Grassroots corporate philanthropy - driven by employees and supported by employers - is on the rise. This paper discusses how corporate philanthropy is changing, how it affects employee engagement and loyalty, and how that in turn delivers a demonstrable ROI over the medium and long term.
2. OVERVIEW
Corporate philanthropy programs which invove high levels of employee
participation: We all know they seem like a good idea, and HR specialists will
tell you that they make a difference to the organization in all kinds of ways.
But do these āgrassrootsā giving back programs in fact translate into improved
business success?
In terms of HR and recruiting specifically, do these programs increase the "Allowing employees to
level of 'employee engagement', resulting in easier recruiting, improved link arms and give back
retention, and increased productivity? collectively is a simple way
to inspire your workforce."
Drawing a straight line to ROI Peggy Pelosi, Founder
It can be difficult to establish a clear correlation between grassroots giving ORENDA
back programs and the bottom line, especially for small and mid-sized
organizations who don't have complex research tools and resources in-house.
So Head2Head decided to assess our own āHead2Head Gives Backā
program: By examining our own program, surveying our employees, and
reviewing current research, we can better understand the role of grassroots
giving back programs in overall business success.
Why produce this whitepaper?
Itās our hope that our experiences can serve as an example for other smaller,
entrepreneurial organizations to come up with their own grassroots giving
back programs. Weāve tried to pull together some data, too, to help convince
the bean counters that this kind of thing is more than a āfeel goodā exercise ā
and demonstrate that itās good for the business!
What do we mean by 'Grassroots Giving Back' programs?
We're using the term 'grassroots' to refer to corporate philanthropy initiatives
which involve high levels of employee participation at a grassroots (bottom-
up) level. This is distinct from traditional corporate philanthropy, which tends
to be 'top-down'-driven, with little or no involvement by employees on a day-
to-day basis, and results in a large cheque being presented (and maybe a
hospital wing named after someone titan of industry).
3. TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................. 2
Drawing a straight line to ROI .......................................................................... 2
Why produce this whitepaper?......................................................................... 2
What do we mean by 'Grassroots Giving Back' programs? ............................. 2
CORPORATE PHILANTHROPY IS CHANGING ........................................................ 4
'Giving back' is a key element of celebrities' personal brand ........................... 4
More awareness, of more causes, than ever before .............................................. 4
Grassroots zeitgeist: from teenagers to office culture..................................... 5
The Gen Y influence .............................................................................................. 5
The 'lean living' movement ..................................................................................... 5
Charity begins in the workplace: The value of corporate philanthropy to business
success .................................................................................................................. 6
The connection between philanthropy and stakeholder behaviour .................. 6
Employee engagement .................................................................................... 6
Employee engagement translated into dollars and cents ................................ 7
What does this mean for HR and recruiting? ......................................................... 7
Of particular note to recruiters: ........................................................................ 7
THE HEAD2HEAD GIVES BACK PROGRAM ............................................................ 9
Why we created H2H Gives Back .......................................................................... 9
Well, for starters, it's the Right Thing To Do .................................................... 9
Responsiveness to employees and other stakeholders................................... 9
Recruitment thought leadership ....................................................................... 9
Brand-building for a growing company .......................................................... 10
Grassroots Giving Back programs increase 'buzz' ........................................ 10
PROGRAM DETAILS ................................................................................................ 11
Choosing the charity ............................................................................................ 11
The initiatives ....................................................................................................... 11
Initiative #1: āEvery Hour Countsā .................................................................. 11
Initiative #2: āDo Your Own Thingā................................................................. 11
SURVEY OF EMPLOYEES ....................................................................................... 14
Preferred charities to support ............................................................................... 15
WHAT WEāVE LEARNED SO FAR ........................................................................... 16
CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... 18
The impact on recruiting and HR ......................................................................... 18
ABOUT HEAD2HEAD ............................................................................................... 19
4. CORPORATE PHILANTHROPY IS CHANGING
Corporate philanthropy isnāt a new idea: since the late 1800s, barons of
industry have been writing cheques to worthy causes, and having buildings,
hospitals and university chairs named in their honour. After all, thereās no
better PR opportunity than a big photo of yourself handing over a $10 million
cheque to some worthy organization, or thousands of people seeing your
name in huge letters on the side of a hospital.
'Giving back' is a key element of celebrities' personal brand
In todayās media climate, where net worth and salaries of businesspeople and
celebrities are common knowledge, itās more important than ever for well-
known, successful media figures to be seen to be 'giving back'. The success
of mega-stars like Oprah Winfrey, Brangelina, Bill Gates and Madonna
depends, to a large extent, on people 'liking' them - and it's hard to stay
popular when everyone knows you made $47 million last year and kept it all
to yourself. Whether it's starting a foundation (like Bill Gates), establishing a
school for underprivileged children (Oprah), or being a UN Goodwill
Ambassador (Angelina Jolie), involvement with charitable causes is now a
INCREASED
crucial element of a celebrity's personal brand.
AWARENESS
For the average worker, however, charity hasnāt historically been
part of their day-to-day work environment: In an effort to
prevent employees from losing productivity to non-work-related
activities, many companies banned charity in the workplace. LEAN LIVING
GEN Y IN THE
(Because let's face it: none of us want to be hounded by co- MOVEMENT
WORKPLACE
workers to buy their kids' Girl Guide cookies or sponsor their
bowlathon or donate to their church bake sale.)
But this is changing. In the past few years, increased awareness,
the influx of Gen Y into the workforce, and the recent trend towards 'lean
living', have combined to create an environment in which 'business' and
'charity' are no longer mutually exclusive within the workplace.
More awareness, of more causes, than ever before
We may decry the non-stop newscycle - the websites, blogs, social network
media, instant access to breaking news - which streams information at us
24/7, on a global scale, but it's had a significant consequence: the average
person in a first-world country today is more aware of more social and
community challenges than ever before, whether those challenges are around
the corner or around the world.
5. Grassroots zeitgeist: from teenagers to office culture
In many ways, this increased awareness started with teenagers: teens,
always ready to get passionate about something, were the first hard-core
adopters of the internet, which gave them access to information about āsocial
injusticesā (always a popular rallying point for teens), and in the late 90s we
saw more and more teens organizing fundraisers for Tibetan monks, food
drives at school, and even participating in reality shows which involve sending
them to third-world countries to build schools and infrastructure. "I don't think the
American Dream of
owning the biggest car is
The Gen Y influence contributing to a higher
According to USA Today, 61% of people aged 13-25 feel personally quality of lifeā¦"
responsible for making a difference in the world. Additionally, ā69% consider
Dominic Mishio, University of
a companyās social and environmental commitment when deciding where to
Alberta student
shop, and 83% will trust a company more if it is socially/environmentally
responsible.ā
Most importantly, 79% said they āwant to work for a company that cares about
how it affects or contributes to society.ā
Since Gen Y represents a sought-after demographic in terms of the workforce
(recession or no recession, there are still more people leaving the workforce
at the older end of the spectrum than entering at the younger end), their
desires and beliefs have assumed an increased importance in the workplace.
In many ways itās their commitment to activism and social causes which has
helped to drive the movement towards corporate giving back programs in the
past few years.
The 'lean living' movement
Environmentalism and the recession have combined to produce a new trend:
leaner living. The blogophere now abounds with stories of people who are
living on less: feeding themselves on $100 monthly food budgets (by growing
some of their own), abandoning their SUVs for Priuses,increasing their visits
to libraries instead of buying more video games ā getting and spending as
much as possible is no longer necessarily the defacto goal.
The leaner living approach involves reducing and reusing ā which means that
more co-workers are arranging clothing drives, garage sales, etc., with the
proceeds often going to good causes.
This in turn is beginning to translate into office culture: in the past 12 months,
weāve seen an increase in RFP (Request for Proposals) that specifically
require information about environmental initiatives and corporate giving back
initiatives as part of the criteria upon which organizations are choosing
suppliers for big contracts.
6. CHARITY BEGINS IN THE WORKPLACE: THE VALUE
OF CORPORATE PHILANTHROPY TO BUSINESS
āCorporate philanthropy
SUCCESS can be an effective tool
It's great that more and more people believe that giving back is just as for companies that are
important between 9 and 5 as it is at home, but what does this mean for trying to meet consumersā
business? After all, without business success, there wouldn't be anything in rising expectations of the
the coffers to 'give back', anyway. role businesses should
play in society.ā
The connection between philanthropy and stakeholder behaviour McKinsey Quarterly study,
The Walker Information Council on Foundations study (2002) found that February 2008
stakeholders of organizations with high CPI (Corporate Philanthropy Index)
ratings tend to engage in behaviours which ālead directly to the companyās
bottom line success.ā
Stakeholders of organizations with high CPIs tend to:
Recommend the company and its products and services
Believe the companyās reputation is excellent
Continue to do business with, work for, or invest in the company
Say they are committed to the organization, and would
recommend it as a good place to work and with which to do
business
Be truly loyal (committed to the company and planning to
continue the relationship)
For our purposes, the last three bullet points are really the most important:
when employees perceive the organization to have a high CPI, they tend to
be more engaged with the organization ā which in turn affects recruiting,
retention, and productivity.
Employee engagement
A review of the Gallup Studies regarding employee engagement and
business performance found that employee turnover is reduced and
productivity is increased when the employee feels that:
The organization cares about him/her
There is a strong mission/purpose
The organization is a āfriendā
The organization is committed to quality
The organization provides opportunities to learn and grow
Whatās more, the Gallup studies found a demonstrable relationship between
employee engagements and business unit success: business units at the 95th
percentile of employee engagement improve their odds of success by 42%
7. over the median business unit (and by 145% over the business units at the 5th
percentile).
Employee engagement translated into dollars and cents
The Gallup data review allows us to extrapolate to attach dollar values to
employee engagement by translating business unit success, customer
satisfaction and employee turnover into hard costs.
Assume a 100-person business unit or organization, with $20 million in
revenue:
Difference between
organization with low
employee engagement and Annualized cost
one with high employee
engagement
Turnover 4-8% $125,000
Customer
satisfaction 2-3% $400,000-$600,000
Productivity 5-60% $1,000,000+
Profitability
measures 2% $400,000
SOURCE: Adapted/extrapolated from Table 9.3 in āWell-Being in the Workplace and its
Relationship to Business Outcomes: A Review of the Gallup Studiesā, 2002.
What does this mean for HR and recruiting?
We can actually draw a straight line from grassroots giving back programs to
employee engagement ā and to a demonstrable effect on the bottom line.
Corporate giving Greater employee Itās possible to Which means that
back programs engagement has attach specific corporate giving
lead to greater a demonstrable dollar values to back programs
employee effect on turnover, turnover, have an impact
engagement retention and retention and on the bottom line
productivity productivity
Of particular note to recruiters:
One of the factors not specifically mentioned - but which we know is at play -
is that companies with greater employee engagement tend to generate more
candidate referrals than other organizations. And we all know that referrals
8. from current and former employees typically deliver a larger percentage of A-
list candidates, faster, than any other sourcing method. So establishing a
grassroots giving back program means that ultimately, recruiting becomes
faster, easier and cheaper - and delivers a better quality of hire in the longer
term.
9. THE HEAD2HEAD GIVES BACK PROGRAM
In January 2008, Head2Head implemented the 'Head2Head Gives Back'
program.
The program was designed to reflect Head2Headās corporate philosophy that
Before there was H2H Gives
bringing the entrepreneurial spirit of small business to community-minded Back, we
initiatives can have benefits for everyone: employees, the business, and the
charitable organizations involved. Got involved with our
clients' causes (such as
Virgin Unite)
Why we created H2H Gives Back Donated to SickKids
Hospital instead of
sending Christmas cards
Well, for starters, it's the Right Thing To Do Supported (with
As a very fast-growing company (in 2000, we were 'two guys in a basement'; sponsorship or time off)
by 2008, we had grown to $15 million in annual revenue, with 35 employees employees who
in 3 offices across Canada), we've always believed in giving back to the participated in activities
community (see box at right). like a run for cancer
Provided internships for
So in many ways, H2H Gives Back was really just a formal acknowledgement new Canadians and
recent grads through
of something we were doing already. Establishing it as an 'official' program - CareerBridge and
and giving it a logo, brand identity and a name - was a good way of raising CareerEdge
the profile of our endeavours. By keeping it top-of-mind with employees, we Donated used office
knew we'd increase employee engagement - and the program would deliver supplies to non-profit
an even better experience to our employees. organizations
Offered donations to the
charity of their choice in
Responsiveness to employees and other stakeholders lieu of referral rewards
Each year, Head2Head recruiters place more than 13,000 people in new jobs,
which means weāre interacting with hundreds of candidates every year. Over
the past 12-18 months, we've seen a marked increase in the number of
candidates who tell us that grassroots corporate philanthropy programs are
increasingly important to them, and play a role in their decisions about
working for specific organizations.
Recruitment thought leadership
As the only company in Canada which focuses on providing on-site recruiters-
by-the-hour ā and several other unique recruiting-related offerings in the
Canadian and North American marketplace ā Head2Head has always been
seen as an innovative organization. Our network of more than 4000
recruiters across Canada puts us in a unique position to be connected to
more up-to-date recruiting information than anyone else ā so it made sense
for us to be ahead of other recruiting organizations in terms of establishing a
grassroots giving back program.
10. Brand-building for a growing company
As a smaller ($15 million revenue), newer (Head2Head was founded in 2000)
organization, the brand-building advantages of a corporate philanthropy
program are obvious: it gives us something to talk about in the marketplace,
to clients, consultants, candidates and other stakeholders.
Grassroots Giving Back programs increase 'buzz'
Recruiters have always known that A-list candidates and employees are likely
to know other A-list candidates - which is why more than 72% of Canadian
recruiters say that referrals from current or former employees are the single
most important source of great candidates. What's more, a company with a
strong referral network spends less time and money on sourcing, recruitment
advertising, recruiting agencies and other recruiting-related services.
In other words, word-of-mouth - the 'buzz' - is crucial to recruiting success.
As we've seen with companies like Google and Virgin - which have such
strong 'giving back' attributes in their consumer and recruitment brands -
establishing grassroots philanthropy can dramatically increase the 'buzz'
about your organization. As we often say: "Go ahead - talk about us behind
our backs!"
11. PROGRAM DETAILS
The āHead2Head Gives Backā Program was officially launched in January of
2008. The structure was to be a series of discrete initiatives, determined on
an ad hoc basis.
Choosing the charity
Initially, we chose a single organization (SEDI: Social and Economic
Development Initiatives) as the beneficiary of our initiatives. This seemed like
a good fit: weāre a recruiting company, and one of SEDIās goals is to put
people back into the workforce.
However, it turned out to be a poor fit: SEDIās typical donors tended to give
$100,000+ ā making us a very, very small potential player ā and the majority
of our employees simply couldnāt emotionally engage with SEDI, which
seemed too corporate and insufficiently immediate to capture their
imagination.
A poll of employees determined that while everyone wanted to help
community organizations ā regardless of what the organization was ā
opinions were sharply divided as to whether that organization should be local,
national international; focused on children, disease, social injustice ā
everyone had a different opinion.
So after our initial initiative (āEvery Hour Countsā, described below), we
decided to let employees choose the charity/organization(s) about which they
felt most passionate.
The initiatives
Initiative #1: āEvery Hour Countsā
In March 2008, Head2Head donated 25 cents from every hour worked by our
100+ consultants to SEDI. We were happy with this program insofar as it
raised more than $4500 for SEDI, but because it didn't have a strong
employee involvement component, it didn't create the positive 'buzz' we'd
hoped for.
Initiative #2: āDo Your Own Thingā
For our second initiative, we wanted to do something which would maximize
employee participation - and let us have some fun in the process.
So we came up with 'Do Your Own Thing': Between September 15-
December 15, 2008, employees were encouraged to come up with creative
12. ways to raise money for causes they believed in, and Head2Head would
match any funds they raised.
We had only one restriction: You could raise money for whatever cause you
felt most passionate about, but in order to be eligible for the 'matching funds',
the organization had to have a registered charity number in Canada.
Otherwise, employees could do whatever they wanted - the more creative, the
better.
We also offered an incentive to encourage competition: at the end of the
initiative, the employee or group of employees (they could work individually or
in teams) which had raised the most money would each receive a paid day
off.
We had a lot of fun with this one: as an entrepreneurial company, our
employees like coming up with interesting ideas and areenthusiastic with the
follow-through, including:
Thursday wing days
For a 25-cents-per-wing surcharge, one of our senior CRM Specialists would
deliver hot wings to your desk every Thursday at lunch. The surcharge was
donated to SickKids Hospital (25 cents per wing really adds up - we made
$200!).
The Jessarelle Boutique
Three employees - whose combined names formed 'Jessarelle' - asked
friends and family to donate their new/gently used designer clothes and
cosmetics, then hosted the 'Jessarelle Boutique' on a Friday afternoon. H2H-
ites sipped champagne while purchasing items such as Christian Louboutin
shoes and Burberry shirts for a fraction of their retail price. We're a fashion-
conscious group - the boutique raised more than $400 for women's shelters.
Coffee Concierge
Throughout the 3-month period, the Head2Head recruiting team ran
coffee/snack runs each morning and afternoon. For a donation of $1, they'd
pick up your coffee at Starbucks or your afternoon doughnut from Tim
Horton's. This became a very popular service, and raised more than $200. (Of
all the Do Your Own Thing initiatives, this is the one we'll miss the most -
there have already been requests to make this a permanent function!)
Echo Jibe jewellery sale
Our Director of Sales and Operations has a sister who is a professional
jewellery designer, under the name Echo Jibe. She and her sister hosted two
jewellery events, with 10% of sales donated to the Heart & Stroke
Foundation. Total raised? $150!
13. 24-Hour Food Sort with the Daily Bread
Each year in October, the Daily Bread food bank runs the 24-Hour Food Sort
event: Teams of 10 from Toronto-area businesses compete to see who can
sort the most food in 2.5 hours. The H2H team - looking like colourblind
bumblebees in their orange-and-blue striped shirts - worked fast and came in
4th in their time slot! More importantly, the Daily Bread Food Bank received
$500, and much-needed help sorting almost 100,000 pounds of food.
Ongoing initiative: The H2H DVD Club
A great example of the āliving leanā idea: Head2Head employees were
encouraged to bring in their own DVDs. Then co-workers could borrow them
ā at a cost of $1 per DVD. All the money earned is to be given to the
Canadian Liver Foundation (because the Managing Partner who started and
runs this initiative has a sister who recently had a liver transplant). Initially
designed to be a part of the Do Your Own Thing initiative, this didnāt start until
after DYOT ended, and shows no signs of winding down, 3+ months later.
Upcoming initiative: āGet Canned!ā
A humourous response to the recession, this initiative (May 2009) will see
Head2Head donate a canned good to the Daily Bread Food Bank for every
candidate who comes to our office for an interview. If candidates choose to
bring their own canned good (which will have no bearing on the success of
their interview or potential hire), Head2Head will donate two canned goods.
We hope to generate more than 500 canned goods over the course of the
month.
14. SURVEY OF EMPLOYEES
In our research ā both in terms of grassroots corporate philanthropy initiatives
and in the measurement of their efficacy ā we discovered that while everyone
speaks anecdotally to the positive response of employees regarding these
programs, very few publicize the actual response of their employees.
In an effort to help other organizations understand the potential benefits of
this kind of program, we surveyed our employees ā and present our findings
here. āAmazing program, gave a
sense of community, team
Demographics of respondents: work and high levels of
ethics, and was lots of
57% aged 30-39 (so the majority are NOT Gen Ys)
fun. Which is what I
43% aged 25-29
believe Head2Head
48% in the workforce for 5-10 years
stands for.ā
33% in the workforce for 11-20 years
Remainder in the workforce for less than 5 years Head2Head employee
(survey respondent)
Response highlights:
86% indicated that corproate giving/community involvement programs
were important
43% indicated they were āvery importantā
No respondents indicated they were ānot importantā
Almost 70% agreed that these programs were important to them
More than 80% said that a corproate giving back program was
something they told their friends and family about
Only one person agreed with the statement that ācharity does not
belong in the workplaceā
Almost 60% agreed with the statement that āThese programs are a
good indication about whether a company is forward-thinking and a fun
place to work.ā
Somewhat surprising findings:
Almost 20% disagreed with the statement that corporate giving back
programs were a factor in their decision to work for an organization ā
and almost 50% indiated they were āneutralā on the subject
More than 10% indicated that involving the employees in a program like
this was less powerful than the company just writing a cheque
15. Preferred charities to support
We asked respondents which sorts of organizations/causes they most liked to
support. Predictably, we got a variety of answers (we let them choose more
than one):
Types of organizations employees most wanted to support
(% of total - more than one selection allowed)
It doesn't matter
Other
Global disease-related organizations
Global community organizations
Animal-related organizations
Canadian community organizations
Canadian disease-related organizations
Local community organizations
Child-based organizations
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Other comments and feedback
After 3 months of the āDo Your Own Thingā initiative, employees felt a
little frustrated that their co-workers were constantly asking them for
money for something
Most respondents wanted to see the Do Your Own Thing program
continued on a year-round basis
The total dollar amounts raised might have been small, but it set up a
culture of āgiving backā which continues outside of formal initiatives (for
example, one employee started a clothing drive for abused women
trying to get back into the workforce)
We offered time off to support volunteer commitments, but very few
employees took us up on it. This age group (mostly under 40s) are so
focused on work/family that they donāt feel they have the time to devote
to volunteering
16. WHAT WEāVE LEARNED SO FAR
With only a handful of initiatives under our belt, we still feel that we are very
much at the beginning of our corproate āgiving backā project, so we hesitate to
draw too many hard-and-fast conclusions based on our experiences and
employee responses to date.
However, we have learned some lessons in the past 15 months:
Employees tend to be more enthusiastic when they are working
for a cause they believe in (rather than one which has been
imposed from the top down)
Initiatives which get everyone involved tend to be more
successful than those which are tied to some other factor (Do
Your Own Thing was more successful than Every Hour Counts ā
because DYOT required individual participation)
Itās very important to avoid the appearance of āforcingā
participation, because this can cause even previously
enthusiastic participants to feel negative
Itās imperative for senior leadership to set the tone ā and the
example. The Do Your Own Thing initiative had a slow start ā
until a couple of senior leadership team members initiated their
own activities
Itās imperative for senior leadership to appear involved (if thereās
a clothing drive, they should bring donations; if there is a
bowlathon, they need to show up). When senior players donāt
participate, employees become cynical (āOh, I guess this was a
publicity stunt after all ā they donāt really care about this stuff at
allā¦ā) and the program can lose momentum
Donāt expect the charities involved to care about what youāre
doing. We initially thought that the local organizations especially
would be excited about what we were doing. They werenāt. We
donāt know whether this was because they didnāt really
understand what we were doing, or whether the dollar amounts
involved were simply too low, or whether they are leery of
aligning with a for-profit organization. Either way, donāt expect a
lot of support or enthusiasm from this channel
Expect to be in this for the long-term. Donāt expect that one
month-long initiative is going to change your corporate culture
17. forever, or that employees will immediately get on board. Donāt
blame them ā itās tough not to be cynical in this economy! If you
continue to implement, encourage and support grassroots giving
back initiatives ā and if senior leadership sets an example ā youāll
eventually see a workforce who is fully committed to the idea and
wholeheartedly participates.
There will be demonstrable business benefits in the long-term.
Head2Head has low turnover (which is particularly good given
our industry and the relative youth of our employee base) and
high employee engagement rates. We know that the H2H Gives
Back program is one of the reasons for this. Can we draw a
straight line from our initiatives to ROI yet? No ā but we fully
expect to be able to in the future.
18. CONCLUSIONS
Our original purpose in preparing this document was to help other small and
mid-sized organizations chart their own path in terms of creating, establishing
and tracking a grassroots giving back program.
With that in mind, we offer the following conclusions:
Employee engagement has a demonstrable effect on the bottom line
Grassroots āgiving backā programs are the form of corporate philanthropy
most likely to have a positive effect on employee engagement
In today's marketplace, organizations can not hope to establish themselves
as 'best in class' unless they have some kind of formalized grassroots
giving back program (distinct from whatever big corporate sponsorship may
be taking place at a C-suite level)
The actual dollar value of the money raised isn't particularly important.
Employees will be more excited about $250, if they helped raise it
themselves, than they will be about $250,000 in which they had no
participation
The impact on recruiting and HR
In the current recruiting and talent marketplace, it's more important than ever
to (a) secure the best talent (because if you've laid off a lot of workers, you
need the remaining employees to be top performers); and (b) keep recruiting
costs to a minimum by mobilizing a strong recruitment brand and network.
So there's no better time to create and establish a grassroots giving back program.
The money and resources spent on this now will deliver demonstrable cost, quality
and efficiency metrics in the long-term.
19. ABOUT HEAD2HEAD
With a network of more than 4000 recruitment consultants across Canada,
and more than 350 clients ā including market leaders such as Microsoft,
Virgin Mobile, Accenture and Effem , Head2Head is North Americaās leading
provider of on-site recruiters.
Since 2000, Head2Head has been providing innovative recruiting solutions
informed by some of the best recruiting thinking in the industry. Our
Recruiter2Recruiter.ca is the only online resource created especially for
Canadian recruiting professionals, featuring articles, tools and templates
designed to help recruiters look like rockstars and organizations get the most
out of their recruitment function.
For more information about this report, or any other information about
Head2Head, please contact:
Sarah Welstead
Director, User Experience
Head2Head Inc.
31 Davisville Avenue
Toronto, ON
M4S 1G3
416.440.2043
sarah@head2head.ca
Check us out online:
Follow us on Twitter! http://twitter.com/RecruitingH2H
Get HotJobs on our Facebook application: http://tinyurl.com/H2HFacebook
Read the blog: http://www.head2head.ca/blog.php