• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
School reform project vs2
 

School reform project vs2

on

  • 2,290 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,290
Views on SlideShare
2,290
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
19
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    School reform project vs2 School reform project vs2 Presentation Transcript

    • School Reform Project
      Critical Analysis of Schools
      and Educational Practice
      ESED 9132
      Spring 2010
      Cathy Griffin
    • Three Major Issues
      Closing the Achievement Gap & No Child Left Behind Act
      Accountability
      Standardized Testing
    • Where’s the Gap?
      Between white and minority children.
    • NCLB Truths and Consequences
    • Is NCLB Legislation the Solution?
      Key Factors of Concern Regarding NCLB Legislation
      • The goal has been set that by the year 2014 the achievement gap will no longer exist
      • High-stakes standardized testing has been implemented to monitor student achievement
      • Free tutoring must be offered by schools that do not meet NCLB standards.
      • Federal funding will be provided to support research-based teaching strategies
      • More choices for parents will be offered for students who attend schools that do not meet NCLB standards
      (No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 2001)
    • Pros, Cons & Alternatives of NCLB?
      Pros:
      • Improved test scores since implementation
      • Decreases in achievement gap
      • Increases in highly qualified teachers
      • Additional testing has helped to identify low-performing students
      • Increases in the number of schools attaining AYP status.
      (Ramsay, 2008), (No Child Left Behind's 5th Anniversary, 2007), (Jehlen, 2007)
    • Pros, Cons & Alternatives of NCLB?
      Cons:
      • Program funding is lacking each year
      • Multiple choice testing is the only measure of student performance
      • Since math and reading are the target areas, other subject areas are being neglected
      • Teachers are being forced to tech to the test
      • Educators are punished for working in high-risk schools
      • All students regardless of their native language or ability level are held to the same standards
      (Ramsay, 2008), (No Child Left Behind's 5th Anniversary, 2007), (Jehlen, 2007)
    • Pros, Cons & Alternatives of NCLB?
      Alternatives:
      • Provide multiple assessment criteria to allow students to show mastery and achievement
      • Smaller class sizes
      • Support programs that encourage parental and community involvement
      • Acknowledge educators who show significant gains in student achievement
      (Ramsay, 2008), (No Child Left Behind's 5th Anniversary, 2007), (Jehlen, 2007)
    • Who Should Be Held Accountable?
      According to NCLB, schools are held accountable for making adequate yearly progress (AYP) based on guidelines created, and implemented by each individual state (Carey, 2007).
    • Pros, Cons & Alternatives ~ Accountability
      Pros:
      • Disaggregation of data by subgroups helps schools to center attention on problem areas
      • School systems are being forced to take a closer look at their low-performing students and design new programs to assist with closing the achievement gap
      • School systems are required to publish their accountability reports which keeps the community informed
      (Carey, 2007)
    • Pros, Cons & Alternatives ~ Accountability
      Cons:
      • Each state dictates what their standards should look like. If you live in Alabama versus Georgia, you have widely differing levels of student achievement criteria
      • Goals for student achievement are unrealistic given such a short time span
      • Schools showing huge gains may still be labeled as not making AYP
      • A small subgroup of students could possibly cause an entire school to not make AYP
      (Carey, 2007)
    • Pros, Cons & Alternatives ~ Accountability
      Alternatives:
      • Instead of tracking students from one grade to the next longitudinally, a successive comparison. For example comparing 6th grade students from 2009 to 6th grade students from 2010 would be more informative (Linn, 2005).
      • Standardize minimum requirements for state standards
      • Create attainable goals
      • Create accountability measures that include achievement gains.
      (Carey, 2007)
    • Standardized Testing as the ONLY Determining Factor in Student Achievement.
      Definition: “Standardized Test – a form of measure that has been normed against a specific population”
      (A Glossary of Measurement Terms, ERIC Digest, 1989)
    • Pros, Cons & Alternatives ~
      Standardized Testing
      Pros:
      • Great tool for teachers to use to guide their instruction
      • Comparisons can be made across groups to help track student performance
      • Can help analyze the effectiveness of new programs
      (Neill & Peterson, 1999)
    • Pros, Cons & Alternatives ~
      Standardized Testing
      Cons:
      • As the definition suggests, standardized testing has been “normed against a specific population” (A Glossary of Measurement Terms, ERIC Digest, 1989). Where does that leave our minority populations?
      • “…parents are often the first to understand that the complexity of their child cannot be captured by a test score”(Neill & Peterson, 1999).
      • One snapshot, on one day, out of 180 days of learning does not give an accurate picture of student achievement
    • Pros, Cons & Alternatives ~
      Standardized Testing
      Alternatives:
      • Use a variety of assessment tools to generate a more holistic view of student performance
      • Student performance portfolios collecting work samples and data throughout the year will give a much clearer picture of overall student achievement
      • Performance task based assessments where students are able to “show what they know”
      (Neill & Peterson, 1999)
    • Closing the Achievement Gap, Accountability and Standardized Testing
      What is the Impact on our
      Teaching Professionals?
    • The Impact on Teaching Professionals
      Pros:
      • Teachers are more cognizant of and willing to try new, research-based teaching strategies
      • Teachers are learning to use student dada to drive their instruction, rather than the chapter number in a textbook
      • Teachers are receiving more high-quality professional development to help enhance instruction and student engagement
      • High standards are set for teacher qualifications
      • School report cards keep the community informed of what is taking place in their local schools
      (White, 2010).
    • The Impact on
      Teaching Professionals
      Cons:
      • High-stakes testing is creating a teaching profession that is being forced to teach to the test
      • Proper funding has not been made available to comply with all of the NCLB requirements
      • High standards set for teacher qualifications are causing a shortage of teachers in lower income schools
      • There is a failure to address many issues that affect low achievement including: “class size, old and damaged school buildings, hunger and homelessness, and lack of health care: (White, 2010).
    • Continued: The Impact on Teaching Professionals
      • Educators are more frustrated than ever at their lack of autonomy in their own classrooms coupled with feelings of insignificance when it comes to determining what is best for their students
      • Subjects other than math and reading are taking a back seat
      • Educators are no longer considered the experts in the field of education
    • What is the Impact on Students?
    • What is the Impact on Students?
      Pros:
      • Student achievement has never been more closely monitored due in part to data driven instruction; therefore much needed differentiation of instruction is easier to identify
      • Students who attend a school that is not making AYP has the option to transfer to another school
      • Students who attend a school that is not making AYP are given tutoring opportunities
      (Staff, 2008)
    • What is the Impact on Students?
      Cons:
      • Students are bombarded with so many tests throughout the year that they lose sight of why they are in school
      • Our special education students are often being held to standards that are not attainable based on their particular disability; this can be devastating for the child
      • Our limited English proficiency students are required to take the standardized test in a language that they have yet to master which results in merely a test of their English language skills rather than their achievement within the content areas
      • Students no longer see the relevance in what they are learning other than to pass a test
      (Harper, 2005)
    • What is the Impact on Society?
    • What is the Impact on Society?
      Pros:
      • Society has access to more specific details about their local schools and schools across the country
      • More attention is being paid to exactly what is taught in our public schools
      • Greater emphasis is being paid to low-performing schools
      • Teacher qualifications are being raised in the hopes of acquiring a quality teaching force in each school
      • Test scores in math and reading have improved
      (Jennings & Rentner, 2006)
    • What is the Impact on Society?
      Cons:
      • Little evidence has been shown that parents are taking advantage of school choice or that this component is helping to raise student achievement
      • Testing of our special education and limited English proficiency student populations have come under much scrutiny
      • Lack of Federal funding to promote many of the required school programs is creating a burden on local schools, PTA’s, parents and teachers
      (Jennings & Rentner, 2006)
    • One Middle School Math Teacher’s Perspective on NCLB, Standardized Testing and Accountability as it Relates to My Teaching, My Students, My School and the Community.
    • Where Do I Stand?
      Pros:
      • I am enjoying much more quality staff development from our county which helps me keep my teaching current and relevant
      • Learning how to use data to drive my instruction has benefitted my teaching and subsequently my student’s learning
      • Since the implementation of NCLB legislation and becoming a Title I school, we have put into action many new programs to help our struggling students and get parents and community members involved
      • Math test scores are rising slightly every year
    • Where Do I Stand?
      Cons:
      • I fear that the time I spend teaching my students how to take the standardized test is taking away from precious time and energy better spent on meaningful learning
      • There is no time in the curriculum calendar for students to explore math conceptually
      • Students no loner find value in what they learn other than attaining a good test score
      • Lack of autonomy causes me great frustration when it comes to planning and implementing my lessons
    • Continued: Where Do I Stand?
      Cons:
      • We are encouraged to differentiate instruction however the standardized test does not account for this much needed differentiation
      • My special education students are left feeling like failures when they often don’t pass the state test; even though they may have shown tremendous growth
      • There is no room in the curriculum calendar for “teachable moments”
      • The community looks unfavorably on our school due to its low SES and the fact that we are a Title I school
      • Although accountability should occur at all levels of education, ultimately the teachers take the brunt of the “blame”
    • My Plan For Change
      In a Perfect World, What Would My School Look Like?
    • My Plan For Change
      • Smaller class sizes to assist with our students varying learning styles and offer more one-on-one instruction.
      • Introduce a curriculum that has a much narrower focus allowing for delving deeper into each standard.
      • Create strong relationships with parents and community members; get them involved
      • Allow for some “breathing room” when it comes to the requirements and standards for each content area. Permitting more “teachable moments” to be discovered and explored
      • Leave room for more creativity and critical thinking in the classroom
      • Consent to offer students more opportunities to study humanities and the arts.
      • Incorporate time in the school day to explore new technology
    • What Can I Do Right Now?
      • Continue to speak out and get involved in the decision-making at my local school and in the community
      • Continue to share with and encourage my colleagues to use best practices in their classrooms
      • Create more opportunities for parents to get involved in the school and their child’s education
      • Stay abreast of and give input into curriculum decisions being made within our county
      • Continue to advocate for smaller class sizes
      • Continue to research strategies and implement activities that foster creativity and critical thinking while still teaching the required standards
      • Voice my opinion with regard to education whenever the opportunity arises, no matter how small and inconsequential my vote may seem!
    • What Are My Possible Challenges or Roadblocks?
      • Based on previous years’ experience, parental involvement has been the biggest roadblock to much of what we would like to accomplish at our school
      • The biggest impact on student achievement could be made if we could overcome this one obstacle
      • Fear. Change and going against the norm is often obstructed by fear of the unknown and fear of failure.
    • What Resources and Support Will I Need?
      • Parental support will be crucial - I am in contact with parents not only through the students that I teach but also through initiatives put in place through Title I
      • Community support - I am in regular contact with many community leaders already through initiatives put in place for Title I
      • Teacher buy-in - I am in a position to assist and inspire teachers through my position as a math coach
      • Student buy-in – I believe this will come naturally as students see teachers, administrators, parents and community members working together for their school
    • What Will It Take To Keep the Momentum Going?
      Community
      Teachers
      Students
      Parents
      Administration
      Elected Officials
      Working Together
    • Click Once and then Be Patient! 
      "Every hour spent on such exam preparation is an hour not spent helping students to become critical, creative, curious learners." Alfie Kohn
      "Would a child who spent every day doing basketball drills without ever having the joy of playing a game of basketball enjoy basketball enough to become good at it?" Lalia Kerr
      "If more testing were the answer to the problems in our schools, testing would have solved them a long time ago." Bill Goodling, chair of House Education Committee
      "'Teaching to the test' [is] a practice likened to memorizing an eye chart. With enough drill and rote work, even a person with 20/150 vision can rattle off 'E-F-P-T-O-Z'. Of course this doesn't mean that person can truly see." Meredith Scrivner
      "In America, no child should be left behind. Every child should be educated to his or her own full potential." President George W. Bush
      "If I were to compare the agendas of teachers and the agendas of test publishers, the bottom line for teachers is always kids. For test publishers it's money. For politicians, it is votes. Who do you want to trust your child's learning to? George Bush, Prentice Hall, STAR test, or a teacher with a strong sense of commitment to the welfare of children?" Nancy Haas
      "I'm thinking about letting us have a scream day sometime in March, when we just go outside and scream," anonymous Louisiana teacher
      "Education ceases to be learning when the 3 R's are read, remember, and regurgitate." "Boston Public" character of student protester
      "Education is not a preparation for life...education is life itself". John Dewey
      "Anyone can confirm how little the grading that results from examinations corresponds to the final useful work of people in life." Jean Piaget
      "Believing we can improve schooling with more tests is like believing you can make yourself grow taller by measuring your height." Robert Schaeffer of FairTest
      "What we want is to see the child in pursuit of knowledge and not knowledge in pursuit of the child." George Bernard Shaw
      "Not everything that counts can be counted and not everything that can be counted counts." Albert Einstein
    • Works Cited
      A Glossary of Measurement Terms. ERIC Digest. (1989). Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Ericae.net Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation: http://ericae.net/edo/ed315430.htm
      Carey, K. (2007, November 13). The Pangloss Index: How States Game the No Child Left Behind Ac. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Education Sector: http://www.educationsector.org/research/research_show.htm?doc_id=582446
      Harper, L. (2005, August 21). No Child Left Behind's Impact on Specialized Education. Retrieved April 6, 2010, f rom PBS News Hour: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/indepth_coverage/education/no_child/impact.html
      Jehlen, A. (2007, February). NCLB: The Sequel. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from National Education Association: http://www.nea.org/home/11528.htm
      Jennings, J., & Rentner, D. S. (2006, November). Ten Big Affects of the No Child Left Behind Act on Public Schools. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Center on Education Policy: http://www.education.uiowa.edu/cea/documents/NCLB-TenBigEffects.pdf
      Linn, R. L. (2005, Summer). Fixing the NCLB Accountability System. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from CRESST National Center for Research: http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/policy/cresst_policy8.pdf
      Neill, M., & Peterson, B. (1999, Spring). Alternatives to Standardized Tests. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Rethinking Schools Online: http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/13_03/assess.shtml
      No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2001). Retrieved April 6, 2010, from http://ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/4pillars.html
      No Child Left Behind's 5th Anniversary. (2007, January). Retrieved April 6, 2010, from US Department of Education: http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/importance/nclb5anniversary.html
      Ramsay, J. (2008). The Controversy: Has NCLB Been Successful or Has It Failed? Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Care To Vote 08': Getting Smart About Getting Smart: http://www.carleton.edu/departments/educ/Vote/pages/Pros_and-Cons.html
      Staff, G. S. (2008). What the No Child Left Behind Law Means for Your Child. Retrieved April 9, 2010, from Great Schools: http://www.greatschools.org/improvement/quality-teaching/no-child-left- behind.gs?content=61&page=1
      Test Quotes. (2010). Retrieved April 10, 2010, from Students Against Testing: http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.whatkidscando.org/archives/images/featurestories/directorytop.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.whatkidscando.org/archives/featurestori es/yodirectory.html&usg=__mfhfZ4C8MEMTy3sRYy_RNackRLk=&h=350&w=475&sz=64&hl=en
      White, D. (2010). Pros and Cons of No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from About.com US Liberal Politics: http://usliberals.about.com/od/education/i/NCLBProsCons_2.htm