CAMM presentation for Cyber Security Gas and Oil june 2011
1. Managing risks in the supply chain 19 June, 2011 Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com 1 Vladimir Jirasek CAMM Steering Group Twitter @vjirasek
2. People do not fully trust The Cloud People say that they are concerned that their information is not secure in The Cloud
3. Is the Cloud Secure? 19 June, 2011 Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com 3 Can be as secure as any other IT system Depends on the model chosen Understand the responsibilities All eggs in one basket is the real question Implicit trust on provider Exit and lock-in
4. Problem to be solved – trust in the supply chain 19 June, 2011 Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com 4 Suppliers for the cloud provider Your business Your cloud provider End to end assurance
5. What a CIO want 19 June, 2011 Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com 5 Provider A Provider B Maturity levels feed into a supplier selection process
6. 19 June, 2011 Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com 6 CAMM MISSIONProvide an objective framework to transparently rate and benchmark the capability of a selected solution to deliver information assurance maturity across the supply chain
7. Overall structure of CAMM components 19 June, 2011 Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com 7 TPAC Final maturity scores Mapping to other standards Free GRC app Scoring model Non CAMM audit results Maturityscores Weightingframework WorkBench App Audited controls Controls framework Auditors
8. Utilize your current investmentto an another standard e.g. ISO The Statement Of Applicability (SOA) of source standard is used as a baseline for translation CAMM Guidance documents will help auditors with ”yellow” area intepretations 19 June, 2011 Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com 8 Souce standard Target standard e.g. ISO 2700x SOA CAMM Translate Not implemented > to be CAMM audited Auditor intepretation of applicability 1=1 applicable, no need of intepretation
9. Stakeholders Consumers – Can form trust relationship based on understantable facts Companies – Can form trustworthy supply chains to provide real trustworthiness to consumers & other customers Governents – Canhavemore confidence in corporategovernance to remove barriers from global single e-markets Service Providers & Consultancies – Can buildcompetences to achieve the target Industry Associations – can excel in defining harmonized model implementations Consumer Government CAM Commitee
10. Progress It is anticipated for the initial set of COMMON controls and associated guidance to be completed by Q4 2011. The following details the key milestones: Major client, standards and service provider organisations engaged Development of framework and appropriate weighting mechanism underway Development of the framework Control framework created and reviewed Scoring model created Development of the guidance Guidance material to be completed by end of October 2011 Pilot Pilot with major organisation planned for summer 2011 Development of Free GRC tool Major GRC vendor engaged to ad CAMM module
Editor's Notes
Security very important issue to peopleBut look at other areas – vendor lock-inAt the same time business teams (marketing) go to cloud services with their credit cards – as IT is tooooo slow
Picture kindly taken from a Microsoft presentationProbably more secure than your local IT – but how to measure thatRisk cannot be outsourced to cloud – so how to measure what the riks with the cloud provider, type and delivery model isIf I use IaaS I still am responsibel for application mangement and potentially OS management