This document provides instructions for Assignment CW2: Portfolio and reflective summary for the Creativity Module. Students must create a portfolio with a minimum of 10 artefacts demonstrating their learning during the module. They must also write a 500-word reflective summary explaining how the portfolio materials supported their employability development. The portfolio must be uploaded to the university's online storage system and shared with instructors. The summary should be submitted through Turnitin and meet formatting requirements. The assignment aims to assess students' achievement of four module learning outcomes related to communication skills, self-reflection, resource evaluation, and critical thinking about careers.

1. Creativity Module leader: Shan Wikoon Assignment No. and type: CW2:
Creativity Module leader: Shan WikoonAssignment No. and type: CW2: Portfolio and
reflective summary Assessment weighting: 60%Submission time and date:Tuesday
18/01/2022 at 2:00 pm Target feedback time and date:3 weeks after submission
deadlineAssignment taskUsing materials generated by the project classes and through your
independent study, populate a portfolio of evidence of your learning and development
during the module.Write a 500 word reflective summary to explain how and why these
materials have supported the development of your employability.This assignment requires
you to Create a portfolio as below:1. Create a minimum of 10 artefacts. (The individual
artefacts and project materials have no word count associated with them but it is
anticipated that these should add up to a minimum of 1500 words of original content.)2.
Upload your artefacts to LSST OneDrive (RMUnify) and share this with your seminar
lecturer and with your tutor.3. Ensure the artefacts are clearly organised and sequenced
within the portfolio4. Write the 500 word summary and submit this through
Turnitin.Portfolio workshops will be provided to help you to complete these tasks.Word
counts:There is a word count of 500 words for the summary and you should provide the
portfolio in appendix section of the summary.The individual artefacts and project materials
have no word count associated with them but it is anticipated that these should add up to a
minimum of 1500 words of original content.This assignment has been designed to provide
you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning
outcomes:LO 1 Demonstrate effective communication skills, applicable to academic and
professional contexts.LO 2 Reflect on their individual performance, behaviour and
experience in education and/or employmentLO 3 Locate and evaluate resources for
academic and employment-related purposesLO 4 Think critically and creatively about
graduate employment opportunities in the futureTask requirementsWritten work
submitted as part of this assignment should be presented according to the following:1. The
summary should be 1.5 line spaced2. Font must be Arial 123. Follow the reference
guidelines4. The summary must be within the word count range 450-550 words5. Written
work for this assignment should be submitted through the appropriate Turnitin submission
point through VLE.6. Written work for this assignment should be saved and submitted as a
Word document (.docx) or as a .pdf file. If other file formats are used, these may not be
compatible with Turnitin and the work cannot be marked.Referencing and research
requirementsPlease reference your work according to the Harvard style for your subject as
defined in Cite Them RightOnline (http://www.citethemrightonline.com). This information

2. is also available in book form: Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2016) Cite them right: the essential
reference guide. 10th edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Copies are available via the
University library.As the portfolio is developmental, only the summary will be marked
according to the Harvard referencing guidelines on Cite Them Right Online.How your work
will be assessedYour work will be assessed against the assessment criteria which have been
provided at the end of this brief.These criteria have been designed specifically for this
assignment and are intended to measure the extent to which you have demonstrated your
achievement of its associated learning outcomes (see above). They have been aligned with
the institutional grade descriptor appropriate for your level.The assessment criteria
provide a basis for fair and consistent marking and indicate what is expected of you in this
assignment. It is strongly recommended that you engage with them while you are working
on the assignment and use them in combination with any feedback you receive once your
work has been marked to help you plan for future learning and development.Submission
detailsSummary SubmissionYou are required to submit the 500 word summary via an
electronic submission point on VLE.Portfolio Submission1. Create a snapshot of the
completed portfolio and share this with your seminar lecturer and with your tutor, using
their usernames (not email addresses)2. Complete the portfolio completion checklist and
submit this to the VLE submission point. This is where the grade and the feedback will be
located.It is essential that both elements are submitted according to these instructions.• You
are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic misconduct, which can be viewed
on the University website: https://bucks.ac.uk/
data/assets/pdf_file/0024/9546/Academic-Misconduct-Policy.pdf. In submitting your
assignment, you are acknowledging that you have read and understood these regulations•
Please also note that work that is submitted up to 10 working days beyond the submission
date will be considered a late submission. Late submissions will be marked and the actual
mark recorded, but will be capped at the pass mark (typically 40%), provided that the work
is of a passing standard.Work submitted after this period will not be marked and will be
treated as a non-submission.Before you submit• Please use the provided checklist below to
make sure you are ‘fit to submit’ your work• We recommend you use this checklist as soon
as you get this assignment brief to help you plan your workFit to Submit: Assignment
ChecklistThis brief assignment checklist is designed to help you avoid some of the most
common mistakes students make in their coursework.Have you read the assignment brief?
If not, do so now!In it you will find details of the assessment task, word count, the
assessment criteria your work is marked against, and the learning outcomes – the basis for
the assessment strategy in each module.Students often lose marks by forgetting some of the
more straightforward elements of their assignments. We recommend that you “tick off”
each of the points below as you prepare your work for submission. If you need any help, ask
your tutor and/or visit https://bucks.ac.uk/students/academicadvice/assessment-and-
examinationHave you read and understood the assessment criteria?Have you met the
learning outcomes? You will lose marks and your work may even be failed if you have
not.Have you demonstrated you can think and write critically in the completed work? This
means you have supported your arguments/explanations appropriately e.g. using relevant
academic sources and you have offered discussion points which extends your own or

3. others’ viewpoints to make reasoned conclusions/judgements.Have you maintained an
appropriate tone throughout your work? Is your work formal, focused, developed and
clear?Have you checked that the referencing in your assignment is in line with your
programme requirements?Have you proof-read your work and used spellcheck software to
check your spelling and grammar?Have you checked the presentation of your work is as
specified by your tutor, for example, are font size, colour, style, line spacing and margins as
the tutor specified?Have you kept to the word count (or equivalent)? If you are not sure,
check with your tutorCan you confirm that the work submitted is your own work and
maintains academic integrity?Fail Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass0-34 (F) – Fail 35-39 E –
Marginal fail 40-49 (D) 50-59 (C) 60-69 (B) 70-79 (A) 80-100 (A+)Not successful Below
required standard Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent OutstandingApplication
andPractice 35% This should include evidence of:• Accuracy,coordination and proficiency
in the completion of practical tasks and processes?• Technical skills?• Presentation of
research findings? The work demonstrateslittle or no ability to operate in predictable and
defined contexts and use given techniques to undertake well-defined roles and performance
tasks, and so:• Well-defined, occasionally complex, tasks are attempted but inaccurate and
error strewn• Use of given technical and creative skills is not demonstrated in most or all
key areas• Presentation of findings is not clear or effective. The work demonstratesan
insufficient ability to operate in predictable and defined contexts and use given techniques
to undertake well-defined roles and performance tasks, and so:• Well-defined, occasionally
complex, tasks are completed with partial accuracy and independence• Use of given
technical and creative skills is demonstrated in some of the key areas• Presentation of
findings is often not clear or effective. The work demonstratesa sufficient ability to use
operate in predictable and defined contexts and use given techniques to undertake well-
defined roles and performance tasks, and so:• Complete well- defined, occasionally complex,
practical tasks• Use of given technical andcreative skills is demonstrated• Within a
narrowly defined context, present findings in clear and appropriate formats The work
demonstrates a consistent and confident ability to operate in predictable and defined
contexts and use given techniques to undertake well-defined roles and performance tasks,
and so:• Complete defined, occasionally complex, practical tasks accurately with a degree of
autonomy in predictable, defined contexts• Consistently use a given range of technical and
creative skills• Within a narrowly, defined context consistently present findings in clear and
appropriate formats The work demonstratesa highly proficient abilityto operate in
predictable and defined contexts and use given techniques to undertake well-defined roles
and performance tasks, and so:• Complete well- defined, occasionally complex, practical
tasks autonomously and with accuracy and coordination in predictable, defined contexts•
Consistently use in a highly developed way a given range oftechnical and creative skills•
Within a narrowly defined context, consistently present findings in detailed, clear and
appropriate formats The work demonstrates a highly accomplished ability to operate in
predictable and defined contexts and use given techniques to undertake well-defined roles
and performance tasks, and so:• Complete well- defined, occasionally complex, practical
tasks autonomously and with a high degree of accuracy, coordination and proficiency in
predictable, defined contexts• Consistently use in a highly developed way the full range of

4. given technical andcreative skills• Within a narrowly defined context, consistently present
findings perceptively, convincingly and The work demonstrates an exceptional ability to
operate in predictable and defined contexts and use given techniques to undertake well-
defined roles and performance tasks, and so:• Complete well- defined, occasionally complex,
practical tasks autonomously and with an exceptional degree of accuracy, coordination and
proficiency in predictable, defined contexts• Consistently use in a highly developed and
sophisticated way the full range of given technical and creative skills• Within a narrowly
defined context,Internal approval: Ina Stan, 29.09.20215appropriately and in a wide range
of appropriate formats consistently present findings perceptively, authoritatively and
appropriately and in a wide range of appropriate formatsAnalysis and criticality 35% This
should include evidence of:• Logic and argument• Analytical reflection• Organisation of
ideas and evidence A limited (or no) ability to use ideas and information to deviseand
sustain arguments Little or no demonstration of an ability to describe and comment upon
aspects of pre-defined frameworks and criteria An insufficient ability touse ideas and
information to devise a and sustain arguments An insufficient demonstration of an ability to
describe and comment upon aspects of pre-defined frameworks and criteria A sufficient
ability to use ideas and information to devise and sustain arguments A sufficient
demonstration of an ability to describe and comment upon aspects of pre-defined
frameworks and criteria A sound ability to use ideas and information to devise and sustain
argumentsA sound demonstration of an ability to describe and comment upon aspects of
pre-defined frameworks and criteria A sophisticated ability to use ideas and information to
devise and sustain arguments A sophisticated demonstration of an ability to describe and
comment upon aspects of pre-defined frameworks and criteria A highly accomplished
ability to use ideas and information to devise and sustain arguments An insufficient
demonstration of an ability to describe and comment upon aspects of pre-defined
frameworks and criteria An exceptional ability touse ideas and information to devise and
sustain argumentsTransferable skills(written communication)30%