The document discusses five different legal scenarios involving international law and transactions: 1) Three Costa Rican banks defaulted on promissory notes payable in US dollars in New York due to Costa Rica's debt crisis. A US bank sued and the Costa Rican banks claimed the act of state doctrine. 2) Six US antibiotic manufacturers divided overseas markets and prices in violation of US antitrust laws. Foreign countries wanted damages but act of state may apply. 3) A US family's tour of the Dominican Republic, involving US and Dominican companies, went wrong when they were denied entry and had additional expenses. They sued all companies and the Dominican airline claimed act of state. 4) A developing

1. May the above foreign countries recover treble damages for violation
ASSIGNMENT1. Three banks that are wholly owned by the Republic of Costa Rica had issued
promissory notes, payable in U.S. dollars in New York City. The notes are now in default due
solely to actions of the Costa Rican government, which had suspended all payments of
external debt because of escalating economic problems. Efforts by Costa Rica to curb foreign
debt payment difficulties conflicted with U.S. policy for debt resolution procedure as
conducted under the auspices of the International Monetary Fund. A syndicate of U.S. banks
brought suit to recover on the promissory notes. The three Costa Rican banks assert the act
of state doctrine as a defense. Should the doctrine apply? Explain.2. Six U.S. manufacturers
of broad-spectrum antibiotics derived a large percentage of their sales from overseas
markets, including India, Iran, the Philippines, Spain, the Republic of Korea, Germany,
Colombia, and Kuwait. The manufacturers agreed to a common plan of marketing, whereby
territories were divided and prices for products were set. The members of the plan also
agreed not to grant foreign producers licenses to the manufacturing technology of any of
their “big money” drugs. May the above foreign countries recover treble damages for
violation of the U.S. antitrust laws? Why or why not?3. After reading attractive brochures
advertising a package tour of the Dominican Republic, a U.S. family decided to purchase
tickets for the family vacation plan. The tour was a product of four different business
entities, two domestic (U.S.) and two foreign. Sheraton Hotels & Inns, World Corporation,
was to provide food and lodging; Dominicana Airlines, wholly owned by the government of
the Dominican Republic, which routinely flew into Miami International Airport and sold
tickets within the United States, was to provide round-trip air transportation and “tourist
cards” necessary for entry into the Dominican Republic; and two U.S. firms organized and
sold the tour. Problems for the family began when their Dominicana flight landed in the
Dominican Republic and immigration officials denied them entry. Forced to leave, the family
was shuttled first to Puerto Rico and then to Haiti, where they had to secure their own
passage back to the United States at additional expense. The family brings suit for battery,
false imprisonment, breach of warranty, and breach of contract against all four business
entities. The Dominicana Airlines asserts the act of state doctrine as a defense. Explain
whether this defense applies in this situation.4. A privately owned business in a developing
country determines that current computer technology could solve many of the problems
faced by its country’s private and public sectors. This business, however, lacks the capital
resources necessary for research and development to acquire such computer technology,
even if trained personnel were available. Furthermore, despite a sense of patriotism, the

2. business concludes that its national government could not efficiently or effectively handle
such a development project. What business forms are available to this business for
acquiring sophisticated computer technology? What are the advantages and problems
inherent in the various options?5. King Faisal II of Iraq was killed on July 14, 1958, in the
midst of a revolution in that country that led to the establishment of a republic
subsequently recognized by the U.S. government. On July 19, 1958, the new republic issued
a decree that all property of the former ruling dynasty, regardless of location, should be
confiscated. Subsequently, the Republic of Iraq brought suit in the United States to obtain
possession of money and stocks deposited in the deceased king’s U.S. bank account in New
York City. Explain whether Iraq will be able to collect the funds