2. interacting with paper bill buxton | 2007 outline example: scoping out tektronix interactive paper interfaces back to our agenda keeping cool - a home climate controller appearances can be deceiving
3.
4. usage of a paper interface to point out the problems
8. and, this method can be enhanced with respect to speed, by taking it to an electronic environment (like a flash media)
9. distinguishing the real cursor, and the implemented representation of the tested intereface’s cursor, is important
10.
11.
12. used different techniques to create an dynamic interactive paper prototype: changing whole layout, changing overlays, removing and re-pasting tapes, erasing and re-drawing on acetate paper.
13.
14. used different techniques to create an dynamic interactive paper prototype: changing whole layout, changing overlays, removing and re-pasting tapes, erasing and re-drawing on acetate paper.
15. there is a necessity for a facilitator who will create the interactive responseschanging layout changing overlays replacing tapes re-drawing indicators
19. sketching, in this sense, is not just what you use, but how, when, where and why you use it.
20. Wiklund, Thurrot & Dumas’s usability research on aesthetic refinements of an interface – to figure out the role of appearances in usability testing.
21.
22. test subjects psychology: when subjected to only one design, they have absolute judgements. when there are multiple alternatives, they can set a scale for user.
23. the difference between usability engineering & design: usability engineering – getting the design right act of design – getting the right design
