2. Research commissioned by the Department of
Children and Youth Affairs and conducted in
2012-13
Objective: To study recommendations from 5
specific reports of inquiries into child
protection failures (1993-2010) and ascertain
degree of implementation
Develop a template for future
recommendations
3. Literature and Policy Review
Detailed study of 5 reports of inquiries
Establish list and timeline of all published
inquiries/reviews of CP services
Semi-structured (elite) interviews (21)
Consultation with stakeholders (21)
4. (Published)Inquiries initiated in response to
perceived crisis
29 published inquiries and reviews over 20
years
Wide range of failures investigated:
Intra-familial abuse
Institutional abuse
Diocesan clerical abuse
551 recommendations in total
5. ‘that’s life…that’s just life’
Political reality
Original report ‘game-changer’
Way of accessing resources
Very difficult for staff ‘caught up’ in the
process
Not always conducive to learning
Scope for improvement
6. Many of the issues underpinning recommendations
had already been identified by policy makers and
had in many cases been planned and may have
stalled due to lack of funding
Too numerous
Some were predictable
Some repetitive (infers lack of change)
Some considered too aspirational
Reflected agendas of panel members
Potential for consultation
7. ‘You can seal it in a brown envelope before you start
and know that inter-agency cooperation will come
up, probably something to do with adherence to
policy and procedure, and all these predictable
things, the quality of records and so on … You can
bet your bottom dollar that they will come out.’
8. Improved vigilance and identification of
children at risk
Better inter-agency co-operation
Improved record keeping and exchange of
information
Protocols for child protection conference
Training
Child-centeredness
Children’s rights
9. Most implemented at least to some degree
Implementation of recommendations with a
local rather than national focus more difficult
to measure
Implementation was often obscured by other
developments at the time
Distinction between addressing and
implementing recommendations
Pressure for implementation tended to come
from politicians in the opposition parties
10. Considered far more influential than empirical
research because of public awareness- yet not real
drivers of change
Implications?
Recommendations fatigue- diminishing returns
Critical mass reached
Internal QA mechanisms providing greater
transparency & promoting higher standards- less need
for inquiries
Effective reforms need local knowledge and
professional ‘buy-in’
Process of developing recommendations needs to
provide for collaboration with key stakeholders
Shift in focus to learning
11. ‘A very good […] and very knowledgeable … but when […] had
[their] analysis done and began working on recommendations, the
absolute poverty of [their] understanding of management became
absolutely crystal clear because the consequences of what was
recommended were so inconsistent with any sound management
practice that it was completely undermining the report … You get
somebody at one level from the professional child care perspective
talking about interdisciplinary and inter-agency collaboration and
all of that and then coming with recommendations that are much
more akin to silos … The actual experience of having being
involved in statutory child protection and the actual experience of
managing within a statutory context is starkly absent from most
of the inquiries, it seems to me.’
12. Establish advisory group
↓
Invite written submissions
↓
Conduct review and draft recommendations
↓
Stakeholder seminar
↓
Convene workshops
↓
Briefings
13. Case for change
Learning oriented
Evidence based
Assignment of responsibility
Review – written in a manner which facilitates
review
14. Drawing on evidence, identify the issues that
need change
Outline the consequences of no change
Contextualise it in current policy to show the
level of congruence
15. Deficits are not necessarily due to lack of
training but to inadequate information or
guidance
Promote additional research and practice
guidance
Evidence of good practice
Messages for practice elaborated in a separate
section
16. Evidence of deficits in policy or practice
Need to demonstrate knowledge of the context
in which recommendations are to be
implemented
Recommendations should only be made if
evidence exists to show that their
implementation will effectively address and
remediate the deficits identified by the report
17. Specify:
Discipline
Directorate
Organisation
Leader to coordinate and oversee implementation
18. The implementation of recommendations
should be amenable to review
Should be possible to link them to regulatory
processes such as HIQA standards
Any review should capture the more nuanced
aspects of child protection practice
Multi method approach to auditing will be
required
19. Recommendations should be fewer in number
and should be the result of a collaborative and
consultative process,
A fresh approach should provide clarity and
ensure that recommendations are well
grounded, more feasible and cost effective
The CLEAR template should get over the
difficulty of measuring outcomes in an area
that involves the exercise of professional
judgement.