SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Abstract
According to the Salt Lake Valley Health Department1 the optimal level of
fluoride is 0.7 to 1.2 ppm in drinking water. In 2003 the State of Utah
started adding fluoride to tap water1. At present the state has about 50% of
the population receiving fluoride treated water with the aim of reaching the
1 ppm fluoride level2. It has also been reported that some counties are
considering cutting back to about 0.7 ppm2.The acidity of many foods and
drinks leads to tooth decay. This study examined the pH and fluoride
content of domestic water in Utah as well as areas in Nevada and
California. Fluoride levels ranged from <0.05 – 0.94 ppm. The pH values
for these samples ranged from 6.26-8.16. The fluoride levels and pH in
bottled water and other drinks were also studied because many people in
Utah do not drink tap water, particularly in regions of high water hardness
or areas where taste and / or odor can be off-putting. The pH values ranged
from 2 to 8, the most acidic being colas, energy and citrus-based drinks.
Fluoride values varied from <0.02 to1.34 ppm. Five loose leaf tea samples
were also analyzed and found to be in the range 0.26-1.03 ppm. . Instant
Coffees showed fluoride ranges from < 0.1 and 0.34 ppm.
Introduction
Fluoride is universally recognized to help build stronger tooth enamel, stop
or reverse the tooth decay process and prevent loss of important minerals.
Tooth enamel is primarily fluorapatite. This mineral is developed prior to
teeth breaking through the gums and continues be replenished by dietary
fluoride throughout the lifetime of the teeth3. The Fluoride Ion-Selective
Electrode couples with Total Ionic Strength Adjustments Buffers (TISAB
II) has been used to measure fluoride in water samples since 1968,
providing a versatile tool for chemical speciation studies of fluoride4.
Dentists have concerns about the acidity of many drinks consumed in most
people’s diets and one asked this team to investigate drinks as part of this
study 5. Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) mode was employed via a Chemflow
FIP-3 flowcell, which enabled up to 120 injections per hour. This study
shows data on samples in two categories, firstly domestic water and
secondly a wide range of beverages including loose leaf tea samples
because it has been reported that camellia plants are known to concentrate
fluoride from the environment6.
Experimental
pH measurements were made with a Thermo Scientific Orion 4-star
pH/ISE meter and a Thermo Scientific Ross Ultra glass pH combination
electrode. Fluoride measurements were made with a Thermo Scientific
Orion Fluoride Ion Selective Electrode. All fluoride samples and standards
were treated with equal volumes of TISAB II (29.30 grams of sodium
acetate (UNIVAR), 29.0 g of sodium chloride (NHD), 6 g of trisodium
citrate dehydrate, (BHD), 2 g of CDTA (ALDRICH) and 8.2 mL of glacial
acetic acid (BHD) per 1000 mL water. The pH was adjusted to 5.5 using
10M sodium hydroxide prior to being made to volume). Ultra pure water
was used for all prepared solutions: Barnstead, E-pure; 17.9 megaohms.
Sodium Fluoride: ScholAR Chemistry, Sodium Hydroxide Pellets:
J.T.Baker, AR.
FIA measurements were made using a Chemflow FIP-3 flowcell wall-jet
configuration and a MicroLab FS-522 in conjunction with a Dell laptop. 60
µL injection volumes with a Reodyne injection valve were used. Flow rates
of 2 - 5 mL per minute were employed via a Gilson peristaltic pump.
Results and Discussion
Table 1 shows samples and data from 2011 to 2016. The fluoride
concentrations and pHs found in city / county water supplies from various
sites in Utah, Nevada, and California. The locations are indicated in the top
part of the Table 1. The fluoride and pH values for beverage samples are
also shown in the lower part of Table 1.
The results reported for domestic water show that only modest percentage of
the water supply samples fall in the range 0.7-1.2 These results indicate that
none or very little fluoridation has occurred, with most values near the 0.2
ppm example value for Farmington creek water which may be used as an
estimate of background levels..
The beverage samples generally showed quite low fluoride concentrations
with a few notable exceptions. Arrowhead bottled water contained 0.47 ppm
in 2011 and 1.05 ppm in 2012 suggesting it may be filtered tap water. Coke
products contained between < 0.05 and 0.59 ppm fluoride suggesting some
fluoridated water. Beverage pH values ranged from 2 to 8. Tea samples
ranged between 0.26 and 1.34 ppm. On its label, the low-fluoride tea claims
to be made from very young leaves from the top of the plant. These leaves
apparently had little time to accumulate fluoride from the environment. The
bottled cold teas show significant fluoride levels and the highest being 1.34
ppm. Energy drinks generally had low fluoride when not based on tea. The
acidity of these samples is generally quite low and similar to other
commercial soft drinks. Instant Coffees ranged from < 0.1 and 0.34
ppm.and pH 4.4 – 4.9.
Acknowledgements
SLCC Chemistry Department and students, Chris Peak, Sara Ranquist, Sydney
Richards, Rajan Kochambilli, Darren Saunders, Lacey Walker, Adam Dastrup
References
1. Salt Lake Valley Health Department, www.slvhealth.org , 2010.
2. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion,
apps.nccd.cdc.gov, 2010.
3. Frieden, E. Biochemistry of the Essential Ultratrace Elements, Plenum
Press, New York, 1984.
4. Frant , M. S. and Ross, J. W. Jr, Use of a Total Ionic Strength Adjustment
Buffer for Electrode Determination of Fluoride in Water Supplies, Anal.
Chem. 40 (7) ;1169-1171, 1968.
5. Sorensen, C. O. , private communication, 2010.
6. Fung K.F., Zhang Z.Q., Wong J.W.C., and Wong M.H. Fluoride contents in
tea and soil from tea plantations and the release of fluoride into tea liquor
during infusion. Environ Pollut 1999: 104: 197–205.
Conclusion
It seems that many of Utah’s counties and cities need to better monitor and
adjust their fluoridation methods to meet the fluoride levels for optimum dental
health. Dental practitioners are deservedly concerned with colas, energy drinks
and citrus-based drinks, which are highly acidic, and with loose teas and
instant coffees, may present a risk of over-fluoridation when made with
fluoridated tap water. The Chemflow FIP-3 flowcell was found to be ideal with
injection rates up to 120 per hour. In the future an expanded survey will be
conducted to determine the fluoride levels in more domestic water locations.
An analysis of the chemical content of Fluoride additive to water sources may
be done to see if it releases free F- ions. Also, an analysis of these samples for
water hardness may shed further light on the potential health effects of
consuming these domestic and commercial products.
Table 1. Water and Beverage Data
Analysis of Dental Parameters, Fluoride and pH, in Utah's waters and drinks.
Peter Iles, Alan Abbinanti, Sarah Moore, Ashley Rihm, Tyler Fullmer, Kenny Robbins, William Ballard, Tallon Nielsen, Laura Dalby,
Lourdes Peralta, Ryan Holcomb, Neil Bastian, Luther Giddings, Mary Alvarez and Ron Valcarce
Salt Lake Community College 4600 South Redwood Rd. Salt Lake City Utah, 84130
Location [ F-] ppm pH Location [ F-] ppm pH Location [ F-] ppm pH
Battle Mountain, NV 0.81 7.31 LDS Hospital 0.49 8.07 Sugarhouse 0.56 7.88
Beaver County 0.17 7.88 Lehi, Utah County 0.23 7.83 Suisun City, CA 0.90 8.16
Beck St Warm Springs 1.59 6.95 Magna 0.41 8.06 Taylorsville Campus 0.92 7.90
Bountiful City 0.69 7.78 Millard County 0.10 7.63 Taylorsville City 0.54 8.16
Davis County 0.52 7.77 Millcreek 0.46 7.75 Truckee, CA 0.76 7.35
Draper 0.86 7.88 Millcreek, UT 0.85 7.90 Washington County 0.23 7.86
Draper, UT 0.94 7.83 Morgan 0.04 6.26 West Valley City 0.89 7.90
Emigration canyon 0.35 7.54 Murray 0.29 7.85 West Wendover, NV 0.78 8.06
Fort Douglas 0.47 7.82 Murray 0.58 7.90
Farmington Creek,
Farmington, UT
0.22
Herriman 0.90 7.67 Park city 0.10 7.67 Holladay, UT 0.32
Herriman 0.75 8.00 Redwood SLCC 0.54 8.07 North Salt Lake, UT 0.43
Jordan Campus 0.20 7.00 Roseville, CA 0.86 6.51 Park City, UT 0.27
Juab County 0.08 8.00 Salt Lake City 0.47 7.98 Rose Park, UT 0.38
Kaysville 0.62 7.76 Sandy 0.68 7.74 Snyderville, UT 0.25
Kaysville City 0.04 7.75 South Salt Lake Well 0.16 8.04 Tooele, UT 0.24
Kaysville Water w/filter 0.39 6.73 St. George 0.18 7.90
Kearns City 0.74 7.85 St. George 0.19 8.00
Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH
Aquafina Bottled Water 0.03 5.96 Arrowhead Bottled Water 0.47 8.16 Kirkland Bottled Water 0.03 8.16
Smart Water <0.05 7.42 Arrowhead Water 1.05 8.22
Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH
Amp Cherry Energy <0.05 3.04
Maverik: Get Rev'd
(Grape)
0.21 2.95 NOS: Zero 0.04 2.47
AMP: Mixed Berry <0.02 2.65
Maverik: Get Rev'd Extra
Strength
0.31 2.89 Red Bull: Original 0.10 3.17
AMP: Sugar Free Citrus <0.02 2.59 Monster: Absolute Zero 0.04 3.44 Red Bull: Sugar Free 0.03 3.20
Five Hour Energy: Extra Strength <0.02 2.57 Monster: Low Carb <0.02 3.44 Rockstar: Original <0.02 2.60
Five Hour Energy: Lemon Lime <0.02 2.56 Monster: Zero Ultra <0.02 3.42 Rockstar: Zero Carb 0.09 3.17
Full Throtle: Citrus <0.02 2.84 NOS: Regular <0.02 3.14
Xyience: Xenergy (Frost
Berry Blast)
<0.02 2.85
Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH
A & W Root Beer 0.04 4.69 Coke Zero 0.31 2.96 Mountain Dew 0.39 3.45
Barq's Root Beer 0.14 4.29 Diet Dr. Pepper 0.15 3.30 Ocean Spray Apple Juic <0.05 3.88
Caffeine Free Diet Coke 0.31 3.22 Kirkland Vita Rain Mango 0.01 2.72 Pepsi Max <0.05 3.00
Coke from Mexico <0.05 2.40 Mello Yello 0.15 3.14 Regular Coca Cola 0.22 2.38
Coke from USA 0.59 2.38 Minute Maid Lemonade 0.07 2.57 Schwepps GingerAle 0.01 2.94
Beverage [F-]ppm pH Beverage [F-]ppm pH Beverage [F-]ppm
Lipton: Herbal Peppermint Tea 0.04 7.01
Stash: Chai Spice Black
Tea
0.74 4.54
Rishi organic green tea,
“Jade Cloud”
0.26
Lipton: Peach Mango White Tea * 0.77 Brisk raspberry iced tea 0.71
Rishi organic white tea,
“Silver Needle Jasmine”
0.35
Lipton: Pure Green Tea 1.34 4.76 Pure Leaf iced tea 0.89
Monster: Rehab Tea &Pink Lemonade 0.12 4.00
Rishi organic black tea,
“China Breakfast”
1.03
Beverage [F-] ppm pH Beverage [F-] ppm pH Beverage [F-] ppm pH
Maxwell House Instant Coffee Original 0.1 4.41
Starbuck’s Instant
Colombia
<0.1 4.93 Folger’s Instant Classic 0.12 4.66
Taster’s Choice Instant House Blend 0.34 4.62
Western Family Instant
Classic Blend
0.21 4.74
* Storage spoiled sample

More Related Content

Similar to Fluoride ACS 2016

P h value in exposed common drinks
P h value in exposed common drinksP h value in exposed common drinks
P h value in exposed common drinksPearl Mutiara
 
Running Head WATER QUALITY AND CONTAMINATION1WATER QUALITY A.docx
Running Head WATER QUALITY AND CONTAMINATION1WATER QUALITY A.docxRunning Head WATER QUALITY AND CONTAMINATION1WATER QUALITY A.docx
Running Head WATER QUALITY AND CONTAMINATION1WATER QUALITY A.docxtoltonkendal
 
Water Quality Criteria and standards).pdf
Water Quality Criteria and standards).pdfWater Quality Criteria and standards).pdf
Water Quality Criteria and standards).pdfMuhammadRamzan757427
 
Water Quality Analysis of Dhaka City, Bangladesh
Water Quality Analysis of Dhaka City, BangladeshWater Quality Analysis of Dhaka City, Bangladesh
Water Quality Analysis of Dhaka City, BangladeshMd. Tanzirul Amin
 
2_5456541970002366441.pdf. ..
2_5456541970002366441.pdf.              ..2_5456541970002366441.pdf.              ..
2_5456541970002366441.pdf. ..d64jq2vryw
 
2_5456541970002366441.pdf. ..
2_5456541970002366441.pdf.              ..2_5456541970002366441.pdf.              ..
2_5456541970002366441.pdf. ..d64jq2vryw
 
Types of Fluoride Additives Community water syst.pdf
                     Types of Fluoride Additives  Community water syst.pdf                     Types of Fluoride Additives  Community water syst.pdf
Types of Fluoride Additives Community water syst.pdfannapurnnatextailes
 
Capstone Powerpoint Presentation
Capstone Powerpoint PresentationCapstone Powerpoint Presentation
Capstone Powerpoint PresentationJoshua Rochotte
 
Project Report water quality.pdf
Project Report water quality.pdfProject Report water quality.pdf
Project Report water quality.pdfKrishanKumar917698
 
WHAT’S IN YOUR WATERPreviousNextWe take for granted the water.docx
WHAT’S IN YOUR WATERPreviousNextWe take for granted the water.docxWHAT’S IN YOUR WATERPreviousNextWe take for granted the water.docx
WHAT’S IN YOUR WATERPreviousNextWe take for granted the water.docxphilipnelson29183
 
Preliminary study on potable water solutions for the rural poor
Preliminary study on potable water solutions for  the rural poorPreliminary study on potable water solutions for  the rural poor
Preliminary study on potable water solutions for the rural poorAbhishek Aggarwal
 
pollution and environmental chemistry in ke
pollution and environmental chemistry in kepollution and environmental chemistry in ke
pollution and environmental chemistry in keWan Syafawani
 
Estimation of chemicals in Soft drinks
Estimation of chemicals in Soft drinksEstimation of chemicals in Soft drinks
Estimation of chemicals in Soft drinksMohit Dwivedi
 
Determination of Soil Reaction (pH): Theoretical Concept and Teacher's Guide
Determination of Soil Reaction (pH): Theoretical Concept and Teacher's GuideDetermination of Soil Reaction (pH): Theoretical Concept and Teacher's Guide
Determination of Soil Reaction (pH): Theoretical Concept and Teacher's GuideSarada Mandal
 
A water quality field study 2010
A water quality field study 2010A water quality field study 2010
A water quality field study 2010pauleyler
 

Similar to Fluoride ACS 2016 (20)

Water Quality
Water QualityWater Quality
Water Quality
 
P h value in exposed common drinks
P h value in exposed common drinksP h value in exposed common drinks
P h value in exposed common drinks
 
Running Head WATER QUALITY AND CONTAMINATION1WATER QUALITY A.docx
Running Head WATER QUALITY AND CONTAMINATION1WATER QUALITY A.docxRunning Head WATER QUALITY AND CONTAMINATION1WATER QUALITY A.docx
Running Head WATER QUALITY AND CONTAMINATION1WATER QUALITY A.docx
 
Water Quality Criteria and standards).pdf
Water Quality Criteria and standards).pdfWater Quality Criteria and standards).pdf
Water Quality Criteria and standards).pdf
 
LSAMP poster Harlem
LSAMP poster HarlemLSAMP poster Harlem
LSAMP poster Harlem
 
Water Quality Analysis of Dhaka City, Bangladesh
Water Quality Analysis of Dhaka City, BangladeshWater Quality Analysis of Dhaka City, Bangladesh
Water Quality Analysis of Dhaka City, Bangladesh
 
2_5456541970002366441.pdf. ..
2_5456541970002366441.pdf.              ..2_5456541970002366441.pdf.              ..
2_5456541970002366441.pdf. ..
 
2_5456541970002366441.pdf. ..
2_5456541970002366441.pdf.              ..2_5456541970002366441.pdf.              ..
2_5456541970002366441.pdf. ..
 
Types of Fluoride Additives Community water syst.pdf
                     Types of Fluoride Additives  Community water syst.pdf                     Types of Fluoride Additives  Community water syst.pdf
Types of Fluoride Additives Community water syst.pdf
 
Capstone Powerpoint Presentation
Capstone Powerpoint PresentationCapstone Powerpoint Presentation
Capstone Powerpoint Presentation
 
four mile creek
four mile creekfour mile creek
four mile creek
 
Project Report water quality.pdf
Project Report water quality.pdfProject Report water quality.pdf
Project Report water quality.pdf
 
Coacervates Experiment
Coacervates ExperimentCoacervates Experiment
Coacervates Experiment
 
Water quality assessment
Water quality assessmentWater quality assessment
Water quality assessment
 
WHAT’S IN YOUR WATERPreviousNextWe take for granted the water.docx
WHAT’S IN YOUR WATERPreviousNextWe take for granted the water.docxWHAT’S IN YOUR WATERPreviousNextWe take for granted the water.docx
WHAT’S IN YOUR WATERPreviousNextWe take for granted the water.docx
 
Preliminary study on potable water solutions for the rural poor
Preliminary study on potable water solutions for  the rural poorPreliminary study on potable water solutions for  the rural poor
Preliminary study on potable water solutions for the rural poor
 
pollution and environmental chemistry in ke
pollution and environmental chemistry in kepollution and environmental chemistry in ke
pollution and environmental chemistry in ke
 
Estimation of chemicals in Soft drinks
Estimation of chemicals in Soft drinksEstimation of chemicals in Soft drinks
Estimation of chemicals in Soft drinks
 
Determination of Soil Reaction (pH): Theoretical Concept and Teacher's Guide
Determination of Soil Reaction (pH): Theoretical Concept and Teacher's GuideDetermination of Soil Reaction (pH): Theoretical Concept and Teacher's Guide
Determination of Soil Reaction (pH): Theoretical Concept and Teacher's Guide
 
A water quality field study 2010
A water quality field study 2010A water quality field study 2010
A water quality field study 2010
 

Fluoride ACS 2016

  • 1. Abstract According to the Salt Lake Valley Health Department1 the optimal level of fluoride is 0.7 to 1.2 ppm in drinking water. In 2003 the State of Utah started adding fluoride to tap water1. At present the state has about 50% of the population receiving fluoride treated water with the aim of reaching the 1 ppm fluoride level2. It has also been reported that some counties are considering cutting back to about 0.7 ppm2.The acidity of many foods and drinks leads to tooth decay. This study examined the pH and fluoride content of domestic water in Utah as well as areas in Nevada and California. Fluoride levels ranged from <0.05 – 0.94 ppm. The pH values for these samples ranged from 6.26-8.16. The fluoride levels and pH in bottled water and other drinks were also studied because many people in Utah do not drink tap water, particularly in regions of high water hardness or areas where taste and / or odor can be off-putting. The pH values ranged from 2 to 8, the most acidic being colas, energy and citrus-based drinks. Fluoride values varied from <0.02 to1.34 ppm. Five loose leaf tea samples were also analyzed and found to be in the range 0.26-1.03 ppm. . Instant Coffees showed fluoride ranges from < 0.1 and 0.34 ppm. Introduction Fluoride is universally recognized to help build stronger tooth enamel, stop or reverse the tooth decay process and prevent loss of important minerals. Tooth enamel is primarily fluorapatite. This mineral is developed prior to teeth breaking through the gums and continues be replenished by dietary fluoride throughout the lifetime of the teeth3. The Fluoride Ion-Selective Electrode couples with Total Ionic Strength Adjustments Buffers (TISAB II) has been used to measure fluoride in water samples since 1968, providing a versatile tool for chemical speciation studies of fluoride4. Dentists have concerns about the acidity of many drinks consumed in most people’s diets and one asked this team to investigate drinks as part of this study 5. Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) mode was employed via a Chemflow FIP-3 flowcell, which enabled up to 120 injections per hour. This study shows data on samples in two categories, firstly domestic water and secondly a wide range of beverages including loose leaf tea samples because it has been reported that camellia plants are known to concentrate fluoride from the environment6. Experimental pH measurements were made with a Thermo Scientific Orion 4-star pH/ISE meter and a Thermo Scientific Ross Ultra glass pH combination electrode. Fluoride measurements were made with a Thermo Scientific Orion Fluoride Ion Selective Electrode. All fluoride samples and standards were treated with equal volumes of TISAB II (29.30 grams of sodium acetate (UNIVAR), 29.0 g of sodium chloride (NHD), 6 g of trisodium citrate dehydrate, (BHD), 2 g of CDTA (ALDRICH) and 8.2 mL of glacial acetic acid (BHD) per 1000 mL water. The pH was adjusted to 5.5 using 10M sodium hydroxide prior to being made to volume). Ultra pure water was used for all prepared solutions: Barnstead, E-pure; 17.9 megaohms. Sodium Fluoride: ScholAR Chemistry, Sodium Hydroxide Pellets: J.T.Baker, AR. FIA measurements were made using a Chemflow FIP-3 flowcell wall-jet configuration and a MicroLab FS-522 in conjunction with a Dell laptop. 60 µL injection volumes with a Reodyne injection valve were used. Flow rates of 2 - 5 mL per minute were employed via a Gilson peristaltic pump. Results and Discussion Table 1 shows samples and data from 2011 to 2016. The fluoride concentrations and pHs found in city / county water supplies from various sites in Utah, Nevada, and California. The locations are indicated in the top part of the Table 1. The fluoride and pH values for beverage samples are also shown in the lower part of Table 1. The results reported for domestic water show that only modest percentage of the water supply samples fall in the range 0.7-1.2 These results indicate that none or very little fluoridation has occurred, with most values near the 0.2 ppm example value for Farmington creek water which may be used as an estimate of background levels.. The beverage samples generally showed quite low fluoride concentrations with a few notable exceptions. Arrowhead bottled water contained 0.47 ppm in 2011 and 1.05 ppm in 2012 suggesting it may be filtered tap water. Coke products contained between < 0.05 and 0.59 ppm fluoride suggesting some fluoridated water. Beverage pH values ranged from 2 to 8. Tea samples ranged between 0.26 and 1.34 ppm. On its label, the low-fluoride tea claims to be made from very young leaves from the top of the plant. These leaves apparently had little time to accumulate fluoride from the environment. The bottled cold teas show significant fluoride levels and the highest being 1.34 ppm. Energy drinks generally had low fluoride when not based on tea. The acidity of these samples is generally quite low and similar to other commercial soft drinks. Instant Coffees ranged from < 0.1 and 0.34 ppm.and pH 4.4 – 4.9. Acknowledgements SLCC Chemistry Department and students, Chris Peak, Sara Ranquist, Sydney Richards, Rajan Kochambilli, Darren Saunders, Lacey Walker, Adam Dastrup References 1. Salt Lake Valley Health Department, www.slvhealth.org , 2010. 2. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, apps.nccd.cdc.gov, 2010. 3. Frieden, E. Biochemistry of the Essential Ultratrace Elements, Plenum Press, New York, 1984. 4. Frant , M. S. and Ross, J. W. Jr, Use of a Total Ionic Strength Adjustment Buffer for Electrode Determination of Fluoride in Water Supplies, Anal. Chem. 40 (7) ;1169-1171, 1968. 5. Sorensen, C. O. , private communication, 2010. 6. Fung K.F., Zhang Z.Q., Wong J.W.C., and Wong M.H. Fluoride contents in tea and soil from tea plantations and the release of fluoride into tea liquor during infusion. Environ Pollut 1999: 104: 197–205. Conclusion It seems that many of Utah’s counties and cities need to better monitor and adjust their fluoridation methods to meet the fluoride levels for optimum dental health. Dental practitioners are deservedly concerned with colas, energy drinks and citrus-based drinks, which are highly acidic, and with loose teas and instant coffees, may present a risk of over-fluoridation when made with fluoridated tap water. The Chemflow FIP-3 flowcell was found to be ideal with injection rates up to 120 per hour. In the future an expanded survey will be conducted to determine the fluoride levels in more domestic water locations. An analysis of the chemical content of Fluoride additive to water sources may be done to see if it releases free F- ions. Also, an analysis of these samples for water hardness may shed further light on the potential health effects of consuming these domestic and commercial products. Table 1. Water and Beverage Data Analysis of Dental Parameters, Fluoride and pH, in Utah's waters and drinks. Peter Iles, Alan Abbinanti, Sarah Moore, Ashley Rihm, Tyler Fullmer, Kenny Robbins, William Ballard, Tallon Nielsen, Laura Dalby, Lourdes Peralta, Ryan Holcomb, Neil Bastian, Luther Giddings, Mary Alvarez and Ron Valcarce Salt Lake Community College 4600 South Redwood Rd. Salt Lake City Utah, 84130 Location [ F-] ppm pH Location [ F-] ppm pH Location [ F-] ppm pH Battle Mountain, NV 0.81 7.31 LDS Hospital 0.49 8.07 Sugarhouse 0.56 7.88 Beaver County 0.17 7.88 Lehi, Utah County 0.23 7.83 Suisun City, CA 0.90 8.16 Beck St Warm Springs 1.59 6.95 Magna 0.41 8.06 Taylorsville Campus 0.92 7.90 Bountiful City 0.69 7.78 Millard County 0.10 7.63 Taylorsville City 0.54 8.16 Davis County 0.52 7.77 Millcreek 0.46 7.75 Truckee, CA 0.76 7.35 Draper 0.86 7.88 Millcreek, UT 0.85 7.90 Washington County 0.23 7.86 Draper, UT 0.94 7.83 Morgan 0.04 6.26 West Valley City 0.89 7.90 Emigration canyon 0.35 7.54 Murray 0.29 7.85 West Wendover, NV 0.78 8.06 Fort Douglas 0.47 7.82 Murray 0.58 7.90 Farmington Creek, Farmington, UT 0.22 Herriman 0.90 7.67 Park city 0.10 7.67 Holladay, UT 0.32 Herriman 0.75 8.00 Redwood SLCC 0.54 8.07 North Salt Lake, UT 0.43 Jordan Campus 0.20 7.00 Roseville, CA 0.86 6.51 Park City, UT 0.27 Juab County 0.08 8.00 Salt Lake City 0.47 7.98 Rose Park, UT 0.38 Kaysville 0.62 7.76 Sandy 0.68 7.74 Snyderville, UT 0.25 Kaysville City 0.04 7.75 South Salt Lake Well 0.16 8.04 Tooele, UT 0.24 Kaysville Water w/filter 0.39 6.73 St. George 0.18 7.90 Kearns City 0.74 7.85 St. George 0.19 8.00 Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Aquafina Bottled Water 0.03 5.96 Arrowhead Bottled Water 0.47 8.16 Kirkland Bottled Water 0.03 8.16 Smart Water <0.05 7.42 Arrowhead Water 1.05 8.22 Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Amp Cherry Energy <0.05 3.04 Maverik: Get Rev'd (Grape) 0.21 2.95 NOS: Zero 0.04 2.47 AMP: Mixed Berry <0.02 2.65 Maverik: Get Rev'd Extra Strength 0.31 2.89 Red Bull: Original 0.10 3.17 AMP: Sugar Free Citrus <0.02 2.59 Monster: Absolute Zero 0.04 3.44 Red Bull: Sugar Free 0.03 3.20 Five Hour Energy: Extra Strength <0.02 2.57 Monster: Low Carb <0.02 3.44 Rockstar: Original <0.02 2.60 Five Hour Energy: Lemon Lime <0.02 2.56 Monster: Zero Ultra <0.02 3.42 Rockstar: Zero Carb 0.09 3.17 Full Throtle: Citrus <0.02 2.84 NOS: Regular <0.02 3.14 Xyience: Xenergy (Frost Berry Blast) <0.02 2.85 Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH Beverage [ F-] ppm pH A & W Root Beer 0.04 4.69 Coke Zero 0.31 2.96 Mountain Dew 0.39 3.45 Barq's Root Beer 0.14 4.29 Diet Dr. Pepper 0.15 3.30 Ocean Spray Apple Juic <0.05 3.88 Caffeine Free Diet Coke 0.31 3.22 Kirkland Vita Rain Mango 0.01 2.72 Pepsi Max <0.05 3.00 Coke from Mexico <0.05 2.40 Mello Yello 0.15 3.14 Regular Coca Cola 0.22 2.38 Coke from USA 0.59 2.38 Minute Maid Lemonade 0.07 2.57 Schwepps GingerAle 0.01 2.94 Beverage [F-]ppm pH Beverage [F-]ppm pH Beverage [F-]ppm Lipton: Herbal Peppermint Tea 0.04 7.01 Stash: Chai Spice Black Tea 0.74 4.54 Rishi organic green tea, “Jade Cloud” 0.26 Lipton: Peach Mango White Tea * 0.77 Brisk raspberry iced tea 0.71 Rishi organic white tea, “Silver Needle Jasmine” 0.35 Lipton: Pure Green Tea 1.34 4.76 Pure Leaf iced tea 0.89 Monster: Rehab Tea &Pink Lemonade 0.12 4.00 Rishi organic black tea, “China Breakfast” 1.03 Beverage [F-] ppm pH Beverage [F-] ppm pH Beverage [F-] ppm pH Maxwell House Instant Coffee Original 0.1 4.41 Starbuck’s Instant Colombia <0.1 4.93 Folger’s Instant Classic 0.12 4.66 Taster’s Choice Instant House Blend 0.34 4.62 Western Family Instant Classic Blend 0.21 4.74 * Storage spoiled sample