2. TBI: Introduction
• Traumatic brain injury is one of the most complex
CNS disorder
• Survivors are at risk to develop
• Acute neurological deficits
• Persistent pathological changes
• Chronic neuropsychiatric
• Physical and cognitive disability
3. TBI: Introduction
• Consists of four overlapping phases
• Primary injury
• Evolution of the primary injury
• Secondary or additional injury
• Regeneration
4. TBI: Animal Models
• Animal models that mimic a single type of
primary impact resulting in TBI can help in
identifying signatures that are characteristic
or unique for the given type of TBI
• Animal models that reliably demonstrate
clinically relevant endpoints will expedite
development of new treatments,
diagnostics, preventive measures, and
rehabilitative strategies
5. TBI: Purpose of Animal Models
• To replicate certain pathological components
or phases of clinical trauma in experimental
animals
• To address pathology and/or treatment
• To understand the complex molecular
detrimental cascades initiated by trauma
6. TBI: Experimental Model Criteria
The mechanical force used to induce injury is
controlled, reproducible, and quantifiable
The inflicted injury is reproducible, quantifiable, and
mimics components of human conditions
The injury outcome, measured by morphological,
physiological, biochemical, or behavioral parameters,
is related to the mechanical force causing the injury
The intensity of the mechanical force used to inflict
injury should predict the outcome severity
7. TBI: Commonly Used Models
• Focal “impact loading”:
• Weight drop model (Fenney, Shohami)
• Fluid Percussion Injury model (Hayes, McIntosh)
• Controlled Cortical Impact model (Dixon, Hayes)
• Missile and ballistic Injury models (Carey, Williams. Tortella)
• Penetrating TBI model (Davidsson, Risling)
• Diffuse “Inertial loading”
• Impact
• Inertial acceleration model (Ono)
• Diffuse injury model (Cernak, Vink)
• Impact acceleration model (Marmarou)
• Non-impact
• Inertial acceleration models (Thibault, Genneralli, Meaney, Graham)
• Rotational TBI model (Davidsson, Risling)
• Blast TBI models
8. Challenges: The Pathophysiological
Heterogeneity
• The location
• Nature and severity of the primary injury
• Preexisting factors and conditions
• Age
• Health
• Gender
• Medication
• Alcohol and drug use
• Genetics
9. Animal Models: Challenges
• A reliable and reproducible animal model that reproduces
development/age- and gender-dependent responses to
traumatic brain injury
• Each is intended to mimic certain components of clinical TBI
• It is difficult to establish consistent models that include
most or all of the factors that contribute to post-traumatic
tissue damage
• Failure to utilize the most effective experimental design
• Unfortunately, results from animal models have had limited
diagnostic and therapeutic implications in the clinical setting
10. Limitations
• Incomplete understanding of the complexity
and diversity of secondary injury mechanisms
• Inability of the drugs to adequately cross the
blood-brain barrier
• Failure to assess clinically relevant behavioral
outcomes
• Pharmacogenetic/epigenetic variability
11. Conclusions
• There are numerous rodent models of TBI available
• Widely varying in their ability to model
pathomechanisms associated with human TBI
• Provide the experimental backbone for investigating
TBI pathomechanisms and for the initial testing of
neuro-protective compounds
• Considering the heterogeneity of human TBI,
scientific hypothesis should be tested in multiple
rodent models resulting in distinct types of injury
12. Future
• Cell culture models
• Cell culture is currently the most promising
alternative to animal research
13. References
• Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M. Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev
Neurosci. 2013 Feb;14(2):128-42.
• Marklund N, Hillered L. Animal modelling of traumatic brain injury in preclinical drug
development: where do we go from here? Br J Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;164(4):1207-29.
• Briones TL. Chapter 3 animal models of traumatic brain injury: is there an optimal model
that parallels human brain injury? Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2015;33(1):31-73.
• Rubovitch V, Ten-Bosch M, Zohar O, Harrison CR, Tempel-Brami C, Stein E, Hoffer BJ,
Balaban CD, Schreiber S, Chiu WT, Pick CG. A mouse model of blast-induced mild
traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2011 Dec;232(2):280-9.
• Loane DJ, Faden AI. Neuroprotection for traumatic brain injury: translational challenges
and emerging therapeutic strategies. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Dec;31(12):596-604.
• Janowitz T, Menon DK. Exploring new routes for neuroprotective drug development in
traumatic brain injury. Sci Transl Med. 2010 Apr 14;2(27):27rv1.
• Kabadi SV, Faden AI. Neuroprotective strategies for traumatic brain injury: improving
clinical translation. Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Jan 17;15(1):1216-36.
• Xiong Y, Zhang Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M. Investigational agents for treatment of
traumatic brain injury. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2015 Jun;24(6):743-60.
• Yarnell AM, Shaughness MC, Barry ES, Ahlers ST, McCarron RM, Grunberg NE. Blast
traumatic brain injury in the rat using a blast overpressure model. Curr Protoc Neurosci.
2013;Chapter 9:Unit 9.41.