course evaluation report

1. Course Evaluation Report - Version 3.0 - 2022
1
FKTM -
Mekanikal
FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
COURSE EVALUATION REPORT
Course Code/ Name MMJ12503 Computer Programming
Academic Session/ Semester 2021/2022 sem 1
Course Coordinator Dr. Mohd Zakimi bin Zakaria
Lecturers Dr. Tan Wee Choon
Teaching Engineer -
Assistant Engineer -
Division Electric & Electronic
Number of Students 138
1. COURSE ASSESSMENTS
Table 1: Course Outcomes (CO) Assessments Matrix
Course Outcome, CO
Level of
Complexity
Assessment components & contribution
Examina
tions
(0%)
Continual Assessment (100%)
Final
Exam
(0%)
Lab
Test
(40%)
Quiz
(25%)
Assign.
(35%)
CO1:
Ability to construct C
programs with the
desired input/ output.
Cognitive
C3 Applying
Psychomotor
P5 Complex
Overt
Response
Lab
test
1Q1
Quiz 1
Assignm
et 1
CO2:
Ability to construct C
programs with control
structure and looping.
Cognitive
C3 Applying
Psychomotor
P5 Complex
Overt
Response
Lab
test
1Q2
Quiz 2
Assignm
et 2
CO3:
Ability to construct C
programs with
functions and numeric
Cognitive
C3 Applying
Psychomotor
P5 Complex
Lab
test 2
Quiz 3
Assignm
et 3

2. Course Evaluation Report - Version 3.0 - 2022
2
Course Outcome, CO
Level of
Complexity
Assessment components & contribution
Examina
tions
(0%)
Continual Assessment (100%)
Final
Exam
(0%)
Lab
Test
(40%)
Quiz
(25%)
Assign.
(35%)
arrays. Overt
Response

3. Course Evaluation Report - Version 3.0 - 2022
3
2. COURSE OUTCOMES ATTAINMENT ANALYSIS
Table 2: Course Outcomes Attainment Analysis
(Copy and paste (paste as picture) from iGrading 4.0)
3. STUDENT’S COURSE DELIVERY EVALUATION
No. Of Respondents: 126 respondents
(i) Course Evaluation
No ITEM SCORE (%)
A1 The course has developed my interest in the subject 82
A2 The course has given me a good understanding of the subject 84
A3 The course was well organized 86
A4 The handouts/exercises/assessments given were adequate 84
A5 The workshops/seminars/tutorials/practices/etc. were useful 86
A6 I have achieved Course Outcomes No. 1 85
A7 I have achieved Course Outcomes No. 2 83
A8 I have achieved Course Outcomes No. 3 79
AVERAGE 83.6
(ii) Teaching Evaluation
No ITEM SCORE (%)
B1 The course syllabus was presented clearly to the class 87
B2 The lecturer demonstrated knowledge and competence in the subject matter 87
B3
The lecturer gave sufficient practices to test my understanding of concepts and
principles
87
B4 Corrected assignments and tests were made available to the students 87
B5 The lecturer was punctual for classes 91
B6 The lecturer is easily available for consultation 90
B7 Overall, I would rate the lecturer’s performance as very good 89
AVERAGE 88.3

4. Course Evaluation Report - Version 3.0 - 2022
4
(iii) Lab Evaluation
No ITEM SCORE (%)
C1 Labs help me in understanding course concepts and principles (theory) 85
C2 Labs help me understanding application of theory 85
C3 Lab tests and presentation help me in understanding course theory 84
C4 The PLV is very helpfull 86
C5 The PLV is punctual for labs 89
C6 The PLV demonstrated knowledge & competence in the subject matter 87
C7 Corrected lab reports and tests were made available to the students 88
C8 Overall, I would rate the PLV’s performance as very good 87
AVERAGE
86.4
(iv) Summary
No Evaluation Score (%) Satisfactory
1 Course 83.6 √
2 Teaching 88.3 √
3 Laboratory 86.4 √
Average 86.1
COURSE COORDINATOR EVALUATION REPORT
COURSE OUTCOME ATTAINMENT
(Copy and paste (paste as picture) from iGrading 4.0)
77.84
63.52
55.69
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
CO1 CO2 CO3
%
Course Outcome
CO Attainment

5. Course Evaluation Report - Version 3.0 - 2022
5
STUDENT’S COURSE DELIVERY EVALUATION
{Please comment based on the CO attainment and Student’s Course Delivery}
In general, the course outcomes attainments are 77.84%, 63.52%, and 55.69%, respectively. As this
course is first time offered after modification from ENT 189 Computer Programming, it is not suitable to
compare with the previous CO attainment. (Comments on CO attainment)
As for the course delivery evaluation, 126 students (91.3% out of 138 students) participated. Based on
the course evaluation, it is agreed that the average of 86.1% for the course delivery is satisfied.
(Comments on student course delivery evaluation)
Based on the result in HEA-02(B), there is 5.8% and 15.2% students successfully obtained A and A-,
respectively. On the other hand, 0.7%, 0% and 0% students obtained D, D- and F, respectively. A student
is suggested for the grade of TL (subjected for approval by senat). (General comments about the
course delivery)
83.6
88.3
86.4
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
Course Teaching Laboratory

6. Course Evaluation Report - Version 3.0 - 2022
6
4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT/CHANGES
Current
Implementation
Proposed
Improvement
Justification
(If A & A- less than 10%
please comment)
(If D, D- and F more than
30% please comment)
Disclaimer:
I have checked all the student marks/data, calculations and formatting are correct.
-------------------------------------
Course Coordinator
Date:
I have verified all the student marks/data, calculations and formatting are correct.
-------------------------------------
Programme Chairperson
Date: