More Related Content Similar to other colleges SAR PPT presentation for purpose of using Similar to other colleges SAR PPT presentation for purpose of using (20) other colleges SAR PPT presentation for purpose of using1. CriteriaNo. Criteria Mark/Weightage
Program Level Criteria
1. Vision,MissionandProgramEducationalObjectives 50
2. ProgramCurriculumandTeaching–LearningProcesses 100
3. Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 175
4. Students’Performance 100
5. FacultyInformationandContributions 200
6. FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport 80
7.
ContinuousImprovement
75
Institute Level Criteria
8.
FirstYearAcademics
50
9. StudentSupportSystems 50
10. Governance,InstitutionalSupportandFinancialResources 120
Total 1000
SAR Contents
2. Criteria/
Sub.crit
eriaNo.
Particulars
Max.
Score
1 Criterion1:Vision,Mission and Program Educational
Objectives (60)
60
1.1 State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute 5
A Availability of the Vision and Mission statements of the Department (1)
B Appropriateness/Relevance of the Statements (2)
C C. Consistency of the Department statements with the institution statements (2)
1.2 StatetheProgramEducationalObjectives(PEOs) 5
1.3 IndicatewhereandhowtheVision,MissionandPEOs
arepublishedanddisseminatedamongstakeholders
10
1.4 StatetheprocessfordefiningtheVisionandMissionoftheDepartment,andPEOsof
theprogram
25
1.5 EstablishconsistencyofPEOs withMissionoftheDepartment 15
3. 2 Criterion2:Program Curriculum and Teaching–Learning Processes (120) 120
2.1 Program Curriculum (20) 20
2.1.1 State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University curriculum for
a t t a i n i n g t h e P r o g r a m Outcomes(POs) and Program Specific Outcomes(PSOs),
mention the identified curricular gaps, if any
10
2.1.2 State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the attainment of POs
and PSOs.
10
2.2 Teaching-Learning (100) 100
2.2.1 Describe the Process followed to improve quality of Teaching Learning 25
2.2.2 Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and Evaluation. 20
2.2.3 Qualityofstudentprojects 25
2.2.4 Initiativesrelated toindustryinteraction 15
2.2.5 Initiativesrelatedtoindustryinternship/summertraining 15
4. 3 Criterion3:CourseOutcomesandProgramOutcomes(120) 175
3.1 Establish thecorrelationbetween thecoursesandthePOs&PSOs 25
3.2 AttainmentofCourseOutcomes75 75
3.2.1
Describetheassessmenttoolsandprocessesusedtogatherthedatauponwhichtheevalu
ationofCourseOutcomeis
Based
10
3.2.2 RecordtheattainmentofCourseOutcomesofallcourseswithrespecttosetattainmentlev
els
65
3.3 ttainmentofProgramOutcomesandProgramSpecificOutcomes75 75
3.3.1 Describeassessmenttoolsandprocesses usedforassessingthe attainmentofeachof
thePOs&PSOs
10
3.3.2 ProvideresultsofevaluationofeachPO & PSO 65
5. 4 Criterion4:Students’Performance(100) 10
0
4.1 EnrolmentRatio 20
4.2 SuccessRateinthestipulatedperiodoftheprogram20 20
4.2.1 SuccessratewithoutbackloginanySemester/yearofstudy 15
4.2.2 Successrateinstipulatedperiod(actualdurationoftheprogram)[Totalofwithbac
klog+withoutbacklog]
5
4.3 AcademicPerformanceinSecondYear 10
4.4. Placement,HigherstudiesandEntrepreneurship 30
4.5 ProfessionalActivities20 20
4.5.1 Professionalsocieties/chaptersandorganizingengineeringevents 5
6. Criteria/
Sub.criteri
aNo. Particulars
Max.Sc
ore
Availia
blescor
e
1 Criterion1:Vision,MissionandProgramEducationalObjectives(50) 50 50
1.1 StatetheVisionandMissionoftheDepartmentandInstitute 5 5
1.2 StatetheProgramEducationalObjectives(PEOs) 5 5
1.3 IndicatewhereandhowtheVision,MissionandPEOs arepublishedanddisseminatedamongstakeholders 15 15
1.4 StatetheprocessfordefiningtheVisionandMissionoftheDepartment,andPEOsoftheprogram 15 15
1.5 EstablishconsistencyofPEOs withMissionoftheDepartment 10 10
2 Criterion2:ProgramCurriculumandTeaching–LearningProcesses(100) 100 100
2.1 ProgramCurriculum30 30 30
2.1.1 Statetheprocessfordesigningtheprogramcurriculum 10 10
2.1.2 StructureoftheCurriculum 5 5
2.1.3 StatecurriculumthecomponentsoftheCurriculum 5 5
2.1.4 StatetheprocessusedtoidentifyextentofcomplianceofthecurriculumforattainingtheProgramOutcomes(POs)&ProgramSpecificOutcomes(PSOs) 10 10
2.2 Teaching-LearningProcesses70 70 70
2.2.1 DescribetheProcessfollowedtoimprovequalityofTeachingLearning 15 15
2.2.2 Qualityofendsemesterexamination,internalsemesterquestionpapers,assignmentsandevaluation 15 15
2.2.3 Qualityofstudentprojects 20 20
2.2.4 Initiativesrelated toindustryinteraction 10 10
2.2.5 Initiativesrelatedtoindustryinternship/summertraining 10 10
3 Criterion3:CourseOutcomesandProgramOutcomes(175) 175 175
3.1 Establish thecorrelationbetween thecoursesandthePOs&PSOs 25 25
3.2 AttainmentofCourseOutcomes75 75 75
3.2.1
DescribetheassessmenttoolsandprocessesusedtogatherthedatauponwhichtheevaluationofCourseOutcomeis
based 10 10
3.2.2 RecordtheattainmentofCourseOutcomesofallcourseswithrespecttosetattainmentlevels 65 65
3.3 ttainmentofProgramOutcomesandProgramSpecificOutcomes75 75 75
3.3.1 Describeassessmenttoolsandprocesses usedforassessingthe attainmentofeachof thePOs&PSOs 10 10
3.3.2 ProvideresultsofevaluationofeachPO & PSO 65 65
4 Criterion4:Students’Performance(100) 100 89.56
4.1 EnrolmentRatio 20 20
4.2 SuccessRateinthestipulatedperiodoftheprogram20 20 11.72
4.2.1 SuccessratewithoutbackloginanySemester/yearofstudy 15 6.9
4.2.2 Successrateinstipulatedperiod(actualdurationoftheprogram)[Totalofwithbacklog+withoutbacklog] 5 4.82
4.3 AcademicPerformanceinSecondYear 10 10
4.4. Placement,HigherstudiesandEntrepreneurship 30 27.84
4.5 ProfessionalActivities20 20 20
4.5.1 Professionalsocieties/chaptersandorganizingengineeringevents 5 5
PART-B:Criteria Summary
Name of the program: Electronics and Communication Engineering
7. 9 Criterion9:StudentSupportSystems(50) 50
9.1 Mentoringsystemtohelpatindividuallevel 5
9.2 Feedbackanalysisandreward/correctivemeasurestaken,ifany 10
9.3 Feedbackonfacilities 5
9.4 Self–Learning 5
9.5 CareerGuidance,Training, Placement 10
9.6 EntrepreneurshipCell 5
9.7 Co-curricularandExtracurricularActivities 10
8. 10 Criterion10:Governance,InstitutionalSupportandFinancialResources(120) 120
10.1 Organization,GovernanceandTransparency55 55
10.1.1 StatetheVisionandMissionoftheInstitute 5
10.1.2 AvailabilityoftheInstitutionalStrategicPlananditsEffectiveImplementationandMonitoring 25
10.1.3
Governingbody,administrativesetup,functionsofvariousbodies,servicerulesprocedures,recruitmentandp
romotionalpolicies. 10
10.1.4 Decentralizationinworkingandgrievanceredressalmechanism 5
10.1.5 Delegationoffinancialpowers 5
10.1.6 Transparencyandavailabilityofcorrect/unambiguousinformationinpublicdomain 5
10.2 BudgetAllocation,Utilization,andPublicAccountingatInstitutelevel15 15
10.2.1 AdequacyofBudgetallocation 5
10.2.2 Utilizationofallocatedfunds 5
10.2.3 Availabilityoftheauditedstatementsontheinstitute’swebsite 5
10.3 ProgramSpecificBudgetAllocation,Utilization30 30
10.3.1 Adequacyofbudgetallocation 10
10.3.2 Utilizationofallocatedfunds 20
10.4 LibraryandInternet20 20
10.4.1 Qualityoflearningresources(hard/soft) 10
10.4.2 Internet 10
GrossTotal 1000
9. 9 Criterion9:StudentSupportSystems(50) 50 50
9.1 Mentoringsystemtohelpatindividuallevel 5 5
9.2 Feedbackanalysisandreward/correctivemeasurestaken,ifany 10 10
9.3 Feedbackonfacilities 5 5
9.4 Self–Learning 5 5
9.5 CareerGuidance,Training, Placement 10 10
9.6 EntrepreneurshipCell 5 5
9.7 Co-curricularandExtracurricularActivities 10 10
10 Criterion10:Governance,InstitutionalSupportandFinancialResources(120) 120 120
10.1 Organization,GovernanceandTransparency55 55 55
10.1.1 StatetheVisionandMissionoftheInstitute 5 5
10.1.2 AvailabilityoftheInstitutionalStrategicPlananditsEffectiveImplementationandMonitoring 25 25
10.1.3
Governingbody,administrativesetup,functionsofvariousbodies,servicerulesprocedures,recruitmentandpromotio
nal
policies.
10 10
10.1.4 Decentralizationinworkingandgrievanceredressalmechanism 5 5
10.1.5 Delegationoffinancialpowers 5 5
10.1.6 Transparencyandavailabilityofcorrect/unambiguousinformationinpublicdomain 5 5
10.2 BudgetAllocation,Utilization,andPublicAccountingatInstitutelevel15 15 15
10.2.1 AdequacyofBudgetallocation 5 5
10.2.2 Utilizationofallocatedfunds 5 5
10.2.3 Availabilityoftheauditedstatementsontheinstitute’swebsite 5 5
10.3 ProgramSpecificBudgetAllocation,Utilization30 30 30
10.3.1 Adequacyofbudgetallocation 10 10
10.3.2 Utilizationofallocatedfunds 20 20
10.4 LibraryandInternet20 20 20
10.4.1 Qualityoflearningresources(hard/soft) 10 10
10.4.2 Internet 10 10
GrossTotal 1000 986.42
NBA-ECE-Self Evaluation report
Editor's Notes CriteriaNo.
Criteria
Mark/Weightage
Program Level Criteria
1.
Vision,MissionandProgramEducationalObjectives
50
2.
ProgramCurriculumandTeaching–LearningProcesses
100
3.
CourseOutcomesandProgramOutcomes
175
4.
Students’Performance
100
5.
FacultyInformationandContributions
200
6.
FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport
80
7.
ContinuousImprovement
75
Institute Level Criteria
8.
FirstYearAcademics
50
9.
StudentSupportSystems
50
10.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportandFinancialResources
120
Total
1000