course material

1. Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay Example Paper
Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay Example PaperQuantitative research and
assessments are instrumental methods of collecting evidence and making concrete results
in the field of nursing. Although these research and evaluations provide the researchers and
readers with useful information, they also present some shortcomings. As such, readers
should, at all times, be aware of these limitations when drawing information from
quantitative extracts. A review of Sand Jeklin and K Sherman's article "Quantitative
assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation"
available in the Journal of Clinical Nursing is taken to find specific flaws and evaluate the
reliability of quantitative research Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay Example
Paper.ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HEREThis particular article appears to follow
several of the credibility requirements outlined in the critique form's second page. The
article matches the criteria for credibility since it is peer-reviewed. When a paper is peer-
reviewed, it indicates other experts in the area have been consulted (Shaklee & Cousijn,
2015). This will almost certainly provide the correct facts and has an original viewpoint on
the topic. Regarding the issue as to whether the authors of the article are professionals, it is
clear that Sand Jeklin and Sherman are nursing experts. They are both professors at West
Virginia University.Although the article achieves most of the credibility standards, the usage
of quasi-experimental correlations has several significant flaws in the design of the study.
The usage of quasi-experimental raises specific tremendous challenges to the internal
integrity of the research-gathered evidence (Punch, 2013). Internal validation challenges
include unplanned occurrences that may happen during the research, biological and
psychological changes that may occur on the participants, and mean regression (Punch,
2013). To overcome the flaws of the quasi-experimental approach, the authors should have
used substitutes such as a cross-lagged panel model and causal modeling Common Flaws in
Quantitative Studies Essay Example Paper.ReferencesPunch, K. (2013). Validity in Quasi-
Experimental Research. Routledge.Sand‐Jecklin, K., & Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative
assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report
implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(19-20), 2854-2863.Shaklee, P., & Cousijn, H.
(2015). Can data be peer-reviewed. Retrieved from ELSEVIER:
https://www.elsevier.com/connect/can-data-be-peer-reviewed.When nurses have a
question about a clinical practice issue that they can turn to the literature to see what
scientific evidence is available that addresses their question. However, as discussed in Week
2, not all evidence is created equal. When looking at the literature, it is important to

2. evaluate each research study. Before assumptions can be made about the applicability of a
study's results, specific elements of a research design must be evaluated. This week, you
will examine elements of the strength of a quantitative research study’s design, including
sample size, generalizability, statistical analysis and conclusions. Keep in mind all studies
have flaws or are not valid for your population. Consequently, one study by itself will not
warrant a change in practice. It is important to find a number of studies to support your
change in practice. To prepare for this Discussion, Review the following from this week’s
resources: AWE Checklist (Level 4000) Discussion Rubric, provided in the Course
Information area This week’s Writing Resources and Program Success Tools (link to e-
guide) This week’s articles and media By Day 3 Post the following: After viewing the Week 3
Webinar: Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Research, complete the Appraisal Guide:
Findings of a Quantitative Study in this week’s resources. Of the questions discussed on the
second page of the critique form, titled Credibility, which ones were identified in the article
reviewed during the webinar? Describe one of the most serious flaws in this study and why
it leaves you wondering if the study findings should be used as evidence in an assessment of
patient handoff? Note Initial Post: A three-paragraph (at least 350 words) response. Be sure
to use evidence from the readings and include in-text citations. Utilize essay-level writing
practice and skills, including the use of transitional material and organizational frames.
Avoid quotes; paraphrase to incorporate evidence into your own writing. A reference list is
required. Use the most current evidence (usually ≤ 5-years-old.) This is the webinar
mentioned: https://mym.cdn.laureate-Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay
Example Paper media.com/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/4100/CH/mm/quantitative-
appraisal/index.html this is the Appraisal guide:Appraisal Guide: Findings of a Quantitative
Study APA Formatted Citation: (4 pts.) Answer Here: Synopsis (16 pts.) 1. What was the
purpose of the study (research questions, purposes, and hypotheses)? Answer Here: 2. How
was the sample obtained? Answer Here: 3. What inclusion or exclusion criteria were used?
Answer Here: 4. Who from the sample actually participated or contributed data
(demographic or clinical profile and dropout rate)? Answer Here: 5. What methods were
used to collect data (e.g., sequence, timing, types of data, and measures)? Answer Here: 6.
Was an intervention tested? Answer Yes or No A. How was the sample size determined?
Answer Here: B. Were patients randomly assigned to treatment groups? Answer Here: 7.
What are the main findings of the study? (10 pts.) Answer Here: Credibility (14 pts.) Yes No
Not Clear Is the study published in a source that required peer review? *Did the data
obtained and the analysis conducted answer the research question? Were the measuring
instruments reliable and valid? *Were important extraneous variables and bias controlled?
*If an intervention was tested, answer the following five questions: Were participants
randomly assigned to groups and were the two groups similar at the start (before the
intervention)? Were the interventions well defined and consistently delivered? Were the
groups treated equally other than the difference in interventions?ORDER A PLAGIARISM-
FREE PAPER HEREIf no difference was found, was the sample size large enough to detect a
difference if one existed? If a difference was found, are you confident it was due to the
intervention? Are the findings consistent with findings from other studies? All Some No ARE
THE FINDINGS CREDIBLE? Clinical Significance (6 pts.) 1. Note any difference in means, r2s,

3. or measures of clinical effects (ABI, NNT, RR, OR) Answer Here: Yes No Not Clear *Is the
target population clearly described? *Is the frequency, association, or treatment effect
impressive enough for you to be confident that the finding would make a clinical difference
if used as the basis for care? All Some No ARE THE FINDINGS CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT?
Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay Example Paper