This document discusses the philosophical question of whether physical reality is actually a simulation. It presents various perspectives on this possibility, including evidence from science, paradoxes in physics, and the likelihood that advanced civilizations could create realistic simulations. The document also explores what we might be able to learn if we assume our universe is a simulation, such as looking for correlations or creatures exploiting bugs in the system. Overall, it examines how our understanding of what is real may evolve over time and encourages using technology like augmented reality to help "root reality."
9. “Normal” People Follow “Experts”
There is no Child
• Gurus
• Novelists
• Movie Makers
• Idiots Giving
Speeches
10. Evidence Against Physical Reality
Paradoxes of Relativistic Space-Time
Virtual Particles
Dark Energy & Matter
Quantum Entanglement
Probability of Civilizations Creating Ideal Simulators
11. What if, instead…
Reality is a machine
designed to explain
its own existence,
as far down the
rabbit hole as we
choose to go?
Drawing by Anne Thouthip
19. A Better Idea
Let’s work on the assumption
that our universe is a simulation
and see what we might know…
20. Any Rational Simulation
Must have some communication between simulation and simulator
• Rules and initial conditions apply
• “Reality” is mere data manipulated by the simulator
• Results should ideally be collected
Or else why bother?
21. Karl Sims Evolved Virtual Creatures
Creatures generally evolve
to better exploit their
‘physical environment’
Simple Finish Line => Tumblers
Lazy Physics => Vibrating Cheaters
Special thanks to Karl Sims for this rare video.
More info at: http://www.karlsims.com/
26. In an Perfect Simulation
• We can eventually build perfect simulators inside
• We can jack in, walk in or send delegates
27. “A Brief History of Time Turtles”
A well-known scientist once gave a public lecture on astronomy.
At the end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room
got up and said: “What you have told us is rubbish. The world
is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant
tortoise.”
The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, “What is the
tortoise standing on?”
“You’re very clever, young man, very clever,” said the old
lady. “But it’s turtles all the way down!”
28. Every time you enter a
virtual world, you push
one turtle onto the stack
Every time you leave a
virtual world, you pop
one from the stack
A Stack of Metaphorical Turtles
29. How can we Pop more Turtles?
We need to “root” reality!
30. Say, does AR also add Turtles?
At its worst, it re-paints the current
turtle and distracts us from what is
ostensibly real.
(if so, this could actually help highlight whatever remains true)
31. At its best, it can help us be more
genuine and understanding of who
is casting these shadows we see...
(if so, it actually helps deconstruct a turtle and ‘root’ reality.)
Say, does AR also add Turtles?
34. What is true in every reality
What elicits child-like joy
What inspires and drives us
(what lies do we repeat)
(what hurts and tricks us)
(what addicts & traps us)
How to Spot what is Most (and Least) Real?
?
35. Whether this is the Real Life or not…
Design AR and VR in a way that is
most Genuine and Transcendent
“Help Root Reality, Today!”
Thank you!
Editor's Notes
Are we living in a simulation?
Show of hands. How many people think we are definitely not living in a simulation?
Philosophers, at least as far back as Plato, wondered if we exist in a richer environment than we can ordinarily perceive; where ‘people’ as we see them are merely shadows on a wall.
George Carlin
Even the wisest humans can’t tell us what is real. They can only talk in terms of faith or probabilities.
It would be a sloppy simulator that allowed its simulants to prove they weren’t real
And a really crappy one to allow some of us to alter its fundamental rules with some in-world hacking.
I’d want my money back — assuming I could escape the simulator to get it.
A better question would be: what questions can’t we ask?
If we question the reality of ‘time’ itself (and some do, convincingly), then the entire history of the universe could be an artifact of the ‘present’ answer to that question. The history we learned (remember: from physical artifacts and from people whose memory is based in matter and energy) could be invented on the fly.
And so we’d be stuck again, without an answer. Or so it would seem.
I tend to think that the natural sciences can’t get us out of this one, any better than religion or philosophy. But rather than giving up and chowing down on tasty fish, I’d rather we start with the assumption that our universe is a simulation and then work backwards to see what we can learn.
Several takeaways: virtual creature evolve to exploit their environment. In one case, integration errors in the simulation allowed for supernatural energy, so some creatures evolved to vibrate and then burst with speed. In another case, a too-simple fitness function rewarded creatures crossing a finish line. So instead of evolving limbs, some creatures evolved to simply be tall and rigid, falling or tumbling over the finish line.
If information flowed in both directions, in and out of our universe, we might eventually discover a correlation that makes absolutely no sense within our reality. It would rely on some logic happening outside our universe. For example, flipping a power switch in Detroit inexplicably produces penguins in Antarctica. Alas, what we see is more industrial activity in Detroit probably means fewer penguins, by a very explicable interaction of purely natural rules.
Of course, it’s a spectrum. There are or will be VR experiences that can help us understand our truer selves, as we might exist apart from this world. And there really bad AR experiences (think the HyperReality video) that can occlude the real world and help us forget what it means to be human.
Are we living in a simulation?
Show of hands. How many people think we are definitely not living in a simulation?