2. Dr. Azade Tadayon Fard
Dept. of Prosthodontics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
3.
4. Sharry J, Complete Denture Prosthodontics. Mc Graw-Hill Book Com
St Louis. 1974
5. 1) Physiologic and Biological Differences
Between tissues
2) Occlusal Plane Of the remaining teeth
Koper A, The maxillary complete denture opposing natural teeth:
some solutions. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1987, 57(6): 70
Fayyaz A, Sadr SJ, Clinical Problems in Single Dentures. 1992, 20-
6. Sharry J, Complete Denture Prosthodontics. Mc Graw-Hill Book Compa
St Louis. 1974
Kelly E, Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture op
maxillary complete denture. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1972, 27(
Jameson WS. Various clinical situations and their influence on
linear occlusion in treating combination syndrome: a discussion of
treatment options. Gen Dent.2003;51:443–447.
Shen J, Prevalence of the “combination syndrome” among denture pa
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1989,62(6): 642-644
7. Ant. Maxillary
Bone
Resorption
Five Potential Changes that Lead to CS
(By Kelly 1972)
Papillary
Hyperplasia
Tuberosity
Down
Growth
Mandibular
Bone
Resorption
Lower Ant.
Teeth
Extrusion
Kelly E, Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial
denture opposing a
maxillary complete denture. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,
8. Six Additional Changes Observed in CS;
by Saunders
Saunders TR, Gillis RE, Desjardins RP. The maxillary complete denture
opposing the mandibular bilateral distal-extension partial denture:
Treatment considerations. The
Poor
Prosthesis
Adaptation
Occlusal
Plane
Discrepancy
Ant.
Repositionin
g of
Mandible
Periodonta
l Changes
Loss of
VDO
Epulis
Fissuratu
m
9. Tolstunov L, Combination syndrome: classification and case
report. Journal of oral Implantology 2007; 33(3), 139-151
11. Classification; 2008
(Tulstunov)
I. Completely
Edentulous Maxilla
I. Ant.
lower
teeth
II. Fixed
full
lower
dentitio
n
III. Ant.
and 1
post.
quadrant
Tolstunov L, Combination syndrome: classification and case
report. Journal of oral Implantology 2007; 33(3), 139-151
12. II. Anterior
Edentulous Maxilla
I. Ant.
lower
teeth
II.
Fixed
full
lower
dentiti
on
III. Ant.
and 1
post.
quadran
t
Tolstunov L, Combination syndrome: classification and case
report. Journal of oral Implantology 2007; 33(3), 139-151
13. Ant. and 1
post.
non-
occludin
g quadrant
III. Partially
Edentulous Maxilla
(teeth in 1 post.
Quadrant)
Ant.
lower
teeth
Fixed
full
lower
dentiti
on
Ant. and 1
post.
occludin
g
quadrant
Tolstunov L, Combination syndrome: classification and case
report. Journal of oral Implantology 2007; 33(3), 139-151
15. Kelly E, Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial
denture opposing a
maxillary complete denture. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,
1972, 27(2): 140-150
Saunders TR, Gillis RE, Desjardins RP. The maxillary complete denture
opposing the mandibular bilateral distal-extension partial denture:
Treatment considerations. The
16.
17. Watt DM, Mac Gregor AR, Designing Complete Dentures, 1986
Jacobson TE, KroI AJ.A contemporary review of the factors involved
in complete dentures. Part II: stability. J PD l983; 49(2):165-72.
20. oNo Treatment
oProsthetics
• Stable Prosthesis
• Stable Occlusion
Load Distribution
Kapil S Pal, Shriprasad Sarapur. Combination Syndrome: A Review
of
21. As The Chewing pattern changes, the
Occlusal Considerations also change.
Wennerberg A, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Influence of occlusal factors on treatment
outcome: a study
of 109 consecutive patients with mandibular implant-supported fixed
prostheses opposing maxillary complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont
22. 3. Biologic over dentures
4. Periodic follow-ups
1. Tissue management through accurate
impression techniques
2. Splinted lower Anterior teeth
23. Schmitt S. Combination syndrome: A treatment approach. The
Journal of
25. 1) Implants in the Maxilla
Ned Tijdschr, et al. An implant-supported overdenture in an
edentulous upper jaw. 2011;118(11):577-82
26. Maxillary
Complete
Denture
2) Implants in the anterior mandible
Barber et al (JOMFS 1990; 1283-1287)
Maxson et al (JPD 1990; 554-558)
Sybille et al (IJP 1996; 58-64)
Jacobs B et al (JPD 1993: 70; 135-140)
Abd El-Dayem et al (Implant Dent. 2007
Henry et al (IJP 1999: 12; 492-497)
28. 3) Implants in the posterior
mandible
Bortolini S, Natali A, Implant Retained Removable Partial
Dentures:
An 8-Year Retrospective Study. Journal of
29. Controversies
Deogade S, The Combination Syndrome: An Evaluation Of Literature Review.
Int. Journal of Dental Practice & Medical Sciences 2012
Kamble Vikas B,Combination syndrome –revisited. Journal of pearl dent
2012
30. o Number of Implants
o Supra-structure Design
o Maxillary Bone Resorption
o Antagonistic Teeth
o Incidence
o Cantilever
Rutkunas V, et al. Maxillary complete denture outcome with two-
implant supported mandibular overdentures. A systematic review.
Raghoebar GM, et al. A systematic review of implant-supported
overdentures in the edentulous maxilla, compared to the mandible: how
many implants? Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 ; S191-201.
Ohkubo C,Does the presence of antagonist remaining teeth affect implant
overdenture success? A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(4):306-
12.
Tymstra N1,Maxillary anterior and mandibular posterior residual ridge
resorption in patients wearing a mandibular implant-retained
Solutions: good retention and stability, designing of the occlusion, implants on the upper jaw. The principle is to design and provide an occlusion that is ideal for the important criteria of denture success—STABILITY !
The occlusal prescription provided is a major factor in determining the size of the force applied to the dentures
The patients masticatory patterns defines the retentive capacity of the dentures
As the lower denture becomes more retentive…….
The scenario
in short…
Ineffective mastication
Very unretentive upper denture.
The ruminatory pattern of mastication
Unable to exert any control over the mandible