps established by the Turks (Cohan par. 22). Some eyewitnesses
recount church burnings, mass drownings, beatings, rapes, and mutilation. Yevnige Salibian, a 101–year old survivor, shares in 2015, "I saw the
Turkish people, long whips in their hands ... and the children were crying, 'Mama, I am hungry. I want some bread. Mama, I am thirsty. Mama, I
cannot walk'" (qtd in Gottlieb par. 1). This incident described by Saliban has a strong correlation to what Elie Wiesel describe in the novel Night
when the Nazis first arrived in his village. Research states that by 1918 any remaining Armenians in their historic land were either dead or in the
Diaspora. From this time to 1922, Ataturk, the previous ruler of Turkey, expelled all of the remaining Armenians (Cohan par. 23). Even though the
definition of genocide states that there is

Armenian Genocide Essay
The Armenian Genocide was one of the worst planned killings in history taking over one and half million lives. First having disputes with the Turkish
government in 1894, Turkish military officials, soldiers and ordinary men sacked Armenian villages and cities and massacred their citizens. This is
also known as the Armenian Holocaust. Being part of a religious minority in the region the Armenian people were seen as inferior to the Muslims and
having very few political and legal rights. Issues increased during World War One when Ottoman religious authorities began a holy war against all
christians expect their allies. Turkish military leaders began to think if the Allies won that theArmenians would turn and fight for them. As the war
continued...show more content...
The monument is a symbol of respect to the people showing the history of the Genocide and raising the awareness around it. We did not have a
target audience as the memorial is for both people part of the genocide as well as people who want to learn about it. The pathway is lined with
birch trees on either side with white tulips in front of it. These trees show the strict control the soldiers had as they marched the prisoners to be
executed, surrounded with no way out. To the left of the pathway is a white building with the Armenian flag embroidered on the floor. This is to
symbol patriotism and give the emotion of remorse to the people affected by the genocide. People can pay a small fee to have their names
engraved onto the stones. Outside the main building is a garden with the flowers planted in order of the flag. The waterfalls compliment the flowers
and the walkway to give an emotion of peace and hope before entering the building. The first one in the garden shows "never ending tears" with the
lasting effect the genocide has had on people. This is used as a prayer area for people looking to be at peace with the past. The pathway going inside
memorial symbolizes the long marches that the captured civilians would take heading into the prisons. Inside the building after walking down the
hallway you see straight ahead the Armenian flag spanning the wall. This is shown as a

Armenian People During WW1
Can you imagine yourself living during the time that WWI was going on? I'm pretty sure you'd be terrified to even walk out of your house. Like it
wasn't bad enough that the whole world was at each other's throat, but to know that your country may be at the hands of another leader. A leader who
may have different perspectives on every day life, with the benefit of doubt that it may be extremely foreign to you, is pretty scary. I'm pretty sure that it
would make you or anyone else feel extremely unsafe and uncomfortable. But imagine being unaware of the underlying plan to "cleanse" your ethnic
group. The Armenian people faced this situation during the time of WWI. Life between...show more content...
Others hesitated to abandon their only means of self–defense and instead, buried guns in the ground, store them in dry wells, or hid them in their
houses or barns5. This led to house–to–house searches in some communities, with Armenians being tortured until they revealed whether they owned
weapons.
On May 27, 1915, an official Edict of Deportation was issued6. For most
Armenians, the deportation orders were a complete surprise. The Armenians were in despair as they left the villages and cities where their families had
lived for many generations. When preparing for the deportation journey, Armenians faced anguishing decisions about what to take with them, who to
go with, or even the decision of whether to leave their children behind, especially if there was a
Turkish family willing to keep him or her for her. Some Armenians faced other moral dilemmas: that they were given the option of converting to Islam
and remaining in their homes7. Very few Armenians selected this option. In the beginning of spring of 1915, Armenians were deported from their
homes and forced to march hundreds of miles to the deserts of Syria and Mesopotamia8. This was called "death marches"9. Along the way some were
killed outright, and tens of thousands more died of dehydration,

Armenia Genocide Essay
Armenia is one of the world's oldest civilizations. Inhabiting the mountainous Caucasus region at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, the people of
Armenia have shared a unique language and culture for over 3,000 years. The systematic annihilation of the Armenian population from their historic
homeland was a horrific example to serve the upcoming genocides, including Hitler's Holocaust. Every Armenian thinks that it is their own
responsibility to honor the innocent Armenian people. Armenian genocide is a part of the world history and every year on April 24th numerous
events take place to spread awareness and demand recognition. In addition, April 24 is a huge political event for all the Armenians all over the world
and thousands of people gather...show more content...
The Armenian Genocide was carried out during World War 1 between the years nineteen fifteen and nineteen eighteen. It was planned and managed by
the Turkish government against the entire Armenian population of theOttoman Empire. The mass of the Armenian population was forcibly removed
from Armenia and Anatolia to Syria, where the mass was sent into the desert to die of thirst and hunger. Large numbers of Armenians were
systematically massacred all over the Ottoman Empire. Women and children were abducted and terribly abused. The entire wealth of the Armenian
people was confiscated. After a year of calm at the end of World War One, the slaughter was renewed between nineteen twenty and nineteen twenty
three the turks organized massacres of Armenians in and as a result of Turkish atrocities more than one million of Armenians were slaughtered, died
from cold, hunger and epidemics, hundreds of thousands Armenians were captivated, assimilated, deported by force from their native places
(Armenocide.am). Today, most historians call this event genocide–"a premeditated and systematic campaign to exterminate an entire people." The
Armenian people were issued to deportation, seizure, persecution, massacre, and hunger. Ordinary Armenians were turned out of their homes and sent
on death marches through the Mesopotamian desert without food or

Armenian Genocide Research Paper

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Armenian Genocide Research Paper