The document discusses construction stage road safety audit for an underpass construction project near Ashram Junction in New Delhi. Key issues noted during the audit include lack of proper traffic management and control measures like signs, markings, and speed reduction mechanisms. Recommendations provided focus on implementing a traffic management plan as per IRC guidelines, installing missing signs and road markings clearly delineating traffic diversion and work zones, and using measures like rumble strips and barricades to manage traffic and ensure safety of workers and road users.
3. Dr J Nataraju
(MENTOR)
Shri Ashish Singhal
Shri DP Deshmukh
Lt Col Anand Kumar
Shri. Dr. Sunil Dhapte
(Team Leader)
10
th
Certificate
Course
on
Road
Safety
Audit
and
Other
Road
Safety
Related
Aspects.14
th
Nov
to
29
th
Nov
2022
Audit Team-E Members
3
Shri Ravinder Kumar Mittal
Ms . Ravuri Meghala
Shri Soham Paul
Shri Kuldeep Natwarsinh
Barad
Shri Kishan Vachhani
Shri. Chennakeshavulu
(Dy Team Leader)
Shri Sushil Kumar
Shri Arun Kumar Sethi
Shri Macharla Pandu
Shri Irshad Mohd Hanif
Bagwan
Shri Goutam Patil
Shri Ratan Lal Meena
4. Need for
Safety at Work
Zone • Construction is Always done in stages
• Multiple Activities at construction site
• Coordination of Activities is must
• Efficiency and Safety requirement to be maximized
• Environmental Consideration
4
5. Steps involved in
Construction Stage Audit
Advance Warning
Zone, Approach
Transition Zone,
Work Zone,
Terminal
Transition Zone
Safety of
Workmen and
Safety of Road
Users
Application of
Traffic Control
Devices and other
Safety measures
Any other
parameter
noticed which
can enhance
safety
5
6. Location / Site
• The present Road stretch is 6/8 lane road with varying Median width
• Underpass Construction is Proposed beneath the existing road at a third level
• Over 4,00,000 PCUs pass through this important intersection.
6
Project Brief
8. 8
• Traffic management plan (Design and implementation)
• Speed Control
• Signals, Signs, pavement markings and delineation
• Diversions & Carriageway
• Road surface
• Barricades & Crash Barrier
• Work Site Access
• Road worker safety
• Vulnerable Road Users
• Safety at night
Following were checked during a Construction stage Road Audit and Issues
discussed:
10. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Construction
of Underpass
Near Ashram
Junction
(FARIDABAD
TO INDIA
GATE)
• Temporary traffic control zone not maintained as
per IRC SP 55 2014.
• Advance Construction zone warning sign and
flagman has not been provided.
• Men at work sign is not provided.
Very
High
• Traffic Management plan to be prepared
and implemented as per IRC: SP: 55-2014.
• As per section 4 of IRC 55 2014 the zone
wise recommendations are elaborated in
the subsequent slides
Essential
10
Work Zone Traffic Management Plan
11. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Construction
of Underpass
Near Ashram
Junction
(FARIDABAD
TO INDIA
GATE)
• Construction zone is of semi circular in shape
instead of tapered rectangular.
• Transition tapered approach and Terminal
transition approach length not provided
properly.
• Work end zone sign not provided.
• Speed calming measures not provided
Very
High
• Temporary Traffic Control zone to be
maintained as per IRC-55:2014 as per fig
given below.
Essential
11
Work Zone Traffic Management Plan
13. Stretches Considered for Construction Stage Audit
Faridabad to India Gate – VUP Construction
(Source: Video)
Extension of Ashram Flyover to DND
Flyway (Source: Visit)
India Gate to
Faridabad – VUP
Construction
(Source: Video)
15. Traffic Control Zones and Suggested Lengths
Speed <=50 kmph, AWL = 180 mts., WEL = 45 mts.
Min. distance b/w signages = 40 mts.
16. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description
Risk Recommendation Priority
India
Gate to
FBD on
Mathura
Road
• Absence of “Men at Work” Signage
• Absence of speed limiting signs in Advance Warning
Zone
• Absence of speed calming measures at entry and exit
of Work Zone.
• Absence of restriction ends signage
Very
High
• Speed Limit board to be provided as per
Table 4.1 of IRC SP 55 2014
• TBM should be provided to reduce speed
on approaches and termination of work
zone
Essential
Speed Control Measures
Type IV retro reflective signage
AWL= 180 mts.
170 m TBM @ 70 mts.
Height
from the
Footpath :
2100 mm
Clearance :
600 mm
Work Zone End
Zone = 45 mts.
17. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description
Risk Recommendation Priority
FBD to
India
Gate on
Mathura
Road
• Absence of “Men at Work” Signage
• Absence of speed limiting signs in Advance Warning
Zone
• Absence of speed calming measures.
• Lane Marking not provided
• Cautionary Signs Not Provided
Very
High
• Speed Limiting Sign should be provided
• TBM should be provided to reduce speed
on approaches to work zone
Essential
Speed Control Measures
Type IV retro reflective signage
AWL= 180 mts.
170 m
Speed Hump (with signage)
OR TBM
TBD specifications –
1. 15 -20 Strips @ 130 – 180
mts. From work zone
2. 300 mm wide
3. 500-1000 mm spacing
TBM @ 70 mts.
18. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description
Risk Recommendation Priority
Extension
of
Ashram
Flyover to
DND
Flyway
• Absence of speed limiting signs in Advance Warning
Zone
• Absence of speed calming measures.
Very
High
• Speed Limiting Sign should be provided
• Speed Hump/ TBM should be provided to
reduce speed on approaches to work zone
Essential
Speed Control Measures
AWL= 180 mts.
130 m
170 m
1. Speed Hump (with signage)
specifications –
1. 3m – 9.5 m chord length
2. 100 mm = height
19. Chainage/Location Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description
Risk Recommendation Priority
Extension of
Ashram Flyover
to DND Flyway
(towards
Akshardham)
• Absence of restriction end sign in Work Zone
End Zone
• Absence of active speed control measures
Very
High
• TBM and Studs should be provided to
reduce speed on approaches to work site
• Restriction Ends sign to be provided in
Work Zone End Zone
Essential
Speed Control Measures
Work Zone End
Zone = 45 mts.
22. Advanced Warning Zone
Observations Risk Recommendation Priority
• “Traffic Diversion” sign missing.
• Speed Limit and “Go Slow” signs not provided.
• “Men At Work” sign is missing
• Reduced Carriageway right lane sign board not
provided.
• Thermoplastic Bar Marking as speed calming
Measure not provided.
• Pavement marking from the approach of the
diversion has not been provided.
Very High • Diversion ahead sign should be placed in advance to warn
the drivers.
• Speed limits should be gradually reduced towards the
approach.
• Men at works and reduced carriageway right signs should
be provided in advance.
•Layout no. 10.7 from IRC SP 55-2014 shall be referred for
the design of Traffic Management Plan.
• Traffic shall be diverted properly in advance of diversion
with requisite payment markings.
Essential
India Gate to Faridabad Faridabad to India Gate
23. Both Transition Zones Cum Activity Zone
23
Observations Risk Recommendation Priority
•Absence of Object Hazard Marker (Right) at the
starting of Approach Transition Zone.
• No provision of delineation for night time
visibility.
• Work Traffic Exit sign board not provided.
• Road Marking near the activity zone has not
been provided.
• All the approach arms of the round about has
been signalized.
Very High • Retro reflective stickers should be provided on the
barricades for better night time visibility.
• Road Studs along the edges.
• Work Traffic Exit sign shall be provided as per
layout 10.7 of IRC:SP:55-2014.
• Marking to segregate activity zone & moving
traffic shall be provided as per layout 10.7of
IRC:SP:55-2014.
Essential
India Gate to Faridabad
India Gate to Faridabad
24. End Zone
India Gate to Faridabad Faridabad to India Gate
Direction Observations Risk Recommendation Priority
Faridabad
to
India
Gate
And
India
Gate
to
Faridabad
• Dual carriageway sign is missing on the exit
• Restriction end sign not provided.
Medium
• Dual carriageway sign to be provided to alert
the drivers.
• Restriction end sign to be provided at the end
zone as per layout 10.7of IRC:SP:55-2014.
Desirable
27. Direction - Ashram to DND Flyover
Observations Risk Recommendation Priority
• Warning sign boards have been provided at the
Advance Warning Zone
• Absence of Road Marking have been observed.
• Raised pavement marker s and retro-reflective
stickers on the barricades are missing.
• Painting of Kerbs have been done wrongly
• No median marking on the dividers
• Missing Object Hazard Marker at Taper zone or
approach transition zone.
Very
High
• All the absent sign boards like “Speed Limit”, “Men at
Work”, Work in progress” ,”Reduced carriageway lane”
should be provided as IRC:SP:55-2014.
• Painting and marking should be done as per IRC:SP:35-
2015
• Painting of kerbs should be done in yellow-black colour
• Median Markers should be provided at Divider so this can
be clearly visible for the road users during the night time
Essential
28. Direction - Ashram to DND Flyover
Observations Risk Recommendation Priority
• Absence of gore area and Two way Hazard sign
board has been observed
• No informatory sign board for the intersection
have been provided.
• Absence of Road marking & Road studs is visible.
•Painting of New jersey barriers are missing
• Road widen sign and Restrictions End sign are
missing at the RHS photographs.
Very
High
• All the absent sign boards should be provided as
IRC:SP:55-2014.
• Warning lights should be provided on top of the barriers
for night time.
• End Road Work Sign can be provided as per IRC:SP:55-
2014
Essential
29. Direction - DND Flyover to Ashram
Observations Risk Recommendation Priority
• Object Hazard marker is not provided.
• Pavement marking not done as well as proper
delineation at the column base is missing.
Very
High
• Object Hazard Marker should be provided at the edge RE
wall.
• ‘Work Traffic Only” sign board should be provided at the
starting of this under construction flyover as per
IRC:SP:55-2014
• Aluminum backed flexible prismatic sheet can be
provided at the column base for clear visibility at night
time.
Essential
30. Direction - DND Flyover to Ashram
Observations Risk Recommendation Priority
•Pavement Marking and Delineation is not provided.
• Dual Carriageway sign and Restrictions End sign
are missing at the RHS photographs.
High •All the absent sign board should be provided as
IRC:SP:55-2014.
Highly
Desirable
31. Other Construction Site Work
Observations Risk Recommendation Priority
• No sign board is provided at the Advance warning
zone
• Pavement Marking and Delineation are not
provided.
• Proper Barricading is not provided.
Very
High
• All the sign boards should be provided as per IRC:SP:55-
2014
• Pavement Marking and Delineation should be provided.
• Proper Barricading should be provided to segregate the
activity zone from moving traffic.
Essential
Alipurduar, NH-31, West Bengal
32. Other Construction Site Work
Observations Risk Recommendation Priority
• Proper barricading with Traffic Cones are missing. Very
High
• Traffic Cones should be provided along with flag man
shall be assigned.
• Personal protection equipment shall be provided
Essential
Moynaguri, NH-31, West Bengal
35. Advance Warning Zone
Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Approaching
from India
Gate to
Badarpur
• Following signs were found to be missing in advance
warning zone:
Presence of the hazard: "Men at Work" sign
Traffic Divergent sign
Speed limit sign
Hazard sign
Low visibility of traffic divergent sign
Very
High
• Men at work sign to be provided as per codal
provision.
• Provide adequate Advance warning length (AWL)
180 m ahead and signage's as per IRC- SP 55 -2014
as the speed of moving vehicle is more than
50kmph.
• Location of Traffic Diversion Sign with good
visibility as per Fig. WZ WR06 from IRC: SP 55-
2014.
• As per Section 5.2.3 of IRC SP 55 (2014), Object
Hazard Markers should be provided at this location
shown in figure.
Essential
35
36. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Approaching
from Both
side
No speed reduction measures taken for the
incoming traffic on both side of the
construction zone.
Very
High
• As per the section 6.5 of IRC SP 55 2014 raised
rumble strips markings using thermoplastic paint
or mastic sheets shall be used with installation
across the carriageway for deliberate reduction of
speed in work zones in urban areas. With first
application of 300 mm wide strips and second of
150 mm as shown in figure below. These strips
shall be provided at 500 mm spacing in a series
comprising 15 strips at a distance of 150 m for
both directions of traffic.
Note:- These Bar markings shall be removed upon
completion of work at sites.
Normal warning sign of construction zone rumble
strips(with yellow background) shall
be provided 50 m advance of the rumble strips
to control and reduce the speed.
Essential
36
Advance Warning Zone
FARIDABAD TO INDIA GATE
INDIA GATE TO FARIDABAD
37. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Approaching
from Both
side
• Rate of Taper is absent
• Approach taper length (ATL) is absent.
Very
High
• 1:12 Taper rate to be maintained as per
Table 4.1 of IRC SP 55 2014.
• ATL Must be maintained 40m for 4-lane
as per Table 4.1 of IRC SP 55 2014
Essential
37
Approach Transition Zone
FARIDABAD TO INDIA GATE
INDIA GATE TO FARIDABAD
38. Chainage
/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Descriptions Priority
Construction
of Underpass
Near Ashram
Junction
(FARIDABAD
TO INDIA
GATE)
• Traffic Channelizing lane marking not
provided properly.
• Absence of Object Hazard Marker.
Very
High
As per Section 5.2.3 of IRC SP 55 (2014),
Object Hazard Markers should be provided
at this location.
The exposed road side fixed object adjacent
to traffic movement should be delineated
with hazard marker just in front of them.
Essential
Activity Zone
39. Chainage
/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Construction
of Underpass
Near Ashram
Junction
(FARIDABAD
TO INDIA
GATE)
• There is no buffer space given in this zone. High • Minimum approach longitudinal length
ALB is 10m as per Table 4.1 of IRC SP 55
2014.
• Minimum exit longitudinal buffer space is
5m as per Table 4.1 of IRC SP 55 2014.
• Minimum lateral buffer space is 0.5m LBS
as per Table 4.1 of IRC SP 55 2014.
Desirable
Activity Zone
40. Chainage/Lo
cation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Recommendation Priority
Construction
of Underpass
Near Ashram
Junction
(FARIDABAD
TO INDIA
GATE)
• No directions for drivers and object hazard marker
• The road construction material is being stored on
footpath so pedestrian movement is obstructing.
There is a high risk to pedestrian Safety. It is
observed that stored material placed improper
and without any safety and reflective stickers.
Very
High
• Directional Indicator Barricade shall be
provided in series to direct the driver
through the transition and into the
intended travel lane (Refer Section 5.2.6 of
IRC SP 55 (2014) Fig. 5.17).
• The material should be removed.
Pedestrian barrier shall be provided for
block and redirect pedestrian movement.
• Reflective Stickers should be placed on
material for site safety.
Essential
40
Activity Zone
41. Chainage/Loc
ation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Construction
of Underpass
Near Ashram
Junction
(FARIDABAD
TO INDIA
GATE)
• No retro reflecting tapes kept on
barricading and machines.
• Blinker has not been provided before start
of working zone.
Very
High
• Reflecting tapes should be kept at
machines for safe movement of vehicles
with visibility at night time.
• Also blinker should be kept as per IRC SP
55 (2014).
Essential
41
Activity Zone
42. Chainage/Lo
cation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Construction
of
Underpass
Near Ashram
Junction
(FARIDABAD
TO INDIA
GATE)
• No delineation are provided at the terminal
transition zone, which may encourage
vehicles to abruptly speed up and change
the lane
• Absence of restriction ends signage.
• Terminal Taper length is Absent
Very
High
• The terminal zone should be
channelized with Retro-reflectorized
cones with 500mm size and 1.5m
spacing and can be tied with retro
reflective tapes to provide longitudinal
guiding line. Else, As per Table 5.9 of
IRC SP 55(2014), the spacing of the
tubular marker may be determined
based on vehicular speed.
• As per Fig WZ NR 28 from IRC SP-
55:2014 placing of restriction end
signage.
• TTL is 40m as per Table 4.1 of IRC SP
55 2014.
Essential
42
Termination Zone
45. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Recommendations
Observation/Deficiencies Risk Measures Priority
Panikoili to
Rimuli
section of
NH 20
• No safety measure has been taken on
Advance Warning Zone and Approach
Transition zone, which makes this zone
hazardous for the road user not only in day
but also in night hours.
Very
High
At Advance warning zone speed limit,
Work zone ahead with distance and at
approach transition zone Type 3/4
barricade , speed limit, No over taking
and chevron sign boards are required to
warn road user as per clause No.-5.2.5
and section 4 of IRC:SP:55-2014. Cone
with solar blinker needs to install to
warn user at night hours.
Essential
45
Diversion Zone
46. Chainage/Loc
ation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Recommendations
Observation/Deficiencies Risk Measures Priority
Panikoili to
Rimuli
section of
NH 20
• No safety measure has been taken on
Advance Warning Zone and Approach
Transition zone are provided at the terminal
transition zone, which makes this zone
hazardous for the road user. Loose unbound
surface has been provided for diversion.
Very
High
At Approach transition zone Type 3/4
barricade , speed limit, No over taking
and chevron sign boards are required to
warn road user as per clause No.-5.2.5
and section 4 of IRC:SP:55-2014. Cone
with solar blinker needs to install to
warn user at night hours. Diversion Must
be Bituminous of capacity of 10 MSA as
per Clause No-1.14.2 of IRC:SP-84-2019
Essential
46
Diversion Zone
48. Chainage/Loc
ation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Recommendations
Observation/Deficiencies Risk Measures Priority
Nuapara-
Sinapali
Section
BIJU EXP -2
CH-85+300
• Lack of safety measures near the
construction zone is Highly Hazardous for the
road user. Absence of Barricading, Cone on
the edge, OHM before face of structure
makes is highly potential for the severe road
accident.
Very
High
1-Barricating required with NJC Barrier.
2-if possible provide Buffer zone for safe
movement of traffic.
3-OHM required all the 4 faces.
4-Periodically water sprinkle is required.
5- Narrow road Ahead sign board also
required
With all this men at work, Speed Limit,
No Over taking sign board is required to
provide utmost safety to the road user.
Essential
48
Safety Precaution for Carriageway
49. Chainage/Loc
ation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Recommendations
Observation/Deficiencies Risk Measures Priority
Nuapara-
Sinapali
Section
BIJU EXP -2
CH-67+000
• Absence of buffer space and barricading between
activity zone and traffic flow lane.
• Dust on road surface which leads to discomfort to
the two wheelers.
• Absence of speed limit, Man at work, No Over
taking sign board.
High
The Activity zone should be channelized
with Retro-reflectorized cones with
750mm size with 1.5m spacing and can
be tied with retro reflective tapes to
provide longitudinal guiding line.
Else, As per Table 5.9 of IRC SP 55(2014),
the spacing of the tubular marker may
be determined based on vehicular
speed.
Speed limit and GO SLOW Sign boards
needs to install to control traffic and No
Over taking and NO STOP NO STANDING
is highly required for the location.
Highly
Desirable
49
Safety Precaution for Carriageway
50. Chainage/Loc
ation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Recommendations
Observation/Deficiencies Risk Measures Priority
Panikoili to
Rimuli
section of
NH 20
• Construction material on Main carriageway is
Extremely hazardous for the Road user.
Very
High Construction material shall be removed
from main carriageway on war basis.
Essential
50
Safety Precaution for Carriageway
51. Chainage/Loc
ation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Recommendations
Observation/Deficiencies Risk Description Priority
Nuapara-
Sinapali
Section
BIJU EXP
CH-85+300
• Construction material on Main carriageway is
Extremely hazardous for the Road user. High
Construction material shall be removed
from main carriageway on war basis.
Highly
Desirable
51
Safety Precaution for Carriageway
53. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Extension of
Ashram
Flyover to
DND Flyway
• Construction Material dumped on the road,
making unsafe movement for vehicular and
pedestrian traffic.
• Barricading is not as per IRC 55 2014 .
Very
High
• Material Should be Removed from
Site.
• Construction zone area need to be
barricaded as per approved Traffic
Management Plan during
construction.
Essential
53
Road Surface
54. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Extension
of Ashram
Flyover to
DND
Flyway
• Pavement aligned to the work zone is
deteriorated.
• Throughout the work zone there are
potholes, rutting and ravelling of the
pavement.
Very
High
• As per IRC : SP: 55 – 2014, Clause
1.2 the primary purpose of Work
zone Traffic Maintenance Plan
(WTMP’s) is to provide for the
reasonably safe and effective
moment of road users through or
around the work zones. The
concurrent objective of WTMP is
to maintain the highway to
facilitate the smooth and
effective flow of traffic.
• Potholes, rutting and ravelling
shall be rectified to provide
smooth flow for moving traffic by
providing bituminous layer with
proper road markings near work
zone.
Essential
54
Road Surface
57. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Extension
of Ashram
Flyover to
DND
Flyway
• Edge Drop observed near work zone.
• Edge lane markings missing.
Very
High
• Edge Drop is more than 0.5 m, it is
essential to provide New Jersey
Barriers or the pre-existing barricades
shall be provided properly to reduce
the severity.
• Edge lane marking shall be provided as
per IRC:35-2015.
Essential
57
Road Surface
58. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Extension
of Ashram
Flyover to
DND
Flyway
• No dust controlling measures at work zone. High • Regular maintenance to be take
care of work zone by providing
misting water sprays sufficient to
reduce airborne dusting specially
during dry season
Essential
58
Road Surface
60. IRC:SP:55-2014 Fig. 10.15
60
Work Area and traffic flow are to be separated by using New Jersey Barrier , Water Filled
Barricades and Barricading Boards
Barricades & Crash Barrier
Barricading at Ashram Underpass
61. Barricades & Crash Barrier
Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations Priority
Ashram
Underpass
(Faridabad
to India
Gate)
• Tin Sheet barricades are provided for barricading at
construction of Ashram Underpass.
• Water filled Barriers not provided at Corners.
Very
High
High
• As per IRC 55-2014, clause 5.2.7, New
Jersey Barrier should be provided for
Construction works undertaken for
long time and in limited space.
• New Jersey Barrier to be painted and
median marker to be fixed.
• As per IRC 55-2014, clause 5.2.8,
Water Filled Barricades to be provided
at Corners where traffic is expected to
change direction of movement.
Essential
Desirable
Desirable
61
62. Barricades & Crash Barrier
Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations Priority
Extension
of Ashram
Flyover to
DND
Flyway
• Barricades installed are not as per standards.
• Barricades are installed under superstructure
without lateral buffer zone.
High
Very
High
• Type IV barricades are to be installed as
per clause 5.2.5 Fig 5.16 of IRC 55-2014,
• Barricades are required to be installed at
lateral buffer space of minimum 0.5
meter as per IRC 55-2014, as per table
4.1.
Desirable
Essential
62
63. Barricades & Crash Barrier
Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations Priority
Ashram
Underpass
(India Gate
to
Faridabad)
• Gap in Barricades are observed which is covered
with green cloth net.
• Barricades are not installed in proper line and gaps
found.
High
High
• Barricades are required to be installed
continuously without any gap.
• Barricades are to be installed in proper
line and with retro reflective strips as per
clause 5.2.5 of IRC SP 55-2014.
Desirable
Desirable
63
64. Barricades & Crash Barrier
Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations Priority
Ashram
Underpass
(India Gate
to
Faridabad)
• Water filled Barricades are not provided at Approach
Transition Zone.
Very
High
• Water filled Barricades to be provided
in Approach Transition Zone where
traffic movement changes as per IRC
55-2014.
Essential
64
66. Brief Description about Work Site
Access
66
Site Access means access to the site from
adjacent parcels or internal access from one part
of the site to another part of the site for
pedestrian or vehicular traffic, provided other
routes of access are unavailable or impractical.
67. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Giddaluru
to
Vanukonda
2 Lane Road
project (NH-
54D)
• No Barricading’s and no traffic control measure have
been taken to enter into worksite.
Very High Site access to be provided along with hard
barricading and traffic sign boards as per
IRC-SP-55-2014.
Essential
67
Work Site Access
68. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Giddaluru
to
Vanukonda
2 Lane Road
project (NH-
54D)
• Access to unauthorised traffic is not closed.
Barricading around the work site and required sign
boards are not provided.
Very High All Site access points to be closed off to
unauthorised traffic, barricading to be
provided around the working area and
proper sing board as per IRC-SP-55-2014.
Essential
68
Work Site Access
69. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Giddaluru
to
Vanukonda
2 Lane Road
project (NH-
54D)
• No Barricading’s and access to the workers is not
provided.
Very High Site access to be provided along with hard
barricading and sign boards to be provided
as per IRC-SP-55-2014.
Essential
69
Work Site Access
70. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description Risk Recommendation Priority
Giddaluru
to
Vanukonda
2 Lane Road
project (NH-
54D)
• Access to unauthorised traffic is not closed.
Barricading around the work site and required sign
boards are not provided.
Very High Site access to be provided along with hard
barricading and traffic sign boards as per
IRC-SP-55-2014.
Essential
70
Work Site Access
71. SAFETY OF ROAD WORKERS
There are a few guidelines given in IRC-SP- 55-2014 in clause number 7.10,8.2.6 and 9.5 which
state about protective gears for workers as under .
Safety helmet- to protect against falling objects.
Safety shoes- to provide protection from any hazzard posed by the activity being done .
Hand gloves- to protect from personal injury during the work.
Dust mask- for proper respiration in the area exposed to dust .
Goggles- to protect the eyes of workers engaged in welding works.
Safety jackets-
72. SAFETY OF ROAD WORKERS….
• As per guidelines of “ Contract Labour Central Rules-1971” , two rooms of reasonable
dimension for the use of children under the age of six years shall be provided by the
contractor where 20 or more women are employed .
• Provision of First Aid Box for all the workers.
• “ Safety Belt“ for the workers working at reasonably great heights without support .
73. Observation:
• Improper barricading in the form of tins at deep
excavation site
Recommendation:
• Needs proper barricading in the form of new jersey
barricades.
Risk/Priority- Very High/Essential
74. Observation:
• “ Men at work “ sign boards were not provided
Recommendation:
• Needs to be provided at 180m distance before
start of actual work area to alert the road users .
Priority- Highly desirable
75. Observation:
• Site workers were found without any PP
equipment.
Recommendation:
• Workers need to be provided with helmets,safety
shoes, hand gloves and Jackets.
Risk/Priority-
High/Highly Desirable
76. Observation:
• Site workers were found without full PPE kit.
Recommendation:
• Workers need to be provided with helmet,safety
shoes,hand gloves and safety jackets.
Risk/Priority- High/Highly
Desirable
77. Observation:
• Site worker was found without full PPE kit .
Recommendation:
• Worker needs to be provided with helmet,safety shoes
and hand gloves
•Risk/Priority-Medium/
Desirable
78. Observation:
• Site workers were found without full PPE kit
Recommendation:
• Workers need to be provided with helmets,
safety shoes,hand gloves and Safety Jackets.
•Risk/Priority-Medium/
Desirable
79.
80. Vulnerable Road Users
VRUs includes pedestrians including differently abled , cyclists, non motorised vehicles
and two wheelers who are more exposed and susceptible to road hazards
81. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description Risk Recommendation Priority
Underpass
Extension
from India
Gate to
Faridabad
• It is observed that there is no footpath provided.
• No proper signage provided
Very
High
• It is recommended to have footpath facility for
the pedestrians
• An alternative safe route for pedestrians must
be provided if it is necessary to close a
footpath or part of a footpath
• Safety provisions in activity zone should be as
per Section 6.3 of IRC: SP: 55-2014
Highly
Essential
81
Construction Stage RSA (VRUs)
82. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description Risk Recommendation Priority
Underpass
Extension
from India
Gate to
Faridabad
• Very poor facility for VRUs.
• Edge lane marking is not provided
Very
High
• To mitigate the risk, it is recommended to
have pedestrian barrier and redirect the
pedestrian movement as per Section 6.3
of IRC: SP: 55-2014
• Proper edge marking should be provided
for safer VRUs movements
Highly
Essential
82
Construction Stage RSA (VRUs)
83. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description Risk Recommendation Priority
Ashram to
DND
• Hawkers/shops are established on the footpath
resulting in obstruction of pedestrian movement.
High • The hawkers or shops should be removed
• Safety provisions in activity zone should
be as per IRC: SP: 55-2014
Essential
83
Construction Stage RSA (VRUs)
84. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description Risk Recommendation Priority
Ashram to
DND
• It is observed that there is no footpath provided.
• There is no separate lane provided for two wheeler
movement
Very
High
• To mitigate the risk, it is recommended to
have footpath along with separation
barrier
• Safety provisions in activity zone should
be as per Section 6.3 IRC: SP: 55-2014
Essential
84
Construction Stage RSA (VRUs)
85. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description Risk Recommendation Priority
Under pass
extension
from
Faridabad
to India
Gate
• No markings are observed in the construction zone.
• There is no pedestrian crossing marking.
Very
High
• To mitigate the risk, it is recommended to
have zebra crossing along with warning
and speed signages, transverse bar
marking should be provided in the
approach to the junction to reduce the
speed
• Speed reduction provisions to be
provided in the activity zone as per
section 6.5 IRC: SP: 55-2014
Essential
85
Construction Stage RSA (VRUs)
86. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description Risk Recommendation Priority
Under pass
extension
from
Faridabad
to India
Gate
• It is observed that there is no footpath provided.
• There is no adequate lighting in the construction
area
• It is observed that there is no separate provision
made for the movement of two wheelers
Very
High
• To mitigate the risk, it is recommended to
have foot path along with overhead
protection and adequate lighting for the
movement of pedestrians.
• It is recommended to have separate lane
for two wheelers
• Safety provisions in activity zone should
be as per Section 6.3 IRC: SP: 55-2014
Essential
86
Construction Stage RSA (VRUs)
87. Chainage/L
ocation
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendations
Description Risk Recommendation Priority
DND
flyover end
zone
At Bus bay Zebra crossing, stop line, advance sign board,
information board and TBM are not provided.
Foothpath kerb is not as per standard
High • To mitigate the risk, it is recommended to
have zebra crossing along with warning
and speed signages, transverse bar
marking should be provided in the
approach to reduce the speed as per IRC
SP: 55-2014
• Minimum kerb height of 150mm to be
provided
Essential
Construction Stage RSA (VRUs)
87
89. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Faridabad
to India
gate
1) Access to enter into the work zone is not properly
defined/maintained.
2) Barricading/ s`heeting which is provided to
segregate work zone from Moving traffic is not
properly maintained (Protruding towards Moving
traffic)
Medium
Very High
1) Access to work zones shall be
maintained properly as per clause 4.2.3
of IRC SP-55:2014. It is designed such
that all the construction vehicle that
are entering Activity zone should be
easily accessible.
2) Barricades/ sheeting shall be
maintained or checked regularly so that
any on going traffic do not have
disturbance (ware and tare in tyre).
Desirable
Essential
Observations: Faridabad to India Gate
89
Work zone –Safety at Night
90. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
Faridabad
to India
gate
1) Sudden access from service road to main
carriageway which is not visible at night time.
2) Vegetation covering the signs provided.
Very High
High
• Access shall be possibly illuminated
or warned to the drivers in advance
about the access.
• Trim the over grown vegetation
shall be done regularly, such that
the vegetation should not obscure
the signage visibility.
Essentia
Highly
Diserable
Observations: Faridabad to India Gate
90
Work zone –Safety at Night
91. Chainage/
Location
Safety Concerns & Audit Findings Risk Recommendation Priority
India gate
to
Faridabad
• Diversion to work zone not properly designed.
• No advance waring signs has been provided in
advance.
Very High • Diversions shall be illuminated in
advance to warn the drivers as per
layout 10.7 of IRC:SP 55-2014
Essential
Observations and probable recommendation: India Gate to Faridabad
91
Work zone –Safety at Night
92. Case Study: Karnataka State-4/6 lane Hubli-Haveri Project
Transition Zone
Typical Example
Picture Courtesy: 3M
93. Case Study: Karnataka State-4/6 lane Hubli-Haveri Project
Proposed Changes (Day)
Transition Zone
Picture Courtesy: 3M
94. Proposed Changes (Night)
Transition Zone
Picture Courtesy: 3M
Case Study: Karnataka State-4/6 lane Hubli-Haveri Project
Safety at Night after better enhancement
Typical Example
95. Picture Courtesy: 3M
Case Study: Karnataka State-4/6 lane Hubli-Haveri Project
Transition Zone
Typical Example