SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 109
Download to read offline
LiDAR Data Gave Us 2’ Contours,
                  Now What…?
   1mb = 1,000 kb
   1 gb = 1,000 mb
   1 tb = 1,000 gb
   2 Terrabytes = 1,428,571 3.5” floppy disks
    ◦ Today’s cost around $750.00
   Stacked on top of one another = 2.5 miles
    high!
    ◦ And at the time, they cost $1.00+




                                MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops   11/01/2012
LiDAR Derived DEM
                      Cell Size: 1 meter sq
                      Vertical Error: 15 cm1

                      1.5 million points / sq mile




2.5
mi
                          USGS Standard DEM
                          Cell Size: 30 meter sq
                          Vertical Error: “Equal to or
                          better than 15 meters”2

                          1600 points / sq mile

                      1 Varies    based on project specifications
                      2   http://edc.usgs.gov/guides/dem.html

      MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops    11/01/2012
   LiDAR datasets tend to be very large
    ◦ LAS Format
      All Returns – 4 Million points ~ 55 mb / square mile
      Bare Earth – 3 million points ~ 45 mb / square mile
    ◦ ASCII Format
      All Points – 4 million points ~ 75 mb / square mile
      Bare Earth – 3 million points ~ 73 mb / square mile
    ◦ Grid Format
      5 mb / square mile in integer format
      11.2 mb / square mile in floating point format

     OC has over 300GB in raw data!!!



                                        Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
                                                       Workshops      11/01/2012
   Water Resources               Water Quality
    ◦ Floodplain mapping                 Watershed modeling
    ◦ Storm water management
    ◦ Drainage basin                     Wetland reconstruction
      delineation                        Land cover/land use
    ◦ Shoreline erosion                  mapping
   Geology                       Forestry
    ◦ Sinkhole identification
    ◦ Geologic/geomorphic                Forest characterization
      mapping                            Fire fuel mapping
   Transportation                Fish and Wildlife
    ◦ Road and culvert design
    ◦ Cut and fill estimation     Management
    ◦ Archaeological site                Drainage and water
      identification                     control
   Agriculture                          Walk-in Accessibility
    ◦ Erosion control structure
      design                             Habitat Management
    ◦ Soils mapping               Emergency
    ◦ Precision farming           Management
                                         Debris removal
                                         Hazard Mitigation
                                  Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
                                                 Workshops      11/01/2012
   Need licenses:
    ◦ ArcEditor/ArcInfo
    ◦ 3D Analyst
    ◦ Spatial Analyst
   AP Framework
   ArcHydro Extension
   Data in same projection
   3D Analyst Extension
    ◦ Manages 3D data
    ◦ Generates surfaces for use in ArcHydro
   Spatial Analyst Extension performs the
    analyses
   LAS files   (Common LiDAR Data Exchange)
    ◦ Stores a variety of point information
        Number of returns
        Return Number
        Intensity
        Classification
        X,Y, Z values
        Scan Direction
        Scan Angle Rank
        GPS Time



                             Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
                                            Workshops      11/01/2012
    Intensity = amount of
     energy reflected for
     each return
    Different surfaces
     reflect differently based
     on wavelength of laser
    Example at 1064nm
     (NIR), water absorbs,
     vegetation highly
     reflective
    Can be used to build
     black and white near-IR
     images




    11/01/2012           Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops
                                                                 Slide courtesy of USGS
   Single Return

   Multiple returns

   Waveform
    Returns




                       Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
                                      Workshops 11/01/2012
                                            Slide courtesy of USGS
   Single Return
                       1st return
   Multiple returns
                       2nd return
   Waveform           3rd return
    Returns



                       4th return


                                Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
                                               Workshops 11/01/2012
                                                     Slide courtesy of USGS
Returns

Single Return
Multiple
returns
Waveform
Returns


                Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
                               Workshops 11/01/2012
                                     Slide courtesy of USGS
   Classification – Points can be classified to
    reflect their ground condition
         Class   Definition
         0       Created, Never Classified
         1       Unclassified
         2       Ground
         3       Low Vegetation
         4       Medium Vegetation
         5       High Vegetation
         6       Building
         7       Low Point (noise)
         8       Model Key-Point (mass point)
         9       Water
         12      Overlap

                                                MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops   11/01/2012
Land & Water (LCD)
Lidar in Red
                                         GPS Topo in Green



                                                                         Co
                                                                         urt
                                                                          es
                                                                           y
                                                                          of
                                                                          Sa
                                                                         uk
Field was contour strip cropped so vegetation is not uniform which may   Co
account for some of the variability along the cross section.             un
                                                                          ty
Lidar in Red
                                             GPS Topo in Green




The same cross section with lidar shifted down vertically 3”. Lidar may give
absolute elevations slightly higher than referenced vertical datum, but relative
elevations for similar land cover provide good results.

                                                                       Courtesy of Sauk County
Mowed meadow and lawn land cover provided lidar elevations that
matched absolute reference vertical datum elevations.
Marsh (heavy vegetation, unmowed, not pastured) land cover provided lidar
elevations higher than absolute reference vertical datum elevations.
There is a lidar elevation shift when going from one land cover type to
another, but most sites are typically of one land cover so Sauk County
hasn’t considered it a significant issue.
                                                                    Courtesy of Sauk
                                                                             County
*
#SCBM2




         Maple Creek




                       Shots within 0.02’
                       relative to control.
50’ x 50’ Square Open Ground = 52 LIDAR
     Points (notice building point removal)
50’ x 50’ Square Woods = 16 LIDAR Points
An 11.3 Acre Selection =
          13,634 Points
   Great Planning tool
   Engineering may require survey.
   Shapefile limitation
   Land Use limitation
   Data maintenance
   Lidar data can be visualized a number of ways
    ◦   POINTS
    ◦   TERRAINS (ESRI)
    ◦   GRIDS (DEM or DSM)
    ◦   TINS
    ◦   CONTOURS




                             MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops   11/01/2012
   Create File Geodatabase
   Convert LiDAR to multipoint feature class
   Make a Terrain
   Export rasters (i.e. DEM, Grid) for analysis
    Here’s our process:
1.     Need 3D Analyst or Spatial Analyst for LIDAR Processing.
2.     In ArcCatalog, right-clickNEWCreate a file geodatabase.
3.     In Arc Catalog, right-click the named file geodata baseCreate a
       feature dataset and import County coordinate system for horizontal
       projection.
4.     Choose vertical projection of LIDAR data (NAVD 88 for us)
5.     In ArcCatalog Use 3D-Analyst ToolsConversionFrom File”ASCII
       3d to Feature Class” tool to select tiles to process (careful over 6 tiles.)
6.     In ArcCatalog, right-click the Feature DatasetNEWTerrain.
7.     Follow the Terrain Wizard. We let GIS Calculate the Pyramids.
8.     In ArcCatalog Use 3D-Analyst ToolsConversionFrom
       Terrain”Terrain to Raster” tool to convert Terrain to a DEM. (3
       min./tile)
9.     For hydrology, “CELLSIZE 15” seems to be good compromise.
10.    For Cross-Section work, may want to use 3D-Analyst
       ToolsConversionFrom Terrain”Terrain to TIn” tool to convert
       Terrain to a TIN.
11.    A county-wide terrain and DEM may need to run over the weekend.
   Per ESRI, a terrain dataset is a multiresolution, TIN-
    based surface built from measurements stored as
    features in a geodatabase.
   Terrains reside in the geodatabase, inside feature
    datasets with the features used to construct them.
   Terrains have participating feature classes and
    rules, similar to topologies. Common feature
    classes that act as data sources for terrains include
    the following:
    ◦ Multipoint feature classes of 3D mass points such as lidar
    ◦ 3D point and line feature classes, i.e. breaklines
    ◦ Study area boundaries that define the bounds of the terrain
      dataset
Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
               Workshops 11/01/2012
                     Slide courtesy of USGS
   From the 3D Analyst Tools, double-click the
    Terrain To Raster geoprocessing tool to open it.
   Input Terrain
    ◦ add the terrain dataset
   Output Raster
    ◦ specify the location where the raster dataset is to be
      created.
    ◦ Recommend including grid size in name
   Output data type
    ◦ Either 32-bit floating point or 32-bit integer.
    ◦ Floating point is the default value.
   Interpolation method
    ◦ Either Linear or Natural Neighbors.
    ◦ Both are TIN-based interpolation methods applied through
      the triangulated terrain surface.
    ◦ The Linear option finds the triangle encompassing each cell
      center and applies a weighted average of the triangle's
      nodes to interpolate a value.
    ◦ The Natural Neighbors option uses the Voronoi neighbors
      of cell centers.
    ◦ Consider the natural neighbors method for interpolating a
      terrain surface.
    ◦ Natural neighbor interpolation takes longer processing
      time; however, the generated surface is much smoother
      than that produced with a linear interpolation. It is also less
      susceptible to small changes in the triangulation.
   Sampling Distance
    ◦ Either Observations or Cellsize, which controls the
      horizontal resolution of the raster.
    ◦ Observations method
      calculates the cell size based on the set value this
       number represents and the number of cells you want
       on the longest edge of the raster surface.
    ◦ Cellsize method
      You set the cell size explicitly
        i.e. “CELLSIZE 15” outputs a raster with 15’ square
         representing the surface.
   Resolution
    ◦ The resolution parameter indicates which
      pyramid level of the terrain dataset to use for
      conversion.
    ◦ To output a raster dataset at full resolution, set
      this parameter to 0.
   To extract a subset of the terrain, click the
    Environments button on the bottom of the
    geoprocessing tool. Click the General
    Settings tab and define the extent of the
    output DEM.
   DEM Cellsize Matters
   TIN vs. DEM
   Terrain (represents, no labels, resolution)
   Shapefile
   Land Use Matters
   2’ as base.
   A data infrastructure for storing and
    integrating hydro data within ArcGIS
    ◦   A   set of hydro objects
    ◦   A   set of standardized attributes
    ◦   A   vocabulary for describing data
    ◦   A   toolset for data model applications
Arc Hydro Tools




Regression Tools
1.   Terrain Preprocessing – topographic and
     hydrographic layers
2.   Location specific layers – generated by the
     user
3.   Statewide parameter layers – used for flood
     flow prediction
   Multiple ways of representing elevation
    ◦ Contours and points (Vector)
    ◦ Triangulated irregular network (TIN)
    ◦ Digital elevation model (Raster)
   Each has advantages and disadvantages
   DEM is used for Arc Hydro terrain analysis
    and watershed delineation
DEMs have become a common way of representing elevation where every grid cell is given
an elevation value. This is allows for very rapid processing and supports a wide-array of
critical analyses.
Cell size

Number
  of
 rows
                          NODATA cell
    (X,Y)
            Number of Columns
   Each cell usually
Graphical



                               stores the average
                               elevation of grid cell
                              Alternatively, it may
                               store the value at the
                               center of the grid cell
            67   56   49
                               Elevations are
Digital




                           
            53   44   37       presented graphically
                               in shades or colors
            58   55   22
   Spurious sinks
    ◦ Spurious sinks are a byproduct of the DEM
      creation / interpolation process
    ◦ Spurious sinks ought to be removed
   True sinks
    ◦ Some landscapes have natural depressions
    ◦ e.g. pothole lakes
    ◦ True sinks may be retained or removed
   Sinks are removed by raising the elevation
    of the sink to the elevation of the outlet
DEM with unfilled sinks         DEM with filled sinks                  Depth of sink
                               Images from ESRI Map Book Gallery
         http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume19/conservation5.html


Sinks that are removed (filled) will contribute
             to downstream flow
   New Arc Hydro tools available to screen,
    evaluate, and leave / remove true sinks (in
    the exercise, all sinks will be filled)
Graphical




            67 56 49      2   2   4
Digital




            53 44 37      1   2   4

            58 55 22     128 1    2
             Elevation   Flow Direction
32   64   128


16         1


8    4     2
   Flow accumulation
                                     is the number of
                                     upstream grid
                                     cells that
                                     contribute flow to
 2   2   4          0   0   0
                                     a given grid cell
                                    Calculated from
 1   2   4          0   3   2        flow direction
128 1    2          0   0   8
Flow Direction   Flow Accumulation
   Streams are defined
    from the flow
    accumulation grid
    based on a threshold
   Reclassify grid
    ◦ If [Cell] > Threshold
      Then [Cell]=Stream
    ◦ If [Cell] < Threshold
      Then [Cell]=Not
      Stream
All the cells in a particular segment have the same grid code
that is specific to that segment
Edge


  Junction
   Arc Hydro uses AGREE
                100                                                                                 method to “burn-in” streams
                                     Original Surface                                              Adjusts elevation of DEM
                90                   Modified Surface                                               based on input vector line
                                                                                                    features
                80                                                                                 Drop/raise elevation of cells
                                                                                                    corresponding to lines by
Elevation (m)




                70                                                                                  smoothdrop
                                                                                                   Buffer lines by
                60                                                                                  smoothdistance
                                                                                                   Elevation of cells inside
                50                                                                                  buffer are adjusted to a
                                                                                                    straight line from edge of
                40                                                                                  buffer to line.
                                                                                                   Drop/raise the elevation of
                30                                                                                  the cells corresponding to
                                                                                                    the lines by sharpdrop
                      20
                           40
                                60
                                     80
                  0




                                          100
                                                120
                                                      140
                                                            160
                                                                  180
                                                                        200
                                                                              220
                                                                                    240
                                                                                          260




                                       Lateral Distance (m)
Correct
drainage path
Derived
drainage path
Correct
(burned)
drainage path
Derived
drainage path
   Difference between LiDAR data and 30-meter
    DEM
    ◦ LiDAR is detailed enough to show road grades /
      ditches
    ◦ More effort required to burn proper drainage paths
   Burn short segments at culvert crossings
   Catchment – the area
    draining to a single
    segment of stream
    between two junctions
   Subwatershed – the
    drainage area between
    two user defined
    drainage points
   Watershed – the entire
    drainage area
    upstream of a user
    defined drainage point
   Catchment Grid Delineation – creates a grid of
    catchment areas draining into each stream segment
   Catchment Polygon Processing – coverts catchments into
    a polygon feature class
   Adjoint Catchment Processing – For each catchment that
    is not a head catchment, a polygon representing the
    whole upstream area draining to its inlet point is
    constructed
1.   Terrain Preprocessing – topographic and
     hydrographic layers
2.   Location specific layers – generated by the
     user
3.   Statewide parameter layers – used for flood
     flow prediction
   WatershedPoint – user
    defined outlet point
   Watershed – resulting
    watershed polygon
   LongestFlowPath3D –
    longest flowpath line
   Slp1085Point – points
    at 10 and 85 percent
    along the longest
    flowpath (used for
    slope calculation)
   Rainfall-runoff model: HEC-HMS
    ◦ Run a synthetic/observed storm over a subdivided
      watershed model
    ◦ HEC-GeoHMS extension can be used to set up model
      geometry
   Flood-Frequency Characteristics – based on the
    USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-
    4250, “Flood-Frequency Characteristics of
    Wisconsin Streams” by J.F. Walker and W.R. Krug
    (2003). http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri034250/
    ◦ Step 1: Extract watershed parameters
    ◦ Step 2: Plug parameter values into Regional Regression
      Equations
   Layer was obtained
    from USGS
   Each region has a
    different set of
    regression
    equations
   Layer was obtained
    from USGS
   Weighted average
    of the watershed
   Original source:
    1:250,000 scale
    soil maps of
    Wisconsin (Hole et.
    al. 1968)
   Rainfall value
    determined at the
    watershed outlet
   Rainfall data from
    Huff and Angel,
    1992
   Snowfall was clipped
    from a nationwide
    grid from the Climate
    Source
   The same source data
    was used to create the
    snowfall contours in
    USGS Figure 2
   Snowfall value
    determined at the
    watershed outlet

     http://www.climatesource.com/us/fact_sheets/fact_snowfall_us.html
   USGS method is to
    determine forest and
    storage from the
    symbols shown on the
    USGS 24K quad maps
    (DRGs)
   Forest and Storage
    grids were developed
    from 1992 WISCLAND
    land cover
    classification for use
    in Arc Hydro
   Weighted average of
    the watershed
   After extracting parameters, run Regression
    Calculator from Arc Hydro
   Before applying to real-world situations,
    users should…
    ◦ Understand equation limitations
    ◦ Know the stand errors of estimate
    ◦ Be familiar with other calculation techniques listed
      in the USGS report
   Arc hydro link
    ◦ http://resources.arcgis.com/content/hydro-data-
      model
   Water resources
    ◦ http://www.esri.com/industries/water_resources/re
      sources/data_model.html
Stream Power Index
   Online Tutorial

http://wrc.umn.edu/randpe/agandwq/tsp/lida
 r/trainingvideos/index.htm
   Slope Raster (%) X Flow Accumulation
   LN (above)
   Symbology (is a guess yet…)
   Field proofing
   Tweak symbology
   Targeted Conservation
Lidar Point Cloud of Structures




               Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
                              Workshops 11/01/2012
                                    Slide courtesy of USGS
   Emergency Management
   Plat Book
   Zoning
   Stormwater
   Other
   ENVI EX 4.8 (www.excelisvis.com)
   ENVI, EX + IDL
   ArcGIS + 3D Analyst
   2010   6” Color Aerial
   2010   6” CIR Aerial
   2005   6” Black & White Aerial
   2005   LiDAR Data (stood alone)
   Acquisition
   Building Lean
   Intermediate Shapefile
   Angled Buildings
   Grid
Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
               Workshops      11/01/2012
Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
               Workshops      11/01/2012
Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
               Workshops      11/01/2012
Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
               Workshops      11/01/2012
Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall
               Workshops 11/01/2012
                     Slide courtesy of USGS
   Planimetrics
   Change Detection
   Land Use
   Wetland ID
Slides courtesy of:
Sauk County LCD
MN-DNR
NRCS
USGS



PRESENTER: JEREMY FREUND, P.E.
           OUTAGAMIE COUNTY LCD


            JEREMY.FREUND@OUTAGAMIE.ORG

More Related Content

Similar to LiDAR Data Gave Us 2’ Contours, Now What…?

Loesch - What Is LiDAR, Status In Minnesota
Loesch -  What Is LiDAR, Status In MinnesotaLoesch -  What Is LiDAR, Status In Minnesota
Loesch - What Is LiDAR, Status In Minnesota
Jose A. Hernandez
 
Google Earth for Land Use assessmet
Google Earth for Land Use assessmetGoogle Earth for Land Use assessmet
Google Earth for Land Use assessmet
Hrvoje Ujlaki
 
Caldwell community sustainability and land use policy
Caldwell community sustainability and land use policyCaldwell community sustainability and land use policy
Caldwell community sustainability and land use policy
GeCo in the Rockies
 
Alexander vega 2019_iop_conf._ser.__mater._sci._eng._603_022010
Alexander vega 2019_iop_conf._ser.__mater._sci._eng._603_022010Alexander vega 2019_iop_conf._ser.__mater._sci._eng._603_022010
Alexander vega 2019_iop_conf._ser.__mater._sci._eng._603_022010
jalexvega
 
WE1.L09 - AN OVERVIEW OF THE DESDYNI MISSION
WE1.L09 - AN OVERVIEW OF THE DESDYNI MISSIONWE1.L09 - AN OVERVIEW OF THE DESDYNI MISSION
WE1.L09 - AN OVERVIEW OF THE DESDYNI MISSION
grssieee
 
A GIS based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
A GIS based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...A GIS based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
A GIS based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
World Agroforestry (ICRAF)
 
A gis based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
A gis based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...A gis based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
A gis based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
World Agroforestry (ICRAF)
 
Introduction To and Arcaeological Apps of GIS
Introduction To and Arcaeological Apps of GIS Introduction To and Arcaeological Apps of GIS
Introduction To and Arcaeological Apps of GIS
Jo Dyson
 

Similar to LiDAR Data Gave Us 2’ Contours, Now What…? (20)

Loesch - What Is LiDAR, Status In Minnesota
Loesch -  What Is LiDAR, Status In MinnesotaLoesch -  What Is LiDAR, Status In Minnesota
Loesch - What Is LiDAR, Status In Minnesota
 
Msr apyouth
Msr apyouthMsr apyouth
Msr apyouth
 
Google Earth for Land Use assessmet
Google Earth for Land Use assessmetGoogle Earth for Land Use assessmet
Google Earth for Land Use assessmet
 
Remote sensing & gis
Remote sensing & gisRemote sensing & gis
Remote sensing & gis
 
Landuse landcover mapping
Landuse landcover mappingLanduse landcover mapping
Landuse landcover mapping
 
Sea-level rise and GIS
Sea-level rise and GISSea-level rise and GIS
Sea-level rise and GIS
 
Site Suitability For Construction(Dam)
Site Suitability For Construction(Dam)Site Suitability For Construction(Dam)
Site Suitability For Construction(Dam)
 
Operational Remote sensing Applications
Operational Remote sensing ApplicationsOperational Remote sensing Applications
Operational Remote sensing Applications
 
Caldwell community sustainability and land use policy
Caldwell community sustainability and land use policyCaldwell community sustainability and land use policy
Caldwell community sustainability and land use policy
 
Alexander vega 2019_iop_conf._ser.__mater._sci._eng._603_022010
Alexander vega 2019_iop_conf._ser.__mater._sci._eng._603_022010Alexander vega 2019_iop_conf._ser.__mater._sci._eng._603_022010
Alexander vega 2019_iop_conf._ser.__mater._sci._eng._603_022010
 
Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Remote Sensing Applications
Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Remote Sensing ApplicationsGreat Lakes Restoration Initiative Remote Sensing Applications
Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Remote Sensing Applications
 
Using LiDAR to Map Sinkholes (EPAN09)
Using LiDAR to Map Sinkholes (EPAN09)Using LiDAR to Map Sinkholes (EPAN09)
Using LiDAR to Map Sinkholes (EPAN09)
 
Soillimits_Assessment_2009 Irow_Portland
Soillimits_Assessment_2009 Irow_PortlandSoillimits_Assessment_2009 Irow_Portland
Soillimits_Assessment_2009 Irow_Portland
 
MODULE VII_ Remote Sensing_Avantika.pptx
MODULE VII_ Remote Sensing_Avantika.pptxMODULE VII_ Remote Sensing_Avantika.pptx
MODULE VII_ Remote Sensing_Avantika.pptx
 
WE1.L09 - AN OVERVIEW OF THE DESDYNI MISSION
WE1.L09 - AN OVERVIEW OF THE DESDYNI MISSIONWE1.L09 - AN OVERVIEW OF THE DESDYNI MISSION
WE1.L09 - AN OVERVIEW OF THE DESDYNI MISSION
 
Remote Sensing and GIS techniques.pptx
Remote Sensing and GIS techniques.pptxRemote Sensing and GIS techniques.pptx
Remote Sensing and GIS techniques.pptx
 
A GIS based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
A GIS based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...A GIS based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
A GIS based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
 
A gis based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
A gis based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...A gis based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
A gis based framework for assessing and mapping potential irrigation areas in...
 
Introduction To and Arcaeological Apps of GIS
Introduction To and Arcaeological Apps of GIS Introduction To and Arcaeological Apps of GIS
Introduction To and Arcaeological Apps of GIS
 
soil erosion modelling by RUSLE
soil erosion modelling by RUSLEsoil erosion modelling by RUSLE
soil erosion modelling by RUSLE
 

More from Wisconsin Land Information Association

Workshop using open source software for mobile data collection workshop - a...
Workshop   using open source software for mobile data collection workshop - a...Workshop   using open source software for mobile data collection workshop - a...
Workshop using open source software for mobile data collection workshop - a...
Wisconsin Land Information Association
 
Mapping spatial patterns of whai finder usage to measure community outreach e...
Mapping spatial patterns of whai finder usage to measure community outreach e...Mapping spatial patterns of whai finder usage to measure community outreach e...
Mapping spatial patterns of whai finder usage to measure community outreach e...
Wisconsin Land Information Association
 
Lakesheds and riverscapes extending wisconsin's hydro database with landsca...
Lakesheds and riverscapes   extending wisconsin's hydro database with landsca...Lakesheds and riverscapes   extending wisconsin's hydro database with landsca...
Lakesheds and riverscapes extending wisconsin's hydro database with landsca...
Wisconsin Land Information Association
 
Lake habitat mapping with side scan sonar in nine wisconsin lakes - christine...
Lake habitat mapping with side scan sonar in nine wisconsin lakes - christine...Lake habitat mapping with side scan sonar in nine wisconsin lakes - christine...
Lake habitat mapping with side scan sonar in nine wisconsin lakes - christine...
Wisconsin Land Information Association
 
Integrating sanitary televising data with utility gis data within the city of...
Integrating sanitary televising data with utility gis data within the city of...Integrating sanitary televising data with utility gis data within the city of...
Integrating sanitary televising data with utility gis data within the city of...
Wisconsin Land Information Association
 
Integrating high accuracy gps with esri's arc gis for windows mobile field so...
Integrating high accuracy gps with esri's arc gis for windows mobile field so...Integrating high accuracy gps with esri's arc gis for windows mobile field so...
Integrating high accuracy gps with esri's arc gis for windows mobile field so...
Wisconsin Land Information Association
 
Implementing arc gis 10.1 for the wisconsin dnr nhi portal levi felling
Implementing arc gis 10.1 for the wisconsin dnr nhi portal   levi fellingImplementing arc gis 10.1 for the wisconsin dnr nhi portal   levi felling
Implementing arc gis 10.1 for the wisconsin dnr nhi portal levi felling
Wisconsin Land Information Association
 

More from Wisconsin Land Information Association (20)

Airphoto anomilies
Airphoto anomiliesAirphoto anomilies
Airphoto anomilies
 
A wikimap of landscape values in the bad river watershed carl sack
A wikimap of landscape values in the bad river watershed   carl sackA wikimap of landscape values in the bad river watershed   carl sack
A wikimap of landscape values in the bad river watershed carl sack
 
Workshop using open source software for mobile data collection workshop - a...
Workshop   using open source software for mobile data collection workshop - a...Workshop   using open source software for mobile data collection workshop - a...
Workshop using open source software for mobile data collection workshop - a...
 
Wigicc's role in wisconsin jon schwitchtenberg
Wigicc's role in wisconsin   jon schwitchtenbergWigicc's role in wisconsin   jon schwitchtenberg
Wigicc's role in wisconsin jon schwitchtenberg
 
Wi 590 nutrient management web application lisa morrison
Wi 590 nutrient management web application   lisa morrisonWi 590 nutrient management web application   lisa morrison
Wi 590 nutrient management web application lisa morrison
 
Surveying and land records management dean roth
Surveying and land records management   dean rothSurveying and land records management   dean roth
Surveying and land records management dean roth
 
Mapping spatial patterns of whai finder usage to measure community outreach e...
Mapping spatial patterns of whai finder usage to measure community outreach e...Mapping spatial patterns of whai finder usage to measure community outreach e...
Mapping spatial patterns of whai finder usage to measure community outreach e...
 
Local gis in the statewide voter registration system sarah whitt
Local gis in the statewide voter registration system   sarah whittLocal gis in the statewide voter registration system   sarah whitt
Local gis in the statewide voter registration system sarah whitt
 
Li dar quality control a client's perspective - tyler grosshuesch
Li dar quality control   a client's perspective - tyler grosshueschLi dar quality control   a client's perspective - tyler grosshuesch
Li dar quality control a client's perspective - tyler grosshuesch
 
Li dar meets wisconsinview jc nelson
Li dar meets wisconsinview   jc nelsonLi dar meets wisconsinview   jc nelson
Li dar meets wisconsinview jc nelson
 
Lakesheds and riverscapes extending wisconsin's hydro database with landsca...
Lakesheds and riverscapes   extending wisconsin's hydro database with landsca...Lakesheds and riverscapes   extending wisconsin's hydro database with landsca...
Lakesheds and riverscapes extending wisconsin's hydro database with landsca...
 
Lake habitat mapping with side scan sonar in nine wisconsin lakes - christine...
Lake habitat mapping with side scan sonar in nine wisconsin lakes - christine...Lake habitat mapping with side scan sonar in nine wisconsin lakes - christine...
Lake habitat mapping with side scan sonar in nine wisconsin lakes - christine...
 
Integrative mapping strategies jeremy bixby
Integrative mapping strategies   jeremy bixbyIntegrative mapping strategies   jeremy bixby
Integrative mapping strategies jeremy bixby
 
Integrating sanitary televising data with utility gis data within the city of...
Integrating sanitary televising data with utility gis data within the city of...Integrating sanitary televising data with utility gis data within the city of...
Integrating sanitary televising data with utility gis data within the city of...
 
Integrating high accuracy gps with esri's arc gis for windows mobile field so...
Integrating high accuracy gps with esri's arc gis for windows mobile field so...Integrating high accuracy gps with esri's arc gis for windows mobile field so...
Integrating high accuracy gps with esri's arc gis for windows mobile field so...
 
Implementing arc gis 10.1 for the wisconsin dnr nhi portal levi felling
Implementing arc gis 10.1 for the wisconsin dnr nhi portal   levi fellingImplementing arc gis 10.1 for the wisconsin dnr nhi portal   levi felling
Implementing arc gis 10.1 for the wisconsin dnr nhi portal levi felling
 
Gis in parks and recreation the proragis website - trish nau
Gis in parks and recreation   the proragis website - trish nauGis in parks and recreation   the proragis website - trish nau
Gis in parks and recreation the proragis website - trish nau
 
Geo moose project update brian fischer
Geo moose project update   brian fischerGeo moose project update   brian fischer
Geo moose project update brian fischer
 
Elevation hydrology tools kent pena
Elevation hydrology tools   kent penaElevation hydrology tools   kent pena
Elevation hydrology tools kent pena
 
Developing mobile apps pick your poison - levi felling
Developing mobile apps   pick your poison - levi fellingDeveloping mobile apps   pick your poison - levi felling
Developing mobile apps pick your poison - levi felling
 

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Artificial Intelligence Chap.5 : Uncertainty
Artificial Intelligence Chap.5 : UncertaintyArtificial Intelligence Chap.5 : Uncertainty
Artificial Intelligence Chap.5 : Uncertainty
 
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
 
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
 
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
 
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin WoodPolkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
 
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemkeProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
 
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps ScriptAutomating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
 
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Deploy with confidence: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdg...
Deploy with confidence: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdg...Deploy with confidence: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdg...
Deploy with confidence: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdg...
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
Top 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live Streams
Top 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live StreamsTop 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live Streams
Top 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live Streams
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 

LiDAR Data Gave Us 2’ Contours, Now What…?

  • 1. LiDAR Data Gave Us 2’ Contours, Now What…?
  • 2. 1mb = 1,000 kb  1 gb = 1,000 mb  1 tb = 1,000 gb  2 Terrabytes = 1,428,571 3.5” floppy disks ◦ Today’s cost around $750.00  Stacked on top of one another = 2.5 miles high! ◦ And at the time, they cost $1.00+ MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 3. LiDAR Derived DEM Cell Size: 1 meter sq Vertical Error: 15 cm1 1.5 million points / sq mile 2.5 mi USGS Standard DEM Cell Size: 30 meter sq Vertical Error: “Equal to or better than 15 meters”2 1600 points / sq mile 1 Varies based on project specifications 2 http://edc.usgs.gov/guides/dem.html MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 4. LiDAR datasets tend to be very large ◦ LAS Format  All Returns – 4 Million points ~ 55 mb / square mile  Bare Earth – 3 million points ~ 45 mb / square mile ◦ ASCII Format  All Points – 4 million points ~ 75 mb / square mile  Bare Earth – 3 million points ~ 73 mb / square mile ◦ Grid Format  5 mb / square mile in integer format  11.2 mb / square mile in floating point format OC has over 300GB in raw data!!! Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 5. Water Resources Water Quality ◦ Floodplain mapping Watershed modeling ◦ Storm water management ◦ Drainage basin Wetland reconstruction delineation Land cover/land use ◦ Shoreline erosion mapping  Geology Forestry ◦ Sinkhole identification ◦ Geologic/geomorphic Forest characterization mapping Fire fuel mapping  Transportation Fish and Wildlife ◦ Road and culvert design ◦ Cut and fill estimation Management ◦ Archaeological site Drainage and water identification control  Agriculture Walk-in Accessibility ◦ Erosion control structure design Habitat Management ◦ Soils mapping Emergency ◦ Precision farming Management Debris removal Hazard Mitigation Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 6. Need licenses: ◦ ArcEditor/ArcInfo ◦ 3D Analyst ◦ Spatial Analyst  AP Framework  ArcHydro Extension  Data in same projection
  • 7. 3D Analyst Extension ◦ Manages 3D data ◦ Generates surfaces for use in ArcHydro  Spatial Analyst Extension performs the analyses
  • 8. LAS files (Common LiDAR Data Exchange) ◦ Stores a variety of point information  Number of returns  Return Number  Intensity  Classification  X,Y, Z values  Scan Direction  Scan Angle Rank  GPS Time Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 9. Intensity = amount of energy reflected for each return  Different surfaces reflect differently based on wavelength of laser  Example at 1064nm (NIR), water absorbs, vegetation highly reflective  Can be used to build black and white near-IR images 11/01/2012 Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops Slide courtesy of USGS
  • 10. Single Return  Multiple returns  Waveform Returns Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012 Slide courtesy of USGS
  • 11. Single Return 1st return  Multiple returns 2nd return  Waveform 3rd return Returns 4th return Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012 Slide courtesy of USGS
  • 12. Returns Single Return Multiple returns Waveform Returns Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012 Slide courtesy of USGS
  • 13. Classification – Points can be classified to reflect their ground condition Class Definition 0 Created, Never Classified 1 Unclassified 2 Ground 3 Low Vegetation 4 Medium Vegetation 5 High Vegetation 6 Building 7 Low Point (noise) 8 Model Key-Point (mass point) 9 Water 12 Overlap MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 14. Land & Water (LCD)
  • 15. Lidar in Red GPS Topo in Green Co urt es y of Sa uk Field was contour strip cropped so vegetation is not uniform which may Co account for some of the variability along the cross section. un ty
  • 16. Lidar in Red GPS Topo in Green The same cross section with lidar shifted down vertically 3”. Lidar may give absolute elevations slightly higher than referenced vertical datum, but relative elevations for similar land cover provide good results. Courtesy of Sauk County
  • 17. Mowed meadow and lawn land cover provided lidar elevations that matched absolute reference vertical datum elevations. Marsh (heavy vegetation, unmowed, not pastured) land cover provided lidar elevations higher than absolute reference vertical datum elevations. There is a lidar elevation shift when going from one land cover type to another, but most sites are typically of one land cover so Sauk County hasn’t considered it a significant issue. Courtesy of Sauk County
  • 18. * #SCBM2 Maple Creek Shots within 0.02’ relative to control.
  • 19.
  • 20. 50’ x 50’ Square Open Ground = 52 LIDAR Points (notice building point removal)
  • 21. 50’ x 50’ Square Woods = 16 LIDAR Points
  • 22. An 11.3 Acre Selection = 13,634 Points
  • 23. Great Planning tool  Engineering may require survey.  Shapefile limitation  Land Use limitation  Data maintenance
  • 24.
  • 25. Lidar data can be visualized a number of ways ◦ POINTS ◦ TERRAINS (ESRI) ◦ GRIDS (DEM or DSM) ◦ TINS ◦ CONTOURS MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 26. Create File Geodatabase  Convert LiDAR to multipoint feature class  Make a Terrain  Export rasters (i.e. DEM, Grid) for analysis
  • 27. Here’s our process: 1. Need 3D Analyst or Spatial Analyst for LIDAR Processing. 2. In ArcCatalog, right-clickNEWCreate a file geodatabase. 3. In Arc Catalog, right-click the named file geodata baseCreate a feature dataset and import County coordinate system for horizontal projection. 4. Choose vertical projection of LIDAR data (NAVD 88 for us) 5. In ArcCatalog Use 3D-Analyst ToolsConversionFrom File”ASCII 3d to Feature Class” tool to select tiles to process (careful over 6 tiles.) 6. In ArcCatalog, right-click the Feature DatasetNEWTerrain. 7. Follow the Terrain Wizard. We let GIS Calculate the Pyramids. 8. In ArcCatalog Use 3D-Analyst ToolsConversionFrom Terrain”Terrain to Raster” tool to convert Terrain to a DEM. (3 min./tile) 9. For hydrology, “CELLSIZE 15” seems to be good compromise. 10. For Cross-Section work, may want to use 3D-Analyst ToolsConversionFrom Terrain”Terrain to TIn” tool to convert Terrain to a TIN. 11. A county-wide terrain and DEM may need to run over the weekend.
  • 28. Per ESRI, a terrain dataset is a multiresolution, TIN- based surface built from measurements stored as features in a geodatabase.  Terrains reside in the geodatabase, inside feature datasets with the features used to construct them.  Terrains have participating feature classes and rules, similar to topologies. Common feature classes that act as data sources for terrains include the following: ◦ Multipoint feature classes of 3D mass points such as lidar ◦ 3D point and line feature classes, i.e. breaklines ◦ Study area boundaries that define the bounds of the terrain dataset
  • 29. Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012 Slide courtesy of USGS
  • 30. From the 3D Analyst Tools, double-click the Terrain To Raster geoprocessing tool to open it.  Input Terrain ◦ add the terrain dataset  Output Raster ◦ specify the location where the raster dataset is to be created. ◦ Recommend including grid size in name  Output data type ◦ Either 32-bit floating point or 32-bit integer. ◦ Floating point is the default value.
  • 31. Interpolation method ◦ Either Linear or Natural Neighbors. ◦ Both are TIN-based interpolation methods applied through the triangulated terrain surface. ◦ The Linear option finds the triangle encompassing each cell center and applies a weighted average of the triangle's nodes to interpolate a value. ◦ The Natural Neighbors option uses the Voronoi neighbors of cell centers. ◦ Consider the natural neighbors method for interpolating a terrain surface. ◦ Natural neighbor interpolation takes longer processing time; however, the generated surface is much smoother than that produced with a linear interpolation. It is also less susceptible to small changes in the triangulation.
  • 32. Sampling Distance ◦ Either Observations or Cellsize, which controls the horizontal resolution of the raster. ◦ Observations method  calculates the cell size based on the set value this number represents and the number of cells you want on the longest edge of the raster surface. ◦ Cellsize method  You set the cell size explicitly  i.e. “CELLSIZE 15” outputs a raster with 15’ square representing the surface.
  • 33. Resolution ◦ The resolution parameter indicates which pyramid level of the terrain dataset to use for conversion. ◦ To output a raster dataset at full resolution, set this parameter to 0.  To extract a subset of the terrain, click the Environments button on the bottom of the geoprocessing tool. Click the General Settings tab and define the extent of the output DEM.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37. DEM Cellsize Matters  TIN vs. DEM  Terrain (represents, no labels, resolution)  Shapefile  Land Use Matters  2’ as base.
  • 38.
  • 39. A data infrastructure for storing and integrating hydro data within ArcGIS ◦ A set of hydro objects ◦ A set of standardized attributes ◦ A vocabulary for describing data ◦ A toolset for data model applications
  • 41. 1. Terrain Preprocessing – topographic and hydrographic layers 2. Location specific layers – generated by the user 3. Statewide parameter layers – used for flood flow prediction
  • 42.
  • 43. Multiple ways of representing elevation ◦ Contours and points (Vector) ◦ Triangulated irregular network (TIN) ◦ Digital elevation model (Raster)  Each has advantages and disadvantages  DEM is used for Arc Hydro terrain analysis and watershed delineation
  • 44. DEMs have become a common way of representing elevation where every grid cell is given an elevation value. This is allows for very rapid processing and supports a wide-array of critical analyses.
  • 45. Cell size Number of rows NODATA cell (X,Y) Number of Columns
  • 46. Each cell usually Graphical stores the average elevation of grid cell  Alternatively, it may store the value at the center of the grid cell 67 56 49 Elevations are Digital  53 44 37 presented graphically in shades or colors 58 55 22
  • 47. Spurious sinks ◦ Spurious sinks are a byproduct of the DEM creation / interpolation process ◦ Spurious sinks ought to be removed  True sinks ◦ Some landscapes have natural depressions ◦ e.g. pothole lakes ◦ True sinks may be retained or removed  Sinks are removed by raising the elevation of the sink to the elevation of the outlet
  • 48. DEM with unfilled sinks DEM with filled sinks Depth of sink Images from ESRI Map Book Gallery http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume19/conservation5.html Sinks that are removed (filled) will contribute to downstream flow
  • 49. New Arc Hydro tools available to screen, evaluate, and leave / remove true sinks (in the exercise, all sinks will be filled)
  • 50. Graphical 67 56 49 2 2 4 Digital 53 44 37 1 2 4 58 55 22 128 1 2 Elevation Flow Direction
  • 51. 32 64 128 16 1 8 4 2
  • 52. Flow accumulation is the number of upstream grid cells that contribute flow to 2 2 4 0 0 0 a given grid cell  Calculated from 1 2 4 0 3 2 flow direction 128 1 2 0 0 8 Flow Direction Flow Accumulation
  • 53. Streams are defined from the flow accumulation grid based on a threshold  Reclassify grid ◦ If [Cell] > Threshold Then [Cell]=Stream ◦ If [Cell] < Threshold Then [Cell]=Not Stream
  • 54. All the cells in a particular segment have the same grid code that is specific to that segment
  • 56. Arc Hydro uses AGREE 100 method to “burn-in” streams Original Surface  Adjusts elevation of DEM 90 Modified Surface based on input vector line features 80  Drop/raise elevation of cells corresponding to lines by Elevation (m) 70 smoothdrop  Buffer lines by 60 smoothdistance  Elevation of cells inside 50 buffer are adjusted to a straight line from edge of 40 buffer to line.  Drop/raise the elevation of 30 the cells corresponding to the lines by sharpdrop 20 40 60 80 0 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Lateral Distance (m)
  • 59. Difference between LiDAR data and 30-meter DEM ◦ LiDAR is detailed enough to show road grades / ditches ◦ More effort required to burn proper drainage paths  Burn short segments at culvert crossings
  • 60.
  • 61.
  • 62.
  • 63. Catchment – the area draining to a single segment of stream between two junctions  Subwatershed – the drainage area between two user defined drainage points  Watershed – the entire drainage area upstream of a user defined drainage point
  • 64. Catchment Grid Delineation – creates a grid of catchment areas draining into each stream segment  Catchment Polygon Processing – coverts catchments into a polygon feature class  Adjoint Catchment Processing – For each catchment that is not a head catchment, a polygon representing the whole upstream area draining to its inlet point is constructed
  • 65. 1. Terrain Preprocessing – topographic and hydrographic layers 2. Location specific layers – generated by the user 3. Statewide parameter layers – used for flood flow prediction
  • 66. WatershedPoint – user defined outlet point  Watershed – resulting watershed polygon  LongestFlowPath3D – longest flowpath line  Slp1085Point – points at 10 and 85 percent along the longest flowpath (used for slope calculation)
  • 67. Rainfall-runoff model: HEC-HMS ◦ Run a synthetic/observed storm over a subdivided watershed model ◦ HEC-GeoHMS extension can be used to set up model geometry  Flood-Frequency Characteristics – based on the USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 03- 4250, “Flood-Frequency Characteristics of Wisconsin Streams” by J.F. Walker and W.R. Krug (2003). http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri034250/ ◦ Step 1: Extract watershed parameters ◦ Step 2: Plug parameter values into Regional Regression Equations
  • 68.
  • 69. Layer was obtained from USGS  Each region has a different set of regression equations
  • 70. Layer was obtained from USGS  Weighted average of the watershed  Original source: 1:250,000 scale soil maps of Wisconsin (Hole et. al. 1968)
  • 71. Rainfall value determined at the watershed outlet  Rainfall data from Huff and Angel, 1992
  • 72. Snowfall was clipped from a nationwide grid from the Climate Source  The same source data was used to create the snowfall contours in USGS Figure 2  Snowfall value determined at the watershed outlet http://www.climatesource.com/us/fact_sheets/fact_snowfall_us.html
  • 73. USGS method is to determine forest and storage from the symbols shown on the USGS 24K quad maps (DRGs)  Forest and Storage grids were developed from 1992 WISCLAND land cover classification for use in Arc Hydro  Weighted average of the watershed
  • 74. After extracting parameters, run Regression Calculator from Arc Hydro  Before applying to real-world situations, users should… ◦ Understand equation limitations ◦ Know the stand errors of estimate ◦ Be familiar with other calculation techniques listed in the USGS report
  • 75.
  • 76. Arc hydro link ◦ http://resources.arcgis.com/content/hydro-data- model  Water resources ◦ http://www.esri.com/industries/water_resources/re sources/data_model.html
  • 78. Online Tutorial http://wrc.umn.edu/randpe/agandwq/tsp/lida r/trainingvideos/index.htm
  • 79. Slope Raster (%) X Flow Accumulation  LN (above)  Symbology (is a guess yet…)
  • 80.
  • 81.
  • 82. Field proofing  Tweak symbology  Targeted Conservation
  • 83.
  • 84. Lidar Point Cloud of Structures Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012 Slide courtesy of USGS
  • 85. Emergency Management  Plat Book  Zoning  Stormwater  Other
  • 86. ENVI EX 4.8 (www.excelisvis.com)  ENVI, EX + IDL  ArcGIS + 3D Analyst
  • 87. 2010 6” Color Aerial  2010 6” CIR Aerial  2005 6” Black & White Aerial  2005 LiDAR Data (stood alone)
  • 88. Acquisition  Building Lean  Intermediate Shapefile  Angled Buildings  Grid
  • 89.
  • 90.
  • 91.
  • 92.
  • 93.
  • 94.
  • 95.
  • 96. Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 97. Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 98. Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 99. Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012
  • 100. Courtesy of MN GIS/LIS Fall Workshops 11/01/2012 Slide courtesy of USGS
  • 101.
  • 102.
  • 103.
  • 104.
  • 105.
  • 106.
  • 107. Planimetrics  Change Detection  Land Use  Wetland ID
  • 108.
  • 109. Slides courtesy of: Sauk County LCD MN-DNR NRCS USGS PRESENTER: JEREMY FREUND, P.E. OUTAGAMIE COUNTY LCD JEREMY.FREUND@OUTAGAMIE.ORG